Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 53: 2144-2151, 2007. First published October 19, 2007; 10.1373/clinchem.2007.090670
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2007.090670v1
53/12/2144    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mistry, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mistry, J. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism
(Clinical Chemistry. 2007;53:2144-2151.)
© 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

Endocrinology and Metabolism

Analytical Validation and Biological Evaluation of a High–Molecular-Weight Adiponectin ELISA

Madhur K. Sinha1,a, Traci Songer1, Qiang Xiao1, John H. Sloan1, Jin Wang1, Shaoquen Ji1, William E. Alborn2, Randy A. Davis2, Michael M. Swarbrick3, Kimber L. Stanhope3, Bruce M. Wolfe4, Peter J. Havel3, Todd Schraw5, Robert J. Konrad2, Philipp E. Scherer5 and Jehangir S. Mistry1

1 Millipore Bioscience Division, Millipore Corporation, St. Charles, MO.
2 Division of Laboratory and Experimental Medicine, Eli-Lilly Company, Indianapolis, IN.
3 Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA.
4 Division of General Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
5 Touchstone Diabetes Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Millipore Bioscience Division, 6 Research Park Dr., St. Charles, MO 63304. Fax 636-442-6087; e-mail Madhur_Sinha{at}Millipore.com.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background: Of the 3 circulating multimeric forms of adiponectin, the high–molecular-weight (HMW) form, as measured by size-exclusion and/or immunoblotting techniques, is a better index of insulin sensitivity for monitoring health and disease than is total adiponectin. We aimed to develop a simple ELISA to measure HMW adiponectin.

Methods: We pretreated serum or plasma samples with digestion solution containing proteinase K (Millipore, ESDS). HMW (Millipore, EZHMWA-64K) and total adiponectin (Millipore, EZHADP-61K) concentrations were measured in treated and untreated samples, respectively, from 108 individuals and from 20 morbidly obese patients before and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after gastric-bypass surgery.

Results: The ELISA has a dynamic range of 3–200 µg/L and a detection limit of 0.8 µg/L. Intraassay and interassay CVs were <4% and <10%, respectively. Sample-dilution curves paralleled the calibration curves. Fast protein liquid chromatography profiles of the proteinase K-treated samples revealed predominantly HMW adiponectin. Values for HMW adiponectin produced with this method are comparable with those obtained with Western blot analysis (y = 0.77x – 0.15; r = 0.96; n = 56). Body mass index (BMI)- and sex-related changes were more pronounced for HMW adiponectin and percentage of HMW adiponectin than for total adiponectin. HMW and total adiponectin increased after bypass surgery, but changes in HMW adiponectin were more pronounced and preceded changes in total adiponectin.

Conclusion: This simple, rapid ELISA for HMW adiponectin recognizes the HMW isoform, produces results closely correlated with those obtained with Western blotting, and appears to better distinguish BMI-, sex-, and weight loss–associated differences than assays for total adiponectin.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Adiponectin, the only secretory hormone of fat cells that is paradoxically decreased in obesity(1), also has insulin-sensitizing effects(2)(3)(4); all other known adipokines are increased in obesity and induce insulin resistance(5). Given that adipose tissue is the primary site of adiponectin secretion, the decrease in the production and secretion of adiponectin with increasing adiposity is an intriguing phenomenon. Substantial and convincing evidence demonstrates that hypoadiponectinemia is associated with insulin resistance and obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome including cardiovascular abnormalities(6)(7). Dietary, lifestyle, and/or pharmacological interventions (thiazolidinediones) that improve insulin sensitivity also increase circulating adiponectin concentrations(8)(9). In addition, decreased adiponectin could be a risk factor for the progression of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes in healthy individuals, with or without impaired glucose tolerance(10)(11).

Adiponectin is a 28-kDa protein with a collagen-like structure; it circulates predominantly in 3 multimeric forms, i.e., trimer, hexamer, and high–molecular-weight (HMW)1 multimers (12- and 18-mers), which are evident from size-fractionation (gel filtration, velocity gradient, and gel electrophoresis) and immunoblotting experiments(5). These 3 multimeric adiponectin isoforms have different biological activities, with HMW adiponectin probably being the active form(5)(12)(13). Tonelli et al.(14) and Pajvani et al.(15) initially showed that the distribution of these multimers, particularly as measured by the ratio of HMW adiponectin to total adiponectin (i.e., percentage of HMW adiponectin), correlates better with thiazolidinedione-mediated improvement in insulin sensitivity than does the total adiponectin concentration. Percentage of HMW adiponectin appears to be a better index of insulin sensitivity(14)(15) and of metabolic syndrome trait cluster(s)(16).

To measure HMW adiponectin and/or percentage of HMW adiponectin, most studies have combined size fractionation and immunoblotting(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21), a cumbersome approach that cannot easily be adopted for high-throughput analyses of several samples. Therefore, we have developed an ELISA to measure HMW adiponectin in human serum and plasma samples.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
study participants
We obtained human serum and/or plasma samples from 4 different sources. In the initial development and validation of the HMW adiponectin ELISA, plasma (containing EDTA dibasic sodium salt, 1.5 g/L) and serum samples from 30 individuals (4 men and 26 women) were obtained from a commercial source (Bioreclamation). After assay development, we obtained another 56 plasma samples from Bioreclamation to compare HMW adiponectin values obtained with the new ELISA and with Western blotting; we obtained no biochemical or anthropometric data on these individuals. In a retrospective study, we obtained another 108 plasma samples from Bioreclamation and measured HMW adiponectin and total adiponectin to evaluate the effect of body mass index (BMI) and sex. Table 1 summarizes the anthropometric data for these individuals. Plasma samples obtained from 20 morbidly obese patients before and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after Roux-en-Y gastric-bypass surgery were also measured to evaluate the effect of weight loss on HMW adiponectin as measured with this new ELISA method. The changes in body composition, measures of insulin resistance, and the concentrations of adiponectin and its isoforms that occurred after gastric-bypass surgery have previously been described(22). The Institutional Review Board of the University of California, Davis, approved the experimental protocol, and all study individuals provided written informed consent to participate in this study.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Anthropometric variables for the study individuals.1

fast protein liquid chromatography analysis
Samples of human serum and plasma (100 µL of a 1/5 dilution in sample-digestion buffer, EDGB) were fractionated before and after proteinase K (sample-digestion solution, ESDS) treatment by size-exclusion fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) on a Superdex 200 10/300 Tricorn column (GE Healthcare). Sample treatment with the enzyme selectively degrades hexamer and trimer isoforms without affecting HMW adiponectin. The mobile phase was 25 mmol/L sodium phosphate, pH 7.5, containing 100 mg/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, with a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min and a 0.25-mL fraction size. FPLC fractions of the enzyme-treated and untreated plasma sample were then assayed for adiponectin immunoreactivity with the Human Adiponectin ELISA (EZHADP-61K; Millipore) and Human HMW Adiponectin ELISA (EZHMWA-64K, Millipore) reagent sets.

western blot analysis
We used Western blotting to measure the trimer, hexamer, and HMW adiponectin isoforms in 56 human plasma samples. We first fractionated plasma samples by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under nondenaturing and nonreducing conditions with a 1.5-mm 4%–20% polyacrylamide Tris-glycine gel cassette (Invitrogen, EC6028BOX), 10x Novex TrisGlycine SDS Running Buffer (Invitrogen, LC2675; diluted 1/10), and 2x TrisGlycine SDS Sample Buffer (Invitrogen, LC2675) in a XCell SureLock MiniCell (Invitrogen, EI0001) for 1.5 h at 150 V. We ran SeeBlue Plus2 Pre-Stained Standard (Invitrogen, LC5925) with each electrophoresis separation. Proteins were transferred from the gel to a nitrocellulose membrane at 100 V for 2 h in a Mini Trans-Blot Cell with 200 mL/L methanol, 2 g/L sodium dodecyl sulfate and 40 mL 25x Novex Tris-Glycine Transfer Buffer (Invitrogen, LC3675) in 760 mL distilled water. After blocking overnight at 4 °C with BlockerTM Casein in Tris-buffered saline (1% by weight Casein Hammersten Grade in Tris-buffered saline, Kathon as preservative, pH 7.4, Pierce, 37532), we incubated the nitrocellulose membrane in the same buffer for 1.5 h with mouse antihuman adiponectin monoclonal antibody labeled with horseradish peroxidase (1/1000 dilution) (R&D Systems, MAB10651). After washing away the excess antibody, we added detection reagents 1 and 2 in equal proportions (Amersham/GE Healthcare, RPN2106V1 and RPN2106V2), incubated the membrane for 1 min, and exposed the membrane for 1–4 min to BioMax Light Film (Kodak, 869358). We digitally photographed the immunoblot and quantified the trimer, hexamer, and HMW adiponectin bands with AlphaImager and AlphaEase FC software V.4.1.0 (Alpha Innotech).

measurement of total human adiponectin and hmw adiponectin
We measured total adiponectin in serum and plasma samples with Millipore’s Human Adiponectin ELISA. We used the newly developed HMW Adiponectin ELISA to measure HMW adiponectin. We diluted 20-µL serum samples 1/10 with sample-digestion buffer (Millipore, EDGB) and pretreated the samples with sample-digestion solution (Millipore, ESDS) for 2 h at 37 °C. Enzyme-treated samples were diluted further to 1/20 with 1x sample dilution buffer (Millipore, ESDB) and then assayed for HMW adiponectin with the Human HMW Adiponectin ELISA. The pairs of antibodies for capture and detection were different for the total (Millipore, EZHADP-61K) and HMW (Millipore, EZHMWA-64K) adiponectin ELISA reagent sets. The calibrator for the total adiponectin ELISA was pooled human serum calibrated against recombinant human adiponectin produced in mammalian cells (Millipore, 1061-K). We used the same calibrator for the HMW Adiponectin ELISA after we corrected for the proportion of HMW adiponectin, as measured by FPLC analysis.

statistical analysis
We carried out a regression analysis to compare HMW adiponectin values obtained with the HMW ELISA reagent set and with Western blotting. Differences in the concentrations of total adiponectin and HMW adiponectin between lean, overweight, and obese individuals, between male and female individuals, and before and after gastric-bypass surgery were compared by means of 2-tailed Student t-tests under the assumption of unequal variances. Multivariate analysis was performed by stepwise regression (Minitab 14; Minitab). BMI was entered as a response variable, and sex, age, race, diastolic and systolic blood pressures, total adiponectin, HMW adiponectin, and percentage of HMW adiponectin were entered as predictor variables. HMW, percentage of HMW, and total adiponectin values are expressed as the mean (SE), whereas all other data including those of anthropometric variables and assay characteristics are expressed as the mean (SD).


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
characteristics of the hmw adiponectin assay
The calibration curve for this HMW Adiponectin ELISA (n = 8, Fig. 1A ) has a concentration range of 3–200 µg/L. Assay imprecision (CV) ranged between 4% and 8% for absorbance and was <2% for the back-calculated values, as evaluated by fixed weighted 5-parameter (asymmetrical) logistic curve fitting (StatLIA software; Brendan Technologies). This program yielded an assay sensitivity of 0.8 µg/L, which is the mean + 2 SDs of the minimum detection limit (n = 8). Interassay imprecision (4 assays, 10 samples) and intraassay imprecision (5 results within a single assay, 8 samples; Table 2 ) were measured after the samples had each been pretreated and diluted (1/200 final dilution). HMW adiponectin values reported in Table 2 are after sample pretreatment and dilution from HMW adiponectin assays. Intraassay CVs were between 1.0% and 3.4% for sample HMW adiponectin values between 6.0 µg/L and 65.3 µg/L. Interassay CVs were between 3.0% and 8.1% for HMW adiponectin values between 13.3 µg/L and 61.5 µg/L. To evaluate the robustness of the assay, we analyzed 18 different serum samples on 2 different occasions. We observed no significant differences (i.e., P >0.05) in HMW adiponectin values [mean (SD), 8.7 (4.5) mg/L vs 9.0 (4.8) mg/L] with a mean difference of –1.6% (7.1%) in the mean values obtained with the 2 replicate assays. Recovery was evaluated by adding different concentrations of HMW adiponectin (obtained from human serum after enzyme digestion and calibration with the HMW Adiponectin ELISA) to 8 pretreated and diluted samples. The data in the recovery experiments were expressed as a percentage of the expected value (basal plus added HMW adiponectin). The mean recovery was 101.2% (1.9%) for 3.125 µg/L, 106.6% (2.3%) for 25 µg/L, and 112.4% (3.1%) for 100 µg/L. An evaluation of the linearity of endogenous HMW adiponectin concentrations in serial dilutions (1/8, 1/4, and 1/2) of 10 initially diluted and pretreated serum samples yielded values between 95% and 110% of the expected values (value of a 1/1 dilution times the dilution factor). The dilution curves were linear for all 8 serum samples (Fig. 1B ) and paralleled the calibration curve. Insulin, glucagons, leptin, glucagon-like peptide 1, amylin, resistin, acylation-stimulating protein, different interleukins, interferon {gamma}, tumor necrosis factor {alpha}, transforming growth factor β, and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 diluted in assay buffer (20–1000 µg/L) showed no cross-reactivity (<0.01%) with the HMW Adiponectin ELISA in direct tests. Values for paired serum (x) and plasma (y) samples (n = 21) showed excellent correlation in the same assay (y = 0.95x – 0.23; r = 0.99); however, plasma values [7.0 (5.1) mg/L] were slightly but significantly lower [mean difference, 8.0% (5.7%); P <0.01] than serum values [7.5 (5.3) mg/L].


Figure 1
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 1. Evaluation of the HMW Adiponectin ELISA.

(A), calibration curve with mean absorbance values (n = 8; {blacksquare}) and an imprecision profile ({square}) of CVs based on the same 8 calibration curves. (B), linearity of the dilution curves for 10 serum samples after pretreating and diluting the sample; serial dilutions were with ELISA buffer.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. Interassay and intraassay CVs.

fplc profiles
Six serum samples with or without proteinase K pretreatment were fractionated by FPLC on a Superdex G-200 column. The total adiponectin ELISA for FPLC fractions of untreated samples detected 3 distinct peaks for the HMW, hexamer, and trimer isoforms. These results suggest that the total adiponectin ELISA recognizes all 3 adiponectin multimeric isoforms (Fig. 2A ). The HMW Adiponectin ELISA recognizes all 3 isoforms, but hexamers and trimers are recognized to an appreciably lesser extent before the simple enzyme pretreatment. After pretreatment, the HMW adiponectin peak remains unaltered, whereas both hexamer and trimer peaks virtually disappear because of their preferential degradation by the enzyme (Fig. 2A ). The efficacy of the HMW Adiponectin ELISA for measuring HMW adiponectin can be ascribed to both this ELISA’s lower sensitivity for recognizing hexamers and trimers and preferential enzymatic degradation of these 2 isoforms.


Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 2. Comparison of ELISA and Western blot analysis.

(A), a representative FPLC elution profile of human serum before ({diamondsuit}) and after ({lozenge}) sample pretreatment and subsequent ELISA of total and HMW adiponectin. (B), comparison with Western blotting results (ratio of HMW adiponectin to total adiponectin x total adiponectin).

western blot analysis
We measured the relative distributions of adiponectin isoforms in 56 human plasma samples by Western blotting with nondenaturing and nonreducing gels. HMW adiponectin concentrations in these samples were then extrapolated by multiplying the percentage HMW adiponectin values obtained by Western blotting by the total adiponectin concentrations obtained with the Millipore human adiponectin ELISA. The HMW adiponectin values indirectly derived via Western blotting were then compared with those obtained for the HMW Adiponectin ELISA after sample pretreatment. HMW adiponectin concentrations obtained with these 2 different methods show high correlation (y = 0.77 x – 0.15; r = 0.96) (Fig. 2BUp ). Of note is that the apparent difference (approximately 23%) in absolute values could be due to these 2 very different methods and the possibilities of differential recognition and/or different affinities of the antibodies used.

effect of body weight and sex
Mean (SE) values for total adiponectin, HMW adiponectin, and percentage of HMW adiponectin (relative to total adiponectin) in lean [mean BMI, 21.56 (1.85) kg/m2], overweight [mean BMI, 26.79 (1.34) kg/m2], and obese [mean BMI, 35.67 (5.13) kg/m2] individuals are shown in Fig. 3A . As expected, concentrations of total adiponectin were significantly decreased in overweight individuals [10.75 (0.98) mg/L; P <0.05] and obese individuals [9.45 (0.51) mg/L; P <0.001], compared with lean individuals [13.80 (1.08) mg/L]; however, the differences for HMW adiponectin concentrations were even more pronounced in overweight individuals [4.44 (0.55) mg/L; P <0.005] and obese individuals [3.60 (0.32) mg/L; P <0.0001], compared with lean individuals [7.06 (0.68) mg/L]. Similarly, the differences in percentage of HMW adiponectin were also more pronounced than for the total adiponectin differences in comparisons of overweight individuals [38.71% (2.55%); P <0.0002] and obese individuals [35.44% (1.61%); P <0.000005] with lean individuals [50.48% (2.21%)]. The differences in HMW adiponectin (P <0.0005) and percentage of HMW adiponectin (P <0.0005) were also more pronounced in the obese group [mean BMI, 35.75 (5.13) kg/m2] than in the combined lean and overweight groups [mean BMI, 24.32 (3.07) kg/m2], compared with the differences for total adiponectin (P <0.005). The ratio of HMW adiponectin to total adiponectin has previously been demonstrated to be higher in female individuals than in male individuals(3)(15). Because of the disproportionately higher ratio of males to females in the lean group than in the overweight and obese groups, the weight-related decrease in HMW adiponectin concentration may have been compromised due to a suboptimal selection of the study population.


Figure 3
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 3. Total adiponectin, HMW adiponectin, and percentage of HMW adiponectin according to body weight and sex.

(A), values for lean (n = 25), overweight (n = 28), and obese (n = 55) individuals. *, P <0.05; **, P <0.001; +, P <0.005; ++, P <0.0001; {dagger}, P <0.0002; {dagger}{dagger}, P <0.000005. (B), values for African American women (n = 26) and men (n = 35). *, P <0.05; ++, P <0.02; {dagger}{dagger}{dagger}, P <0.01. Columns represent the mean (SE).

As shown in Fig. 3BUp with mean (SE) values, the subpopulation of African American women [mean BMI, 29.74 (5.81) kg/m2; n = 26] and men [mean BMI, 28.97 (7.78) kg/m2; n = 35], featured more pronounced alterations for HMW adiponectin [5.68 (0.64) mg/L and 3.63 (0.39) mg/L, respectively; P <0.02] and percentage of HMW adiponectin [44.42% (2.38%) and 35.04% (2.26%), respectively; P <0.01] than for total adiponectin [12.27 (1.08) mg/L and 9.54 (0.64) mg/L, respectively; P <0.05]. Analysis of the entire dataset of 54 female and 54 male individuals revealed significantly higher values in females for HMW adiponectin (P <0.05), but not for percentage of HMW adiponectin (P >0.05) and total adiponectin (P >0.05).

In a multivariate analysis with stepwise regression, the best-fitting model included HMW adiponectin (β = –1.01; P <0.0001), sex (β = 3.5; P <0.01), and diastolic pressure (β = 0.16; P >0.05). This model accounted for 20.5% of the variance in BMI (adjusted R2). Total adiponectin was not a significant predictor and was thus left out of the model.

gastric-bypass surgery
Fig. 4 summarizes the effects of weight loss on total, HMW, and percentage of HMW adiponectin at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after gastric-bypass surgery in 20 morbidly obese adults (19 women and 1 man). Gastric-bypass surgery produced appreciable weight loss and improved insulin sensitivity in all of the patients(22). Before surgery, the mean (SE) concentrations of total adiponectin and HMW adiponectin in the morbidly obese patients were 7.2 (0.5) mg/L and 2.2 (0.3) mg/L, respectively, and the mean (SE) percentage of HMW adiponectin value was 28.1% (2.3%). Total adiponectin concentrations were unaltered at 1 month after surgery [102.47% (7.66%) of presurgery concentrations, P >0.05] but were significantly increased at 3 months [124.52% (9.02%), P <0.02], 6 months [141.3% (10.50%), P <0.001], and 12 months [166.12% (11.44%), P <0.00002]; however, the changes in HMW adiponectin were significantly more pronounced than for total adiponectin at 1 month [147.00% (14.48%), P <0.0005], 3 months [173.65% (20.58%), P <0.002], 6 months [210.5% (23.44%), P <0.0002], and 12 months [271.72% (30.67%), P <0.00002] after gastric-bypass surgery. In addition, the changes in percentage of HMW adiponectin were also more significant than for total adiponectin at 1 month [134.61% (9.17%), P <0.00005], 3 months [136.08% (8.26%), P <0.0005], 6 months [146.81% (7.64%), P <0.00001], and 12 months [160.74% (7.74%), P <0.0000005] after surgery.


Figure 4
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 4. Total, HMW, and percentage of HMW adiponectin in morbidly obese individuals after gastric-bypass surgery.

*, P <0.02; **, P <0.001; ***, P <0.00002; +, P <0.002; ++, P <0.0005; +++, P <0.0002; ++++, P <0.00002; {dagger}, P <0.0005; {dagger}{dagger}, P <0.00001; {dagger}{dagger}{dagger}, P <0.000005; {dagger}{dagger}{dagger}{dagger}, P <0.0000005. Columns (percentage of baseline value) represent the mean (SE).


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
That adiponectin has an insulin-sensitizing effect(2)(3)(4) and is an important biomarker for insulin sensitivity in various pathophysiological conditions associated with insulin resistance is well documented(1)(5)(6)(7). In addition, the circulating adiponectin concentration seems to be a good predictor of the progression of insulin resistance in healthy and/or glucose-intolerant individuals(10)(11). Therapeutic or dietary interventions intended to improve insulin sensitivity are usually associated with increased adiponectin concentrations(8)(9). Of the 3 distinct multimeric isoforms in the circulation, HMW adiponectin (12- to 18-mers) is believed to be the most biologically active(5)(12)(13). The HMW adiponectin concentration and/or percentage of HMW adiponectin are reported to be a better index of insulin sensitivity than total adiponectin(14)(21).

Testing the importance of HMW adiponectin in various metabolic states requires a simple, accurate, and rapid methodology. A majority of the studies have fractionated the different adiponectin multimers by size with gel electrophoresis, gel filtration, and velocity gradient centrifugation and then used immunoblotting with anti-adiponectin antibody to recognize the multimers. These time-consuming methods require experience in protein-separation techniques. In addition, these methods are not practical for analyzing several samples. Immunoassays, particularly ELISA, can be an alternative. Currently, 2 different ELISAs are commercially available(23)(24). Bluher et al.(25) evaluated this HMW Adiponectin ELISA (ALPCO Diagnostics), an RIA for total adiponectin, and another ELISA (Mediagnost) to determine the best adiponectin assay for predicting improvement in insulin sensitivity after exercise in healthy individuals, those with impaired glucose tolerance, and diabetic individuals. These investigators found that the total adiponectin RIA, not the HMW Adiponectin ELISA, was the better predictor of insulin sensitivity. Another HMW Adiponectin ELISA developed by Nakano et al.(24) uses an antibody raised against HMW adiponectin but involves no enzyme pretreatment of the sample. Although this adiponectin ELISA is simple, it also measures the hexameric isoform to some degree(24).

Our HMW Adiponectin ELISA method is simple, rapid, and specific with respect to the multimeric (HMW) isoform. After a simple enzyme pretreatment of the sample, the new ELISA recognizes predominantly the HMW adiponectin isoform. This HMW Adiponectin ELISA meets most of the analytical-robustness criteria of a good immunoassay. In addition, the HMW adiponectin values obtained with this method and with a more conventional size-exclusion and Western blotting method are well correlated (r = 0.96) over a wide range of HMW adiponectin concentrations; however, there is a 23% difference in the absolute values, which is not surprising considering the 2 very different methodologies.

The relevance of this new HMW Adiponectin ELISA is demonstrated by comparing the values for HMW adiponectin and total adiponectin in the context of BMI, sex, and weight loss in morbidly obese patients. Obesity-related changes were more apparent for HMW adiponectin concentration and percentage of HMW adiponectin than for total concentration when these variables were evaluated for lean, overweight, and obese individuals(26)(27)(28). Similarly, we noted larger differences between men and women for HMW adiponectin concentration and percentage of HMW adiponectin than for the concentration of total adiponectin(3)(15)(29); however, our studies may have been compromised by confounding factors introduced by a suboptimal control population. Gastric-bypass surgery is an effective means of weight loss and leads to improved insulin sensitivity(30). Similar to the findings of Swarbrick et al.(22) with a different ELISA(23), the present study also demonstrated a significant increase in HMW adiponectin concentration and percentage of HMW adiponectin (but not for the concentration of total adiponectin) at 1 month after gastric-bypass surgery, when appreciable weight loss and an improvement in insulin resistance are typically observed. The concentration of HMW adiponectin increased progressively at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, along with further decreases in body weight and insulin resistance (homeostasis model assessment), and the increases were proportionately greater than for total adiponectin concentrations.

In summary, we have developed a simple, robust, rapid, and size-specific ELISA for measuring HMW adiponectin. The results are comparable with those obtained with a Western blotting method. More pronounced differences were observed for HMW adiponectin than for total adiponectin with respect to obesity, weight loss, and sex. This assay may become a useful tool for high-throughput analyses of HMW adiponectin and may facilitate further elucidation of the importance of HMW adiponectin as a biomarker for monitoring the progression and treatment of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases.


   Acknowledgments
 
Grant/funding support: None declared.

Financial disclosures: None declared.

Acknowledgments: We thank Dr. Rick Ryan, Millipore Bioscience Division, for his keen interest and encouragement and Deborah Droll for statistical analysis.


   Footnotes
 
1 Nonstandard abbreviations: HMW, high–molecular-weight; BMI, body mass index; FPLC, fast protein liquid chromatography.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Arita Y, Kihara S, Ouchi N, Takahashi M, Maeda K, Miyagawa J, et al. Paradoxical decrease of an adipose-specific protein adiponectin in obesity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999;257:79-83.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Berg AH, Combs TP, Du X, Brownlee M, Scherer PE. The adipocyte-secreted protein Acrp30 enhances hepatic insulin action. Nat Med 2001;7:947-953.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Pajvani UB, Du X, Combs TP, Berg AH, Rajala MW, Schulthess T, et al. Structure-function studies of the adipocyte-secreted hormone Acrp30/adiponectin: implications for metabolic regulation and bioactivity. J Biol Chem 2003;278:9073-9085.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Satoh H, Nguyen MT, Trujillo M, Imamura T, Usui I, Scherer PE, et al. Adenovirus-mediated adiponectin expression augments skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity in male Wistar rats. Diabetes 2005;54:1304-1313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Trujillo ME, Scherer PE. Adiponectin-journey from an adipocyte secretory protein to biomarker of the metabolic syndrome. J Intern Med 2005;257:167-175.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Weyer C, Funahashi T, Tanaka S, Hotta K, Matsuzawa Y, Pratley RE, et al. Hypoadiponectinemia in obesity and type 2 diabetes: Close association with insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:1930-1935.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Cnop M, Havel PH, Utzschneider KM, Carr DB, Sinha MK, Boyko EJ, et al. Relationship of adiponectin to body fat distribution, insulin sensitivity and plasma lipoproteins: evidence for independent roles of age and sex. Diabetologia 2003;46:459-469.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Yang WS, Lee WJ, Funahashi T, Tanaka S, Matsuzawa Y, Chao CL, et al. Weight reduction increases plasma levels of an adipose-derived anti-inflammatory protein, adiponectin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:3815-3819.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Yu JG, Javorschi S, Hevener AL, Kruszynska YT, Norman RA, Sinha M, et al. The effect of thiazolldinedlones on plasma adiponectin levels in normal, obese, and type 2 diabetic subjects. Diabetes 2002;51:2968-2974.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lindsay RS, Funahashi T, Hanson RL, Matsuzawa Y, Tanaka S, Tataranni PA, et al. Adiponectin and development of type 2 diabetes in the Pima Indian population. Lancet 2002;360:57-58.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Schulze MB, Shai I, Rimm EB, Li T, Rifai N, Hu FB. Adiponectin and future coronary heart disease events among men with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2005;54:534-539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Waki H, Yamauchi T, Kamon J, Ito Y, Uchida S, Kita S, et al. Impaired multimerization of human adiponectin mutants associated with diabetes. Molecular structure and multimer formation of adiponectin. J Biol Chem 2003;278:40352-40363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kobayashi H, Ouchi N, Kihara S, Walsh K, Kumada M, Abe Y, et al. Selective suppression of endothelial cell apoptosis by the high molecular weight form of adiponectin. Circ Res 2004;94:e27-e31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Tonelli J, Li W, Kishore P, Pajvani UB, Kwon E, Weaver C, et al. Mechanisms of early insulin-sensitizing effects of thiazolidinediones in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2004;53:1621-1629.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Pajvani UB, Hawkins M, Combs TP, Rajala MW, Doebber T, Berger JP, et al. Complex distribution, not absolute amount of adiponectin, correlates with thiazolidinedione-mediated improvement in insulin sensitivity. J Biol Chem 2004;279:12152-12162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Lara-Castro C, Luo N, Wallace P, Klein RL, Garvey WT. Adiponectin multimeric complexes and the metabolic syndrome trait cluster. Diabetes 2006;55:249-245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Fisher FF, Trujillo ME, Hanif W, Barnett AH, McTernan PG, Scherer PE, et al. Serum high molecular weight complex of adiponectin correlates better with glucose tolerance than total serum adiponectin in Indo-Asian males. Diabetologia 2005;48:1084-1087.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Bodles AM, Banga A, Rasouli N, Ono F, Kern PA, Owens RJ. Pioglitazone increases secretion of high-molecular-weight adiponectin from adipocytes. Am J Physiol 2006;291:E1100-E1105.[Web of Science]
  19. Bobbert T, Rochlitz H, Wegewitz U, Akpulat S, Mai K, Weickert MO, et al. Changes of adiponectin oligomer composition by moderate weight reduction. Diabetes 2005;54:2712-2719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Hammarstedt A, Sopasakis VR, Gogg S, Jansson PA, Smith U. Improved insulin sensitivity and adipose tissue dysregulation after short-term treatment with pioglitazone in non-diabetic, insulin-resistant subjects. Diabetologia 2005;48:96-104.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Halperin F, Beckman JA, Patti ME, Trujillo ME, Garvin M, Creger MA, et al. The role of total and high-molecular-weight complex of adiponectin in vascular function in offspring whose parents both had type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2005;48:2147-2154.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Swarbrick MM, Austrheim-Smith IT, Stanhope KL, Van Loan MD, Ali MR, Wolfe BM, et al. Circulating concentrations of high-molecular-weight adiponectin are increased following Roux-eb-Y gastric bypass surgery. Diabetologia 2006;49:2552-2558.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Ebinuma H, Miyazaki O, Yago H, Hara K, Yamauchi T, Kadowaki T. A novel ELISA system for selective measurement of human adiponectin multimers by using proteases. Clin Chim Acta 2006;372:47-53.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Nakano Y, Tajima S, Yoshimi A, Akiyama H, Tsushima M, Tanioka T, et al. A novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay specific for high-molecular-weight adiponectin. J Lip Res 2006;47:1572-1582.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Bluher M, Brennan AM, Kelesidis T, Kratzsch J, Fasshauer M, Kralisch S, et al. Total and high-molecular weight adiponectin in relation to metabolic variables at baseline and in response to an exercise treatment program: comparative evaluation of three assays. Diabetes Care 2007;30:280-285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Hara K, Horikoshi M, Yamauchi T, Yago H, Miyazaki O, Ebinuma H, et al. Measurement of the high-molecular-weight form of adiponectin in plasma is useful for the prediction of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1357-1362.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Aso Y, Yamamoto R, Wakabayashi S, Uchida T, Takayanagi K, Takebayashi K, et al. Comparison of serum high-molecular-weight (HMW) adiponectin with total adiponectin concentrations in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease using a novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect HMW adiponectin. Diabetes 2006;55:1954-1960.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Nakashima R, Kamei N, Yamane K, Nakanishi S, Nakashima A, Kohno N. Decreased total and high-molecular-weight adiponectin are independent risk factors for the development of type 2 diabetes in Japanese-Americans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:3873-3877.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Andersen KK, Frystayk J, Wolthers OD, Heuck C, Flyvbjerg A. Gender differences of oligomers and total adiponectin during puberty: a cross-sectional study of 859 Danish school children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:3674-3685.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Pories WJ, MacDonald KG, Jr, Morgan EJ, Sinha MK, Dohm GL, Swanson MS, et al. Surgical treatment of obesity and its effect on diabetes: 10-y follow-up. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;55(Suppl 2):582S-585S.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. M. E. Blumer, M. van der Valk, M. Ackermans, E. Endert, M. J. Serlie, P. Reiss, and H. P. Sauerwein
A rosiglitazone-induced increase in adiponectin does not improve glucose metabolism in HIV-infected patients with overt lipoatrophy
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2009; 297(5): E1097 - E1104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
D. Liu, T. Schuster, M. Baumann, M. Roos, D. Sollinger, J. Lutz, U. Heemann, and M. von Eynatten
Comparison of Immunoassays for the Selective Measurement of Human High-Molecular Weight Adiponectin
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2009; 55(3): 568 - 572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. M. E. Blumer, S. N. van der Crabben, M. E. Stegenga, M. W. Tanck, M. T. Ackermans, E. Endert, T. van der Poll, and H. P. Sauerwein
Hyperglycemia prevents the suppressive effect of hyperinsulinemia on plasma adiponectin levels in healthy humans
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2008; 295(3): E613 - E617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2007.090670v1
53/12/2144    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mistry, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mistry, J. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS