Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 52: 917-949, 2006. First published March 28, 2006; 10.1373/clinchem.2005.066076
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2005.066076v1
52/6/917    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Current Issues in Laboratory Medicine
(Clinical Chemistry. 2006;52:917-949.)
© 2006 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Special Report

Curriculum Content and Evaluation of Resident Competency in Clinical Pathology (Laboratory Medicine): A Proposal

Brian R. Smith1,a, Alan Wells2, C. Bruce Alexander3, Edwin Bovill4, Sheldon Campbell1, Amitava Dasgupta5, Mark Fung4, Barbara Haller6, John G. Howe1, Curtis Parvin7, Ellinor Peerschke8, Henry Rinder1, Steven Spitalnik9, Ronald Weiss10, Mark Wener11 for the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists

1 Yale University, New Haven, CT.
2 University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
3 Univeristy of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
4 Univeristy of Vermont, Burlington, VT.
5 University of Texas at Houston, Houston, TX.
6 University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
7 Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
8 Weill Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY.
9 Columbia University, New York, NY.
10 University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
11 University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., PO Box 208035, New Haven, CT 06520-8035.


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
Ten years have passed since the Graylyn Conference Report on Laboratory Medicine/Clinical Pathology training was issued. Over that time period, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) substantially revised the requirements for training programs, the American Board of Pathology (ABP) amended both the requirements and the time periods needed for certification, and the discipline itself, along with the broader discipline of pathology, evolved significantly. Recently, a curriculum proposal in anatomic pathology was published as a potential template to be used by training programs to help meet these new and evolving needs. Toward the same end, the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists has now developed a template for a curriculum in clinical pathology (laboratory medicine), taking into account newly designated and revised areas of residency core competency, the alterations in training requirements promulgated by the ACGME and ABP, and the rapidly developing nature of the discipline itself. The proposed clinical pathology curriculum defines goals and objectives for training, provides guidelines for instructional methods, and gives examples of how outcomes can be assessed. This curriculum is presented as a potentially helpful outline for use by pathology residency training programs.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
Clinical pathology (CP), 1 also referred to as laboratory medicine, is an expansive discipline that is anchored in the clinical laboratory and encompasses a fund of knowledge, reasoning, and skills in pathophysiology, diagnostics, and therapeutics. The appropriate constituents of training in this field and the best means for evaluating adequacy of that training are topics of continuous evolution, as they are in all fields of medical practice. In the case of CP, several different training traditions exist. In the United States, a highly academic venue with a focus on translating research laboratory technologies into clinical practice ("Laboratory Medicine") has combined with a community practice–based tradition emphasizing clinical consultation and resource management ("Clinical Pathology") to produce training programs that integrate all the diverse subdisciplines of CP and which are centered under the broader aegis of pathology. This cohesive training, research, and service environment distinguishes the discipline in the United States; in contrast, in much of the rest of the world training in the subdisciplines more frequently remains discrete and/or embedded within other medical specialties. As such, training in the United States, and in those other countries which share this approach, must not only convey subdiscipline-specific information but also enshrine the common approaches, competencies, and world view shared by these pathology subdisciplines.

Ten years ago, 4 major pathology organizations [Association of Pathology Chairs, College of American Pathologists (CAP), Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists (ACLPS), and American Society for Clinical Pathology] formed a conjoint committee to examine issues related to optimal CP training, which culminated in publication of the Graylyn Conference Report (1). The major conclusions from that conference are summarized in Table 1 . Since then, however, several major shifts in clinical practice and in the philosophy behind residency education and evaluation have occurred. In particular, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has mandated the development of a defined educational program (i.e., curriculum) for trainees in all medical specialties, focused on 6 main areas of competency: patient care, medical knowledge, practice-based learning and improvement, interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism, and systems-based practice(2). A second major change was the reduction in the total time period required by the American Board of Pathology for pathology training by 12 months, from 5 years to 4 years in the case of combined anatomic pathology (AP)/CP certification qualification and from 4 years to 3 years for qualification in AP alone or CP alone. In response to these changes, the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology recently published a proposal for an "idealized" curriculum for AP training(3)(4)(5). In a parallel fashion, ACLPS has now formulated a similar document for CP training, which forms the basis of this report. To accomplish this goal, the ad hoc committee of ACLPS (a) reviewed subdiscipline CP curricula that were previously published, especially in the areas of transfusion medicine(6), molecular diagnostics(7), laboratory management(8), and informatics(9), as well as broader curriculum documents in the field(10)(11); (b) reviewed the CP curriculum in use at 11 institutions that volunteered to supply their programmatic documentation (Stony Brook University Hospital, University of Alabama at Birmingham, University of Minnesota, University of Southern California, University of Texas at San Antonio, University of Utah, University of Vermont, University of Virginia, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, William Beaumont Hospital, and Yale University); and (c) produced a draft proposal that was subsequently reviewed by an additional coterie of members and nonmembers drawn from academic, community, and commercial practice as well as by current residents in 4 programs and by the full membership of ACLPS at the 2005 annual meeting.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Summary of Graylyn Conference recommendations for CP training.1

The Residency Review Committee for Pathology has had the opportunity to independently review this curriculum. The Committee found the document to be comprehensive and "of great value to anyone who is responsible for the design, evaluation, and improvement of CP education at any level. As such, the Committee encourages its dissemination to program directors, faculty and others who are involved in the education of pathology residents and/or fellows." In particular, the Residency Review Committee for Pathology believes that this curriculum "should be especially valuable to residency directors as they respond to the ACGME’s General Competency initiatives" (Steven P. Nestler, PhD, Executive Director, Residency Review Committee for Pathology, August 2005).

It is important to recognize the diversity of pathology training programs themselves as well as the fundamental need to train individuals for potentially diverse career paths in CP, the latter including pathways that emphasize full-time clinical practice as well as those that concentrate on investigative work in addition to clinical practice. Moreover, careers in CP, as for all of medicine, may take place in a variety of settings that themselves emphasize different aspects of the discipline, including academic, community, public health, and industry environments. Thus, this proposed curriculum is viewed as a document that can and should be appropriately modified by individual programs to best meet their own unique programmatic goals, in keeping with both their available resources and their ability to provide appropriate levels of training for all, or for a subset, of these career paths in CP. The current document is deliberately phrased in broad terms in many areas. The hope of the ad hoc committee is that this publication will represent the first step in an evolutionary process, which will be followed by the articulation and publication of more detailed subspecialty curricula, created with input from subspecialty organizations as well as from the general pathology associations and community.

The outline below is designed to meet the didactic criteria articulated by the ACGME, specifically: "Education in clinical pathology must include microbiology (including bacteriology, mycology, parasitology and virology), immunopathology, blood banking/transfusion medicine, chemical pathology, cytogenetics, hematology, coagulation, toxicology, medical microscopy (including urinalysis), molecular biologic techniques, aspiration techniques, and other advanced diagnostic techniques as they become available" (12). It is also designed to presage and incorporate the emerging fields of complex multiparameter diagnostic systems, new biological approaches to diagnostics, including proteomics, cellular therapeutics, and pathology informatics, that are now becoming more routinely incorporated into medical delivery systems and will play an increasingly important role for the clinical pathologist of the future. Finally, the areas of overlap between AP and CP training are taken into account, and hence there are some portions of this CP curriculum that are appropriately also included in an AP curriculum, such as that proposed by Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology(3)(4). The goal of the current document is to be as reasonably comprehensive and inclusive as possible while simultaneously recognizing the need for creative exploration of new educational strategies by diverse programs.


   Overall Goals of the Laboratory Medicine Curriculum
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
The overall goals of a training program in CP should be to develop a pathologist with the following characteristics (Table 2 ):

  1. A pathologist capable of communicating as a medical consultant to other clinicians and to patients, as well as being capable of optimally directing the management of the clinical laboratory enterprise. The pathologist understands the science and technology of the clinical laboratory and assures the quality, clinical appropriateness, and usefulness of the data produced by that laboratory. The pathologist is a clinician first and foremost.
  2. A pathologist who understands and consults on methods of diagnostic test development, test utilization in the context of both generally applicable and patient-specific clinical settings, and assay interpretation in the acute and chronic clinical management of patients. These activities include the pathologist’s role in the development and implementation of integrated medical informatics that optimize patient care. The specific level of technical expertise attained in training will vary with career goals/roles and with the emphasis of the training program itself.
  3. A pathologist who understands methods and implementation of clinical laboratory–based therapeutics, including minimally manipulated and engineered cellular therapy. The specific level of technical expertise attained in training will vary with career goals/roles of the trainee and with the emphasis of the training program.
  4. A pathologist who has the skills to consult in these areas at the broader systems level, and in the various extant healthcare delivery models.
  5. A pathologist who understands the role of research, in its broadest definition, in clinical decision-making, test development, knowledge generation, and continuing education.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Overall goals of the proposed laboratory medicine curriculum.


   Competencies Common to All Rotations
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
Competencies that are common to all rotations are outlined here. Competencies that are specific to individual rotations are included with each subdiscipline. Means of assessing competency in laboratory medicine are discussed in a separate section toward the end of the document.

Patient Care

Medical Knowledge

Practice-Based Learning and Improvement

Interpersonal and Communication Skills

Professionalism

Systems-Based Practice


   Didactic Methodologies
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
The curriculum should emphasize knowledge-based and skills-based activities. Rotations in specific laboratories should emphasize graduated responsibility for clinical consultation and interpretation of unusual results, allowing the use of a case-oriented learning format. The resident should be included as a junior practitioner in the daily clinical workload of the laboratories. "Sign-out" responsibilities are usually accompanied by workstation-oriented teaching of pathophysiology and analytical issues, which in turn may be accompanied, as appropriate, by hands-on experience. Alternatively, a resident could generate a case portfolio including cases involving each of the major areas of laboratory testing. Case discussions should include a sufficient amount of detail demonstrating the resident’s analytical and consultative skills. The information created should demonstrate the ability of the resident to recognize problems in testing and interpretation, make recommendations for additional testing, and understand the clinical utility of test results. Rotations should also generally include active involvement in daily rounds and weekly supervisory meetings in which residents participate in discussions and decisions concerning quality assurance, proficiency testing, personnel management, budgeting, and instrument and procedure evaluations. Didactic sessions, case presentations in a grand-rounds format, research seminars, journal clubs, subspecialty conferences, and participation in multidisciplinary conferences are all useful exercises. Exit examinations held at the end of rotations are helpful in providing feedback to trainees. Principles of training common to all residency programs, such as stress management and maintenance of a nurturing educational environment, are also important parts of the didactic approach.

On-call responsibilities with comprehensive attending pathologist backup and feedback are critical to CP training. Indeed, we believe that all laboratory medicine training programs should have a 24/7 call system. In many programs, a single resident will take calls for all issues and consults at night and on weekends; other programs may want to delegate some areas, for example, blood bank, to a separate resident. The resident is the front-line recipient of calls, and a system of logging cases is essential. There should be an appropriate on-call orientation and training process, appropriate 24/7 backup by faculty members, and appropriate documentation and evaluation on a periodic basis. Although different formats are possible, discussion of these consultations with the entire resident staff in a morning-report format (even if only weekly) has been found to be useful in some programs.

Because project management in the development and implementation of laboratory assays is an integral part of the clinical activities of a laboratory medicine physician, it is recommended that each trainee be actively involved in these activities during his/her CP rotations. The experience should be meaningful and substantive and involve the trainee in all aspects of project management and research, including conception, design, execution, analysis, and communication. The process per se is a more important aspect of the training than the exact target of inquiry. As such, fewer, more involved experiences are preferred over a series of short projects in each rotation. The nature of the project or research should be tailored to the trainee’s career goals/roles and thus can range from assay validation or concordance studies, to utilization guideline construction, to a long-term basic research program. Some of these aspects of training are best incorporated as integral parts of each subdiscipline, whereas other aspects should be approached as free-standing electives. This committee does not recommend a specific structure for this training but emphasizes its central inclusion in the overall training program.


   Basic Schedule of Rotations
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
It is important for residents to undertake graduated responsibilities during their training because the educational process is, of course, not just one of knowledge acquisition but, as importantly, one of attaining progressively more "attending-like" professional skills and mature judgment. In the schema used below, reaching skill levels I and II corresponds to those achievements that are required for minimal competency as a generalist in CP—these skills would normally be acquired in 18–24 months of training. We have used skill levels for pedagogical reasons, so as to suggest a sequence of teaching activities that builds on earlier knowledge and achievement. Individual programs may choose to alter this learning sequence to better fit their local environment. Serving as a guide for curriculum construction, skill level I corresponds roughly to the types of activities and responsibilities that a first- and/or second-year AP/CP resident (or a first-year CP-only resident) would be engaged in, that is, the level of achievement to be attained during the resident’s first exposure to the subdiscipline as a postgraduate. Skill level II corresponds to the achievements expected of a third- and/or fourth-year AP/CP resident (or second-year CP-only resident), that is, the higher level of responsibility and expertise that one would acquire and consolidate during repeat exposure to a subdiscipline. This 18–24 months of training (skill levels I and II) is used to acquire the minimal general skills in all areas sufficient to meet the competency levels required by the American Board of Pathology for eventual certification in CP. Because of the relative brevity of an 18-month course of training in CP, some programs may choose to have no elective time during that period, especially if the overall course of study for a particular AP/CP resident’s career goals will include a predominant AP emphasis; it is then possible to focus on "crossover" aspects of training during months 19–24 (for example, molecular pathology, informatics, management, and morphometric hematopathology). It is expected that for a program that includes 24 months of CP level I and II training, the last 6 months will usually include elective time and offer a degree of flexible emphasis in 1 or 2 areas for months 19–24.

Skill level III refers to the higher level of competency, responsibility, and breadth of knowledge required for those whose career path involves a major or exclusive emphasis on CP in their practice. This would usually correspond to a third year of training (total training of 36 months), such as that required for individuals training in CP without concomitant AP training or certification. In some cases, it might correspond to the last 6–12 months of CP training for an AP/CP resident whose 4-year program involves an emphasis on CP. Because this higher level of training is best individualized depending on career path and because only a subset of pathology programs have the resources to provide such training, suggestions for skill level III training are included as a separate portion of the curriculum in a later section of this document and not as part of the subdiscipline-oriented portion outlined below.

It is recognized that basic residency training in CP, like that in AP, is designed to produce a generalist pathologist. In an era of ever-increasing medical complexity, the role for subspecialization by at least a subset of pathologists is therefore increasing, and fellowship-trained subspecialists are likely to become increasingly important in medical care delivery systems.

In keeping with the prior recommendations of the Graylyn Conference and based on accepted educational practices, it is generally recommended that the core rotations be structured as subdiscipline-specific, concentrated, and protected rotations (for example, a rotation in chemical pathology rather than a joint rotation in chemical pathology and microbiology). Some rotations at higher levels and in more advanced years of training, when the trainee has acquired basic skills, may be productively cross-disciplinary within the broad field of pathology. As noted earlier, the sound principle of graduated responsibility makes a system of at least 2 distinct rotations in each major subdiscipline a generally preferable approach to education.

The general outline for rotations is conceived as follows:

It is recognized that there are areas of overlap between disciplines and that, therefore, some institutions may choose to include portions of the curriculum in different rotations compared with those in which they are subcategorized in this document. In addition, some aspects of the CP knowledge base and skill set are common across disciplines; hence programs may choose to emphasize some of these common areas in different rotations from those in which they are arbitrarily categorized here ("principles of laboratory medicine", management, quality assurance procedures, instrumentation, technical methodologies, and method development are such examples). Where possible, cross-references are indicated in the text. Similarly, there are areas of overlap between traditional AP and CP disciplines that may provide opportunities for programs to alter traditional rotation schedules, especially following minimal core training in AP and CP. Moreover, there are some rotations in the current curriculum of most institutions, and reiterated here, that are based to some extent on technology rather than on clinical field—molecular diagnostics to some extent fits this description—and programs may have different approaches as to how best to include education in these areas within their particular structures. Finally, there are aspects of laboratory medicine that are significantly influenced by characteristics of the patient populations, for example, pediatric and geriatric practice, and some programs may choose to utilize specialized rotations in different clinical settings to provide optimal training in these areas (for example, a pediatric hospital rotation). In summary, curriculum is in constant evolution, and, within the somewhat broad confines of the principles elucidated here, final determination of a training curriculum is best left in the hands of individual programs, which may choose to experiment with innovative organizational structures. Because of these considerations, a web page has been designed as an accompaniment to the current document (www.aclps.org). It is the expectation of ACLPS as sponsor of this web page that it will provide a mechanism for dynamic changes in curriculum recommendations as laboratory medicine evolves, as well as creating a mechanism for discussion on the frontiers of curriculum development and for including additional material that may be of use to training programs.


   Curriculum for Subdiscipline-Specific Rotations
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
The curriculum outlined below attempts to identify most of the major areas needed for CP training in each classic subdiscipline. It is not designed to assess the relative weight to be given to each topic mentioned nor, for the sake of conciseness, is it completely comprehensive. As mentioned earlier, it is hoped that this can form the basis for discussion and for an evolutionary improvement in delineation of curriculum over time and for further work by both general and subspecialty groups of pathologists. In addition, there are some topics that apply to all subdisciplines but which may receive different emphasis in each section or be included predominantly as one of the general competencies outlined earlier. The importance of understanding the unique aspects of pediatric CP would be such an example. Each section ends with a listing of competencies specific to a subdiscipline and with a few possible reference materials. Again, there are many fine reference books available, and the list is by no means comprehensive. Several general texts in laboratory medicine are listed below and not reiterated in each section.

General Reference Materials:

Henry JB, ed. Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods, 20th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2001.

Laposata M, ed. Laboratory Medicine: Clinical Pathology in the Practice of Medicine. Chicago: ASCP Press, 2002.

Mcclatchey KD, ed. Clinical Laboratory Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002.


   Chemistry
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
I. Analytical Techniques and Instrumentation
Skill Level I

Skill Level II

II. Organ-Based Biochemical Pathophysiology
1. assessment of pulmonary function: blood gases and oxygen saturation
Skill Level I

2. acid-base chemistry, electrolytes, and relevant disorders
Skill Level I

3. assessment of renal function
Skill Level I

4. cardiac biomarkers for the assessment of coronary artery diseases
Skill Level I

5. assessment of liver and biliary tract status
Skill Level I

6. assessment of thyroid function
   Skill Level I

7. assessment of pituitary function
   Skill Level II

8. assessment of adrenal function
   Skill Level I

9. assessment of reproductive function, pregnancy, and prenatal testing
   Skill Level II

10. assessment of gastric, pancreatic, and intestinal function
   Skill Level I

11. assessment of glucose and evaluation of diabetes mellitus
   Skill Level I

12. assessment of mineral and bone metabolism
   Skill Level I

13. assessment of porphyrins and disorders of porphyrin metabolism
   Skill Level II

14. tumor biomarkers
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

15. assessment of fetal lung maturity
   Skill Level I

16. trace element assessment
   Skill Level II

17. vitamin assessment
   Skill Level I

18. cholesterol and lipid assessment
   Skill Level I

19. serum and fluid protein and amino acid assessment
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

20. clinical enzyme kinetics
   Skill Level II

21. pediatric biochemistry
   Skill Level II

III. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Toxicology
1. pharmacokinetics
   Skill Level I

2. drug metabolism
   Skill Level I

3. pharmacodynamics
   Skill Level I

4. therapeutic drug monitoring of specific drug classes
   Skill Level I

5. toxicologic syndromes
   Skill Level II

6. laboratory evaluation and management of overdosed or poisoned patients
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

7. laboratory evaluation of drugs of abuse
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

8. pharmacogenomics
   Skill Level II
See the Molecular Pathology section.

additional competencies specific to chemistry
   Patient Care

   Professionalism

Chemistry Reference Materials:

See also the General Reference Materials.

American College of Cardiology. Myocardial Infarction Redefined—A Consensus Document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. http://www.acc.org/clinical/consensus/mi_redefined/.

American Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines. http://www.diabetes.org/for-health-professionals-and-scientists/cpr.jsp.

American Society for Clinical Oncology. 2000 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast and Colorectal Cancer. http://www.asco.org/ac/1,1003,_12-002130,00.asp.

Burtis CA, Ashwood EA, Bruns DE, eds. Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders, 2006.

Kaplan LA, Pesce A, Kazmierczak S, eds. Clinical Chemistry: Theory, Analysis, Correlation, 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby, 2003.

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry. NACB Laboratory Practice Guidelines. http://www.nacb.org/lmpg/main.stm.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health. Third Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/cholesterol/.

Point-of-Care Testing
Point-of-care testing (POCT) occurs across all disciplines, but because there are important common issues in its clinical use, it has been made a separate, distinct part of the curriculum in this document. The POCT curriculum may be taught in a concentrated fashion in any of the subdisciplines, depending on what is most appropriate to the institution.

   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

additional competencies specific to poct
   Systems-Based Practice

POCT Reference Materials:

See also the General Reference Materials.

Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Quality Point of Care Testing: A Joint Commission Handbook. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 1999.

Price CP, St John A. Point of care testing. In: Burtis CA, Ashwood EA, Bruns DE, eds. Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders, 2006:299–320.

Price CP, St John A, Hicks JM. Point of Care Testing, 2nd ed. Washington: AACC Press, 2004.

Threatte GA. Physician office laboratories. In: Henry JB, ed. Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods, 20th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2001.

Hematology
   I. Hematology/Body Fluids/Urinalysis
1. automated hematology Skill Level I

Skill Level II

2. peripheral blood smear analysis Skill Level I

Skill Level II

3. body fluid analysis: csf, ascitic/pleural fluid, joint fluid Skill Level I

Skill Level II

4. manual hematology methods Skill Level I

5. urinalysis Skill Level I

Skill Level II

   II. Special Laboratory Tests in Hematology
1. wbc disorders See Section IV (Flow Cytometry) and Section V (Hematopathology) below.

2. rbc disorders Skill Level I

Skill Level II

3. platelet disorders Skill Level I

Skill Level II

   III. Coagulation
Skill Level I

Skill Level II

   IV. Flow Cytometry
Skill Level I

Skill Level II

V. Hematopathology
   1. bone marrow
Skill Level I

Skill Level II

   2. lymph nodes
Skill Level I

Skill Level II

   additional competencies specific to hematology
Patient Care

Hematology Reference Materials:

See also the General Reference Materials.

Beutler E, Lichtman M, Collet B, Kipps T, Seligson U, eds. William’s Hematology, 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001.

Carr JH, Rodak BF. Clinical Hematology Atlas. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1999.

Colman RW, Hirsh J, Marder VJ, Clowes AW, George JN. Hemostasis and Thrombosis: Basic Principles and Clinical Practice, 4th ed. (5th edition in press). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.

Darzynkiewicz Z, Crissman HA, Robinson JP, eds. Methods in Cell Biology, Cytometry, 3rd ed., Part A, Vol. 63. New York: Academic Press, 2000.

Foucar K. Bone Marrow Pathology, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: American Society of Clinical Pathology, 2001.

Glassy EF, ed. Color Atlas of Hematology: An Illustrated Field Guide Based on Proficiency Testing. Chicago, IL: American Society of Clinical Pathology, 1998.

Goodnight SH Jr, Hathaway WE. Disorders of Hemostasis and Thrombosis: A Clinical Guide. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001.

Hoffman R, Benz E, Shattil S, Furie B, Cohen H. Hematology: Basic Principles and Practice, 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2004.

Hoyer JD, Kroft SH, eds. Color Atlas of Hemoglobin Disorders: A Compendium Based on Proficiency Testing. Chicago, IL: American Society of Clinical Pathology, 2003.

Jaffee ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW, eds. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. Pathogenesis and Genetics of Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon, France: IARC Press, 2001.

Keren DF, McCoy JP, Carey JL, eds. Flow Cytometry in Clinical Diagnosis, 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: American Society of Clinical Pathology, 2001.

King-Strasinger S, Schaub Di Lorenzo M. Urinalysis and Body Fluids, 4th ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 2005.

Kjeldsberg C, ed. Practical Diagnosis of Hematologic Disorders, 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: American Society of Clinical Pathology, 2000.

Knowles DM. Neoplastic Hematopathology, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.

Loscalzo J, Schafer AI, eds. Thrombosis and Hemorrhage, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003.

Nathan DG, Orkin SH, Ginsburg D, Look TA, Oski FA. Hematology of Infancy and Childhood, 6th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2003.

Majerus PW, Perlmutter RM, Varmus H, Stamatoyannopoulos G, eds. The Molecular Basis of Blood Diseases, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2001.

Stewart CC, Nicholson JKA, eds. Cytometric Cellular Analysis: Immunophenotyping. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2000.

Microbiology
I. General Microbiology
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

II. Bacteriology
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

III. Susceptibility Testing
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

IV. Mycobacteriology
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

V. Mycology
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

VI. Parasitology
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

VII. Virology
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

additional competencies specific for microbiology
Patient Care

Medical Knowledge

Microbiology Reference Materials:

CDC/NIH. Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories, 4th ed. Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1999.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; 15th Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S15. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2005.

Fields BN, Howley PM, Griffin DE, Lamb RA, Martin MA, Roizman B, Straus SE, Knipe DM, eds. Field’s Virology, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.

Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS, eds. Trevino EA, photographer. Bailey and Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology, 11th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 2002.

Garcia LS. Diagnostic Medical Parasitology, 4th ed. Washington: ASM Press, 2001.

Isenberg HD, ed. Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, 2nd ed. Washington: ASM Press, 2004.

Jousimies-Somer H, Summanen P, Citron D, Baron E, Wexler H, Finegold S. Wadsworth–KLT Anaerobic Bacteriology Manual, 6th ed. Belmont, CA: Star Publishing, 2002.

Koneman ED, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberger PC, Winn WC, eds. Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1997.

Larone DH. Medically Important Fungi, 4th ed. Washington: ASM Press, 2002.

Lorian V. Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.

Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 6th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2004.

Marler LM. Direct Smear Atlas. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.

Miller JM. A Guide to Specimen Management in Clinical Microbiology, 2nd ed. Washington: ASM Press, 1999.

Mayhall CG. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004.

Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Pfaller MA, Yolken RH, eds. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 8th ed. Washington: ASM Press, 2003.

National Committee for Clinical and Laboratory Standards (now CLSI). Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard–Sixth Edition. NCCLS document M7-A6. Wayne, PA: NCCLS, 2003.

National Committee for Clinical and Laboratory Standards (now CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests; Approved Standard–Eighth Edition. NCCLS document M2-A8. Wayne, PA: NCCLS, 2003.

Smith JA, ed. Laboratory Safety in Clinical Microbiology. Washington: ASM Press, 1996.

Storch GA. Essentials of Diagnostic Virology. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.

Transfusion Medicine
I. Transfusion Service
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

II. Blood Collection/Blood Center/Cell Processing Responsibilities
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

III. Therapeutic Apheresis
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

additional competencies specific to transfusion medicine
Patient Care

Medical Knowledge

Practice-Based Learning and Improvement

Interpersonal and Communication Skills

Transfusion Medicine Reference Materials:

See also the General Reference Materials.

AABB web site. http://www.aabb.org.

AABB Standards for Blood Banks and Transfusion Services, 23rd ed. Bethesda, MD: AABB Press, 2005.

AABB Standards for Cellular Therapy Product Services, 1st ed. Bethesda, MD: AABB Press, 2004.

AABB Technical Manual, 15th ed. Bethesda, MD: AABB Press, 2005.

McLeod BC, Price TH, Weinstein RA. Apheresis: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. Bethesda, MD: AABB Press, 2003.

Blackall DP, Helekar PS, Triulzi DJ. Transfusion Medicine: Self-Assessment and Review. Bethesda, MD: AABB Press, 2002.

Harmening DM. Modern Blood Banking and Transfusion Practices, 5th ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 2005.

Blajchman MA. Landmark studies that have changed the practice of transfusion medicine. Transfusion 2005;45:1523–30.

Hillyer CD, Silberstein LE, Ness PM, Anderson KC, Roush KS. Blood Banking and Transfusion Medicine: Basic Principles and Practice. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2003.

Mintz PD. Transfusion Therapy: Clinical Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. Bethesda, MD: AABB Press, 2005.

Mollison PL, Engelfriet CP, Contreras M. Blood Transfusion in Clinical Medicine, 10th ed. Oxon, UK: Blackwell Science, 1997.

Petz LD, Garratty G. Immune Hemolytic Anemias, 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2004.

Reid ME, Lomas-Francis C. The Blood Group Antigen Facts Book, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004.

Simon TL, Dzik WH, Snyder EL, Rossi EC, Stowell CP, Strauss RG. Rossi’s Principles of Transfusion Medicine, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002.

US Department of Labor. Occupational Safety & Health Administration. Bloodborne pathogens and needlestick prevention. http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/bloodbornepathogens/.

US Food and Drug Administration. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Blood. http://www.fda.gov/cber/blood.htm.

Immunology and Immunogenetics
I. Clinical Practice and Science of Immunodiagnosis and Clinical Immunology Consultation
   1. immunoglobulin quantitative and qualitative disorders
Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

2. autoimmune diseases
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

3. infectious disease serology: principles and general applications
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

4. laboratory assessment of allergic diseases
   Skill Level I

5. innate immunity and inflammation
   Skill Level I

6. immune deficiency disorders
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

7. immunogenetic methods and indications and alloimmune testing
   Skill Level I

   Skill Level II

II. Methods of Clinical Immunology Laboratory Testing
Skill Level I

additional competencies specific to immunology
Professionalism

Immunology Reference Materials:

See also the General Reference Materials.

Abbas AK, Lichtman AH. Cellular and Molecular Immunology, 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2005.

Austen A, Frank MM, Atkinson JP, Cantor HI. Samter’s Immunologic Diseases, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.

Buckley RH. Primary immunodeficiency diseases due to defects in phagocytes. New Engl J Med 2000;343:1313–24.

Davison A, Diamond B. Autoimmune diseases. New Engl J Med 2001;345:340–50.

Delves PJ, Roitt IM. The immune system [two parts]. New Engl J Med 2000;343:37–49, 108–17.

Folds JD, Normansell, DE. Pocket Guide to Clinical Immunology. Washington: American Society for Microbiology, 1999.

Janeway CA, Travers P, Walport M, Shlomchik MJ. Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease, 6th ed. New York: Garland Science, 2004.

Kamradt T, Mitchison NA. Tolerance and autoimmunity. New Engl J Med 2001;344:655–64.

Kavanaugh A, Tomar R, Reveille J, Solomon DH, Homburger HA. Guidelines for clinical use of the antinuclear antibody test and tests for specific autoantibodies to nuclear antigens. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:71–81.

Kay AB. Allergy and allergic diseases [two parts]. New Engl J Med 2001;344:30–7, 109–13.

Lekstrom-Himes JA, Gallin JI. Immunodeficiency diseases caused by defects in phagocytes. New Engl J Med 2000;343:1703–14.

Medzhitov R, Janeway C. Innate immunity. New Engl J Med 2000;343:338–44.

Rose NR, Hamilton RG, Detrick B. Manual of Clinical Laboratory Immunology, 6th ed. Washington: American Society for Microbiology, 2002.

Schumacher RH. Primer in the Rheumatic Diseases, 12th ed. Atlanta, GA: Arthritis Foundation, 2001.

Stiehm ER, Ochs HD, Winkelstein JA. Immunologic Disorders in Infants and Children, 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2004.

Turgeon ML. Immunology and Serology in Laboratory Medicine, 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 2003.

Walport MJ. Complement [two parts]. New Engl J Med 2001;344:1058–66, 1140–4.


   Molecular Pathology (including Cytogenetics)
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
I. Cytogenetics
1. acquisition of knowledge of specific tests using cytogenetic methods
Skill Level I

Skill Level II

2. analytical and technical training
Skill Level I

Skill Level II

3. consultation and presentation of cases using cytogenetic data
Skill Level II

II. Molecular Pathology
1. acquisition of knowledge of specific tests using molecular biology methods
Skill Level I

Skill Level II

2. analytical and technical training
Skill Level I

Skill Level II

3. consultation and presentation of cases using molecular techniques/data
Skill Level II

additional competencies specific to molecular pathology
Patient Care

Professionalism

Systems-Based Practice

Molecular Pathology Reference Materials:

See also the General Reference Materials.

Association for Molecular Pathology. Recommendations for in-house development and operation of molecular diagnostics tests. Am J Clin Pathol 1999;111:449.

Barch MJ, Knutsen T, Spurbeck JL, eds. The ACT Cytogenetics Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed. New York: Raven Press, 1997.

Burtis CA, Ashwood EA, Bruns DE. Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders, 2006.

Coleman, WB, Tsongalis GJ. Molecular Diagnostics for the Clinical Laboratorian, 2nd ed. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2002.

Gardner RJM, Sutherland GR. Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Geren S, Keagle M. The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 1998.

Heim S, Mitelman F. Cancer Cytogenetics, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1995.

Killeen AA. Principles of Molecular Pathology. Totowa, NJ:, Humana Press, 2004.

Leonard DGB. Diagnostic Molecular Pathology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2003.

Persing DH, Tenover FC, Versalovic J, Tang Y-W, Unger ER, Relman DA, White TJ, eds. Molecular Microbiology: Diagnostic Principles and Practice. Washington: ASM Press, 2003.

Rooney DE, Czepulkowski BH, eds. Human Cytogenetics – A Practical Approach, Vols. I and II, 2nd ed. Oxford: IRL Press, 1992.

Scriver CR, Sly WS, Childs B, Beaudet AL, Valle D, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease, 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000.

Sen F, Vega F, Medeiros LJ. Molecular genetic methods in the diagnosis of hematologic neoplasms. Semin Diagn Pathol 2002;19:72–93.

Shaffer LG, Tommerup N, eds. ISCN 2005: An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Basel, Switzerland: S Karger, 2005.

Strachan T, Read AP. Human Molecular Genetics, 3rd ed. London: Garland Press, 2004.

Therman E, Susman M. Human Chromosomes, 4th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2001.

Thompson MW, McInnes RR, Willard HF, eds. Thompson & Thompson: Genetics in Medicine, 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2002.


   Laboratory Management
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
I. Organizational and Leadership Skills
Skill Level I

Skill Level II

II. Financial Skills
Skill Level I

Skill Level II

III. Regulatory Skills
Skill Level I

Skill Level II

IV. Quality Assurance, Quality Control, Pre- and Postanalytic Management
Skill Level I

Skill Level II

competencies specific to laboratory management
Medical Knowledge

Practice-Based Learning and Improvement

Interpersonal and Communication Skills

Systems-Based Practice

Laboratory Management Reference Materials:

See also the General Reference Materials.

American Medical Association. Current Procedural Terminology: CPT 2006. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, 2005.

College of American Pathologists. Compliance Guidelines for Pathologists. Northfield, IL: CAP, 1998.

College of American Pathologists. Professional Relations Manual, 12th ed. Northfield, IL: CAP, 2003.

Davis GG. Pathology and the Law. A Practical Guide for the Pathologist. New York: Springer, 2004.

Farnsworth JR, Weiss RL. A mentor-based laboratory management elective for residents. Am J Clin Pathol 1999;111:156–60.

Garcia LS, Baselski VS, Burke MD, Schwab DA, Sewell DL, Steele JCH Jr, Weissfield AS, Wilkinson DS, and Winn WC Jr, eds. Clinical Laboratory Management, Washington: ASM Press, 2004.

Horowitz RE. The successful community hospital pathologist: what it takes. Hum Pathol 1998;29:211–4.

Horowitz RE, Naritoku W, Wagar EA. Management training for pathology residents: a regional approach. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004;128:59–63.

Kurec AS, Schofield S, Waters MC. The CLMA Guide to Managing a Clinical Laboratory. Wayne, PA: Clinical Laboratory Management Association, 1995.

Sims K, Darcy TA. A leadership-management training curriculum for pathology residents. Am J Clin Pathol 1997;108:90–5.

Travers EM. Clinical Laboratory Management. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 1997.

Weiss RL. A clinical laboratory management elective for residents. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992;116:108–10.


   Informatics
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
I. Basic Computer Skills
Skill Level I

II. Laboratory Information System Concepts
Skill Level I

III. Security and Privacy
Skill Level I

IV. The Internet and World Wide Web
Skill Level I

V. Communication and Standards
Skill Level I

Skill Level II

VI. Emerging Technologies
Skill Level II

additional competencies unique to informatics
Medical Knowledge

Professionalism

Systems-Based Practice

Informatics Reference Materials:

See also the General Reference Materials.

van Bemmel J, Musen MA, eds. Handbook of Medical Informatics. New York: Springer, 1997.

Wiederhold G, Shortliffe EH, Fagan LM, Perreault LE, eds. Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2000.

Skill Level II I Curriculum
Due to the great diversity of career paths available in laboratory medicine, a curriculum for the third year of training must encompass the greatest opportunity for individualization and creativity on the part of all training programs. At the level of third-year (senior or sometimes chief resident) activities, the resident often assumes a significant amount of teaching responsibilities for more junior residents and medical students—an educational exercise that often helps to coalesce knowledge and practice for the third-year resident. It is beyond the scope of this document to provide a full curriculum for third-year training, but examples of appropriate curricula would include:

  1. Investigative Laboratory Medicine Track. Individuals in this track would be expected to spend at least 20% of their third year in longitudinal clinical work, often as an attending apprentice in one laboratory under the mentorship of the laboratory director, and the remaining time in research. The research must be within the broad discipline of laboratory medicine and have clinical relevance but may involve basic bench, translational, or primary clinical investigation. On-call clinical activities along with conferences such as morning report and case presentations are usually continued through this third year. In many cases, this is followed by further year(s) of research training before independence.
  2. Clinical Subspecialization Track. Individuals in this track would be expected to spend 60%–80% of their time specializing in one subdiscipline, often as an attending apprentice. Specialization would include work in test development and implementation or changes in practice parameters. In some cases, this track may be followed by a subspecialty fellowship.
  3. Management Track. Individuals in this track would be expected to spend at least 50% of their time obtaining broad knowledge of the "business" of medicine and learning high-level management skills similar to those taught as part of an MBA program. The remaining time would generally involve application of this knowledge base in the practical laboratory setting. This track sometimes is combined with an actual degree in medical management, requiring an extension of the training timetable.


   Assessment of Competency
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
Different programs will want to utilize different means of assessing general and rotation-specific competencies. Extensive work in this area has been carried out by an ACGME/American Board of Medical Specialties joint initiative on assessment of the 6 general competencies, which resulted in publication of the Toolbox of Assessment Methods© (http://www.acgme.org/outcome/assess/toolbox.asp). Although details of that work will not be reviewed here, it may be useful to outline the tools that are most applicable to CP training. These are outlined below and summarized in Table 3 . This is not to imply that other tools may not also be appropriate but rather that these are the tools that appear to be most easily implemented in CP training. It is expected that comprehensive evaluation of competency will use more than one tool.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Suggestions for competency evaluation methods for CP residency training.

Programs are strongly encouraged to review the materials and references available in the Toolbox document and elsewhere from ACGME and the American Board of Medical Specialties. As of July 2004, all pathology residents are also expected to register in the ACGME Case Log System.

360° Evaluation.
This consists of questionnaires or similar tools completed by multiple individuals in the training sphere of influence that assess performance of the trainee. It is considered most useful to assess interpersonal/communication skills, professional behavior, systems-based practice, and some aspects of patient care. Individuals appropriate to query in this fashion concerning resident performance include supervisory faculty, medical technologists (in particular, laboratory managers or "chief technologists"), clinicians (e.g., pathologists and nonpathologists, attending and resident/fellow staff) with whom the CP resident has consultative interactions, and patients whose care the resident participates in (especially, but not exclusively, during transfusion medicine rotations). In some settings, advanced residents may also have contact with administrative personnel.

Checklist Evaluation.
A checklist may define specific behaviors or activities that make up a more complex competency, either as a pass/fail for each behavior or as a performance judgment (excellent, good, fair, poor). Checklists may be tailored to each laboratory’s skill set but may also include globally accepted basic competencies. This can also be especially useful for assessing procedural competencies, such as performance of a bone marrow aspirate/biopsy or fine-needle aspiration. Interpersonal skills, such as a phone consultation, multidisciplinary conference participation, or "morning report" presentations, may also be effectively evaluated by this method.

Global Rating.
Here a rater judges general categories of ability and does so retrospectively based on impressions over time. Typically, an end-of-rotation evaluation that combines information derived from multiple sources would fall in this category. Generally, qualitative indicators are used. Written comments are important to explain the ratings. All categories may be assessed in this fashion in CP training.

Case and Procedure Logs.
Maintaining a logbook is commonly used in CP training programs. Residents will usually include in a logbook phone and face-to-face case consultations that do not result in a note in the patient chart (a frequent and clinically crucial event in CP) as well as recording procedures (e.g., marrow examinations and apheresis procedures). The logbook serves as a record of overall clinical exposure that can be used to assure adequate breadth of experience for the resident, although the number of cases/procedures recorded is not, per se, an index of competency. Faculty review of the logbook, either in the setting of a morning report or on an individual basis, is recommended. Such a review, if conducted in standardized fashion by an examiner using a well-established protocol and scoring procedure, can be used as the equivalent of a chart-stimulated recall oral examination, although relatively few programs appear to use such an approach at the current time.

Portfolios.
A portfolio is a collection of products prepared by the resident that provides evidence of achievement relative to the curriculum and demonstrates performance, growth, and effort. It may include written documents or video-/audio-recordings, photographs and the like. In CP, this can include computer slide case presentations (case conferences), written materials prepared for journal club, materials generated for morning report, and particular laboratory procedures that the resident has written, revised, or reviewed. It may also contain copies of anonymized patient reports, chart notes, and other clinical interpretations. A portfolio is more than a resident scrapbook—it is most powerful when coupled with resident self reflection. It is a tool to promote self-knowledge and self-esteem and at the same time it can be used to identify areas of strength and areas needing improvement.

Simulations.
Simulations consisting of standardized unknown cases may be used to assess competency in interpretation of various assays. Simulations of QC aberrancies can also be used. Mock CAP inspections in which the resident acts either as the lab director or the inspector are used as an assessment and learning tool in some programs.

Standardized Oral Examination.
The oral examination can be used to assess the resident’s interpretive skills. The exam should utilize realistic cases and problems, and the resident should be evaluated on reasoning and not just medical knowledge. Systems-based practice performance, such as regulatory requirements, can also be assessed by this approach.

Written Examination.
A beginning- and/or end-of-rotation written examination can be effectively used. Often these are multiple choice examinations, but all types can be used.

Record Review.
This can be an effective evaluation tool for chart-based activities of residents, such as evaluation of transfusion reactions, clinical consultations, and interpretations of assay results. This does not imply that the actual patient chart itself must be reviewed because in many cases the laboratory copy of what was sent to the chart is more easily accessible.


   Notes
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 
This document was prepared by an ad hoc committee of the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists (ACLPS) composed of Brian R. Smith, MD (Yale University) and Alan Wells, MD, DMSc (University of Pittsburgh) as chair and co-chair of the committee; C. Bruce Alexander, MD (University of Alabama at Birmingham) and Edwin Bovill, MD (University of Vermont) as members of the steering committee; and, in alphabetical order Sheldon Campbell, MD, PhD (Yale); Amitava Dasgupta, PhD (University of Texas at Houston); Mark Fung, MD, PhD (University of Vermont); Barbara Haller, MD, PhD (University of California at San Francisco); John G. Howe, PhD (Yale); Curtis Parvin, PhD (Washington University); Ellinor Peerschke, PhD (Weill Cornell School of Medicine); Henry Rinder, MD (Yale); Steven Spitalnik, MD (Columbia University); Ronald Weiss, MD (University of Utah); and Mark Wener, MD (University of Washington), along with the assistance of many other members of ACLPS, some of whom are noted below.

This article is also being published in Human Pathology and the American Journal of Clinical Pathology in 2006.


   Acknowledgments
 
Many people have contributed substantially to this manuscript. Major participants in the composition of the document include (in alphabetical order): Qasim Ansari, Leonard Boral, Kendall Crookston, Teresa Darcy, Uttam Garg, Michael Hodsdon, Malek Kamoun, Robin Lorenz, Elaine Lyon, Moon Nahn, Peter Perrotta, SM Hossein Sadrzadeh, Thomas Williams, and Kiang-Teck Jerry Yeo. Reviewers of the document include Michael Brown, Grant Bullock, Desmond Burke, David Chou, Richard Eisen, John Fisk, Elizabeth Frank, Timothy Hamill, Michael Hodsdon, Peter Jatlow, Prasad Koduru, Loren Joseph, Jeffrey Kant, Debra Leonard, Dolores Lopez-Terrada, Marisa Marques, Jonathan Miller, Paul Mintz, May Nakagawa, A. William Pasculle, Luke Perkocha, Petrie Rainey, Leigh Thorne, John Thorson, Richard Torres, Darrell Triulzi, Abraham Tzou, Mark Velleca, Elizabeth Wagar, David Wilkinson, Gail Woods, Yan Wu, and Arthur Zieske. The Executive Council of ACLPS, who also reviewed the document and supported this effort, in addition to those included above, consisted of Fred Apple, David Bruns, Tony Butch, Brad Cookson, William Roberts, David Sacks, Eric Spitzer, and Ana Stankovic.


   Footnotes
 
1 Nonstandard abbreviations: CP, clinical pathology; CAP, College of American Pathologists; ACLPS, Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists; ACGME, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; AP, anatomic pathology; QC, quality control; CLSI, Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (formerly NCCLS); JCAHO, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations; CK, creatine kinase; BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; T4, thyroxine; T3, triiodothyronine; PTH, parathyroid hormone; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; POCT, point-of-care testing; WBC, white blood cell; RBC, red blood cell; AFB, acid-fast bacilli; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; HIPAA, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act; and IRB, institutional review board.


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Overall Goals of the...
Competencies Common to All...
Didactic Methodologies
Basic Schedule of Rotations
Curriculum for Subdiscipline...
Chemistry
Molecular Pathology (including...
Laboratory Management
Informatics
Assessment of Competency
Notes
References
 

  1. . Conjoint Task Force of Clinical Pathology Residency Training Writing Committee. Graylyn Conference Report: Recommendations for reform of clinical pathology residency training. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;103:127-129.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Folberg R, Antonioli DA, Alexander CB. Competency-based residency training in pathology: challenges and opportunities. Hum Pathol 2002;33:3-6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. . Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Curriculum content and evaluation of resident competency in anatomic pathology: a proposal. Am J Clin Pathol 2003;120:652-660.[Free Full Text]
  4. . Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Curriculum content and evaluation of resident competency in anatomic pathology: a proposal. Hum Pathol 2003;34:1083-1090.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Wick MR. Curricula for pathology training: an editorial comment. Hum Pathol 2003;34:1091.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Simon TL. Comprehensive curricular goals for teaching transfusion medicine. Curriculum Committee of the Transfusion Medicine Academic Award Group. Transfusion 1989;29:438-446.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. . The Association for Molecular Pathology Training and Education Committee. Goals and objectives for molecular pathology education in residency programs. J Mol Diagn 1999;1:5-15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Horowitz RE, Naritoku W, Wagar EA. Management training for pathology residents: a regional approach. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004;128:59-63.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Henricks WH, Boyer PJ, Harrison JH, Tuthill JM, Healy JC. Informatics training in pathology residency programs: proposed learning objectives and skill sets for the new millennium. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003;127:1009-1018.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Beastall G, Kenny D, Laitinen P, ten Kate J. A guide to defining the competence required of a consultant in clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2005;43:654-659.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Bousquet B, Brombacher PJ, Zerah S, Beastall GH, Blaton V, Charret J, et al. EC4 European syllabus for post-graduate training in clinical chemistry. Version 2—1999. Clin Chem Lab Med 1999;37:1119-27.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Anatomic Pathology and Clinical Pathology. http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/RRC_300/300_prIndex.asp..



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
X. Bossuyt, K. Verweire, and N. Blanckaert
Laboratory Medicine: Challenges and Opportunities
Clin. Chem., October 1, 2007; 53(10): 1730 - 1733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
H. Rinder and B. R. Smith
Evolving Paradigms of Clinical Pathology Resident Education and Consultation
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2007; 53(1): 3 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. G. Scott and D. E. Bruns
Improving training in laboratory medicine.
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2006; 52(6): 915 - 916.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
E. T. L. Prak, J. Park, G. Yu, and I. Nachamkin
Point: Developing a Curriculum in Clinical Pathology
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2006; 52(6): 969 - 971.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. Wells and B. Smith
Counterpoint: Developing a Clinical Pathology Curriculum to Meet Current and Future Needs
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2006; 52(6): 971 - 972.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2005.066076v1
52/6/917    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Current Issues in Laboratory Medicine


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS