Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 53: 53-61, 2007. First published November 27, 2006; 10.1373/clinchem.2006.073015
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow 073015.Supplemental data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2006.073015v1
53/1/53    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mavrogiannou, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lianidou, E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mavrogiannou, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lianidou, E. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Cancer Diagnostics (since 2002)
(Clinical Chemistry. 2007;53:53-61.)
© 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

Cancer Diagnostics

Real-Time RT-PCR Quantification of Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Splice Variants in Tumor Cell Lines and Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Eleni Mavrogiannou1, Areti Strati1, Aliki Stathopoulou1, Emily G. Tsaroucha2, Loukas Kaklamanis3 and Evi S. Lianidou1,a

1 Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
2 "Sotiria" General Hospital for Chest Diseases, Athens, Greece.
3 Department of Pathology, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Athens, 15771 Athens, Greece. Fax 30-210-7274750; e-mail lianidou{at}chem.uoa.gr.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background: We developed and validated a real-time reverse transcription (RT)–PCR for the quantification of 4 individual human telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) splice variants ({alpha}+ß+, {alpha}–ß+, {alpha}+ß–, {alpha}–ß–) in tumor cell lines and non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: We used in silico designed primers and a common TaqMan probe for highly specific amplification of each TERT splice variant, PCR transcript–specific DNA external standards as calibrators, and the MCF-7 cell line for the development and validation of the method. We then quantified TERT splice variants in 6 tumor cell lines and telomerase activity and TERT splice variant expression in cancerous and paired noncancerous tissue samples from 28 NSCLC patients.

Results: In most tumor cell lines, we observed little variation in the proportion of TERT splice variants. The {alpha}+ß– splice variant showed the highest expression and {alpha}–ß+ and {alpha}–ß– the lowest. Quantification of the 4 TERT splice variants in NSCLC and surrounding nonneoplastic tissues showed the highest expression percentage for the {alpha}+ß– variant in both NSCLC and adjacent nonneoplastic tissue samples, followed by {alpha}+ß+, with the {alpha}–ß+ and {alpha}–ß– splice variants having the lowest expression. In the NSCLC tumors, the {alpha}+ß+ variant had higher expression than other splice variants, and its expression correlated with telomerase activity, overall survival, and disease-free survival.

Conclusions: Real-time RT-PCR quantification is a specific, sensitive, and rapid method that can elucidate the biological role of TERT splice variants in tumor development and progression. Our results suggest that the expression of the TERT {alpha}+ß+ splice variant may be an independent negative prognostic factor for NSCLC patients.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Telomerase is a cellular ribonucleoprotein reverse transcriptase, and telomerase RNA segments act as templates for the synthesis of telomeric DNA onto chromosomal ends (1)(2). Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT)1 2 contains the enzyme’s catalytic subunit (1)(2)(3), and the expression of the functional hTERT protein is a prerequisite for acquisition of telomerase activity (4). Telomerase has a direct role in early oncogenic transformation (3)(5)(6)(7), and through its activation, cancer cells stabilize their telomere size and sustain their unlimited growth (7)(8)(9). Moreover, the in vitro malignant transformation of normal human cells was achieved by reconstitution of telomerase activity by induction of TERT gene expression in combination with other oncogenes (5)(10). More than 85% of most human tumors express telomerase activity (11), and essentially all major types of cancer have been screened for the presence of TERT mRNA in a variety of clinical specimens (12).

Splice variants that are found predominantly in tumors have clear diagnostic value and may provide potential drug targets (13)(14)(15). TERT has been shown to contain at least 6 alternative splicing sites (16)(17)(18)(19)(20); however, only the full-length TERT transcript is associated with telomerase activity (16)(17)(18). The {alpha} splice site causes a 36-bp deletion within the conserved reverse transcriptase motif A (16) and was found to be a dominant negative inhibitor of telomerase activity (21). The ß splice site causes a 182-bp deletion leading to a nonsense mutation truncating the protein before the conserved reverse transcriptase motifs, resulting in a nonactive TERT protein and catalytically inactive telomerase (16)(17)(18). Alternative splicing of TERT may be a novel mechanism of telomerase regulation (22), and TERT mRNA splicing patterns have been studied in immortal human cells (23) and benign and malignant breast tumors (24) in an attempt to elucidate their biological role. The quantitative relationship between functionally active telomerase and the major telomerase components TERT and hTR in acute leukemia cells was recently studied (25). The expression of the {alpha}-negative splice variant can inhibit telomerase activity (26) in telomerase-positive cells and causes telomere shortening and eventually cell death. The function and biological role of TERT splice variants is still unknown, however (2)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26).

Expression of TERT was found to be an independent negative prognostic factor for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (27)(28)(29)(30). Telomerase activity and TERT mRNA expression were detected at a very high percentage in lung carcinoma and are considered poor prognostic indicators in NSCLC. Telomerase activity was not found to correlate with clinicopathologic variables, however, and TERT was not associated with prognosis and did not correlate with any clinical variables (31). Determination of telomerase activity by in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and TRAP assay has been reported to be useful for evaluating the diagnosis and prognosis of lung carcinomas (32). Very recently, alternative splicing of TERT was found to be involved in the control of telomerase activity in lung cancer (33)(34).

We previously developed a quantitative luminometric hybridization assay for telomerase activity (35) and for TERT ß-plus transcript (36)(37). We developed a quantitative real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR method for 4 individual TERT splice variants to clarify their quantitative relationship in tumor cell lines and in NSCLC tissues and their surrounding noncancerous tissues. We also investigated the correlation of TERT splice variant expression and telomerase activity with the clinical outcome of NSCLC patients.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
cell lines and culture
We used the human mammary carcinoma cell line MCF-7 for the development and validation of the assay and studied the expression of TERT splice variants in 6 human cancer cell lines, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, COLO205, K562, T47D, and HeLa (http://www.atcc.org/common/catalog).

patients and tissue samples
Lung carcinomas and adjacent nonneoplastic tissues were obtained from 28 NSCLC patients. All patients gave their informed consent to participate in the study, which was approved by the ethics and scientific committees of our institution. The tumor types and stages were determined according to the WHO classification. At the time of surgery, all tissue samples were immediately flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C. All samples were analyzed histologically to access the account of tumor component (at least 70% of tumor cells) and the quality of material (i.e., absence of necrosis).

total rna isolation and cdna synthesis
Total cellular RNA was isolated with the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Reagent Set (Qiagen) for lung tissue samples and the Trizol LS reagent (Invitrogen) for cell lines, according to the manufacturers’ instructions. All preparation and handling steps of RNA took place in a laminar flow hood under RNase-free conditions. The isolated RNA was dissolved in RNA storage buffer (Ambion) and stored at –70 °C until used. RNA concentration was determined in the NanoDrop® ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies). We used 1 µg of total RNA to perform reverse transcription of RNA with the SuperScript III Kit (Invitrogen) in a total volume of 20 µL, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA integrity of all cDNA preparations was tested by real-time PCR amplification of the HPRT (hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase) gene (LightCycler-h-HPRT, Roche).

quantitative real-time rt-pcr
Primer and probe design.
Four highly specific primers and the TaqMan probe were in silico designed in our laboratory (see Table 1 in the Data Supplement that accompanies the online version of this article at http://www.clinchem.org/content/vol53/issue1). The principle of the developed real-time RT-PCR assay is shown in Fig. 1 . Segments 1–5 do not represent the exons of the TERT gene; for simplicity, segment 2 represents the {alpha}-deletion site, and segment 4 represents the ß-deletion site. Primer TE 1/2 was designed to amplify both TERT {alpha}+ splice variants ({alpha}+ß+, {alpha}+ß–), and TER3 was designed to amplify both {alpha}– splice variants ({alpha}–ß+, {alpha}–ß–). Primer KAT4b was designed to amplify ß+ splice variants ({alpha}+ß+, {alpha}–ß+), and TER2 was designed to amplify ß– splice variants ({alpha}+ß–, {alpha}–ß–). Primer combinations for each splice variant were as follows: TE 1/2–KAT4b, {alpha}+ß+; TE 1/2–TER2, {alpha}+ß–; TER3–KAT4b, {alpha}–ß+; and TER3–TER2, {alpha}–ß–. All primers were designed to have similar melting temperatures, so that all PCRs could be performed in the same run. Quantification of TERT splice variant mRNA was performed in the LightCycler (Roche).


Figure 1
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 1. Principle of the proposed real-time RT-PCR assay for the quantification of 4 TERT splice variants.

Abbreviations: seg, segment; FL, 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM); Q, 5-carboxytetramethye rhodamine.

Real-time PCR conditions.
Real-time-PCR was performed in a total volume of 10 µL per reaction. We placed 1 µL of cDNA into a 9-µL reaction mixture that contained 0.1 µL of Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/µL, Platinum DNA Polymerase; Invitrogen), 1 µL of the supplied 10x PCR buffer, 0.5 µL of MgCl2 (50 mmol/L), 0.2 µL of dNTPs (10 mmol/L; Fermentas), 0.15 µL of bovine serum albumin (10 g/L; Serva), 0.5 µL of the appropriate sense primer for each splice variant, 0.5 µL of the corresponding antisense primer (3 µmol/L), and 1 µL of the TaqMan probe (3 µmol/L); finally, DEPC–H2O was added to a final volume of 10 µL. The cycling protocol was identical for all splice variants and consisted of an initial 5-min denaturation step at 95 °C, followed by 50 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s, annealing at 65 °C for 20 s, and extension at 72 °C for 20 s.

preparation of external standards for each individual tert splice variant
We prepared 4 external standards specific for the 4 TERT splice variants, as previously described (38). cDNA was synthesized from total RNA extracted from 105 MCF-7 cells and served as a template for the amplification of each TERT splice variant by real-time PCR with the above-described specific primers. RT-PCR products were run on a 3% agarose gel, and splice variant–specific bands (see Fig. 1 in the online Data Supplement) were excised, the amplicons were purified (UltraCleanTM, GelSpinTM DNA Purification Kit; MO BIO) and quantified with the PicoGreen DNA Quantification Kit (Molecular Probes). Serial dilutions of these stock amplicon solutions, 1 x 101 to 1 x 104 copies/µL, were kept in 10-µL aliquots in DNase/RNase-free water at –20 °C until use and served as external standards throughout the study. For each target, a calibration curve was created by plotting the concentration of each external standard expressed as copy numbers per microliter vs the value of the corresponding crossing point (Cp).

telomere repeat amplification protocol (trap) assay for telomerase activity
Telomerase activity in NSCLC tissues samples was assessed with the Telo TAGGG Telomerase PCR-ELISAPLUS Kit (Roche), according to the manufacturer’s instructions (8).

statistical analysis
For each TERT splice variant, we used the McNemar and Fisher exact tests (Statmost; DataMost Corp) to compare mRNA expression and telomerase activity. Correlations among TERT {alpha}+ß+ mRNA quantitative levels, telomerase activity, and clinicopathologic features were assessed by the Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Survival times were calculated from the date of surgery to the occurrence of cancer-related events. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant (SPSS).


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
quantitative real-time rt-pcr for tert splice variants
Analytical characteristics.
We performed extensive optimization of the primers and probe concentrations, MgCl2 concentration, and reaction temperatures and times (data not shown).

To determine the analytical sensitivity and linearity of the proposed real-time RT-PCR assay, splice variant-specific TERT external standards were used. For each splice variant, a calibration curve was generated by serial dilutions of 1 x 101 to 1 x 104 copies of the target of interest per reaction. All calibration curves showed linearity over the entire quantification range (R2, 0.9929–0.9997) (see Fig. 2 in the online Data Supplement).

To determine within-run precision of the assay, we tested 3 different concentrations of each TERT splice variant in the same run in 4 parallel determinations, and for between-run precision, we assayed 3 different concentrations of each TERT splice variant in 7 different experiments (all performed in a 1-month period) (Table 1 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Precision study of the real-time RT-PCR assay for TERT splice variants.

Specificity.
When cDNA, derived from 105 MCF-7 cells, was amplified after 50 cycles by real-time PCR, agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products revealed only one specific product of the desired length for each splice variant (see Fig. 1 in the online Data Supplement).

The specificity of our assay was further evaluated by running real-time RT-PCR experiments with the specific primers for each splice variant in samples containing purified PCR amplicons corresponding to the other individual TERT splice variants. Each TERT splice variant was amplified only by its corresponding specific primer pair, and the cross-reactions between them were negligible. In this way, each TERT splice variant was specifically quantified even in the presence of all the rest, a crucial technique to avoid false-positive quantitative results (see Table 2 in the online Data Supplement).

Sensitivity.
The analytical detection limit of the method, defined as 3.3 times the SD of the crossing point for the less concentrated external standard for each splice variant divided by the mean slope of the corresponding calibration curve, was found to be to 3 x 100 copies/reaction for {alpha}+ß+, 7 x 100 copies/reaction for {alpha}–ß+, 2 x 100 copies/reaction for {alpha}+ß–, and 2 x 100 copies/reaction for {alpha}–ß–. The analytical limit of quantification, defined as 3 times the detection limit, was 9 x 100 copies/reaction for {alpha}+ß+, 2 x 101 copies/reaction for {alpha}–ß+, 6 x 100 copies/reaction for {alpha}+ß–, and 6 x 100 copies/reaction for {alpha}–ß–.

quantification of tert splice variants in tumor cell lines
In all cell lines except COLO-205, the most abundantly expressed splice variant was {alpha}+ß– (51.0%–74.7%), followed by the full active transcript {alpha}+ß+ (25.3%–43.9%). The {alpha}+ß+ splice variant, which encodes the catalytically active TERT protein, was the most abundant splice variant in COLO-205 cells. The less abundant splice variants {alpha}–ß+ and {alpha}–ß– were not detected at all in T47D cells, whereas the {alpha}–ß+ splice variant was also not detected in MDA-MB-231 and HeLa tumor cell lines. Both of them were detected at very low percentages in the remaining cell lines (see Fig. 3 in the online Data Supplement).

quantification of tert splice variants in nsclc paired tissue samples
Quantification of the 4 TERT splice variants was performed in 28 pairs of NSCLC tissues and their adjacent nonneoplastic tissues. Both {alpha}+ß– and {alpha}+ß+ splice variants were the most abundant transcripts in NSCLC tissue samples (23 of 28; 82.1%), and the {alpha}–ß+ and {alpha}–ß– splice variants had the lowest expressions [8 of 28 (28.6%) and 15 of 28 (53.6%), respectively]. In adjacent nonneoplastic tissue, the {alpha}–ß+ and {alpha}–ß– splice variants were not expressed at all, the {alpha}+ß+ splice variant was detected in 2 of 28 (7.1%), and the {alpha}+ß– was detected in 8 of 28 (28.6%), respectively. In NSCLC tissues, the {alpha}+ß+ had the highest expression of all (median, 119 copies/µg of total RNA; range, 0–1366), followed by {alpha}+ß– (median, 75 copies/µg of total RNA; range, 0–351) (Fig. 2A ). The {alpha}–ß+ and {alpha}–ß– splice variants were found in very small concentrations ({alpha}–ß+ median, 3 copies/µg of total RNA, range, 0–20; {alpha}–ß– median, 17 copies/µg total RNA, range, 0–393). TERT expression was significantly higher in tumor tissues than in nonneoplastic tissues ({alpha}+ß+, P = 0.000; {alpha}+ß–, P = 0.000; {alpha}–ß+, P = 0.000; {alpha}–ß–, P = 0.001; calculated with the Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test).


Figure 2
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 2. Quantification of TERT splice variants in NSCLC and their adjacent nonneoplastic tissue samples.

(A), absolute quantification (copies per microgram of total RNA). (B), expression (%) of individual TERT splice variants in NSCLC tissues.

In a bar chart showing the proportion of the alternatively splicing variants for each tumor specimen (Fig. 2BUp ), remarkable heterogeneity is seen between NSCLC tumor tissues with respect to TERT splicing variant profiles. The {alpha}+ß– splice variant was the most abundant of all, making up 100% of the TERT transcripts in 2 adenocarci- noma samples, whereas in most other tumors, it made up the majority of all TERT splice variants. The {alpha}+ß+ full active TERT splice variant represents the majority (>50%) of TERT splice variants in many tumors, and the {alpha}–ß– and {alpha}–ß+ splice variants were found in very low percentages. It is remarkable to note that the {alpha}–ß– transcript was detected at a very high percentage in 1 squamous carcinoma sample.

clinical relevance of the detection of tert {alpha}+ß+ splice variant and telomerase activity in patients with nsclc
Our analysis of the concordance between telomerase activity and TERT splice variant expression in 28 paired NSCLC tumor and adjacent noncancerous tissues (Table 2 ) indicated that relative telomerase activity (RTA) did not correlate (P >0.05) with any clinicopathologic feature of the patients in the population studied. We observed similar lack of correlation for TERT {alpha}+ß+ mRNA expression (P >0.05) as quantified by the developed real-time RT-PCR methodology (Table 3 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. Relationship between telomerase activity and TERT splice variant mRNA in NSCLC (n = 28).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3. TERT {alpha}+ß+ mRNA expression and telomerase activity in relation to clinicopathologic features and clinical outcome of NSCLC patients.

Relapse.
The disease-free survival curves in NSCLC patients demonstrated significantly shorter survival in patients with TERT {alpha}+ß+ mRNA-positive tumors than in patients with TERT {alpha}+ß+ mRNA-negative tumors. During the follow-up period, 16 of 28 patients (57.1%) developed metastases; 15 of these patients (93.8%) were TERT {alpha}+ß+ mRNA-positive and had significantly higher scores than the 6 patients who were also TERT {alpha}+ß+ mRNA-positive and had not relapsed (Table 3Up ). The Kaplan–Meier estimates of the cumulative disease-free interval (DFI) for the TERT {alpha}+ß+ mRNA-positive and negative groups were significantly different (log rank test, P = 0.0166) in favor of patients who were TERT {alpha}+ß+ mRNA-negative (Fig. 3A ). When all cases in which at least 1 splice variant was detected were considered TERT positive, however, there was not a significant difference (log rank test, P = 0.6321) in the cumulative DFI for the TERT mRNA-positive and negative groups (data not shown). Eleven of the 16 (68.8%) patients that relapsed were positive for telomerase activity, and there was no significant difference in RTA levels between those patients from those who were telomerase positive but did not show any relapse (P >0.05; Table 3Up ). The DFI curves estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method demonstrated that patients with positive telomerase activity had poorer prognoses (log rank test, P = 0.0499) than those with negative telomerase activity (Fig. 3B ).


Figure 3
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier estimates of DFI and overall survival (OS).

(A), Kaplan–Meier estimates of DFI for the NSCLC patients with or without TERT {alpha}+ß+ mRNA expression (P = 0.0166). (B), Kaplan–Meier estimates of DFI for the NSCLC patients with or without telomerase activity (P = 0.0499). (C), Kaplan–Meier estimates of OS for the NSCLC patients with or without TERT {alpha}+ß+ mRNA expression (P = 0.0296). (D), Kaplan–Meier estimates of OS for the NSCLC patients with or without telomerase activity (P = 0.0202).

Overall survival.
During the follow-up period, 14 of 28 (50%) patients died; however, 12 of 28 (42.8%) died from lung cancer. All patients who died were positive for TERT {alpha}+ß+ mRNA, with a score approximately 4 times higher than those who were alive and positive for TERT {alpha}+ß+ mRNA (Table 3Up ). The Kaplan–Meier estimates of the overall survival rates for the TERT {alpha}+ß+ positive and negative groups were significantly different (log rank test, P = 0.0296) in favor of patients who were TERT {alpha}+ß+ mRNA negative (Fig. 3CUp ). Furthermore, 10 of 12 (83.3%) patients who died were positive for telomerase activity, with an RTA score ~3 times higher than those who were alive and positive (Table 3Up ). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a significant difference (log rank test, P = 0.02) in overall survival rates between patients with positive and negative telomerase activity in favor of those patients who were negative (Fig. 3DUp ).


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
We describe the development and analytical validation of a real-time RT-PCR assay for the absolute quantification of TERT splice variants {alpha}+ß+, {alpha}–ß+, {alpha}+ß– and {alpha}–ß–, a method for quantifying the expression of each individual TERT splice variant in 6 tumor cell lines. All the cell lines studied expressed the TERT full-length message, together with different combinations of alternatively spliced variants, with surprisingly little variation in the proportion of alternatively spliced forms of TERT except in COLO-205. Our finding of a relatively high percentage for the {alpha}+ß+ splice variant (~50%) in all of these cell lines strikingly differs from the lower percentage (~4%) reported in a previous study (23). The differing results may be attributable to our use of quantitative real-time RT-PCR for each splice variant, in the same cDNA and under the same experimental conditions, whereas in the previous study, a semiquantitative method was used (23). As previously suggested (23), however, our study also shows surprisingly little variation in the proportion of alternatively splicing forms of TERT among the different cell lines.

The expression of all TERT splice variants in NSCLC was significantly higher than in adjacent nonneoplastic tissues. The most abundant transcripts were {alpha}+ß– and {alpha}+ß+, and the least abundant were {alpha}–ß+ and {alpha}–ß–. The most impressive difference between squamous and adenocarcinomatous samples was the very low expression of only one splice variant ({alpha}+ß–) in 2 of 15 (13.3%) adenocarcinomas, one of which was positive and the other negative for telomerase activity. The fact that there is a significant heterogeneity in the expression of TERT splice variants in NSCLC raises many questions about the possible role of the alternate transcripts of TERT in the regulation of telomerase and in malignant transformation.

Although in most cases, results of TERT {alpha}+ß+ expression and telomerase activity did not differ significantly (concordance, 20 of 28; 71.4%; P = 0.343), discordant results occurred in 8 cases. A possible explanation for the 7 cases negative for telomerase activity, in which TERT {alpha}+ß+ expression was detected could be the lower detection limit for the TERT assay and the coexpression of other TERT splice variants in these samples. There were 2 tumor samples with relatively low telomerase activity and very high TERT {alpha}+ß+ expression. In both of these samples, we detected a relatively high percentage of the {alpha}–ß+ splice variant, the {alpha}-dominant negative, which has been found to be a negative inhibitor of telomerase activity (21)(26). In addition, the procedure for active telomerase isolation needed for TERT expression analysis has many more steps, and thus possibly lower recovery, than total RNA isolation. On the other hand, we found only 1 sample positive for telomerase activity and negative for TERT {alpha}+ß+, possibly because of PCR artifacts. According to our results, by using primers that amplify a region in the TERT mRNA that is common for all splice variants, we overestimated the positivity of our samples (P = 0.0076), because a high expression of the {alpha}–ß+ splice variant is a negative inhibitor of telomerase activity.

The detection of TERT {alpha}+ß+ splice variant had prognostic implications for NSCLC patients because it was associated with decreased DFI (P = 0.003). During the follow-up period, 12 patients died from disease relapse. Although statistical analysis suggests that there is an association between the quantification of TERT {alpha}+ß+ mRNA and the hazard of death (P = 0.003), the quite small number of patients make us cautious about the interpretation of this finding.

In conclusion, we have developed a highly specific, sensitive, and rapid real-time RT-PCR method for quantitative determination of individual TERT splice variants. We correlated individual TERT splice variant expression with telomerase activity and found that the use of primers that amplify a region in the TERT mRNA that is common to all splice variants leads to overestimation of sample positivity. Quantification of TERT {alpha}+ß+ mRNA is a significant prognostic indicator associated with shortened DFI and overall survival in NSCLC patients. Future studies are needed to further evaluate and confirm our findings in a larger number of patients. Through our results and those of many others, many questions have arisen about the possible role of the alternate transcripts of TERT in the regulation of telomerase and in malignant transformation.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Prof. V. Georgoulias (Laboratory of Tumor Biology, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece) and Prof. E.P. Diamandis (Department of Pathobiology and Laboratory, Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) for kindly providing the tumor cell lines used in this study. We also thank Roche Hellas (Roche Diagnostics, Athens, Greece) for kindly providing the LightCycler instrument.


   Footnotes
 
1 Nonstandard abbreviations: TERT, telomerase reverse transcriptase; NSCLC, non–small cell lung cancer; RT, reverse transcription; RTA, relative telomerase activity; DFI, disease-free interval.

2 Human genes: TERT, telomerase reverse transcriptase (Homo sapiens); HPRT, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Blackburn EH. Telomerase and cancer. Mol Cancer Res 2005;3:477-482.[Free Full Text]
  2. Cong YS, Wright W, Shay J. Human telomerase and its regulation [Review]. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002;66:407-425.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Hahn W. Role of Telomeres and Telomerase in the Pathogenesis of Human Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:2034-2043.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Nakamura TM, Morin GB, Chapman KB, Weinrich SL, Andrews WH, Lingner J, et al. Telomerase catalytic subunit homologs from fission yeast and human. Science 1997;277:955-959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hahn W, Counter C, Lundberg A, Beijersbergen R, Brooks M, Weinberg R. Creation of human tumor cells with defined genetic elements. Nature 1999;400:464-468.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Kelland L. Overcoming the immortality of tumor cells by telomere and telomerase based cancer therapeutics—current status and future prospects. Eur J Cancer 2005;41:971-979.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Weitzman J, Yaniv M. Rebuilding the road to cancer. Nature 1999;400:401-402.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Kim N, Piatyszek M, Prowse K, Harley C, West M, Ho P, et al. Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer. Science 1994;266:2011-2014.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Chang M, Grillari J, Mayrhofer C, Fortschegger K, Allmaier G, Marzban G, et al. Comparison of early passage, senescent and hTERT immortalized endothelial cells. Exp Cell Res 2005;309:121-136.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Bodnar A, Ouellette M, Frolkis M, Holt S, Chiu C, Morin G, et al. Extension of life-span by introduction of telomerase into normal human cells. Science 1998;279:349-352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Shay J, Bacchetti S. A survey of telomerase activity in human cancer. Eur J Cancer 1997;33:787-791.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Kirkpatrick KL, Morbel K. The significance of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) in cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2001;27:754-760.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Kalnina Z, Zayakin P, Silina K, Line A. Alterations of pre-mRNA splicing in cancer [Review]. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2005;42:342-357.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Brinkman B. Splice variants as cancer biomarkers [Review]. Clin Biochem 2004;37:584-594.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Matlin JA, Clark F, Smith C. Understanding alternative splicing: towards a cellular code [Review]. Nat Rev 2005;6:386-398.
  16. Ulaner G, Hu JF, Vu T, Giudice L, Hoffmann A. Telomerase activity in human development is regulated by human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) transcription and by alternate splicing of hTERT transcripts. Cancer Res 1998;58:4168-4172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ulaner AG, Hu Ji-F, Vu HT, Oruganti H, Giudice CL, Hoffman RA. Regulation of telomerase by alternative splicing of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) in normal and neoplastic ovary, endometrium and myometrium. Int J Cancer 2000;85:330-335.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Ulaner AG, Hu Ji-F, Vu H, Giudice L, Hoffmann A. Tissue-specific alternate splicing of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) influences telomere lengths during human development. Int J Cancer 2001;91:644-649.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Hisatomi H, Ohyashiki K, Ohyashiki JH, Nagao K, Kanamaru T, Hirata H, et al. Expression profile of a gamma-deletion variant of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase gene. Neoplasia 2003;5:193-197.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Nagao K, Katsumata K, Aizawa Y, Saito N, Hirata H, Sasaki H, et al. Differential alternative splicing expressions of telomerase reverse transcriptase in gastrointestinal cell lines. Oncol Rep 2004;11:127-131.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Colgin L, Wilkinson C, Englezou A, Kilian A, Robinson M, Reddel R. The hTERT a splice variant is a dominant negative inhibitor of telomerase activity. Neoplasia 2000;2:426-432.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Cerezo A, Kalthoff H, Schermann M, Schafer B, Boukamp P. Dual regulation of telomerase activity through c-Myc-dependent inhibition and alternative splicing of hTERT. J Cell Sci 2002;115:1305-1312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Yi X, Shay JW, Wright WE. Quantitation of telomerase components and hTERT mRNA splicing patterns in immortal human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:4818-4825.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Zaffaroni N, Della Porta C, Villa R, Botti C, Buglioni S, Mottolese M, et al. Transcription and alternative splicing of telomerase reverse transcriptase in benign and malignant breast tumours and in adjacent mammary glandular tissues: implications for telomerase activity. J Pathol 2002;198:37-46.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Ohyashiki JH, Hisatomi H, Nagao K, Honda S, Takaku T, Zhang Y, et al. Quantitative relationship between functionally active telomerase and major telomerase components (hTERT and hTR) in acute leukaemia cells. Br J Cancer 2005;92:1942-1947.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Yi X, White MD, Aisner LD, Baur AJ, Wright EW, Shay WJ. An alternative splicing variant of the human telomerase catalytic subunit inhibits telomerase activity. Neoplasia 2000;2:433-440.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Komiya T, Kawase I, Nitta T, Yasumitsu T, Kikui M, Fukuoka M, et al. Prognostic significance of hTERT expression in NSCLC. Int J Oncol 2000;16:1173-1177.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Hara H, Yamashita K, Shinada J, Yoshimura H, Kameya T. Clinicopathologic significance of telomerase activity and hTERT mRNA expression in NSCLC. Lung Cancer 2001;34:219-226.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Wang L, Soria JC, Kemp B, Liu D, Mao L, Khuri F. hTERT expression is a prognostic factor of survival in patients with stage I NSCLC. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:2883-2889.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Lantuejoul S, Soria JC, Moro-Sibilot D, Morat L, Veyrenc S, Lorimier P, et al. Differential expression of telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) in lung tumors. Br J Cancer 2004;90:1222-1229.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Wu TC, Lin P, Hsu C, Huang Y, Chen C, Chung W, et al. Loss of telomerase activity may be a potential favorable prognostic marker in lung carcinomas. Lung Cancer 2003;41:163-169.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Kumaki F, Kawai T, Hiroi S, Shinomiya N, Ozeki Y, Ferrans V, et al. Telomerase activity and expression of human telomerase RNA component and human telomerase reverse transcriptase in lung carcinomas. Hum Pathol 2001;32:188-195.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Fujiwara M, Kamma H, Wu W, Hamasaki M, Kaneko S, Horiguchi H, et al. Expression and alternative splicing pattern of human telomerase reverse transcriptase in human lung cancer cells. Int J Oncol 2004;24:925-930.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Zaffaroni N, Villa R, Pastorino U, Cirincione R, Incarbone M, Alloisio M, et al. Lack of telomerase activity in lung carcinoids is dependent on human telomerase reverse transcriptase transcription and alternative splicing and is associated with long telomeres. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:2832-2839.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Kolioliou M, Talieri M, Lianidou E. Development of a quantitative luminometric hybridization assay for the determination of telomerase activity. Clin Biochem 2001;34:277-284.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Angelopoulou K, Spiropoulou T, Stathopoulou A, Dimitropoulos D, Malamos N, Georgoulias V, et al. Development of a highly sensitive RT-PCR luminometric hybridization assay for human telomerase reverse-transcriptase beta-plus transcript. Anticancer Res 2003;23:4821-4830.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Spiropoulou T, Ferekidou L, Angelopoulou K, Stathopoulou A, Talieri M, Lianidou E. Effect of antineoplastic agents on the expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase ß plus transcript in MCF-7 cells. Clin Biochem 2004;37:299-304.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Zygalaki E, Stathopoulou A, Kroupis C, Kaklamanis L, Kyriakides Z, Kremastinos D, et al. Real-time reverse transcription-PCR quantification of vascular endothelial growth factor splice variants. Clin Chem 2005;51:1518-1520.[Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow 073015.Supplemental data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2006.073015v1
53/1/53    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mavrogiannou, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lianidou, E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mavrogiannou, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lianidou, E. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Cancer Diagnostics (since 2002)

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS