Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 52: 1627-1628, 2006; 10.1373/clinchem.2006.069997
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stankovic, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Parmar, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stankovic, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Parmar, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Laboratory Management
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry
(Clinical Chemistry. 2006;52:1627-1628.)
© 2006 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Assay Interferences from Blood Collection Tubes: A Cautionary Note

Ana K. Stankovica and Girish Parmar

Clinical Affairs, BD Diagnostics, Preanalytical Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ

aAddress correspondence to this author at: BD Preanalytical Systems, 1 Becton Drive, M/C 310, Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417. Fax 210-847-4851; e-mail ana_stankovic{at}bd.com.


To the Editor:

Recent publications (1)(2) have reported an association between the surfactant present in BD Vacutainer® blood collection tubes and interference in select immunoassays on certain instrument platforms. Blood collection tubes contain not only surfactants but multiple additives that contribute to the optimal recovery of serum or plasma for laboratory analysis. For plastic tubes, which are largely replacing glass tubes because of safety considerations, several suppliers have added silica particles to promote blood clotting (3)(4)(5) and polyvinylpyrrolidone to aid the adherence of silica particles to the tube walls and to facilitate rapid dissolution of the silica in the blood specimen. Moreover, silicone-based surfactants or polypropylene oxide are present as coatings for the interior tube wall (6)(7) to act as hemorepellent agents and improve blood flow. Stoppers of tubes are also coated with lubricant to facilitate their removal and to maintain the lower pressure inside the evacuated tubes (4). Separator gels are present in some tubes to serve as a barrier between the serum (or plasma) and the clot after centrifugation of the tubes (8). Plastic blood collection tubes have been widely shown to be suitable for routine clinical chemistry analytes, hormone analysis, and therapeutic drug monitoring (9)(10)(11).

Surfactants are also a common component of many immunoassays. They are used to decrease or eliminate nonspecific adsorption, improve stability of the reagents, or modify the solid-phase surface to render it less hydrophobic and thus minimize loss of noncovalently bound antibody. Inclusion of surfactants in immunoassay reagents requires careful selection and optimization. High concentrations of surfactants may lead to direct loss of passively adsorbed antibody from the solid phase, among other nonspecific effects (12)(13).

The reports by Bowen et al. (1)(2) show that a high concentration of a silicone-based surfactant is a potential source of the immunoassay interference in the DPC IMMULITE® 2500 Total Triiodothyronine (TT3) assay. The authors indicate that one of the possible mechanisms of interference is desorption of the antibodies from the solid phase by the surfactant for the TT3 assay (1), resulting in a falsely increased estimate of the TT3 concentration. As described above, this phenomenon is not unknown in immunoassays in which the antibodies are passively adsorbed onto the solid phase (12)(13). Other types of assay formats with more robust antibody binding schemes do not show this problem, even at high concentrations of surfactant as demonstrated on the AxSymTM analyzer. The concentration of surfactant at which Bowen et al. demonstrated the desorption of antibody in the TT3 assay was 2- to 24-fold higher than the concentration of surfactant per milliliter of blood present in the BD Vacutainer tubes that exhibited the interference in the TT3 assay. The current adjusted BD Vacutainer tubes have been shown to produce no clinically significant differences for a variety of assays across many instrument platforms when compared with competitive products [see "Note added in proof" in reference (2)]. The concentration of the surfactant has been adjusted to decrease any known assay interferences and yield clinically equivalent results compared with glass tubes (14).

Assay interferences from blood collection tubes can present challenges to clinical laboratories because they are not easily detected by the daily quality control or even by proficiency testing programs because the samples for such testing are not exposed to the additives in the blood collection tubes (15). However, it is always good practice for laboratories to monitor their reference intervals and population trends and report deviations to the device manufacturers. All laboratorians should be vigilant for potential effects on laboratory assays and work together in partnership with tube manufacturers and diagnostic companies to prevent and minimize problems.


References

  1. Bowen RA, Chan Y, Ruddel ME, Hortin GL, Csako G, Demosky SJ, Jr, Remaley AT. Immunoassay interference by a commonly used blood collection tube additive, the organosolicone surfactant silwet L-720. Clin Chem 2005;51:1874-1882.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bowen RA, Chan Y, Cohen J, Rehak NN, Hortin GL, Csako G, Remaley AT. Effect of blood collection tubes on total triiodothyronine and other laboratory assays. Clin Chem 2005;51:424-433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Cohen R, Dastane AN, inventors. Additive preparation and method of use thereof. US Patent 5,340,166; 2003..
  4. Kessler SB, inventor. Apparatus for the separation of blood components. US Patent 2,578,864; 1981..
  5. Anraku H, Shoji Y, inventors. Vacuum blood collection tubes. US Patent 8,565,334; 1989..
  6. Terumo: Venosafe Shelf Pack, Ref: VF-108SAS..
  7. AFSAAPS: Information à l’attention des clients utilisateurs des tubes secs VENOSAFE en PET. De references VF-xxxSP (sans gel seperateur) et VF-xxxSAS (avec gel seperateur), sur automate IMMULITE 2000 de marque DPC. http://afssaps.sante.fr/htm/alertes/filalert/dv050605.pdf (accessed June 29, 2006)..
  8. Landt M, Wilhite TR, Smith CH. A new plastic evacuated tube with plasma separator. J Clin Lab Anal 1995;9:101-106.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Hill BM, Laessig RH, Koch DD, Hassemer DJ. Comparison of plastic versus glass evacuated serum-separator (SST) blood drawing tubes for common chemistry determinations. Clin Chem 1992;38:1474-1478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Reinartz JJ, Ramey ML, Fowler MC, Killeen AA. Plastic vs glass SST evacuated serum-separator blood drawing tubes for endocrinologic analytes [Letter]. Clin Chem 1993;39:2535-2536.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Boeynaems JM, DeLeener A, Dessars B, Villa-Lobos HR, Aubry JC, Cotton F, et al. Evaluation of new generation of plastic evacuated blood collection tubes in clinical chemistry, therapeutic drug monitoring, hormone and trace metal analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004;42:67-71.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Selby C. Interference in immunoassay. Ann Clin Biochem 1999;36:704-721.
  13. Wood WG, Gadow A. Immobolization of antibodies and antigens on macro solid phases—a comparison between adsorptive and covalent binding. A critical review of macro solid phases for use in immunoassay systems. Part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1983;21:789-797.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. VS7336 BD White Paper: A Comparison of Adjusted BD Vacutainer SST Glass Tubes and Adjusted BD Vacutainer SST Plus Tubes in Various Configurations with BD Vacutainer Serum Glass Tubes for Cortisol, Total T3, Total T4, and TSH on the DPC Immulite Analyzer..
  15. Kricka LJ, Park JY, Senior MB, Fontanilla R. Processing controls in blood collection tubes reveals interference. Clin Chem 2005;51:2422-2423.[Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stankovic, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Parmar, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stankovic, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Parmar, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Laboratory Management
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS