Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 52: 2172-2175, 2006; 10.1373/clinchem.2006.072850
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow 072850.Supplemental Data
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nalefski, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Whitney, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nalefski, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Whitney, D. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Oak Ridge Conference
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 2006;52:2172-2175.)
© 2006 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Abstracts of Oak Ridge Posters

Single-Molecule Detection for Femtomolar Quantification of Proteins in Heterogeneous Immunoassays

Eric A. Nalefski, Christina M. D’Antoni, Evan P. Ferrell, Janice A. Lloyd, Haoqun Qiu, John L. Harris and Duncan H. Whitneya

(U.S. Genomics, Woburn, MA;

aaddress correspondence to this author at: U.S. Genomics, 12 Gill St., Suite 4700, Woburn, MA 01801; fax 781-938-0060, e-mail dwhitney{at}usgenomics.com)

There is growing interest in the development of ultrasensitive immunoassays to facilitate validation of novel biomarkers, especially serum biomarkers, and the application of those assays in clinical settings (1). Current assays focus predominantly on abundantly produced protein biomarkers, such as cardiovascular structural proteins that leak into the bloodstream, and less so on lower abundance cytokines and chemokines (2). Even rarer markers, such as those released from cancerous cells into the bloodstream, remain more elusive (3). Approaches that exploit recent technological advances in molecular imaging, especially at the single-molecule level (4), are likely to improve the detection limits of the immunoassay, and therefore enable improved detection of these markers.

Microfluidic sample delivery and confocal microscopic detection of labeled biomolecules are useful for detecting targets of interest (5)(6). Two-color correlation counting derived from focused laser-induced excitation allows for high signal-to-noise detection even in the presence of large excesses of free probes, enabling measurement of single molecular events (6). Flow velocity and data acquisition rates can be matched to provide highly accurate quantification, even for rapid analyses on the order of seconds per sample, and analysis time can easily be extended to provide increased detection efficiency of rare targets.

Development and application of new assays are straightforward processes based on well-understood fluorescence methods. We describe application of the Trilogy® 2020 Single Molecule Analyzer for analysis of heterogeneous immunoassays. The human gonadotropin follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), which plays a central role in fertility (7), was chosen as a representative analyte because of its clinical importance and current clinical requirements for high-sensitivity detection (8).

The Trilogy 2020 instrument uses laser beams shaped into stripes for fluorescence illumination and focuses the beams through a microscope objective into the center of a sample-delivering microcapillary (see the Data Supplement that accompanies the online version of this article at http://www.clinchem.org/content/vol52/issue11). Fluorescence collected through the objective lens is separated into channels and focused onto a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera. Photon counts are integrated over 110 µs in each of 10 superpixels spanning the width of each laser stripe and stored in data bins. We developed a dynamic thresholding approach to identify and count fluorescence events arising from "in focus" probes (see the online Data Supplement).

We developed a direct immunometric (sandwich) assay for FSH based on a matched monoclonal antibody (mAb) pair specific for FSH (Medix Biochemica). An {alpha}-chain–specific capture mAb was biotinylated by reaction with EZ-LinkTM NHS-PEO4-Biotin (Pierce Biotechnology), leading to 2 biotins/antibody based on biotin quantification by the avidin-2–4'-hydroxyazobenzene benzoic acid method. We Cy5-labeled a ß-chain–specific reporter mAb by reaction with a FluoroLinkTM Cy5 reactive dye (GE Healthcare), leading to 5 dyes/antibody as measured with dye quantification by ultraviolet/visible spectrophotometry. The source of FSH was a purified preparation of FSH (Scripps Laboratories, cat. no. F0613) calibrated by the manufacturer. Capture antibody was coupled to Dynabeads® MyOneTM Streptavidin C1 magnetic beads (Dynal Biotech) at 20 µg per mg of beads in PBS/2% bovine serum albumin and washed extensively before use. Immunoreactions, performed in 96-well plates, consisted of a 100-µL sample, 2.5 µg prepared capture beads (50 ng capture antibody), and 2 nmol/L (30 ng) reporter antibody. After orbital shaking for 1 h at room temperature, we collected beads with a plate magnet and washed them 3 times with cold PBS/0.1% NP40. Reporter antibodies were eluted by addition of 30 µL of 2 mol/L glycine, 0.15 mol/L NaCl, and 0.01% NP40 for 5 min; longer times did not lead to release of more molecules. After the magnetic beads were removed, we neutralized the eluent with 3 µL of 2 mol/L Tris, pH 8.6, and 0.01% NP40, and then analyzed the eluent on the Trilogy instrument.

To characterize the platform sensitivity of the Trilogy 2020 instrument, we collected data on control dilutions of the Cy5-labeled reporter antibody. Representative digitized data traces from a buffer control or a solution containing the Cy5-labeled antibody collected in the Red channel over a 10 ms period are shown in Fig 1A . To illustrate the increase in detected fluorescent events from reporter antibody, signals recorded on the CCD camera in each of the 10 pixels were gray-scaled on the basis of increasing intensity (from white to black). Histogram analysis of bin intensities collected in individual pixels (Fig. 1B ) illustrates the increase in mean intensity with increasing antibody concentrations over a wide concentration range. A dynamic thresholding approach to analyze a dilution series of the Cy5-labeled antibody (Fig. 1C ) reveals that the Trilogy 2020 device exhibits a lower limit of detection (LLOD) of 15 fmol/L, defined as the smallest antibody concentration that generates a mean (–2 SD) signal that is greater than the mean (+2 SD) signal of a buffer control. At this concentration of antibody, ~100 fluorescent events, which corresponds to less than a zeptomole, above background levels were counted in 12 s. The signal response in detecting dye-labeled antibodies was linear up to at least 125 pmol/L, above which there was a slight deviation downward from the prediction line, revealing a linear response of ~4 orders of magnitude. The signal response, however, continued to increase with even 1 nmol/L antibodies, indicating a dynamic response of >6 x 104.


Figure 1
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Single molecule detection.

(A), digitized data recorded in 10 adjacent pixels, represented on the x-axis, of the Red channel over 10 ms, represented on the y-axis, from control buffer (left) or a 4 pmol/L solution of Cy5-labeled antibody (right). Bin intensities recorded on the CCD were scaled downward 20-fold and then gray-scaled equivalently in both panels from low intensity (white), to intermediate (grays), and to high intensity (black) for this representation. (B), histograms of bin intensities for data collected in single pixels of the Red channel over 12 s from increasing concentrations of Cy5-labeled antibody (0–1000 pmol/L), illustrating the increase in mean bin intensity. The number of bins was normalized to time. (C), dose dependence of the number of bins observed to exceed the dynamic fluorescence threshold, normalized to time, on the concentration of Cy5-labeled antibody. Symbols represent the mean of multiple replicates for no antibody (n = 20) or the indicated concentrations of antibody (n = 3). Standard deviations of replicates are indicated by bars, which are in most cases smaller than symbols. The solid line represents linear fitting of the data over 125 pmol/L; open symbols represent data deviating from linearity. LLOD is calculated here as 15 fmol/L. (D–E). Raw trace files collected in the Red channel over 100 ms in single pixels on eluents from immunoreactions containing no FSH (D) or 1 IU/L FSH (E). The dynamic threshold value of 4 counts used to detect antibody molecules is indicated by the dashed horizontal line. (F), FSH immunoassay dose–response curve, illustrating the dependence of observed numbers of bins that exceed dynamically applied thresholds, normalized to time, on the amount of FSH in the reaction. Symbols represent mean values for multiple replicates of no FSH (n = 11) or 12 different FSH dilutions (n = 3). Standard deviations of replicates are indicated by bars, which are smaller than symbols in most cases. The solid line represents fitting of data with a 4-parameter logistic equation. LLOD is calculated here at 20 mIU/L.

After releasing the captured reporter antibodies into solution, we analyzed eluents from heterogeneous FSH immunoreactions on the Trilogy instrument. Short segments of representative trace files are provided in Fig. 1Up , D–E. Without added FSH, we detected only a few reporter antibodies over the dynamic threshold (Fig. 1DUp ). In contrast, considerably more reporter antibodies were detected when FSH was included in the immunoreaction (Fig. 1EUp ). A dose–response curve was generated in which FSH concentrations were increased over several logs, and we used the dynamic thresholding approach to determine the resulting antibody signal (Fig. 1FUp ). Detailed analysis of the curve revealed that the LLOD for the immunoassay conducted under these conditions was 20 mIU/L FSH (~34 fmol/L), in this case defined as the smallest concentration of FSH that generates a mean signal that is 2 SDs above that of a buffer control. For this concentration of FSH, hundreds of fluorescent events, corresponding to zeptomoles of antibodies, were counted above background in 12 s. The signal response continued to increase to ≥200 IU/L FSH, yielding a total dynamic range >4000. In contrast, commonly used enzymatic signal amplification assays are reported to be at least 1 order of magnitude less sensitive (8).

In conclusion, with the Trilogy platform, based on confocal microscopic detection in microcapillaries, photon bursts corresponding to fluorescently labeled antibodies are readily distinguishable from background. Counting molecular events, in turn, provides a very sensitive and precise way to quantify biomolecules of interest. Analysis times of only a few seconds are required to detect as little as zeptomoles of protein analytes, leading to low femtomolar LODs.

In addition to several advantages offered by heterogeneous formats (9), analyte enrichment during the capture step provides a unique opportunity to capitalize on the exquisite sensitivity provided by single-molecule analysis. Because the interrogation zone is on the order of femtoliters, the inner diameter of the sample delivery microcapillary is on the order of tens of micrometers, suitable counting statistics are achieved in seconds, and only small volumes of captured and released reporter antibodies are required for analysis. For instance, at 10 µm/ms, the typical linear flow velocity, only a few microliters are consumed in 12 s, a small fraction of the tens of microliters of reporter antibodies eluted from immune reactions conducted on 100 µL of sample, as reported here. Liquid handling procedures designed to deal with smaller volumes would further decrease the required sample size. This feature would be very useful in pediatric tests, for which only small sample volumes are dedicated per test. An added advantage of the single molecule approach is the requirement for only small quantities of probe reagents: for the FSH assay described here, only 30–50 ng of capture and reporter antibodies are consumed per sample per well, and even less would be needed with further miniaturization.

We used FSH as an example to demonstrate the principles and features of single-molecule, heterogeneous-immunoassays. The platform should be equally suitable for the analysis of other fluorescently labeled reporter antibodies and antigens. Although interference, antibody cross-reactivity, and matrix effects that potentially limit other immunoassays must be considered, they pose no particular challenge for the single-molecule approach. The present study used a capture approach involving biotinylated antibodies immobilized to streptavidin-conjugated beads, but the method is not limited to this approach; we have successfully quantified antigens with capture strategies involving antibodies covalently attached or nonspecifically adsorbed to beads and membranes (data not shown). Furthermore, with inclusion of additional sets of capture reagents and reporter antibodies matching the other fluorescent channels offered by the Trilogy instrument, the platform can simultaneously detect multiple analytes (data not shown). Finally, the platform can be used for precise and sensitive detection of fluorescently labeled probe molecules used in other assays, including those specific for particular nucleic acids (5).


References

  1. Parsons G. An introduction to clinical laboratory immunodiagnostics. Lewandrowski K eds. Clinical Chemistry: Management, Analysis and Clinical Correlation 2002:413-428 Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins Philadelphia, PA. .
  2. O’Sullivan MJ, Capper S, Horton JK, Whateley J, Baxendale P. Immunoassay applications in life-science research. Wild D eds. The Immunoassay Handbook, 2nd ed 2001:817-845 Nature Publishing Group London. .
  3. Anderson NL, Anderson NG. The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects. Mol Cell Proteomics 2002;1:845-867.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Li H, Ying L, Ren X, Balasubramanian S, Klenerman D. Fluorescence studies of single biomolecules. Biochem Soc Trans 2004;32:753-756.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Neely LA, Patel S, Garver J, Gallo M, Hackett M, McLaughlin S, et al. A single-molecule method for the quantitation of microRNA gene expression. Nature Methods 2006;3:41-46.
  6. D’Antoni CM, Fuchs M, Harris JL, Ko H-P, Meyer RE, Nadel ME, et al. Rapid quantitative analysis using a single molecule counting method. Anal Biochem 2006;352:97-109.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Rose MP, Gaines Das RE, Balen AH. Definition and measurement of follicle stimulating hormone. Endocr Rev 2000;21:5-22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Taylor AE, Khoury RH, Crowley WF, Jr. A comparison of 13 different immunometric assay kits for gonadotropins: implications for clinical investigation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994;79:240-247.[Abstract]
  9. Wild D. Separation systems. Wild D eds. The Immunoassay Handbook, 2nd ed 2001:149-158 Nature Publishing Group London. .



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
H. Qiu, E. P. Ferrell, N. Nolan, B. H. Phelps, R. Tabibiazar, D. H. Whitney, and E. A. Nalefski
Fluorescence single-molecule counting assays for high-sensitivity detection of cytokines and chemokines.
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2007; 53(11): 2010 - 2012.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow 072850.Supplemental Data
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nalefski, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Whitney, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nalefski, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Whitney, D. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Oak Ridge Conference
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS