Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 52: 220-226, 2006. First published November 23, 2005; 10.1373/clinchem.2005.054627
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplements
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2005.054627v1
52/2/220    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Santucci, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Santucci, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 2006;52:220-226.)
© 2006 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Proteomics and Protein Markers

Western Blotting of Total Lysate of Helicobacter pylori in Cases of Atrophic Body Gastritis

Roberta Mini1,2, Bruno Annibale3,2, Edith Lahner3, Giulia Bernardini1, Natale Figura2 and Annalisa Santucci1,a

1 Dipartimento di Biologia Molecolare and 2 Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Scienze Endocrino-Metaboliche e Biochimica, Policlinico "Le Scotte", Università degli Studi di Siena, Siena, Italy.
3 Digestive and Liver Disease Unit, University "La Sapienza", Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche, Ospedale Sant’Andrea, Rome, Italy.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Università degli Studi di Siena, Dipartimento di Biologia Molecolare, via Fiorentina 1, 53100 Siena, Italy. Fax 39-0577-234903; e-mail santucci{at}unisi.it.


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Background: Atrophic body gastritis is considered the first important step in the histogenesis of gastric carcinoma, a multistep process starting from chronic gastritis and progressing through chronic atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and dysplasia. Helicobacter pylori is involved in the induction of atrophic body gastritis, but documentation of H. pylori infection is difficult because of the progressive disappearance of the bacterium. Our study aimed to detect past H. pylori infection in patients with atrophic body gastritis.

Methods: We used Western blot analyses of whole bacterial protein lysate of 2 different strains to probe sera from 143 patients. All sera were analyzed by ELISA (Bio-Rad), and results of gastric histology were available for all patients.

Results: Among 111 patient sera previously classified as negative for H. pylori infection by ELISA, 106 (95.5%) were positive when assayed by immunoblotting.

Conclusions: Commercial diagnostic reagent sets may fail to detect H. pylori infection. Western blotting of whole bacterial protein extracts could provide the basis of a noninvasive serology tool able to assess previous infection with H. pylori in patients with atrophic body gastritis.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Atrophic body gastritis (ABG), 1 a disorder that increases the risk for gastric cancer (1), is characterized by chronic inflammation of oxyntic mucosa that leads to progressive atrophy of the oxyntic glands with consequent hypochlorhydria (2). ABG is considered the first important step in the histogenesis of gastric carcinoma (3), which develops in a multistep process starting from chronic gastritis and progressing through chronic atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and dysplasia (3). This sequence is usually triggered by Helicobacter pylori infection and is affected by a variety of genetic and environmental factors that may act synergistically (4). H. pylori is involved in the induction of ABG (5)(6), and longstanding uncured H. pylori antral gastritis could promote, as a sequel, atrophy of the body mucosa (7).

Treatment of H. pylori infection that could lead to major gastric pathology is recommended (8). By promoting healing of the gastric mucosa, pharmacologic treatments may reduce the risk of gastric cancer (9). In patients with ABG, diagnosis of an active H. pylori infection is difficult because of the progressive disappearance of the bacterium (10). Discrepancies between the detection of H. pylori antibodies and the presence of the microorganism in biopsy specimens from patients with advanced atrophic gastritis are common as a consequence of the gradual reduction of H. pylori colonization of the gastric mucosa during the progression of atrophic gastritis and development of hypochlorhydria (6)(11). In patients with ABG, anti-H. pylori antibody concentrations may be increased without histologic evidence of infection (12)(13)(14). In accordance with this finding, similar posttreatment healing of the corpus mucosa was observed in patients with histology-negative, serology-positive H. pylori infection and in those with positive histology and serology (15). In a subset of ABG patients, H. pylori infection was detected only with serologic tests (16)(17), which cannot differentiate between active and past infection (18). A reliable diagnostic test for active H. pylori infection in patients with ABG is therefore needed.

No currently available diagnostic tests for current or past infection with H. pylori can be considered, in clinical practice, as the gold standard method. A single test cannot reliably detect the presence of H. pylori; thus, a combination of at least 2 tests is recommended (8), particularly for clinical identification in ABG patients with active H. pylori infection (9)(13)(19) and the risk of gastric neoplasia (20).

The use of single recombinant bacterial proteins in most conventional current diagnostic serology systems limits the detection of the whole anti-H. pylori immunoglobulin repertoire. In this study, we used immunoblotting with the total lysate of 2 different strains of H. pylori to probe the serostatus of samples from 143 patients with histologically and serologically defined H. pylori infection.


   Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
bacterial strains and culture conditions
H. pylori strains 10K [cagA+ A(I) subtype, vacA+ s1/m1 subtype] and 4Cb (cagA+ C subtype, vacA+ s1/m2 subtype) were isolated from biopsy samples of patients with intestinal-type gastric carcinoma (strain 10K) and diffuse-type gastric carcinoma (strain 4Cb). Biopsy tissue was streaked on the surface of Columbia agar containing 50 mL/L horse blood, 10 mg/L vancomycin, 5 mg/L trimethoprim, 20 kIU/L polymyxin B, and 5 mg/L cefsulodin. Plates were incubated in a microaerobic environment obtained by use of an anaerobic jar with a gas generator that produced a microaerophilic atmosphere (10% CO2, 6% O2, 0% H2, 84% N2; Oxoid Camp GasPak; Oxoid). Colonies resembling H. pylori were identified by Gram stain and by oxidase, catalase, and urease tests.

sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
We performed sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) under reducing conditions with a MiniPROTEAN® 3 Cell (Bio-Rad) (21), using a 4% stacking gel and a 12% separating gel. After sonication for 20 min, the bacterial suspension was denatured in sample buffer for SDS-PAGE. All samples were heated for 5 min in boiling water, cooled to room temperature, and subjected to electrophoresis (100 mg of protein loaded in 1 large well) with a constant voltage of 150 V until the dye front reached the bottom of the gel. At the end of the run, proteins were detected with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R250, or alternatively, electropherograms were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes.

2-dimensional page
The sonicated H. pylori bacterial suspension was denatured in the buffer for the first dimension of 2-dimensional PAGE consisting of a solution containing 8 mol/L urea, 40 g/L CHAPS (3-[(cholamidopropyl)dimethylamino]-1-propanesulfonate), 40 mmol/L Tris, 65 mmol/L dithioerythritol, and a trace of bromphenol blue. We performed 2-dimensional PAGE according to procedures detailed elsewhere (22) and applied 50 µg of protein sample to an Immobiline strip (Immobilized pH Gradient; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) consisting of a nonlinear pH 3.5–10 gradient, previously rehydrated. Isoelectric focusing was carried out on a Multiphor II (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The voltage was linearly increased from 300 to 3500 V during the first 3 h and then stabilized at 5000 V for 22 h (total, 110 kV · h). The Immobilized pH Gradient strip was then equilibrated in 6 mol/L urea, 300 g/L glycerol, 20 g/L SDS, 0.05 mol/L Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), and 20 g/L dithioerythritol and then with 25 g/L iodoacetamide. We performed electrophoresis in the second dimension on a 9%–16% polyacrylamide linear gradient gel (18 cm x 20 cm x 1.5 mm) at a constant current of 40 mA. Analytical gels were stained with silver nitrate as described previously (23). Digitized images were obtained by scanning the gels with a laser densitometer (Molecular Dynamics) and then were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively with Melanie II 2-D PAGE software (Bio-Rad). The spot intensities were obtained in pixel units and normalized to the total absorbance of the gel.

patients and human sera
We analyzed available sera from 143 patients with ABG diagnosed according to the updated Sydney system (24). Patient sera were classified into groups on the basis of H. pylori detection by histologic (Giemsa stain) and serologic [anti-H. pylori IgG antibodies; determined by a commercial ELISA (Bio-Rad)] analysis, as reported previously (18). The reported specificities and sensitivities of the assays were 94% (range, 88%–97%) and 79% (range, 65%–90%), respectively (25) (Table 1 ). Group I consisted of 31 sera from patients both histologically and serologically negative for H. pylori infection (negative/negative); group II consisted of 80 sera from patients histologically negative and serologically positive for H. pylori infection (negative/positive); and group III consisted of 32 sera from patients both histologically and serologically positive for H. pylori infection (positive/positive).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of patients.

We used as positive controls anti-CagA, anti-VacA, anti-HspB, anti-UreA, and anti-UreB rabbit polyclonal antibodies kindly provided by Rino Rappuoli (Chiron Vaccines, Siena, Italy). We used as negative controls sera obtained from 5 patients without ABG and that were histologically and serologically (commercial ELISA and Western blotting tests) negative for H. pylori infection.

western blotting
Proteins were electrotransferred from gels to nitrocellulose sheets by semidry blotting with a Novablot semidry transblot cell and a transfer buffer containing 50 mmol/L Tris, 39 mmol/L glycine, 1 mmol/L SDS, and 200 mL/L methanol (26). The electrotransfer time was 45 min with a current/area of 0.7 mA/cm2. The membranes were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), blocked for 1 h in 30 g/L bovine serum albumin in PBS, and then again washed 3 times for 10 min in PBS. The membranes were incubated for 2 h at room temperature with human sera from patients affected by ABG, with polyclonal antibodies, or with positive and negative pooled sera at a dilution of 1:1000. Immunodetection of IgG was revealed with goat anti-human IgG horseradish peroxidase–conjugated immunoglobulin (Bio-Rad) at a dilution of 1:80 000 (by volume) for human sera and with goat anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase–conjugated immunoglobulin (Bio-Rad) at a dilution of 1:80 000 for polyclonal antibodies. Before and after each step, the membranes were washed extensively 3 times for 10 min in PBS. Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was used for the final detection.

statistical analysis
Data are reported as the mean (SD). Statistical comparisons were performed with ANOVA with the Bonferroni post hoc test. Differences between groups were considered statistically significant at P <0.05.


   Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
An example of the results obtained is shown in Fig. 1 (the entire collection of strip images is available on request).


Figure 1
View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Immunoblotting against H. pylori protein lysate of sera from patients with atrophic gastritis.

Examples of seroreactivities for the 3 groups of sera against whole lysates of H. pylori strains 10K (A) and 4Cb (B) are shown, as well as positive and negative controls and molecular markers.

seroreactivity to antigens of strain 10k
Data obtained by Western blotting with strain 10K revealed that 138 of 143 sera were positive for H. pylori infection (see Table 1Up in the Data Supplement that accompanies the online version of this article athttp://www.clinchem.org/content/vol52/issue2/ ). We considered as positive all sera containing IgG recognizing 2 to 5 known marker antigens. The mean number of reactive known antigens per group of patients showed that all groups were positive for H. pylori infection [group I, 3.61 (0.84); group II, 3.47 (1.16); and group III, 4.31 (0.89)]. Statistical analysis of data indicated homogeneity in immunopositivity among sera groups (P <0.001).

Although patients belonging to group I were negative/negative, we found only 1 serum actually negative for H. pylori infection by immunoblotting analysis; 87.1% of patients had anti-VacA and anti-UreA IgG, 80.6% had anti-CagA, 74.2% had anti-UreB, and 19.3% had anti-HspB IgG (Table 2 ). Results for group II (negative/positive) showed that 76 of 80 patients were positive for H. pylori; 86.2% of sera had anti-VacA IgG, 83.7% had anti-UreA, 73.7% had anti-UreB, 68.7% had anti-CagA, and 32.5% had anti-HspB IgG (Table 2 ). In agreement with the results obtained with other tools used for diagnosis of H. pylori infection and patient classification, all sera of group III were positive by Western blotting analysis. In particular, 96.9% of sera had anti-VacA IgG, 93.7% had anti-UreA, 87.5% had anti-CagA and anti-UreB, and 65.6% had anti-HspB IgG (Table 2 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Seropositivity of group I, II, and III sera against 5 markers on both strains.

seroreactivity to antigens of strain 4CB
Immunoblotting data obtained with strain 4Cb indicated that 138 of 143 sera were positive for H. pylori infection (Table 2 in the online Data Supplement), regardless of their previous group designation. We considered as positive all sera containing IgG recognizing 2 to 5 known antigen markers. The mean number of reactive known antigens per group of patients indicated that all of the groups were positive for H. pylori infection [group I, 3.45 (1.09); group II, 3.62 (1.14); and group III, 4.19 (1.09)]. Statistical analysis of the data indicated homogeneity in immunopositivity among sera groups (P = 0.015).

In group I (negative/negative patients), immunoblotting analysis showed only 1 serum negative for H. pylori infection. Specifically, 96.8% of patients had anti-VacA IgG, 93.5% had anti-UreA, 80.6% had anti-UreB, 35.4% had anti-CagA, and 32.2% had anti-HspB IgG (Table 2Up ). Only 4 of 80 sera of group II (negative/positive) were negative for H. pylori infection: 93.7% of sera had anti-UreA IgG, 90% had anti-VacA, 87.5% had anti-UreB, 48.7% had anti-CagA, and 41.2% had anti-HspB IgG (Table 2Up ).

In accordance with the results obtained with other tools used for diagnosis of H. pylori infection and patient classification, all sera of group III were positive by immunoblotting analysis: 100% of sera had anti-VacA IgG, 93.7% had anti-UreB, 87.5% had anti-UreA, 71.8% had anti-CagA, and 68.7% had anti-HspB IgG (Table 2Up ).

Each group had strong seroreactivity against the standard marker antigens probed. Moreover, negative sera of both adopted strains had similar immunoreactive responses. R129 (group I) and R123 (group II) sera were negative for the whole antigenic pattern for both strains; Q663 (group II) serum was negative for strain 10K but was immunoreactive against the VacA antigen of strain 4Cb. Analogously, serum Q78 (group II), negative for the 4Cb strain, immunorecognized VacA antigen in strain 10K.

comparison of the seroreactivity to antigens of 2 different strains
We observed strain specificity by comparing the seroreactivity to CagA in 2 different strains. Although each serum showed similar reactivity to most of the antigens tested in this study, the immunoreactivity to CagA was very different for strains 4Cb and 10K. This difference could be related to differential expression of the cagA gene in these strains, as deduced from the comparison of the proteome maps of H. pylori strains 10K and 4Cb. Each 2-dimensional gel was obtained by 2-dimensional PAGE using a nonlinear pH 3–10 gradient in the first dimension and a linear 9%–16% polyacrylamide gradient covering the molecular mass range 200 000 to 8000 Da in the second dimension. The relative volume percentage was quantified for the spot corresponding to CagA for both maps; it was 0.836 for strain 10K and 0.134 for strain 4Cb, thus showing a 6.24-fold increase for 10K with respect to 4Cb. CagA was identified on a nitrocellulose replica of the 2-dimensional gel by immunoblotting (data not shown) by use of the same anti-CagA rabbit polyclonal antibodies adopted for 1-dimensional Western blotting under the same experimental conditions.


   Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Our immunoblotting analysis results indicated that 138 of 143 patients affected by ABG had anti-H. pylori antibodies, confirming the hypothesis that H. pylori infection plays a specific role in ABG. Moreover, seroreactivity to the H. pylori antigens was similar among the 3 sera groups for both H. pylori strains. Statistical analysis of immunoreactivity results against the 5 marker antigens showed strong positivity, and we found homogeneity of positivity among the 3 groups, thus negating any previous classification of sera based on commercial H. pylori infection tests.

Remarkably, we found positive sera among samples from patients classified as negative according to histologic assays. This result may be related to ABG stage and patient age, both of which affect H. pylori disappearance, which in turn leads to reduction/disappearance of antibodies other than those related to the immunologic memory. The spontaneous disappearance of anti-H. pylori antibodies in patients with advanced ABG has been documented by ELISA tests (27) and could explain the negative/negative cases found in this study. Because of the high genetic variability of H. pylori and because long-term infection is accompanied by a decrease of circulating antibodies, negative serology may also be related to inadequate sensitivity of ELISA tests that use single-bacterium recombinant proteins.

The 2 different H. pylori strains used in this study, 10K and 4Cb, have individual features relevant to immunoblotting applications. The 2 strains were from the same geographic area and thus autochthonous with respect to the sera probed, but they were derived from 2 different pathologic specimens of gastric adenocarcinoma, the intestinal histotype and the diffuse histotype. These histologically distinct variants differ pathologically both in origin and evolution. The intestinal type progresses through a stepwise transition from healthy mucosa to metaplasia and then to a potentially malignant final destiny. In contrast, the diffuse type appears in healthy gastric mucosa without any apparent association with metaplasia (28). Moreover, the use of 2 different H. pylori strains with different protein and antigenic (data not shown) repertoires also allowed us to investigate the importance of the specificity of single-protein antigen immunorecognition. Even a well-known immunodominant bacterial antigen such as CagA, widely considered the most reliable H. pylori antigen because anti-CagA immunoglobulins are the most long-lived circulating antibodies (29), can yield false-negative results for anti-H. pylori immunoglobulins if the strain is cag-negative or has poor cagA expression (such as strain 4Cb compared with 10K). False-negative results can also occur when single recombinant proteins, often reproducing only portions of native proteins or missing important bacterial posttranslational modifications (30), are used in H. pylori infection tests.

At least 4 of the 5 antigens we focused on are undoubtedly specific for H. pylori infection. The 2 virulence factors CagA and VacA, although not expressed by all strains, are proteins coded exclusively by the H. pylori genome. In regard to the specificity for H. pylori in Western blotting assays, a recently published exhaustive comparative study (31) classified CagA, VacA, and UreA as "HS, highly specific" for H. pylori infection, whereas HspB was classified as "S, specific". Only UreB was considered not specific for H. pylori by those authors, but in our experience the presence of the {alpha} subunit of urease depends exclusively on reduction of the disulfide bridge linking the {alpha} to the ß subunit (SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions); therefore, it is impossible to have the first without the second. Analogously, a comparative Western blotting study carried out at the proteome level confirmed the specificity of those 5 antigens for H. pylori infection (32). Moreover, CagA, VacA, and urease are well-known H. pylori-specific virulence factors; thus, all 3 are considered equally viable candidates for a vaccine against such a bacterium.

Three procedures were important to the success of our approach in revealing H. pylori infection: (a) the use of a whole bacterial protein lysate, a technique that probes almost the entire protein repertoire and is particularly relevant for the specific identification of low–molecular-mass (32–14 kDa) bacterial antigens important for the detection of infection, particularly for ongoing infection, and the evaluation of eradication (33); (b) the use of more than 1 strain of H. pylori, thus covering a qualitatively and quantitatively wider range of antigens to be tested and providing a more reliable control on results; and (c) the use of one of the most sensitive detection systems, enhanced chemiluminescence. As a consequence, our study provides the basis for an improved diagnostic system for H. pylori infection, at least in cases of ABG, for which an efficient test is required for both diagnosis of infection and verification of eradication.

A sensitive and reliable diagnostic test is important in ABG patients because H. pylori disappears as the disease progresses As a consequence, biopsy-based diagnostic tests might give false-negative results, especially if H. pylori infection is patchy or if the bacterial colonization is low. In clinical practice, the diagnosis of active H. pylori infection in ABG patients is generally made after histologic examination of antral and body mucosa specimens with Giemsa and Genta tissue stains, in addition to the routine hematoxylin and eosin, during the diagnostic work-up of ABG (20)(34). It has been shown that anti-H. pylori antibody concentrations are increased in patients with ABG without histologic evidence of infection (12)(13)(14). On the other hand, according to some authors (15), serology is an elective tool for H. pylori diagnosis in ABG patients. Lahner et al. (35) investigated the role of the 13C-urea breath test and the H. pylori stool antigen test as additional diagnostic tools for active H. pylori infection in patients with ABG, but neither of these tests was considered a gold standard method in clinical practice. Moreover, in patients with ABG, determining the efficacy of the pharmacologic treatment to eradicate H. pylori represents a problem. Eradication of the microorganism itself in these patients could reduce the risk of gastric neoplasia because ABG is an important step of the process leading to intestinal adenocarcinoma. In patients with atrophic gastritis, the eradication of H. pylori led to substantial long-term reduction of symptoms of nonulcer dyspepsia with fundic atrophic gastritis (36). In patients with nonatrophic gastritis, ELISA has been considered a valid tool for the diagnosis of H. pylori and may be helpful in verifying the eradication of bacterium (37)(38) because the decrease in anti-H. pylori antibody titer after treatment is related to the healing of gastric inflammation (39). Serology alone may not be a valid tool to assess the efficacy of the eradication therapy in patients with ABG, however, because in most of these patients, the decrease in immunoglobulin titer does not coincide with the reduction in gastric inflammation (18).

Unfortunately, our study results cannot have any direct implication in clinical routine work at the diagnostic level because the whole system is quite expensive and time-consuming and is not commercially available. Nevertheless, our results can provide physicians with an important clinical "take-home-message", underlined by other authors (40), that can be extremely useful for correct interpretation of seroepidemiologic studies.


   Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported in part by funds from Università degli Studi di Siena (to P.A.R.), Quote per Servizi (to A.S and N.F.), and MIUR Cofin 2004 prot. 2004065502.


   Footnotes
 
2 These authors contributed equally to this work.

1 Nonstandard abbreviations: ABG, atrophic body gastritis; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; and PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Lee EL, Feldman M. Gastritis and other gastropathies. Feldman M Friedman LS Sleisenger MH eds. Sleisenger and Fordtran’s gastrointestinal and liver disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, 7th ed 2002:810-827 WB Saunders Philadelphia. .
  2. Peterson WL, Graham DY. Helicobacter pylori. Feldman M Friedman LS Sleisenger MH eds. Sleisenger and Fordtran’s gastrointestinal and liver disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, 7th ed 2002:732-746 WB Saunders Philadelphia. .
  3. Correa P. Helicobacter pylori and gastric carcinogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol 1995;19(Suppl):S37-S43.
  4. Ming SC. Cellular and molecular pathology of gastric carcinoma and precursor lesions: a critical review. Gastric Cancer 1998;1:31-50.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Fong TL, Dooley CP, Dehesa M, Cohen H, Carmel R, Fitzgibbons PL, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection in pernicious anemia: a prospective controlled study. Gastroenterology 1991;100:328-332.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Karnes WE, Samloff IM, Siurala M, Kekki M, Sipponen P, Kim SW, et al. Positive serum antibody and negative tissue staining for Helicobacter pylori in subjects with atrophic body gastritis. Gastroenterology 1991;101:167-174.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Kuipers EJ, Uyterlinde AM, Pena AS, Roosendaal R, Pals G, Nelis GF, et al. Long-term sequelae of Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Lancet 1995;345:1525-1528.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Malfertheiner P, Mégraud F, O’Morain C, Hungin AP, Jones R, Axon ATR, . European Helicobacter Pylori Study Group (EHPSG)et al. Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht 2-2000 Consensus Report [Review]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16:167-180.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Uemura N, Mukai T, Okamoto S, Yamaguchi S, Mashiba H, Taniyama K, et al. Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on subsequent development of cancer after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997;6:639-642.[Abstract]
  10. Annibale B, Negrini R, Caruana P, Lahner E, Grossi C, Bordi C, et al. Two-thirds of atrophic body gastritis patients have evidence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter 2001;6:225-233.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Kokkola A, Rautelin H, Puolakkainen P, Sipponen P, Farkkila M, Haapiainen R, et al. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with atrophic gastritis: comparison of histology, 13C-urea breath test, and serology. Scand J Gastroenterol 2000;35:138-141.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Kokkola A, Rautelin H, Puolakkainen P, Sipponen P, Farkkila M, Haapiainen R, et al. Positive result by serology indicates active Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with atrophic gastritis. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:1808-1810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. El-Omar EM, Oien K, El-Nujumi A, Gillen D, Wirz A, Dahill S, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and chronic gastric acid hyposecretion. Gastroenterology 1997;113:15-24.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Annibale B, Aprile MR, D’Ambra G, Caruana P, Bordi C, Delle Fave G. Cure of Helicobacter pylori infection in atrophic body gastritis patients does not improve mucosal atrophy but reduces hypergastrinemia and its related effects on body ECL-cell hyperplasia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000;14:625-634.
  15. Kokkola A, Sipponen P, Rautelin H, Harkonen M, Kosunen TU, Haapiainen R, et al. The effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on the natural course of atrophic gastritis with dysplasia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16:515-520.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Faisal MA, Russell RM, Samloff IM, Holt PR. Helicobacter pylori infection and atrophic gastritis in the elderly. Gastroenterology 1990;99:1543-1544.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Liston R, Pitt MA, Banerjee AK. IgG ELISA antibodies and detection of Helicobacter pylori in elderly patients. Lancet 1996;347:269-270.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Lahner E, Bordi C, Di Giulio E, Caruana P, D’Ambra G, Milione M, et al. Role of Helicobacter pylori serology in atrophic body gastritis after eradication treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16:507-514.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Annibale B, Di Giulio E, Caruana P, Lahner E, Capurso G, Bordi C, et al. The long-term effects of cure of Helicobacter pylori infection on patients with atrophic body gastritis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16:1723-1731.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Satoh K, Kimura K, Taniguchi Y, Kihira K, Takimoto T, Saifuku K, et al. Biopsy sites suitable for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and the assessment of the extent of atrophic gastritis. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:569-573.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Leammli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly of head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970;227:680-683.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Santucci A, Trabalzini L, Bovalini L, Neri P, Martelli P. Differences between predicted and observed sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Electrophoresis 2000;21:37123-37171.
  23. Hochstrasser DF, Patchornik A, Merril CR. Development of polyacrylamide gels that improve the separation of proteins and their detection by silver staining. Anal Biochem 1988;173:412-423.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, Correa P. Classification and grading of gastritis: the updated Sydney system. Am J Surg Pathol 1996;20:1161-1181.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Ho B, Marshall BJ. Accurate diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. Serologic testing. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2000;29:853-862.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Towbin H, Stahelin T, Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1979;76:4350-4354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kokkola A, Kosunen TU, Puolakkainen P, Sipponen P, Harkonen M, Laxen F, et al. Spontaneous disappearance of Helicobacter pylori antibodies in patients with advanced atrophic corpus gastritis. APMIS 2003;111:619-624.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Stoicov C, Saffari R, Cai X, Hasyagar C, Houghton J. Molecular biology of gastric cancer: Helicobacter infection and gastric adenocarcinoma: bacterial and host factors responsible for altered growth signaling. Gene 2004;341:1-17.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Sorberg M, Engstrand L, Strom M, Jonsson KA, Jorbeck H, Granstrom M. The diagnostic value of enzyme immunoassay and immunoblot in monitoring eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Scand J Infect Dis 1997;29:147-151.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Jungblut PR. Proteome analysis of bacterial pathogens. Microbes Infect 2001;3:8831-8840.
  31. Lepper PM, Moricke A, Vogt K, Bode G, Trautmann M. Comparison of different criteria for interpretation of immunoglobulin G immunoblotting results for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2004;11:569-576.
  32. Jungblut PR, Bumann D, Haas G, Zimny-Arndt U, Holland P, Lamer S, et al. Comparative proteome analysis of Helicobacter pylori. Mol Microbiol 2000;36:710-725.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Voland P, Weeks DL, Vaira D, Prinz C, Sachs G. Specific identification of three low molecular weight membrane-associated antigens of Helicobacter pylori. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16:533-544.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Genta RM. Helicobacter pylori, inflammation, mucosal damage, and apoptosis: pathogenesis and definition of gastric atrophy. Gastroenterology 1997;113(Suppl 6):S51-S55.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Lahner E, Vaira D, Figura N, Pilozzi E, Pasquali A, Severi C, et al. Role of noninvasive tests (C-urea breath test and stool antigen test) as additional tools in diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with atrophic body gastritis. Helicobacter 2004;9:436-442.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Kamada T, Haruma K, Hata J, Kusunoki H, Sasaki A, Ito M, et al. The long-term effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy on symptoms in dyspeptic patients with fundic atrophic gastritis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;18:245-252.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Cutler AF, Havstad S, Ma CK, Blaser MJ, Perez-Perez GI, Schubert TT. Accuracy of invasive and noninvasive tests to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection. Gastroenterology 1995;109:136-141.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Crabtree JE, Shallcross TM, Heatley RV, Wyatt JI. Evaluation of a commercial ELISA for serodiagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. J Clin Pathol 1991;44:326-328.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Kosunen TU, Seppala K, Sarna S, Sipponen P. Diagnostic value of decreasing IgG, IgA, and IgM antibody titres after eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Lancet 1992;339:893-895.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Ekstrom AM, Held M, Hansson LE, Engstrand L, Nyren O. Helicobacter pylori in gastric cancer established by CagA immunoblot as a marker of past infection. Gastroenterology 2001;121:784-791.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
CVIHome page
L. Veijola, A. Oksanen, P. Sipponen, and H. Rautelin
Evaluation of a Commercial Immunoblot, Helicoblot 2.1, for Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., November 1, 2008; 15(11): 1705 - 1710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
E Lahner, M Milione, G Delle Fave, B Annibale, and M Raderer
H pylori negative MALT lymphoma patients successfully treated with antibiotics: doubts about their H pylori negativity * Author's reply.
Gut, November 1, 2006; 55(11): 1669 - 1669.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplements
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2005.054627v1
52/2/220    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Santucci, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Santucci, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS