Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 52: 917-949, 2006. First published March 28, 2006; 10.1373/clinchem.2005.066076
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2005.066076v1
52/6/917    most recent
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Current Issues in Laboratory Medicine
(Clinical Chemistry. 2006;52:917-949.)
© 2006 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Special Report

Curriculum Content and Evaluation of Resident Competency in Clinical Pathology (Laboratory Medicine): A Proposal

Brian R. Smith1,a, Alan Wells2, C. Bruce Alexander3, Edwin Bovill4, Sheldon Campbell1, Amitava Dasgupta5, Mark Fung4, Barbara Haller6, John G. Howe1, Curtis Parvin7, Ellinor Peerschke8, Henry Rinder1, Steven Spitalnik9, Ronald Weiss10, Mark Wener11 for the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists

1 Yale University, New Haven, CT.
2 University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
3 Univeristy of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
4 Univeristy of Vermont, Burlington, VT.
5 University of Texas at Houston, Houston, TX.
6 University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
7 Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
8 Weill Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY.
9 Columbia University, New York, NY.
10 University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
11 University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., PO Box 208035, New Haven, CT 06520-8035.


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
Ten years have passed since the Graylyn Conference Report on Laboratory Medicine/Clinical Pathology training was issued. Over that time period, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) substantially revised the requirements for training programs, the American Board of Pathology (ABP) amended both the requirements and the time periods needed for certification, and the discipline itself, along with the broader discipline of pathology, evolved significantly. Recently, a curriculum proposal in anatomic pathology was published as a potential template to be used by training programs to help meet these new and evolving needs. Toward the same end, the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists has now developed a template for a curriculum in clinical pathology (laboratory medicine), taking into account newly designated and revised areas of residency core competency, the alterations in training requirements promulgated by the ACGME and ABP, and the rapidly developing nature of the discipline itself. The proposed clinical pathology curriculum defines goals and objectives for training, provides guidelines for instructional methods, and gives examples of how outcomes can be assessed. This curriculum is presented as a potentially helpful outline for use by pathology residency training programs.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
Clinical pathology (CP), 1 also referred to as laboratory medicine, is an expansive discipline that is anchored in the clinical laboratory and encompasses a fund of knowledge, reasoning, and skills in pathophysiology, diagnostics, and therapeutics. The appropriate constituents of training in this field and the best means for evaluating adequacy of that training are topics of continuous evolution, as they are in all fields of medical practice. In the case of CP, several different training traditions exist. In the United States, a highly academic venue with a focus on translating research laboratory technologies into clinical practice ("Laboratory Medicine") has combined with a community practice–based tradition emphasizing clinical consultation and resource management ("Clinical Pathology") to produce training programs that integrate all the diverse subdisciplines of CP and which are centered under the broader aegis of pathology. This cohesive training, research, and service environment distinguishes the discipline in the United States; in contrast, in much of the rest of the world training in the subdisciplines more frequently remains discrete and/or embedded within other medical specialties. As such, training in the United States, and in those other countries which share this approach, must not only convey subdiscipline-specific information but also enshrine the common approaches, competencies, and world view shared by these pathology subdisciplines.

Ten years ago, 4 major pathology organizations [Association of Pathology Chairs, College of American Pathologists (CAP), Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists (ACLPS), and American Society for Clinical Pathology] formed a conjoint committee to examine issues related to optimal CP training, which culminated in publication of the Graylyn Conference Report (1). The major conclusions from that conference are summarized in Table 1 . Since then, however, several major shifts in clinical practice and in the philosophy behind residency education and evaluation have occurred. In particular, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has mandated the development of a defined educational program (i.e., curriculum) for trainees in all medical specialties, focused on 6 main areas of competency: patient care, medical knowledge, practice-based learning and improvement, interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism, and systems-based practice(2). A second major change was the reduction in the total time period required by the American Board of Pathology for pathology training by 12 months, from 5 years to 4 years in the case of combined anatomic pathology (AP)/CP certification qualification and from 4 years to 3 years for qualification in AP alone or CP alone. In response to these changes, the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology recently published a proposal for an "idealized" curriculum for AP training(3)(4)(5). In a parallel fashion, ACLPS has now formulated a similar document for CP training, which forms the basis of this report. To accomplish this goal, the ad hoc committee of ACLPS (a) reviewed subdiscipline CP curricula that were previously published, especially in the areas of transfusion medicine(6), molecular diagnostics(7), laboratory management(8), and informatics(9), as well as broader curriculum documents in the field(10)(11); (b) reviewed the CP curriculum in use at 11 institutions that volunteered to supply their programmatic documentation (Stony Brook University Hospital, University of Alabama at Birmingham, University of Minnesota, University of Southern California, University of Texas at San Antonio, University of Utah, University of Vermont, University of Virginia, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, William Beaumont Hospital, and Yale University); and (c) produced a draft proposal that was subsequently reviewed by an additional coterie of members and nonmembers drawn from academic, community, and commercial practice as well as by current residents in 4 programs and by the full membership of ACLPS at the 2005 annual meeting.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Summary of Graylyn Conference recommendations for CP training.1

The Residency Review Committee for Pathology has had the opportunity to independently review this curriculum. The Committee found the document to be comprehensive and "of great value to anyone who is responsible for the design, evaluation, and improvement of CP education at any level. As such, the Committee encourages its dissemination to program directors, faculty and others who are involved in the education of pathology residents and/or fellows." In particular, the Residency Review Committee for Pathology believes that this curriculum "should be especially valuable to residency directors as they respond to the ACGME’s General Competency initiatives" (Steven P. Nestler, PhD, Executive Director, Residency Review Committee for Pathology, August 2005).

It is important to recognize the diversity of pathology training programs themselves as well as the fundamental need to train individuals for potentially diverse career paths in CP, the latter including pathways that emphasize full-time clinical practice as well as those that concentrate on investigative work in addition to clinical practice. Moreover, careers in CP, as for all of medicine, may take place in a variety of settings that themselves emphasize different aspects of the discipline, including academic, community, public health, and industry environments. Thus, this proposed curriculum is viewed as a document that can and should be appropriately modified by individual programs to best meet their own unique programmatic goals, in keeping with both their available resources and their ability to provide appropriate levels of training for all, or for a subset, of these career paths in CP. The current document is deliberately phrased in broad terms in many areas. The hope of the ad hoc committee is that this publication will represent the first step in an evolutionary process, which will be followed by the articulation and publication of more detailed subspecialty curricula, created with input from subspecialty organizations as well as from the general pathology associations and community.

The outline below is designed to meet the didactic criteria articulated by the ACGME, specifically: "Education in clinical pathology must include microbiology (including bacteriology, mycology, parasitology and virology), immunopathology, blood banking/transfusion medicine, chemical pathology, cytogenetics, hematology, coagulation, toxicology, medical microscopy (including urinalysis), molecular biologic techniques, aspiration techniques, and other advanced diagnostic techniques as they become available" (12). It is also designed to presage and incorporate the emerging fields of complex multiparameter diagnostic systems, new biological approaches to diagnostics, including proteomics, cellular therapeutics, and pathology informatics, that are now becoming more routinely incorporated into medical delivery systems and will play an increasingly important role for the clinical pathologist of the future. Finally, the areas of overlap between AP and CP training are taken into account, and hence there are some portions of this CP curriculum that are appropriately also included in an AP curriculum, such as that proposed by Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology(3)(4). The goal of the current document is to be as reasonably comprehensive and inclusive as possible while simultaneously recognizing the need for creative exploration of new educational strategies by diverse programs.


   Overall Goals of the Laboratory Medicine Curriculum
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
The overall goals of a training program in CP should be to develop a pathologist with the following characteristics (Table 2 ):

  1. A pathologist capable of communicating as a medical consultant to other clinicians and to patients, as well as being capable of optimally directing the management of the clinical laboratory enterprise. The pathologist understands the science and technology of the clinical laboratory and assures the quality, clinical appropriateness, and usefulness of the data produced by that laboratory. The pathologist is a clinician first and foremost.
  2. A pathologist who understands and consults on methods of diagnostic test development, test utilization in the context of both generally applicable and patient-specific clinical settings, and assay interpretation in the acute and chronic clinical management of patients. These activities include the pathologist’s role in the development and implementation of integrated medical informatics that optimize patient care. The specific level of technical expertise attained in training will vary with career goals/roles and with the emphasis of the training program itself.
  3. A pathologist who understands methods and implementation of clinical laboratory–based therapeutics, including minimally manipulated and engineered cellular therapy. The specific level of technical expertise attained in training will vary with career goals/roles of the trainee and with the emphasis of the training program.
  4. A pathologist who has the skills to consult in these areas at the broader systems level, and in the various extant healthcare delivery models.
  5. A pathologist who understands the role of research, in its broadest definition, in clinical decision-making, test development, knowledge generation, and continuing education.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Overall goals of the proposed laboratory medicine curriculum.


   Competencies Common to All Rotations
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
Competencies that are common to all rotations are outlined here. Competencies that are specific to individual rotations are included with each subdiscipline. Means of assessing competency in laboratory medicine are discussed in a separate section toward the end of the document.

Patient Care

Medical Knowledge

Practice-Based Learning and Improvement

Interpersonal and Communication Skills

Professionalism

Systems-Based Practice


   Didactic Methodologies
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
The curriculum should emphasize knowledge-based and skills-based activities. Rotations in specific laboratories should emphasize graduated responsibility for clinical consultation and interpretation of unusual results, allowing the use of a case-oriented learning format. The resident should be included as a junior practitioner in the daily clinical workload of the laboratories. "Sign-out" responsibilities are usually accompanied by workstation-oriented teaching of pathophysiology and analytical issues, which in turn may be accompanied, as appropriate, by hands-on experience. Alternatively, a resident could generate a case portfolio including cases involving each of the major areas of laboratory testing. Case discussions should include a sufficient amount of detail demonstrating the resident’s analytical and consultative skills. The information created should demonstrate the ability of the resident to recognize problems in testing and interpretation, make recommendations for additional testing, and understand the clinical utility of test results. Rotations should also generally include active involvement in daily rounds and weekly supervisory meetings in which residents participate in discussions and decisions concerning quality assurance, proficiency testing, personnel management, budgeting, and instrument and procedure evaluations. Didactic sessions, case presentations in a grand-rounds format, research seminars, journal clubs, subspecialty conferences, and participation in multidisciplinary conferences are all useful exercises. Exit examinations held at the end of rotations are helpful in providing feedback to trainees. Principles of training common to all residency programs, such as stress management and maintenance of a nurturing educational environment, are also important parts of the didactic approach.

On-call responsibilities with comprehensive attending pathologist backup and feedback are critical to CP training. Indeed, we believe that all laboratory medicine training programs should have a 24/7 call system. In many programs, a single resident will take calls for all issues and consults at night and on weekends; other programs may want to delegate some areas, for example, blood bank, to a separate resident. The resident is the front-line recipient of calls, and a system of logging cases is essential. There should be an appropriate on-call orientation and training process, appropriate 24/7 backup by faculty members, and appropriate documentation and evaluation on a periodic basis. Although different formats are possible, discussion of these consultations with the entire resident staff in a morning-report format (even if only weekly) has been found to be useful in some programs.

Because project management in the development and implementation of laboratory assays is an integral part of the clinical activities of a laboratory medicine physician, it is recommended that each trainee be actively involved in these activities during his/her CP rotations. The experience should be meaningful and substantive and involve the trainee in all aspects of project management and research, including conception, design, execution, analysis, and communication. The process per se is a more important aspect of the training than the exact target of inquiry. As such, fewer, more involved experiences are preferred over a series of short projects in each rotation. The nature of the project or research should be tailored to the trainee’s career goals/roles and thus can range from assay validation or concordance studies, to utilization guideline construction, to a long-term basic research program. Some of these aspects of training are best incorporated as integral parts of each subdiscipline, whereas other aspects should be approached as free-standing electives. This committee does not recommend a specific structure for this training but emphasizes its central inclusion in the overall training program.


   Basic Schedule of Rotations
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
It is important for residents to undertake graduated responsibilities during their training because the educational process is, of course, not just one of knowledge acquisition but, as importantly, one of attaining progressively more "attending-like" professional skills and mature judgment. In the schema used below, reaching skill levels I and II corresponds to those achievements that are required for minimal competency as a generalist in CP—these skills would normally be acquired in 18–24 months of training. We have used skill levels for pedagogical reasons, so as to suggest a sequence of teaching activities that builds on earlier knowledge and achievement. Individual programs may choose to alter this learning sequence to better fit their local environment. Serving as a guide for curriculum construction, skill level I corresponds roughly to the types of activities and responsibilities that a first- and/or second-year AP/CP resident (or a first-year CP-only resident) would be engaged in, that is, the level of achievement to be attained during the resident’s first exposure to the subdiscipline as a postgraduate. Skill level II corresponds to the achievements expected of a third- and/or fourth-year AP/CP resident (or second-year CP-only resident), that is, the higher level of responsibility and expertise that one would acquire and consolidate during repeat exposure to a subdiscipline. This 18–24 months of training (skill levels I and II) is used to acquire the minimal general skills in all areas sufficient to meet the competency levels required by the American Board of Pathology for eventual certification in CP. Because of the relative brevity of an 18-month course of training in CP, some programs may choose to have no elective time during that period, especially if the overall course of study for a particular AP/CP resident’s career goals will include a predominant AP emphasis; it is then possible to focus on "crossover" aspects of training during months 19–24 (for example, molecular pathology, informatics, management, and morphometric hematopathology). It is expected that for a program that includes 24 months of CP level I and II training, the last 6 months will usually include elective time and offer a degree of flexible emphasis in 1 or 2 areas for months 19–24.

Skill level III refers to the higher level of competency, responsibility, and breadth of knowledge required for those whose career path involves a major or exclusive emphasis on CP in their practice. This would usually correspond to a third year of training (total training of 36 months), such as that required for individuals training in CP without concomitant AP training or certification. In some cases, it might correspond to the last 6–12 months of CP training for an AP/CP resident whose 4-year program involves an emphasis on CP. Because this higher level of training is best individualized depending on career path and because only a subset of pathology programs have the resources to provide such training, suggestions for skill level III training are included as a separate portion of the curriculum in a later section of this document and not as part of the subdiscipline-oriented portion outlined below.

It is recognized that basic residency training in CP, like that in AP, is designed to produce a generalist pathologist. In an era of ever-increasing medical complexity, the role for subspecialization by at least a subset of pathologists is therefore increasing, and fellowship-trained subspecialists are likely to become increasingly important in medical care delivery systems.

In keeping with the prior recommendations of the Graylyn Conference and based on accepted educational practices, it is generally recommended that the core rotations be structured as subdiscipline-specific, concentrated, and protected rotations (for example, a rotation in chemical pathology rather than a joint rotation in chemical pathology and microbiology). Some rotations at higher levels and in more advanced years of training, when the trainee has acquired basic skills, may be productively cross-disciplinary within the broad field of pathology. As noted earlier, the sound principle of graduated responsibility makes a system of at least 2 distinct rotations in each major subdiscipline a generally preferable approach to education.

The general outline for rotations is conceived as follows:

It is recognized that there are areas of overlap between disciplines and that, therefore, some institutions may choose to include portions of the curriculum in different rotations compared with those in which they are subcategorized in this document. In addition, some aspects of the CP knowledge base and skill set are common across disciplines; hence programs may choose to emphasize some of these common areas in different rotations from those in which they are arbitrarily categorized here ("principles of laboratory medicine", management, quality assurance procedures, instrumentation, technical methodologies, and method development are such examples). Where possible, cross-references are indicated in the text. Similarly, there are areas of overlap between traditional AP and CP disciplines that may provide opportunities for programs to alter traditional rotation schedules, especially following minimal core training in AP and CP. Moreover, there are some rotations in the current curriculum of most institutions, and reiterated here, that are based to some extent on technology rather than on clinical field—molecular diagnostics to some extent fits this description—and programs may have different approaches as to how best to include education in these areas within their particular structures. Finally, there are aspects of laboratory medicine that are significantly influenced by characteristics of the patient populations, for example, pediatric and geriatric practice, and some programs may choose to utilize specialized rotations in different clinical settings to provide optimal training in these areas (for example, a pediatric hospital rotation). In summary, curriculum is in constant evolution, and, within the somewhat broad confines of the principles elucidated here, final determination of a training curriculum is best left in the hands of individual programs, which may choose to experiment with innovative organizational structures. Because of these considerations, a web page has been designed as an accompaniment to the current document (www.aclps.org). It is the expectation of ACLPS as sponsor of this web page that it will provide a mechanism for dynamic changes in curriculum recommendations as laboratory medicine evolves, as well as creating a mechanism for discussion on the frontiers of curriculum development and for including additional material that may be of use to training programs.


   Curriculum for Subdiscipline-Specific Rotations
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
The curriculum outlined below attempts to identify most of the major areas needed for CP training in each classic subdiscipline. It is not designed to assess the relative weight to be given to each topic mentioned nor, for the sake of conciseness, is it completely comprehensive. As mentioned earlier, it is hoped that this can form the basis for discussion and for an evolutionary improvement in delineation of curriculum over time and for further work by both general and subspecialty groups of pathologists. In addition, there are some topics that apply to all subdisciplines but which may receive different emphasis in each section or be included predominantly as one of the general competencies outlined earlier. The importance of understanding the unique aspects of pediatric CP would be such an example. Each section ends with a listing of competencies specific to a subdiscipline and with a few possible reference materials. Again, there are many fine reference books available, and the list is by no means comprehensive. Several general texts in laboratory medicine are listed below and not reiterated in each section.

General Reference Materials:

Henry JB, ed. Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods, 20th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2001.

Laposata M, ed. Laboratory Medicine: Clinical Pathology in the Practice of Medicine. Chicago: ASCP Press, 2002.

Mcclatchey KD, ed. Clinical Laboratory Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002.


   Chemistry
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
I. Analytical Techniques and Instrumentation
Skill Level I

Skill Level II

II. Organ-Based Biochemical Pathophysiology
1. assessment of pulmonary function: blood gases and oxygen saturation
Skill Level I

2. acid-base chemistry, electrolytes, and relevant disorders
Skill Level I

3. assessment of renal function
Skill Level I

4. cardiac biomarkers for the assessment of coronary artery diseases
Skill Level I

5. assessment of liver and biliary tract status
Skill Level I

6. assessment of thyroid function
   Skill Level I

7. assessment of pituitary function
   Skill Level II

8. assessment of adrenal function
   Skill Level I

9. assessment of reproductive function, pregnancy, and prenatal testing
   Skill Level II

10. assessment of gastric, pancreatic, and intestinal function
   Skill Level I

11. assessment of glucose and evaluation of diabetes mellitus
   Skill Level I

12. assessment of mineral and bone metabolism
   Skill Level I

13. assessment of porphyrins and disorders of porphyrin metabolism
   Skill Level II

14. tumor biomarkers
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

15. assessment of fetal lung maturity
   Skill Level I

16. trace element assessment
   Skill Level II

17. vitamin assessment
   Skill Level I

18. cholesterol and lipid assessment
   Skill Level I

19. serum and fluid protein and amino acid assessment
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

20. clinical enzyme kinetics
   Skill Level II

21. pediatric biochemistry
   Skill Level II

III. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Toxicology
1. pharmacokinetics
   Skill Level I

2. drug metabolism
   Skill Level I

3. pharmacodynamics
   Skill Level I

4. therapeutic drug monitoring of specific drug classes
   Skill Level I

5. toxicologic syndromes
   Skill Level II

6. laboratory evaluation and management of overdosed or poisoned patients
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

7. laboratory evaluation of drugs of abuse
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

8. pharmacogenomics
   Skill Level II
See the Molecular Pathology section.

additional competencies specific to chemistry
   Patient Care

   Professionalism

Chemistry Reference Materials:

See also the General Reference Materials.

American College of Cardiology. Myocardial Infarction Redefined—A Consensus Document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. http://www.acc.org/clinical/consensus/mi_redefined/.

American Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines. http://www.diabetes.org/for-health-professionals-and-scientists/cpr.jsp.

American Society for Clinical Oncology. 2000 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast and Colorectal Cancer. http://www.asco.org/ac/1,1003,_12-002130,00.asp.

Burtis CA, Ashwood EA, Bruns DE, eds. Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders, 2006.

Kaplan LA, Pesce A, Kazmierczak S, eds. Clinical Chemistry: Theory, Analysis, Correlation, 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby, 2003.

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry. NACB Laboratory Practice Guidelines. http://www.nacb.org/lmpg/main.stm.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health. Third Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/cholesterol/.

Point-of-Care Testing
Point-of-care testing (POCT) occurs across all disciplines, but because there are important common issues in its clinical use, it has been made a separate, distinct part of the curriculum in this document. The POCT curriculum may be taught in a concentrated fashion in any of the subdisciplines, depending on what is most appropriate to the institution.

   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

additional competencies specific to poct
   Systems-Based Practice

POCT Reference Materials:

See also the General Reference Materials.

Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Quality Point of Care Testing: A Joint Commission Handbook. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 1999.

Price CP, St John A. Point of care testing. In: Burtis CA, Ashwood EA, Bruns DE, eds. Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders, 2006:299–320.

Price CP, St John A, Hicks JM. Point of Care Testing, 2nd ed. Washington: AACC Press, 2004.

Threatte GA. Physician office laboratories. In: Henry JB, ed. Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods, 20th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2001.

Hematology
   I. Hematology/Body Fluids/Urinalysis
1. automated hematology Skill Level I

Skill Level II

2. peripheral blood smear analysis Skill Level I

Skill Level II

3. body fluid analysis: csf, ascitic/pleural fluid, joint fluid Skill Level I

Skill Level II

4. manual hematology methods Skill Level I

5. urinalysis Skill Level I

Skill Level II

   II. Special Laboratory Tests in Hematology
1. wbc disorders See Section IV (Flow Cytometry) and Section V (Hematopathology) below.

2. rbc disorders Skill Level I