Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 53: 233-240, 2007. First published December 21, 2006; 10.1373/clinchem.2006.074963
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2006.074963v1
53/2/233    most recent
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steuber, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lilja, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steuber, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lilja, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cancer Diagnostics (since 2002)
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 2007;53:233-240.)
© 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Cancer Diagnostics

Comparison of Free and Total Forms of Serum Human Kallikrein 2 and Prostate-Specific Antigen for Prediction of Locally Advanced and Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Thomas Steuber1,5, Andrew J. Vickers1,2, Angel M. Serio1, Ville Vaisanen6, Alexander Haese5, Kim Pettersson6, James A. Eastham1, Peter T. Scardino1, Hartwig Huland5 and Hans Lilja1,3,7,4,a

Departments of1 Surgery (Urology), 2 Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 3 Clinical Laboratories, and 4 Medicine (GU-Oncology), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
5 Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
6 Department of Biotechnology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
7 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Chemistry, Lund University, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Departments of Clinical Laboratories, Urology, 1275 York Ave., Box 213, New York, NY 10021. Fax 212-422-2379; e-mail liljah{at}mskcc.org.


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Background: We evaluated the association of total and free forms of serum human kallikrein 2 (hK2) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with prostate cancers of unfavorable prognosis.

Methods: We retrospectively measured total PSA (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA), and total hK2 (thK2) in preoperative serum samples from 867 men [and assessed free hK2 (fhK2) measured in 577 of these men] treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Associations between biomarker concentrations and extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) were evaluated. A subset of patients with PSA ≤10 µg/L, the group most commonly seen in clinical practice in the US, was analyzed.

Results: thK2 was the strongest predictor of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion (areas under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.662 and 0.719, respectively), followed by tPSA (AUC, 0.654 and 0.663). All biomarkers were significant predictors of BCR. hK2 forms, but not PSA forms, remained highly significant for predicting BCR in the low-PSA group. Combining tPSA, fPSA, and thK2 in a multivariable model improved prediction compared with any biomarker used individually (AUC, 0.711, 0.755, and 0.752 for this combination predicting extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and BCR, respectively; P <0.001 for all).

Conclusions: Increased concentrations of hK2 in the blood are significantly associated with unfavorable features of prostate cancer, and thK2 is predictive of locally advanced and recurrent cancer in patients with PSA ≤10 µg/L. Independent of tPSA and fPSA, hK2 predicts unfavorable prognosis.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA1 ; human kallikrein 3 protein) is the protein product of the human KLK32 gene. Because of its remarkable tissue specificity in human males, PSA is the most valuable biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa). In addition to its established clinical application for early detection, PSA is a key variable in current prognostic models for clinically localized PCa (1)(2)(3). These models allow us to assess pathologic tumor stage and the risk of disease recurrence after local therapy. PSA concentrations in blood do not reflect only the presence of cancer, however; they are also driven by nodular hyperplastic or inflammatory processes. This lack of specificity limits the application of PSA as a predictor of stage and disease progression in populations in which PSA is regularly used for screening (4)(5)(6).

Human kallikrein 2 (hK2), the product of the KLK2 gene, is a serine protease with 80% sequence identity to PSA. The enzymes share the property of being expressed chiefly in the prostate under androgen regulation (7).

Various tissue studies have documented increases in the ratio of hK2 expression to PSA expression during carcinogenesis and PCa progression (8)(9)(10). Thus, it was hypothesized that hK2 might be a useful biomarker for PCa, particularly for advanced disease. It is, however, unclear whether protein concentrations in tissue correlate with those in circulation; PSA and hK2 concentrations are up to 106-fold higher in tissue than in blood (11). Nevertheless, recent studies have demonstrated that hK2 concentrations in serum are significantly associated with extracapsular extension (ECE) of PCa and with the volume of PCa in prostatectomy specimens (12)(13)(14). Although these studies have provided indications that serum hK2 may be a predictor of advanced PCa, definitive evidence is lacking.

To compare prostate-specific kallikreins in blood for the differentiation of favorable from unfavorable PCa, we assessed free and total PSA (tPSA), total hK2 (thK2), and free hK2 (fhK2) in a large series of 867 patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized PCa. We assessed the degree of overlap in the prognostic information from free and total forms of hK2 and PSA to gain insight as to whether increased concentrations of these kallikreins are attributable to similar biology or whether they reflect different aspects of the malignant process. Pretreatment concentrations of biomarkers were tested for the capacity to reflect the presence of ECE or seminal vesicle invasion (SVI). Both ECE and SVI are commonly accepted as adverse prognostic factors (15)(16)(17). Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy is an unequivocal indicator of eventual clinical progression (18) and thus was chosen as an additional study endpoint. This study is the first clinical evaluation that includes selective measurements of fhK2.


   Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
patients and serum samples
Between December 1997 and March 2004, 2554 patients with clinically localized PCa underwent radical prostatectomy at a single institution (University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany). According to the sampling protocol, pretreatment blood samples were drawn 8 or more weeks after any prostatic manipulation. Samples were immediately processed and frozen at –80 C° until analysis. For 905 of these 2554 patients (35%), a high-quality pretreatment serum sample was available for evaluation. The remaining 1649 patient specimens were not included in analysis because they did not meet the criteria of the sampling protocol and/or participant consent was missing. Of the 905 patients, men with any neoadjuvant therapy (n = 18) or prior surgical treatment for benign prostate hyperplasia (n = 20) were excluded from this study, leaving 867 patients with corresponding blood samples eligible for analysis. Annual availability of samples showed the following distribution: in 1997, 2/14 (14%); in 1998, 29/224 (13%); in 1999, 164/318 (51%); in 2000, 221/383 (58%); in 2001, 70/477 (15%); in 2002, 200/494 (40%); in 2003, 173/545 (32%); and in 2004, 6/101 samples (6%). The clinical and pathologic composition of this randomly achieved cohort was similar to the consecutive series of 2554 radical prostatectomy patients (Table 1 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Clinical and pathologic characteristics of the study cohort (n = 867) and the consecutive series of patients (n = 2554) treated with radical prostatectomy between 1997 and 2004.1

All patients treated with radical prostatectomy were scheduled for an annual follow-up visit at our institutional outpatient clinic. Of the 867 patients, 784 patients had at least 1 follow-up evaluation and hence were eligible for analysis of BCR. Informed consent was obtained from all of the participating patients, and the protocol was approved by the institutional review board.

pathologic evaluation
All radical prostatectomy specimens were surface-inked and processed using serial transverse sections at 3-mm intervals according to the Stanford protocol (19). Histological tumor grading was performed according to the Gleason grading system (20). Pathologic stage was defined according to the 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging classification (21). Tumors infiltrating the seminal vesicles were defined as SVI. Our definition of ECE included cancers with or without SVI.

definition of bcr
BCR was defined as postoperative concentrations of tPSA ≥0.40 µg/L. The selection of this cut point was based on a study that demonstrated that a significant proportion of patients with a lower PSA (e.g., 0.2 or 0.3 µg/L) did not experience further PSA increases (22). None of the patients received adjuvant therapy before evidence of cancer recurrence.

measurements of biomarkers
tPSA and Free PSA (fPSA).
To measure tPSA and fPSA, we used the commercial version of a previously reported dual-label assay (DELFIA Prostatus Dual Assay, Perkin-Elmer) that measures tPSA and fPSA on an equimolar basis (23). Detection limits were 0.04 µg/L for fPSA (CV, 3.7% at 0.44 µg/L and 17.9% at 0.10 µg/L) and 0.05 µg/L for tPSA (CV, 5.0% at 2.32 µg/L and 13.9% at 0.34 µg/L). The percentage of fPSA (%fPSA) was calculated as %fPSA = fPSA/tPSA · 100.

thK2 and fhK2.
PSA- and hK2-specific monoclonal antibodies were used in solid-phase, 2-site immunofluorometric assays to detect fhK2 and thK2 (24). The thK2 assay used PSA-specific antibodies to block nonspecific signals. The capture antibody of the fhK2 assay did not cross-react with PSA. The functional detection limit (defined as the concentration at which the intraassay CV was <15%) in serum was 0.003 µg/L for thK2 and 0.01 µg/L for fhK2. The thK2 assay imprecision ranged from 2.8% for low (0.01 µg/L) to 1.6% for high (4.28 µg/L) hK2 concentrations. Assay imprecision for fhK2 ranged from 3.7% for low (0.01 µg/L) to 2.0% for high (3.34 µg/L) hK2 concentrations. In 290 patients, we lacked sufficient sample to measure fhK2. Concentrations of fhK2 are therefore available for 577 patients of the 867 who were eligible for final analysis.

statistical methods
To facilitate comparisons between biomarkers in univariate and multivariable analyses, we standardized each marker by dividing by its SD within the group under consideration. The coefficient in the regressions can thus be interpreted as the change in log odds/hazard for a 1 SD increase in the predictor. Analyses were performed using Stata 8.2 (Stata Corp.) and S-PLUS software with the Design library (version 6.2, Insightful Corp.).

Risk Assessment for ECE and SVI.
Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association of all biomarkers with the presence of ECE or SVI. Diagnostic accuracy of each variable was quantified by the area under the ROC curve (AUC), which ranges from 0.5 (chance or a coin flip) to 1.0 (perfect ability to rank). Multivariable regression models were generated to assess whether prediction would be improved by combining markers; the AUC was adjusted by bootstrap methods (25).

Risk Assessment for BCR.
Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the association between each biomarker and BCR after radical prostatectomy. We constructed multivariable models including a combination of all biomarkers, again using bootstrap methods to correct for overfit. Predictive accuracy was defined in terms of the concordance index (c-index). In brief, the c-index is comparable to the AUC and can be used to quantify discrimination for a single-variable or multivariable model for survival time data.

Comparison of Predictive Accuracy.
We sought to determine whether a single biomarker or combination of biomarkers enhanced predictive accuracy compared with tPSA alone. We used tPSA alone as the comparator, because it is the marker most frequently used for prediction of ECE, SVI, and BCR. Significance tests for differences in AUC and c-index were conducted, respectively, using the roccomp command in Stata and the rcorrp.cens function from the Design library of S-PLUS.

fhK2 measurements were available for only 577 patients. Consequently, fhK2 and %fhK2 were evaluated separately. These 577 patients, however, did not differ significantly in clinical and pathologic characteristics from the whole cohort of 867 patients. For the sake of simplicity, the fhK2 and %fhK2 results are displayed in the same tables as analysis of thK2, tPSA, and fPSA for all 867 patients. For comparison of predictive accuracy, the comparator for fhK2 and %fhK2 was the AUC/c-index calculated for tPSA, excluding patients for whom fhK2 was missing.

A subgroup analysis was performed on men with moderately increased tPSA concentrations (≤10 µg/L), who are more typical of PCa patients in the US and other countries where tumors are generally detected by PSA screening.


   Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Clinical and pathologic characteristics of the study population are displayed in Table 1Up . This cohort is reasonably representative of a contemporary referral population (26). ECE or SVI was observed in 249 (29%) and 87 (10%) of patients, respectively. In subanalysis of the 627 men with pretreatment PSA ≤10 µg/L, ECE or SVI was present in 142 (23%) and 43 (7%) of patients, respectively. Median concentrations of tPSA, fPSA, thK2, and fhK2 increased with increasingly adverse prostate pathology: concentrations were lowest in the overall cohort and highest in patients with SVI (Table 2 ). Conversely, %fPSA and %fhK2 decreased with increasingly adverse pathology (Table 2 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Pretreatment biomarker measurements for the entire cohort and for subsets with adverse pathologic findings.1

prediction of ece and svi
The associations of biomarkers with ECE and SVI are shown in Tables 3 and 4 . thK2 was a strong discriminator of ECE from non-ECE. However, compared with tPSA alone, thK2 alone was not a significantly superior classifier of ECE in the entire cohort (AUC = 0.654 for tPSA and AUC = 0.662 for thK2; P = 0.6; Table 3 ) The combination of tPSA, fPSA, and thK2 into a single multivariable model significantly enhanced discrimination of ECE compared with the use of tPSA alone for the whole sample (P = 0.001). This model, however, was not enhanced by adding fhK2 or any ratio of single markers (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Univariate and multivariable regression analysis to assess association of pretreatment concentrations of biomarkers with ECE and SVI for the overall cohort of 867 patients.1


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Univariate and multivariable regression analysis to assess association of pretreatment concentrations of biomarkers with ECE and SVI for 627 patients with pretreatment tPSA ≤10 µg/L.1

thK2 measurements were strong predictors of SVI (Tables 3Up and 4Up ), but thK2 was not a significantly superior classifier of SVI compared with tPSA alone in the whole sample (AUC = 0.719 and AUC = 0.663, respectively; P = 0.09). In the low-PSA subgroup, however, thK2 remained highly significant. These results suggest that thK2 is a strong predictor of SVI for men with tPSA ≤10 µg/L. As with ECE, combining tPSA, fPSA, and thK2 (but not fhK2) into a single multivariable model significantly enhanced predictive accuracy compared with the use of tPSA alone for the entire sample (P = 0.0005).

prediction of bcr
Median follow-up for patients without BCR was 36 months. Among 784 patients eligible for analysis of BCR, there were 119 cases of BCR. The 3- and 5-year recurrence-free probabilities for the study cohort were 83% [95% confidence interval (CI), 80%–86%] and 74% (95% CI, 68%–79%), respectively. BCR occurred in 47 patients with tPSA ≤10 µg/L (n = 556). The 3- and 5-year recurrence-free probabilities for those men were 91% (95% CI, 87%–93%) and 84% (95% CI, 77%–88%), respectively.

Associations between biomarkers and BCR are displayed in Table 5 , A and B. hK2 forms were very strong predictors of BCR in the whole sample. This was also reflected in the men with tPSA concentrations ≤10 µg/L, in whom both the free and thK2 forms were highly significant. Combining tPSA, fPSA, and thK2 into a single multivariable model significantly enhanced predictive accuracy compared with the use of tPSA alone for the whole sample (P <0.0005). Of note, in multivariable analyses for men with tPSA ≤10 µg/L, thK2 remained highly statistically significant (P <0.0005).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Cox regression analyses.


   Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Because of their restricted expression patterns with high abundance in human prostate glands, PSA and hK2 have been thoroughly evaluated as candidate biomarkers for benign and malignant prostatic disease. The hK2 concentration in prostate tissue, seminal plasma, and blood is only 1% of the PSA concentration. The amount of hK2 transcripts, however, is ~10%–50% that of PSA transcripts (27), which might indicate that these closely related proteases may differ in regard to translation rates or protein stability.

The initial work on hK2 as a potential tumor marker was performed in tissue studies by Darson et al. (8). They found more intense hK2-specific immunostaining in lymphatic metastases and in high-grade tumors compared with well-differentiated tumors and benign tissue, whereas contrary findings were reported for PSA (8). Herrala et al. quantified expression by a conceptually different approach; in situ hybridization revealed that hK2 was expressed at higher concentrations in PCa tissue compared with benign prostate tissue (P <0.0005), whereas PSA expression had the reverse pattern (P = 0.06) (9). Herrala et al. further reported that the hK2 gene (KLK2) but not the PSA gene (KLK3) was amplified in PCa tissue, one possible explanation for relative changes in their protein expression. Lintula et al. recently reported confirmatory findings obtained using RT-PCR to quantify relative concentrations of hK2 and PSA mRNA in benign tissue and PCa (10). In their study, the ratio of hK2:PSA mRNA was significantly higher in cancer than in benign tissue (P = 0.03) and higher still in high-grade PCa (P = 0.006) (10). This finding suggests that changes in relative expression of hK2 vs PSA may be associated with carcinogenesis and progression, hence providing further evidence that hK2 might be a useful biomarker for PCa and, in particular, advanced disease.

How do these observations from tissue studies translate into protease concentrations in the circulation? The tight compartmentalization of PSA and hK2 in the healthy prostate is altered in prostatic disease. The disintegration of the continuous layer of basal cells, a characteristic early feature of carcinogenesis, leads to loss of the normal glandular architecture and allows substantial leakage of various proteins into circulation. The covariance of hK2 and PSA concentrations in blood has been determined to be generally <60%, suggesting that hK2 might be useful as an independent biomarker for PCa (28).

Several retrospective studies have investigated pretreatment serum hK2 in patients who have subsequently undergone radical prostatectomy for clinically localized PCa. Increasing hK2 was significantly associated with cancer volume, presence of ECE, and high-grade PCa (12)(13)(14).

We evaluated which marker in blood is most closely associated with locally advanced cancer or with subsequent BCR and thus may be used to identify patients who are at risk to develop metastasis. Analysis of our study population, a reasonably representative cohort of 867 men from a contemporary population treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized PCa at a single institution, included fPSA and a recently published method for fhK2 detection (24). Previous studies indicated that a low ratio of fPSA to tPSA (%fPSA) is linked to advanced prostate pathology. In a recently published study, Shariat et al. demonstrated that %fPSA was significantly associated with ECE, SVI, and BCR in a cohort of 402 men with a PSA <10 µg/L (29). Others, however, were not able to confirm these findings. The ratio of fhK2 to thK2 (%fhK2) has been previously measured in a set of 103 patients with PCa, in whom it ranged from 17% to 131% (mean, 81%) (24). However, no study has ever evaluated the clinical relevance of serum fhK2.

Our data demonstrate that serum tPSA concentrations significantly indicate the presence of ECE and SVI and risk of BCR in a heterogeneous population, in which tPSA ranges widely (here from 0.11 to 83 µg/L). In the subgroup of patients with tPSA ≤10 µg/L, however, tPSA was limited as an indicator of ECE, SVI, and BCR. Hence, our data support recent findings from other investigators, who concluded that tPSA had limited capacity to predict unfavorable features of PCa in men with tPSA <10 µg/L, the group most commonly seen in clinical practice (4)(5)(6). Intriguingly, hK2 retained significant ability to mirror ECE, SVI, and BCR in this truncated PSA range.

The clinical relevance of our findings is important considering of the high proportion of men with serum PSA ≤10 µg/L in contemporary radical prostatectomy series. Particularly in the US, PSA concentrations at diagnosis have fallen dramatically because of widespread use of tPSA testing for the detection of PCa (5). As an example of a European population, among patients who recently underwent radical prostatectomy (from 2002 to 2003) at University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, the percentage with tPSA ≤10 µg/L increased to 82%. This trend indicates that the use of PSA testing may also significantly decrease the proportion of men with tPSA >10 µg/L at diagnosis in countries where PSA screening is not officially recommended.

Results from our multivariable analysis demonstrate that a combination of several markers adds to the predictive ability of a single analyte. More accurate predictions of ECE, SVI, and BCR can be obtained by combining tPSA, fPSA, and hK2 in a multivariable model. This observation may be related to a specific interaction of the various protease cascades, which presumably indicates pathologic alteration of the prostate gland before clinical signs. Thus, biological variables should probably not be considered in isolation; more information can be derived from markers in combination. Markers that may be useful for analysis of PCa include the prostate-specific tissue kallikreins or other markers of local cancer progression, such as TGF-ß1, interleukin-6 receptor (30), and the urokinase-like plasminogen activation cascade (31)(32).

The ratio of fhK2 to thK2 in our study slightly decreased from a median of 88% in organ-confined tumors to 78% in cancers with SVI. In univariate analysis, both fhK2 and %fhK2 were associated with ECE, SVI, and BCR. Thus, hK2 in blood is not consistently in the free, unbound form in PCa patients. Significant proportions (median, 15%–20%) are inferred to be stably complexed with serpin-type antiproteases, and these proportions may vary in benign and malignant prostate disease. The diagnostic benefit of selective fhK2 measurement, however, remains limited: according to our multivariable analysis, addition of fhK2 or %fhK2 provided no substantial increase in predictive accuracy for ECE, SVI, or BCR (data not shown). Further evaluations are warranted, including the application of fhK2 for differentiating cancer from noncancer before prostate biopsy.

Several limitations may influence the validity of our findings. The retrospective study design (analysis of frozen serum) may have influenced accuracy of measurements of the analytes. However, the accuracy of the methods used in this study has been demonstrated for tPSA and fPSA measured in archived serum (33). This study used patients from a single institution with large surgical volume, and it featured unusually stringent preanalytical workup and assays of biomarkers; therefore, the findings may not be representative of all clinical settings.

In conclusion, these data support findings from various tissue studies and demonstrate that hK2 concentrations in serum (independent of tPSA and fPSA) indicate PCa of unfavorable prognosis. Our finding that a model combining fPSA, tPSA, and thK2 contributes superior discrimination compared with any of these analytes measured on their own suggests that each reflects different aspects of the malignant process. Serum hK2 testing might play an important role in clinical assessment of the risk of cancer progression after local therapy in PCa patients with only moderately increased PSA, which is typical of the contemporary patient population. If possible, a biochemical serum profile of high-risk PCa should be developed from the combination of established and emerging biomarkers of local progression.


   Acknowledgments
 
H.L. is a patent holder of fPSA and hK2 immunoassays. The authors affirm that no further relationships exist that could be construed as resulting in an actual, potential, or apparent conflict of interest with respect to this paper. We thank Gun-Britt Eriksson and Kerstin Håkansson for expert technical assistance with immunoassay measurements. This study was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant Gz Ha3168 1/1, National Cancer Institute contract P50-CA92629, SPORE Pilot Project 7, the Swedish Cancer Society project no. 3555, European Union 6th Framework contract LSHC-CT-2004-503011 (P-Mark), Finnish Academy contracts 8206690 and 878541, and Fundación Federico SA.


   Footnotes
 
1 Nonstandard abbreviations: PSA, prostate-specific antigen; PCa, prostate cancer; hK2, human kallikrein 2; ECE, extracapsular extension; tPSA, total PSA; thK2, total hK2; fhK2, free human kallikrein 2; SVI, seminal vesicle invasion; BCR, biochemical recurrence; fPSA, free prostate-specific antigen; AUC, area under the ROC curve; c-index, concordance index; CI, confidence interval.

2 Human genes: KLK3, kallikrein-related peptidase 3; KLK2, kallikrein-related peptidase 2.


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Fondurulia J, Chen MH, Kaplan I, et al. Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:168-172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kattan MW, Eastham JA, Stapleton AM, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT. A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:766-771.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Partin AW, Kattan MW, Subong EN, Walsh PC, Wojno KJ, Oesterling JE, et al. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer: a multi-institutional update. JAMA 1997;277:1445-1451.[Abstract]
  4. Stamey TA, Johnstone IM, McNeal JE, Lu AY, Yemoto CM. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen levels between 2 and 22 ng./ml. correlate poorly with post-radical prostatectomy cancer morphology: prostate specific antigen cure rates appear constant between 2 and 9 ng./ml. J Urol 2002;167:103-111.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Stamey TA, Caldwell M, McNeal JE, Nolley R, Hemenez M, Downs J. The prostate specific antigen era in the United States is over for prostate cancer: what happened in the last 20 years?. J Urol 2004;172:1297-1301.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Freedland SJ, Aronson WJ, Kane CJ, Terris MK, Presti JC, Jr, Trock B, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy among men with normal preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen levels. Cancer 2004;101:748-753.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Rittenhouse HG, Finlay JA, Mikolajczyk SD, Partin AW. Human kallikrein 2 (hK2) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA): two closely related, but distinct, kallikreins in the prostate. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1998;35:275-368.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Darson MF, Pacelli A, Roche P, Rittenhouse HG, Wolfert RL, Saeid MS, et al. Human glandular kallikrein 2 expression in prostate adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastases. Urology 1999;53:939-944.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Herrala AM, Porvari KS, Kyllonen AP, Vihko PT. Comparison of human prostate specific glandular kallikrein 2 and prostate specific antigen gene expression in prostate with gene amplification and overexpression of prostate specific glandular kallikrein 2 in tumor tissue. Cancer 2001;92:2975-2984.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Lintula S, Stenman J, Bjartell A, Nordling S, Stenman UH. Relative concentrations of hK2/PSA mRNA in benign and malignant prostatic tissue. Prostate 2005;63:324-329.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Lilja H, Abrahamsson PA. Three predominant proteins secreted by the human prostate gland. Prostate 1988;12:29-38.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Haese A, Graefen M, Becker C, Noldus J, Katz J, Cagiannos I, et al. The role of human glandular kallikrein 2 for prediction of pathologically organ confined prostate cancer. Prostate 2003;54:181-186.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Steuber T, Niemela P, Haese A, Pettersson K, Erbersdobler A, Felix Chun, KH, et al. Association of free-prostate specific antigen subfractions and human glandular kallikrein 2 with volume of benign and malignant prostatic tissue. Prostate 2005;63:13-18.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Steuber T, Vickers AJ, Haese A, Becker C, Pettersson K, Chun FK, et al. Risk assessment for biochemical recurrence prior to radical prostatectomy: significant enhancement contributed by human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) and free prostate specific antigen (PSA) in men with moderate PSA-elevation in serum. Int J Cancer 2006;118:1234-1240.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Schnall M, Tomaszewski JE, et al. A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological factors that predict for prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 1995;154:131-138.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Epstein JI, Partin AW, Potter SR, Walsh PC. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate invading the seminal vesicle: prognostic stratification based on pathologic parameters. Urology 2000;56:283-288.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, Scardino PT. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 2002;167:528-534.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 1999;281:1591-1597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. McNeal JE, Redwine EA, Freiha FS, Stamey TA. Zonal distribution of prostatic adenocarcinoma: correlation with histologic pattern and direction of spread. Am J Surg Pathol 1988;12:897-906.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Gleason DF. Histologic grading and clinical staging of prostate carcinoma. Tannenbaum M eds. Urologic Pathology: The Prostate. Philadelphia 1977:171-197 Lea and Febiger PA. .
  21. Fleming ID Cooper JS Murphy GP Sullivan BO Sobin LH Yarbro JWet al eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 5th ed 1997:219-222 Lippincott-Raven Philadelphia, PA. .
  22. Amling CL, Bergstralh EJ, Blute ML, Slezak JM, Zincke H. Defining prostate specific antigen progression after radical prostatectomy: what is the most appropriate cut point?. J Urol 2001;165:1146-1151.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Mitrunen K, Pettersson K, Piironen T, Bjork T, Lilja H, Lovgren T. Dual-label one-step immunoassay for simultaneous measurement of free and total prostate-specific antigen concentrations and ratios in serum. Clin Chem 1995;41:1115-1120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Vaisanen V, Eriksson S, Ivaska KK, Lilja H, Nurmi M, Pettersson K. Development of sensitive immunoassays for free and total human glandular kallikrein 2. Clin Chem 2004;50:1607-1617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Harrell FEJ. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis 2001:568pp Springer New York. .
  26. Noldus J, Graefen M, Haese A, Henke RP, Hammerer P, Huland H. Stage migration in clinically localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2000;38:74-78.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Ylikoski A, Karp M, Pettersson K, Lilja H, Lovgren T. Simultaneous quantification of human glandular kallikrein 2 and prostate-specific antigen mRNAs in peripheral blood from prostate cancer patients. J Mol Diagn 2001;3:111-122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Becker C, Piironen T, Kiviniemi J, Lilja H, Pettersson K. Sensitive and specific immunodetection of human glandular kallikrein 2 in serum. Clin Chem 2000;46:198-206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Shariat SF, Abdel-Aziz KF, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y. Pre-operative percent free PSA predicts clinical outcomes in patients treated with radical prostatectomy with total PSA levels below 10 ng/ml. Eur Urol 2006;49:293-302.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Shariat SF, Kattan MW, Traxel E, Andrews B, Zhu K, Wheeler TM, et al. Association of pre- and postoperative plasma levels of transforming growth factor ß(1) and interleukin 6 and its soluble receptor with prostate cancer progression. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:1992-1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Piironen T, Haese A, Huland H, Steuber T, Christensen IJ, Brunner N, et al. Enhanced discrimination of benign from malignant prostatic disease by selective measurements of cleaved forms of urokinase receptor in serum. Clin Chem 2006;52:838-844.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Piironen T, Laursen B, Pass J, List K, Gardsvoll H, Ploug M, et al. Specific immunoassays for detection of intact and cleaved forms of the urokinase receptor. Clin Chem 2004;50:2059-2068.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Ulmert D, Becker C, Nilsson JA, Piironen T, Bjork T, Hugosson J, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of measurements of free and total prostate-specific antigen in serum vs plasma after long-term storage at –20 degrees C. Clin Chem 2006;52:235-239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2006.074963v1
53/2/233    most recent
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steuber, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lilja, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steuber, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lilja, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cancer Diagnostics (since 2002)
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS