Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 52: 298-300, 2006; 10.1373/clinchem.2005.057216
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lam, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, H.-G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lam, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, H.-G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
Right arrow Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors
(Clinical Chemistry. 2006;52:298-300.)
© 2006 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Performance Evaluation and Subsequent Clinical Experience with the Abbott Automated Architect STAT Troponin-I Assay

Que Lam1, Marion Black1, Odette Youdell1, Heather Spilsbury1 and Hans-Gerhard Schneider1,2,a

1 Clinical Biochemistry Unit, Alfred Pathology Service, The Alfred Hospital, and2 Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia;

aaddress correspondence to this author at: Clinical Biochemistry Unit, Alfred Pathology Service, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia; fax 61-3-92763424, e-mail schneiderh{at}alfred.org.au)


Abstract

Background: Cardiac troponins are specific biochemical markers of myocardial injury used in the diagnosis of acute myocardial disease and cardiac risk stratification. To avoid misclassification of patients, troponin assays must demonstrate precision at the low end of the measuring range. We report our evaluation of the Architect STAT Troponin-I assay (Abbott Diagnostics), comparison of low-positive results with 2 other assays, and occurrence of heterophile antibody interference in the assay.

Methods: We assessed analytical performance on the ci8200 according to CLSI protocols, using quality-control and patient samples. Our healthy reference population included 480 blood donors. For correlation studies against the AxSYM first-generation cTnI (Abbott Diagnostics) and Access second-generation AccuTnI (Beckman Coulter) assays, we used 339 samples from hospital patients.

Results: The CV of the Architect STAT Troponin-I assay was 10% near the 99th percentile for the reference population (0.03 µg/L). Comparison with the AxSYM first-generation cTnI assay showed good correlation at higher concentrations, but better sensitivity of the Architect cTnI assay at low concentrations, which were clinically relevant as shown by review of patient histories. Correlation was good at the low end of the measuring range with the Access second-generation AccuTnI. Over the last 12 months we have identified 6 patients with heterophile antibodies causing positive interference.

Conclusions: The Architect STAT Troponin-I assay provides highly sensitive measurement of cTnI with a CV of 10% near the upper limit of a reference population; however, heterophile antibodies can interfere with this assay.

Cardiac troponins are specific biochemical markers of myocardial injury with clinical applications in the diagnosis of acute myocardial disease and cardiac risk stratification. In their consensus redefinition of myocardial infarction (1), the European Society of Cardiology and the American College of Cardiology defined an increased troponin value as one greater than the 99th percentile of a healthy reference population with the added recommendation that assay imprecision (CV) at this concentration be ≤10%. This emphasizes the importance of performance at the low end of the measuring range if one is to avoid misclassification of patients. Currently available troponin assays fail to achieve such precision at their 99th percentile reference values (2), and laboratories using these assays quote higher decision limits. Accuracy is another issue, with past concerns regarding antibody specificity and standardization now partially addressed (3). However, reports of interference from rheumatoid factor, heterophile antibodies, autoantibodies, and hemolysis (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) emphasize the potential for both false-positive and false-negative results to influence therapeutic decisions and the importance of the serial rise and fall of troponin concentrations in the circulation after myocardial infarction.

The Architect STAT Troponin-I assay (Abbott Diagnostics) is a 2-step chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay designed to detect cardiac troponin I (cTnI) in serum and plasma. We assessed the assay on the ci8200, particularly evaluating the performance at the low end of measurement and in response to interfering substances. We also report on the reference limit for a healthy population, the correlation with the Access second-generation AccuTnI (Beckman Coulter) and the AxSYM 1st-generation cTnI (Abbott Diagnostics) assay, and the detection of interference in the assay. The Architect STAT Troponin-I assay uses 3 murine monoclonal antibodies to the cTnI molecule. Two act as capture antibodies coating the paramagnetic microparticles, and the third is acridinium-labeled. The assay is traceable to the AACC candidate reference material for cTnI (human ICT tertiary complex; NIST SRM 2921) with a calibrator range of 0–50.00 µg/L (as reported by the manufacturer).

Analytical evaluation was performed to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; formerly NCCLS) protocols. The analytical detection limit was defined as the mean value 2 SD above the mean of 10 replicates of calibrator A (0 µg/L). Functional sensitivity was determined by measuring 10 samples between 0.01 and 0.10 µg/L, assayed in duplicate daily for 10 days. For total imprecision, 3 concentrations of the manufacturer’s quality-control material were measured in duplicate in 2 runs each day for 5 days. Reference intervals were determined on freshly collected serum and plasma from 480 consenting donors from the Australian Red Cross Blood Bank. The 99th percentile reference limits were calculated by a simple nonparametric approach.

Correlation experiments with the AxSYM cTnI assay were performed on 296 consecutive hospital plasma samples with cTnI requests, of which the Emergency and Cardiology Departments accounted for ~70%. When testing was not possible within 4 h, plasma was stored (–30 °C) for later analysis. For correlation with the Access AccuTnI assay, we compared plasma samples from 43 patients with cTnI concentrations ≤0.10 µg/L. In addition, 25 stored samples from 7 patients with false-positive AXSYM cTnI results (negative clinical history and undetectable cTnI in 2 other assays) were analyzed with the Architect assay to study immunoassay interference. During the study, lithium heparin was the anticoagulant used for all plasma samples, and heterophile blocking tubes (Scantibodies Clinical Laboratories) were used to investigate the presence of heterophile antibody interference. This study was approved by the Alfred Hospital ethics committee.

The Architect STAT Troponin-I assay had a limit of detection of 0.004 µg/L and a CV of 10% at concentrations approaching 0.03 µg/L (Fig. 1A ). The total CV did not exceed 6% at concentrations of 0.12, 0.45, and 12.04 µg/L. The healthy reference population had a 2:1 male preponderance (age range, 16–82 years; mean, 47 years for males and 41 years for females). Distribution of cTnI results was slightly lower in serum than for plasma (detection limit, 90th percentile for serum, 75th percentile for plasma; Wilcoxon rank test, P <0.01) with the 99th percentiles in serum (n = 475) and in plasma (n = 480) both at 0.03 µg/L. Matched patient serum and plasma samples across a wide range of cTnI results (0.1–85 µg/L) were in excellent agreement [Deming regression: serum cTnI = 1.03(plasma cTnI) – 0.065 µg/L; correlation coefficient (r) = 0.999, n = 32].


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Precision profile for the Architect STAT Troponin-I assay (error bars, 95% confidence intervals; A), and correlation of the Architect STAT Troponin-I assay with the Access AccuTnI (second-generation) assay (B).

The correlation of the Architect TnI assay with the AxSYM cTnI assay was good across the clinical measurement range [Deming regression: Architect = 0.11(AxSYM) + 0.28 µg/L; correlation coefficient (r) = 0.98] but weaker at concentrations below the AxSYM cutoff (2 µg/L) for acute myocardial infarction [Architect = 0.18(AxSYM) + 0.02 µg/L; r = 0.65]. Of 296 consecutive patient samples, 245 (82.8%) were either positive or negative on both assays. In 51 discrepant samples (17.2%), the AxSYM assay measured increased cTnI in 3 samples (≥0.6 µg/L), whereas the Architect assay was below the 99th percentile value of the reference population. Conversely, the Architect assay results were increased (i.e., ≥0.03 µg/L) for 48 samples that were negative by the AxSYM method. At the time of evaluation, clinical decisions were based on the results of the AxSYM assays. Two of the 3 increased AxSYM samples were taken 7–10 days after myocardial infarction. Time course data obtained with serial samples from patients with myocardial infarctions did not show any time difference between AxSYM and Architect results (data not shown). The other positive AxSYM result was likely a false positive (no evidence of cardiac ischemia on nuclear medicine imaging). Of the 48 samples with increased cTnI by the Architect assay only, clinical files were available for 28 samples (25 patients) and were reviewed by 2 physicians. The Architect assay identified 6 patients with a new acute coronary syndrome/acute myocardial infarction, and an additional 7 samples were obtained from patients with acute pulmonary edema, arrhythmia, or chest trauma or after cardiac procedures. In 3 samples, other AxSYM results from the same clinical episode showed increased troponin. One sample was taken from a patient with severe illness who subsequently died, and 2 samples were collected from patients with renal impairment. Six of the 48 samples (in 4 patients) were likely to be true AxSYM negatives because there were no detected cardiac events during follow-up. The Architect values in these 6 samples ranged from 0.04 to 0.09 µg/L. These findings highlight the potential of the Architect assay to reclassify patients previously labeled as "normal". Of the 25 specimens with known AxSYM cTnI assay interference, all had Architect STAT cTnI concentrations below the reference population.

Deming regression for sample comparison with the AccuTnI assay at plasma concentrations <0.10 µg/L showed good agreement [Architect = 1.06(Beckman) – 0.01 µg/L; r = 0.83; Fig. 1BUp ]. The published limit of detection for the AccuTnI assay is <0.01 µg/L, with the concentration giving a CV of 10% reported as 0.06 µg/L (12). No clinical information was obtained regarding the outcome of these patients.

The Architect STAT Troponin-I assay has now been in routine clinical use in our hospital for almost 12 months with wide acceptance of the new assay and the change to a reference interval in line with the European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology guidelines. Using a commercial control serum (Abacus MAS) at a concentration of 0.05 µg/L, we obtained long-term CVs between 12% and 20% over 12 months. As expected, long-term CVs have been higher than that obtained in our initial evaluation. During this time, we have identified 6 patients with suspected false-positive results (range, 0.1–0.6 µg/L) based on discrepancies between results and clinical information and persistently increased TnI concentrations. Normal TnI concentrations were obtained in these samples after preincubation with heterophile blocking tubes and in other troponin assays. The theoretical incidence of these heterophile antibodies in our population is 1 in 5000.

The Architect STAT Troponin-I assay provides measurement of cTnI in plasma with a CV of 10% near the 99th percentile of a reference group of healthy blood bank donors (0.03 µg/L). Our 99th percentile value is higher than that reported by the manufacturer (0.012 µg/L) and may be attributable to our use of freshly collected blood bank specimens.

Comparison with the clinically evaluated AxSYM cTnI assay (13)(14)(15) showed that the Architect STAT Troponin-I assay identified additional patients who had clinical evidence of cardiac damage. This is in keeping with studies showing that the AxSYM assay may miss patients who later developed poor cardiac outcomes (16). Furthermore, the Architect TnI showed good agreement with the Access AccuTnI at the lower end of the measurement range. Similar data comparing the Architect assay with the Advia Centaur assay were reported recently (17). Identification of such patients is important given the likely benefit from early intervention.

Although the Architect STAT Troponin-I assay was not affected by any of the substances that cause interference in the AxSYM cTnI assay, our 6 cases of heterophile antibody interference are reminders that interference from these and like substances remains an issue. Consistently increased troponin concentrations without a pattern of increase and decrease should be questioned by laboratory staff. Laboratories should have documented procedures to investigate suspicious results such as access to different troponin methodologies in real time.


Acknowledgments

We thank Abbott Diagnostics for supplying some of the reagents, Drs. Z. Lu and J. Newman for performing the Access AccuTnI measurements, and Dr. Al-Kindi for performing the serum troponin measurements on the Architect.


References

  1. Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP. Myocardial infarction redefined: a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:959-969.[Free Full Text]
  2. Panteghini M, Pagani F, Yeo KT, Apple FS, Christenson RH, Dati F, et al. Committee on Standardization of Markers of Cardiac Damage of the IFCC. Evaluation of imprecision for cardiac troponin assays at low-range concentrations. Clin Chem 2004;50:327-332.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Panteghini M. Current concepts in standardization of cardiac marker immunoassays. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004;42:3-8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Eriksson S, Junikka M, Laitinen P, Majamaa-Voltti K, Alfthan H, Pettersson K. Negative interference in cardiac troponin I immunoassays from a frequently occurring serum and plasma component. Clin Chem 2003;49:1095-1104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Knoblock RJ, Lehman CM, Smith RA, Apple FS, Roberts WL. False-positive AxSYM cardiac troponin I results in a 53-year-old woman. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002;126:606-609.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Katwa G, Komatireddy G, Walker SE. False-positive elevation of cardiac troponin I in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2001;28:2750-2751.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Fitzmaurice TF, Brown C, Rifai N, Wu AH, Yeo KT. False increase of cardiac troponin I with heterophilic antibodies. Clin Chem 1998;44:2212-2214.[Free Full Text]
  8. Eriksson S, Hellman J, Pettersson K. Autoantibodies against cardiac troponins. N Engl J Med 2005;352:98-100.[Free Full Text]
  9. Eriksson S, Halenius H, Pulkki K, Hellman J, Pettersson K. Negative interference in cardiac troponin I immunoassays by circulating troponin autoantibodies. Clin Chem 2005;51:839-847.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Eriksson S, Ilva T, Becker C, Lund J, Porela P, Pulkki K, et al. Comparison of cardiac troponin I immunoassays variably affected by circulating autoantibodies. Clin Chem 2005;51:848-855.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hawkins RC. Hemolysis interference in the Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics Vitros ECi cTnI assay [Letter]. Clin Chem 2003;49:1226.[Free Full Text]
  12. Uettwiller-Geiger D, Wu AH, Apple FS, Jevans AW, Venge P, Olson MD, et al. Multicenter evaluation of an automated assay for troponin I. Clin Chem 2002;48:869-876.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Heeschen C, Hamm CW, Goldmann B, Deu A, Langenbrink L, White HD. Troponin concentrations for stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes in relation to therapeutic efficacy of tirofiban. PRISM Study Investigators: Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management. Lancet 1999;354:1757-1762.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Apple FS, Maturen AJ, Mullins RE, Painter PC, Pessin-Minsley MS, Webster RA, et al. Multicenter clinical and analytical evaluation of the AxSYM troponin-I immunoassay to assist in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Clin Chem 1999;45:206-212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Wilcox G, Archer PD, Bailey M, Dziukas L, Lim CF, Schneider HG. Measurement of cardiac troponin I concentrations in the emergency department: predictive value for cardiac and all-cause mortality. Med J Aust 2001;174:170-173.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Venge P, Lagerqvist B, Diderholm E, Lindahl B, Wallentin L. Clinical performance of three cardiac troponin assays in patients with unstable coronary artery disease (a FRISC II substudy). Am J Cardiol 2002;89:1035-1041.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Boyd JC, Henrich M, Schubert MT, Shumacher NR. Evaluation of a sensitive rapid assay for cardiac troponin I (cTnI) as implemented on the ARCHITECT ci8200 analyzer [Abstract]. Clin Chem 2005;51(Suppl 6):A19.



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
C. P. Chong, Q. T. Lam, J. E. Ryan, R. N. Sinnappu, and W. K. Lim
Incidence of post-operative troponin I rises and 1-year mortality after emergency orthopaedic surgery in older patients
Age Ageing, November 13, 2008; (2008) afn231v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lam, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, H.-G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lam, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, H.-G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
Right arrow Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS