Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 53: 91-97, 2007. First published November 16, 2006; 10.1373/clinchem.2006.075176
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2006.075176v1
53/1/91    most recent
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by González-Sánchez, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Serrano-Ríos, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by González-Sánchez, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Serrano-Ríos, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism
(Clinical Chemistry. 2007;53:91-97.)
© 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Endocrinology and Metabolism

Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Haplotypes Are Associated with Features of Metabolic Syndrome

José L. González-Sánchez, María T. Martínez-Larrad, María E. Sáez, Carina Zabena, María J. Martínez-Calatrava and Manuel Serrano-Ríosa

Department of Internal Medicine II, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Cea Bermúdez 66, 5° G. 28003 Madrid-Spain, Fax: +34-91-4429705; e-mail uinvest7.hcsc{at}salud.madrid.org.


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Background: The metabolic syndrome, a cluster of several metabolic disorders, is increasingly being recognized as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Endothelium-derived nitric oxide facilitates skeletal muscle glucose uptake, and data from animal models indicate that endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene–null mice present with a phenotype of insulin resistance, hypertension, and hypertriglyceridemia, much like that observed in humans with metabolic syndrome. We used haplotype tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (htSNPs) to investigate the role of genetic variation in the eNOS gene (NOS3) in metabolic syndrome in humans.

Methods: We recruited 738 unrelated persons from a cross-sectional population-based epidemiological survey in the province of Segovia in Central Spain (Castille). Metabolic syndrome was defined according to the recently modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.

Results: Haplotype analysis showed a statistically significant association between some NOS3 gene variants and features of metabolic syndrome. Relative to the most common haplotype, 121, the haplotype 212 was associated with an increased odds ratio (OR) for metabolic syndrome [OR = 1.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–2.84], and for decreased HDL-cholesterol concentrations (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.01–2.29), and with increased mean values for the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (P = 0.043), and triglycerides (P = 0.026).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that genetic variation at the eNOS locus is associated with features of metabolic syndrome, and might represent a new genetic susceptibility component for insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia, and low HDL-cholesterol concentrations.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The metabolic syndrome, a cluster of disturbed glucose and insulin metabolism, abdominal obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, predicts the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease (1)(2). In addition to lifestyle features such as poor diet and physical inactivity, several studies have suggested a heritable basis to the etiology of metabolic syndrome (3)(4)(5)(6). Although this concept has recently been challenged, we and others feel that the heritability of metabolic syndrome represents a powerful valid working hypothesis that unifies the metabolic factors underlying the development of both atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and diabetes (7)(8).

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS)1 is involved in production of nitric oxide (NO), a ubiquitous molecule responsible for the maintenance of normal endothelial function. Among its many roles, NO facilitates the uptake and metabolism of glucose in skeletal muscle (9)(10). By contrast, the superoxidative effects of NO, which may occur through functional variation in NO synthase genes, may play a role in insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes (11).

In humans, eNOS is encoded by the NOS32 gene, which is located at 7q35–36. Several authors have reported an association between polymorphic alleles of the NOS3 gene and hypertension (12)(13), but the demonstration of such associations has not been replicated by others using the same genetic markers (14)(15). These discrepancies could be due to different ethnic populations, study design, and sample size. In addition, variants at the NOS3 gene have been related to type 2 diabetes mellitus (16), insulin resistance (17)(18)(19), plasma lipids, body mass index (20)(21), and metabolic syndrome (22).

Interestingly, it has recently been reported that genomic variation within the NOS3-proximal region of chromosome 7q influences both insulin resistance and blood pressure (23), suggesting that this locus may influence traits associated with metabolic syndrome. Furthermore, other studies of partial eNOS knockout mice demonstrate that these animals are hypertensive, hyperinsulinemic, dyslipidemic, and have decreased insulin-stimulated glucose uptake compared with wild-type mice (24). Because these pathophysiological disorders are central features of the metabolic syndrome, the purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between NOS3 gene haplotypes and metabolic syndrome defined according to National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III recently modified guidelines (25) in the general Spanish (Caucasian) population.


   Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
population: the segovia study, spain
The Segovia Study was designed as a cross-sectional, population-based study of the prevalence of anthropometric and physiological parameters related to obesity and other components of the metabolic syndrome. It was conducted in rural and urban areas of the province of Segovia (Community of Castilla-León) in Central Spain. A detailed report of this study has been recently published (26). In brief, a random sample of 2992 men and nonpregnant women ages 35–74 years were selected from a target population of 63 417 inhabitants, of which 1033 persons agreed to participate. Persons with a previous diagnosis of type 1 diabetes were excluded (n = 133) from the sample. All study participants gave written informed consent to participate in the study. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos of Madrid. A random sample (n = 738) was successfully genotyped for variants at the NOS3 locus.

phenotype measurements
Anthropometric measurements included body mass index (kg/m2), waist circumference (cm), and waist-to-hip ratio. Waist-to-hip ratio was calculated by dividing waist circumference (cm) by hip circumference (cm). Waist measurements were made with a nonstretchable fiber measuring tape while study participants were standing erect in a relaxed position with both feet together on a flat surface. Waist girth was measured as the smallest horizontal girth between the costal margins and the iliac crests at minimal respiration. Hip measure was taken as the greatest circumference at the level of the greater trochanters (the widest portion of the hip) on both sides. Measurements were made to the nearest centimeter. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured 3 times on persons in the seated position after 10 min of rest; measurements were read to the nearest even digit by use of a random-zero sphygmomanometer.

After participants had fasted overnight, 20 mL of blood were obtained from an antecubital vein without compression. Plasma glucose was determined in duplicate by a glucose-oxidase method adapted to an automated analyzer (Hitachi 704, Boehringer Mannheim). Total cholesterol, triglycerides and HDL cholesterol were determined by enzymatic methods with commercial reagent sets (Boehringer Mannheim). LDL cholesterol was calculated by the Friedewald formula. Serum insulin, adiponectin, and leptin concentrations were determined by RIA (Human Insulin Specific, Human Adiponectin Specific, and Human Leptin Specific, respectively, Linco Research Inc.).

One and 2 h after glucose administration, we obtained blood samples and measured glucose and insulin concentrations. Insulin resistance was estimated by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) method (27).

In the present study we used the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III definition of metabolic syndrome, recently modified (25) for analysis of the association between NOS3 haplotypes and metabolic syndrome in a population-based study.

genetic analyses
Twelve previously described NOS3 gene variants were genotyped (16). Five of these single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (IVS2 + 42, IVS6–26, IVS11–30, E298D – rs1799983, IVS25 + 15) were identified from de novo polymorphism screening in a human diversity panel with 47 samples from 4 distinct ethnic groups including our population of Segovia (16). The remaining 7 candidate SNPs (rs31800783, rs31800779, rs32070744, rs33800787, rs3918166, rs3918212, and rs3918220) were selected from dbSNP database to increase coverage of the gene. SNPs rs3918166, rs3918212, and rs3918220 were monomorphic in the population studied here. dbSNPs were genotyped by use of an adaptation of the homogenous MassExtend protocol supplied by Sequenom for the MassArray system. In summary, for each polymorphism we used an adaptation of the fluorescence polarization template-directed incorporation method to genotype DNA from leukocytes (16). Primer extension preamplification–amplified DNA samples were PCR amplified in 8 µL reactions with primers flanking the variant site, and unincorporated dNTP and remaining unused primer were degraded by exonuclease I and shrimp alkaline phosphatase at 37 °C for 45 min before the enzymes were heat inactivated at 95 °C for 15 min. At the end of the reaction, the samples were held at 4 °C. Single-base primer extension reactions were performed as previously described (28), and allele detection was performed by measuring fluorescence polarization on an LJL Analyst fluorescent reader (Molecular Devices).

statistical analysis
We compared genotype and allele frequency distributions with the {chi}2 test and computed Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium to the expected genotype distribution. We used Student t-test and ANOVA (with Bonferroni test for post hoc comparisons) to compare continuous variables [expressed as means (SD)], and the {chi}2 test to compare categorical variables. Continuous variables that did not have a gaussian distribution were log-transformed.

Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate associations of SNPs with metabolic syndrome. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. The null hypothesis was rejected in each statistical test when P <0.05. Analysis was performed with the Windows SPSS version 11.0 software (SPSS, Inc.).

Haplotype-tagging SNPs (htSNPs) were selected with the htSNP program (available online at http://www.gene.cimr.cam.ac.uk/clayton/software/stata/). This program operates on a Stata platform and enables the selection of htSNPs. htSNPs are the SNPs from a group of linked genetic variants that describe a large proportion of the total variance in all of the available SNPs. We selected 3 htSNPs (rs2070744, IVS11–30, and rs3800787) that explained ~54% of the variance incumbent in all SNPs. We then used the Thesias program to estimate the haplotype frequencies of the 3 htSNPs (available online from http://genecanvas.ecgene.net) (29). Because of the previously reported associations between these htSNPs and diabetes in the UK study (16), we chose to proceed by testing the association between the same htSNPs and features of the metabolic syndrome in the Spanish cohort.

We reconstructed haplotypes from the 3 htSNPs (rs2070744, IVS11–30, and rs3800787) and retained 7 common haplotypes (prevalence at >5%) for further analysis. The coding of the haplotypes refers to the allele at each genetic locus (i.e., 1 or 2). Each number within the haplotype is ordered according to its genomic location. Thus, the 1st number refers to allele 1 or 2 at the rs2070744 SNP, the 2nd number refers allele 1 or 2 at the IVS11–30 SNP, and the 3rd number refers to allele 1 or 2 at the rs3800787 SNP. Comparison of haplotype frequencies was done with {chi}2 tests. For quantitative analysis, haplotype effects are expressed as increases/decreases of the phenotypic mean with respect to the most frequent (the intercept). For qualitative analysis, results are expressed as ORs.


   Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
As expected, the clinical characteristics of participants with and without metabolic syndrome differed for several metabolic traits (Table 1 ). Body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, insulin, leptin, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and HOMA-IR were higher and HDL-cholesterol and adiponectin concentrations were lower in individuals with metabolic syndrome than in those without it. Because metabolic syndrome is defined by the clustering of at least 3 metabolic disorders among 5, we looked at the relationship between NOS3 gene variants and each of the features of the metabolic syndrome separately. Hypertriglyceridemia, glucose intolerance, hypertension, and decreased HDL-cholesterol concentrations were defined by NECP-ATPIII metabolic syndrome cutoffs.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Characteristics of study participants with and without metabolic syndrome.

We observed significant differences in genotypic distributions and haplotype frequencies for the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its related phenotype traits. For the NOS3 IVS11–30 SNP, the prevalence of the AA genotype was greater in individuals with insulin resistance determined by HOMA-IR compared with those without insulin resistance (36.9% vs 26.5%, P = 0.020). In addition to increased insulin resistance, AA homozygous individuals had higher total cholesterol concentrations and a trend toward higher LDL-cholesterol and fasting glucose concentrations than individuals with AG heterozygous and GG homozygous genotypes (Table 2 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Anthropometric and metabolic parameters according to the NOS3 IVS11–30 SNP.

For the rs3800787 SNP, the CC genotype was significantly more frequent in individuals with metabolic syndrome than in those without metabolic syndrome (16.4% vs 12.5%, P = 0.010) and in those with decreased HDL-cholesterol concentrations (16.1% vs 12.7%, P = 0.044). Moreover, the CC genotype was also associated with a higher HOMA-IR value (Table 3 ). Thus, the C (2) allele carriers at the rs3800787 locus had higher mean (SD) values for fasting glucose [5.2 (1.5) vs 4.8 (1.3) mmol/L, P = 0.015], and HOMA-IR [3.3 (2.9) vs 2.8 (1.9), P = 0.013] than those with the GG genotype. Moreover, this C allele was also associated with a greater OR for metabolic syndrome (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.22–2.64) and for decreased HDL-cholesterol concentrations (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.11–2.63).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Anthropometric and metabolic parameters according to the rs3800787 SNP.

In haplotype analyses (Table 4 ), we observed that the haplotype 212 was associated with an increased OR for metabolic syndrome (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.15–2.84, P = 0.01), even after adjustment for variables that may affect NO metabolism such as smoking, alcohol intake, type 2 diabetes, and antihypertensive medication (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.14–3.08, P = 0.01). Moreover, this haplotype was also associated with a greater OR for decreased HDL-cholesterol concentrations (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.01–2.29, P = 0.04) and with increased mean values of HOMA-IR (+35.7%, P = 0.043), and triglycerides (+23.7%, P = 0.026) compared with the most frequent haplotype 121.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Estimated haplotypes frequencies in individuals with and without metabolic syndrome.


   Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
We report association between variation at the NOS3 gene locus and features of the metabolic syndrome in a Spanish population. Metabolic syndrome is characterized by several closely associated metabolic disorders. The clustering of abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension in metabolic syndrome is receiving much attention as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In both animal and human models, the endothelial NO pathway appears to be involved in atherosclerosis (30). Endothelium-derived NO is synthesized from L-arginine by eNOS. NO relaxes vascular smooth muscle, inhibits platelet activation, and modulates migration and growth of vascular smooth muscle cells. Some evidence suggests that alterations in the NO pathway might be involved in endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis (31)(32)(33), hypertension(34), and diabetic vascular diseases (35). Recent findings suggest that eNOS knockout mice present a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors comparable to those of the metabolic syndrome. These mice are hypertensive, insulin resistant, and dyslipidemic. Thus, defects in eNOS function may cause metabolic syndrome. Therefore, we looked at the relationship between NOS3 gene variants and each component of metabolic syndrome. Our results showed an association between NOS3 htSNPs, haplotypes and insulin resistance, dyslipidemia (high total cholesterol, low HDL cholesterol, and high triglyceride concentrations), and high fasting plasma glucose concentrations. These findings support the hypothesis that NOS3 gene variants are involved in the physiopathology of metabolic syndrome.

eNOS activation increases muscle blood flow, with increased delivery of insulin’s major substrate, glucose, to the muscle cell (36)(37)(38). These findings are in agreement with our data suggesting that genetic defects in the NOS3 gene may be useful markers of risk for features of the metabolic syndrome, such as dyslipidemia and insulin resistance.

To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the relationships between eNOS haplotypes and metabolic syndrome in a large population-based study. Other studies utilized different study design and smaller sample size (19)(22). In concordance with our results, Fernández ML et al. (22) also reported an association between NOS3 SNPs and metabolic syndrome, but in hypertensive patients. Other eNOS haplotype studies have been focused on the association with hypertension in hypertensive patients (39) and in Brazilian patients without and with type 2 diabetes (40). In contrast to these studies, our study did not find any association between eNOS haplotypes and hypertension. Some other studies have found evidence of association between NOS3 variants and hypertension (12)(13), but 2 other studies (14)(15) did not.

Discrepancies between these studies may be attributable to sample size, study design, and population stratification secondary to ethnic diversity. In this regard, marked interethnic differences in the distribution of eNOS genetic variants and haplotype frequencies have been reported (41)(42). In addition, discrepancies in association studies may also result from consideration limited to only one polymorphism rather than combinations of polymorphisms (haplotypes) (43)(44). Therefore, it is generally believed that analyzing combinations of genetic markers in a region of interest (haplotypes) can be much more informative than testing the effects of genetic markers one by one (44).

At variance with our study, the majority of published studies reporting association between NOS3 gene variants and features of the metabolic syndrome have used several single markers (SNPs) to characterize the genetic architecture. Although genetic association studies using single markers can be valuable in cases in which SNPs are likely to be functional, the probability of detecting a false-positive association increases proportionally with the number of statistical comparisons made. Thus, if the available SNPs are not believed to be functionally related to the phenotype (i.e., they are thought to flag only the true functional variant through high-linkage disequilibrium), association models that make use of haplotypes, which require fewer statistical comparisons to test the same underlying hypotheses, may be more appropriate. Thus, because haplotype approaches are less likely to lead to false discovery, the genetic associations identified in this way may be of greater value.

Recent studies suggest that the extensive variation in human beings is best described by haplotypes (45)(46). Haplotypes are more likely to identify disease associations than single polymorphisms because they reflect global gene structure and encompass the majority of common variations in a gene. Identification of a haplotype associated with increased or decreased disease risk should facilitate identification of the actual functional variant that affects disease risk, because this variant should lie on chromosome regions identified by that haplotype.

The present study does not address the molecular basis for the association of metabolic syndrome with specific eNOS haplotypes. The effect of eNOS variants on enzyme activity and on the production of NO is still a controversial issue. Some polymorphisms in the promoter region (T-786C) have been shown to decrease promoter activity (47). Recent findings, however, suggest that these polymorphisms do not have a significant effect on NO bioavailability (48). Additional but controversial data on the effect on impaired enzyme function of polymorphisms in exon 7 have also been reported (49)(50). Furthermore, it has been suggested that eNOS haplotypes, instead of eNOS genotypes alone, could have a major effect on NO bioavailability (51). Therefore, the molecular mechanisms underlying the association between specific eNOS haplotypes and abnormalities in eNOS activity deserve further investigation.

In summary, our results suggest that genetic variation at the NOS3 locus may increase an individual’s susceptibility to certain components of the metabolic syndrome, specifically insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia, and low HDL-cholesterol concentrations.


   Acknowledgments
 
To the members of the Segovia Insulin Resistance Study Group, we thank Dr Paul W. Franks (Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, Cambridge, U.K) and Dr Inés Barroso (The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Metabolic Disease Group, Cambridge, U.K) for the critical reading of the manuscript. We acknowledge Milagros Pérez Barba for dedicated and careful technical assistance.

This work was supported by grants FEDER 2FD1997-2309 from Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional; FISS 03/1618 from Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias and a grant from Red de Centros RCMN (C03/08), Madrid, Spain.

Partial support also came from educational grants from Eli Lilly Lab, Spain and Bayer Pharmaceutical Co., Spain. We also acknowledge financial support by an educational grant from Santander Central Hispano Bank (GSCH 5292564).


   Footnotes
 
1 Nonstandard abbreviations: eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase; NO, nitric oxide; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; htSNP, haplotype tagging single nucleotide polymorphism; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

2 Human gene: NOS3, nitric oxide synthase 3 (endothelial cell).


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Reaven GM. Banting lecture 1988. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 1988;37:1595-1607.[Abstract]
  2. Liese AD, Mayer-Davis EJ, Haffner SM. Development of the multiple metabolic syndrome: an epidemiologic perspective. Epidemiol Rev 1998;20:157-172.[Free Full Text]
  3. Hong Y, Pedersen NL, Brismar K, de Faire U. Genetic and environmental architecture of the features of the insulin-resistance syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 1997;60:143-152.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Kissebah AH, Sonnenberg GE, Myklebust J, Goldstein M, Broman K, James RG, et al. Quantitative trait loci on chromosomes 3 and 17 influence phenotypes of the metabolic syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:14478-14483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Groop L. Genetics of the metabolic syndrome. Br J Nutr 2000;83:S39-S48.
  6. Isomaa B. A major health hazard: the metabolic syndrome. Life Sci 2003;73:2395-2411.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Grundy SM. Point: the metabolic syndrome still lives. Clin Chem 2005;51:1352-1354.[Free Full Text]
  8. Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet 2005;365:1415-1428.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Balon TW, Nadler JL. Evidence that nitric oxide increases glucose transport in skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 1997;82:359-363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Higaki Y, Hirshman MF, Fujii N, Goodyear LJ. Nitric oxide increases glucose uptake through a mechanism that is distinct from the insulin and contraction pathways in rat skeletal muscle. Diabetes 2001;50:241-247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Pieper GM. Enhanced, unaltered and impaired nitric oxide-mediated endothelium-dependent relaxation in experimental diabetes mellitus: importance of disease duration. Diabetologia 1999;42:204-213.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Miyamoto Y, Saito Y, Kajiyama N, Yoshimura M, Shimasaki Y, Nakayama M, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene is positively associated with essential hypertension. Hypertension 1998;32:3-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hyndman ME, Parsons HG, Verma S, Bridge PJ, Edworthy S, Jones C, et al. The T-786–>C mutation in endothelial nitric oxide synthase is associated with hypertension. Hypertension 2002;39:919-922.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kato N, Sugiyama T, Morita H, Nabika T, Kurihara H, Yamori Y, et al. Lack of evidence for association between the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene and hypertension. Hypertension 1999;33:933-936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Tsujita Y, Baba S, Yamauchi R, Mannami T, Kinoshita M, Yamamoto R, et al. Association analyses between genetic polymorphisms of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene and hypertension in Japanese: The Suita Study. J Hypertens 2001;19:1941-1948.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Franks PW, Luan J, Barroso I, Brage S, Gonzalez Sanchez JL, Ekelund U, et al. Variation in the eNOS gene modifies the association between total energy expenditure and glucose intolerance. Diabetes 2005;54:2795-2801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ohtoshi K, Yamasaki Y, Gorogawa S, Hayaishi-Okano R, Node K, Matsuhisa M, et al. Association of (-)786T-C mutation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene with insulin resistance. Diabetologia 2002;45:1594-1601.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Yoshimura T, Hisatomi A, Kajihara S, Yasutake T, Ogawa Y, Mizuta T, et al. The relationship between insulin resistance and polymorphisms of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene in patients with coronary artery disease. J Atheroscler Thromb 2003;10:43-47.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Monti LD, Barlassina C, Citterio L, Galluccio E, Berzuini C, Setola E, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase polymorphisms are associated with type 2 diabetes and the insulin resistance syndrome. Diabetes 2003;52:1270-1275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Benjafield AV, Morris BJ. Association analyses of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms in essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2000;13:994-998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Ukkola O, Erkkila PH, Savolainen MJ, Kesaniemi YA. Lack of association between polymorphisms of catalase, copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (SOD), extracellular SOD and endothelial nitric oxide synthase genes and macroangiopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Intern Med 2001;249:451-459.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Fernandez ML, Ruiz R, Gonzalez MA, Ramirez-Lorca R, Couto C, Ramos A, et al. Association of NOS3 gene with metabolic syndrome in hypertensive patients. Thromb Haemost 2004;92:413-418.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Cheng LS, Davis RC, Raffel LJ, Xiang AH, Wang N, Quinones M, et al. Coincident linkage of fasting plasma insulin and blood pressure to chromosome 7q in hypertensive Hispanic families. Circulation 2001;104:1255-1260.
  24. Duplain H, Burcelin R, Sartori C, Cook S, Egli M, Lepori M, et al. Insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circulation 2001;104:342-345.
  25. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, et al. Diagnosis and Management of the Metabolic Syndrome. An American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation 2005;112:2735-2752.
  26. Martinez-Larrad MT, Fernandez-Perez C, Gonzalez-Sanchez JL, Lopez A, Fernandez-Alvarez J, Riviriego J, . the Grupo de Estudio de Atencion Primaria de Segoviaet al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (ATP-III criteria). Population-based study of rural and urban areas in the Spanish province of Segovia. Med Clin (Barc) 2005;125:481-486.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and ß-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985;28:412-419.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Savage DB, Agostini M, Barroso I, Gurnell M, Luan J, Meirhaeghe A, et al. Digenic inheritance of severe insulin resistance in a human pedigree. Nat Genet 2002;31:379-384.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Tregouet DA, Escolano S, Tiret L, Mallet A, Golmard JL. A new algorithm for haplotype-based association analysis: the Stochastic-EM algorithm. Ann Hum Genet 2004;68:165-177.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a prospective for the 1990s. Nature 1993;362:801-809.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Cooke JP. Role of nitric oxide in progression and regression of atherosclerosis. West J Med 1996;164:419-424.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Davis PA. Is atherosclerosis a NO state?. Circulation 1999;99:2709-2712.
  33. Oemar BS, Tschudi MR, Godoy N, Brovkovich V, Malinski T, Luscher TF. Reduced endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression and production in human atherosclerosis. Circulation 1998;97:2494-2498.
  34. Thomas GD, Zhang W, Victor RG. Nitric oxide deficiency as a cause of clinical hypertension: promising new drug targets for refractory hypertension. JAMA 2001;285:2055-2057.[Free Full Text]
  35. Creager MA, Luscher TF, Cosentino F, Beckman JA. Diabetes and vascular disease: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and medical therapy: part I. Circulation 2003;108:1527-1532.
  36. Bates TE, Loesch A, Burnstock G, Clark JB. Mitochondrial nitric oxide synthase: a ubiquitous regulator of oxidative phosphorylation?. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1996;218:40-44.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Kobzik L, Stringer B, Balligand JL, Reid MB, Stamler JS. Endothelial type nitric oxide synthase in skeletal muscle fibers: mitochondrial relationships. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995;211:375-381.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Baron AD, Zhu JS, Marshall S, Irsula O, Brechtel G, Keech C. Insulin resistance after hypertension induced by the nitric oxide synthesis inhibitor L-NMMA in rats. Am J Physiol 1995;269:E709-E715.
  39. Sandrim VC, Coelho EB, Nobre F, Arado GM, Lanchote VL, Tanus-Santos JE. Susceptible and protective eNOS haplotypes in hypertensive black and white subjects. Atherosclerosis 2006;186:428-432.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Sandrim VC, de Syllos RW, Lisboa HR, Tres GS, Tanus-Santos JE. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase haplotypes affect the susceptibility to hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Atherosclerosis 2006;189:241-246.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Tanus-Santos JE, Desai M, Flockhart DA. Effects of ethnicity on the distribution of clinically relevant endothelial nitric oxide variants. Pharmacogenetics 2001;11:719-725.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Marroni AS, Metzger IF, Souza-Costa DC, Nagassaki S, Sandrim VC, Correa RX, et al. Consistent interethnic differences in the distribution of clinically relevant endothelial nitric oxide synthase genetic polymorphisms. Nitric Oxide 2005;12:177-182.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Hassan A, Gormley K, O’Sullivan M, Knight J, Sharm P, Vallance P, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide gene haplotypes and risk of cerebral small-vessel disease. Stroke 2004;35:654-659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Crawford DC, Nickerson DA. Definition and clinical importance of haplotypes. Annu Rev Med 2005;56:303-320.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Daly MJ, Rioux JD, Schaffner SF, Hudson TJ, Lander ES. High-resolution haplotype structure in the human genome. Nat Genet 2001;29:229-232.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Gabriel SB, Schaffner SF, Nguyen H, Moore JM, Roy J, Blumenstiel B, et al. The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science 2002;296:2225-2229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Nakayama M, Yasue H, Yoshimura M, Shimasaki Y, Kugiyama K, Ogawa H, et al. T–786->C Mutation in the 5'-Flanking Region of the Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene Is Associated With Coronary Spasm. Circulation 1999;99:2864-2870.
  48. Nagassaki S, Metzger IF, Souza-Costa DC, Marroni AS, Uzuelli JA, Tanus-Santos JE. eNOS genotype is without effect on circulating nitrite/nitrate level in healthy male population. Thromb Res 2005;115:375-379.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Golser R, Gorren AC, Mayer B, Schmidt K. Functional characterization of Glu298Asp mutant human endothelial nitric oxide synthase purified from a yeast expression system. Nitric Oxide 2003;8:7-14.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Fairchild TA, Fulton D, Fontana JT, Gratton JP, McCabe TJ, Sessa WC. Acidic hydrolysis as a mechanism for the cleavage of the Glu(298)–>Asp variant of human endothelial nitric-oxide synthase. J Biol Chem 2001;276:26674-26679.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Metzger IF, Souza-Costa DC, Marroni AS, Nagassaki S, Desta Z, Flockhart DA, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene haplotypes associated with circulating concentrations of nitric oxide products in healthy men. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2005;15:565-570.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A. Imamura, R. Takahashi, R. Murakami, H. Kataoka, X. W. Cheng, Y. Numaguchi, T. Murohara, and K. Okumura
The effects of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms on endothelial function and metabolic risk factors in healthy subjects: the significance of plasma adiponectin levels
Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2008; 158(2): 189 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2006.075176v1
53/1/91    most recent
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by González-Sánchez, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Serrano-Ríos, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by González-Sánchez, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Serrano-Ríos, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS