Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 53: 539-540, 2007; 10.1373/clinchem.2006.084756
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmann, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by März, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmann, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by März, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
(Clinical Chemistry. 2007;53:539-540.)
© 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

The –50G>T Polymorphism in the Promoter of the CYP2J2 Gene in Coronary Heart Disease: The Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health Study

Michael M. Hoffmann1,a, Peter Bugert2, Ursula Seelhorst3, Britta Wellnitz3, Bernhard R. Winkelmann4, Bernhard O. Boehm5 and Winfried März6

1 Division of Clinical Chemistry, Department of Medicine, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
2 Institute of Transfusion, Medicine and Immunology, Mannheim, Germany
3 LURIC Study nonprofit LLC, Freiburg, Germany
4 Cardiology Group, Frankfurt, Frankfurt-Sachsenhausen, Germany
5 Division of Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
6 Synlab Centre of Laboratory Diagnostics, Heidelberg, Germany

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Hugstetter Str. 55, D-79106 Freiburg i.Br., Germany. Fax +49-761-2703444, e-mail michael.marcus.hoffmann{at}uniklinik-freiburg.de.


To the Editor:

Cytochrome P450 epoxygenases metabolize arachidonic acid to epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs), which possess various biological properties with a role in coronary vascular function. Therefore, the cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily J, polypeptide 2 (CYP2J2) gene, which encodes CYP2J2, the predominant epoxygenase isoform involved in EET formation in the human heart, has been considered a candidate gene for coronary artery disease (CAD) (1). A frequent G-to-T polymorphism at position –50 leads to a 50% reduction in CYP2J2 promoter activity (2)(3). In a cohort of 544 patients, this polymorphism was independently associated with an increased risk of CAD (3).

We investigated whether the –50G>T polymorphism is associated with angiographic CAD, myocardial infarction (MI), or mortality in the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) cohort, which included white patients hospitalized for coronary angiography between June 1997 and May 2001. The study was approved by the ethics review committee at the Landesärztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz (Mainz, Germany). A detailed description of LURIC has been published (4). In total, the LURIC cohort includes 3243 individuals, 2547 (78.5%) with angiographically proven CAD ("CAD patients") and 696 (21.5%) individuals without CAD ("CAD controls"). Information on vital status was obtained from local registries. Another control group ("blood donor controls") included a cohort of 960 healthy blood donors [male: female 1:1; mean (SD) age 58 (5) years] with an ethnic and geographic origin comparable to that of the LURIC cohort.

Genomic DNA was prepared from EDTA-anticoagulated peripheral blood by salting-out or a commercial system (DNA Blood Mini Kit; Qiagen). The –50G>T polymorphism (rs890293) was genotyped by PCR and AluI restriction fragment-length analysis (3). Associations between categorical variables were examined by {chi}2 testing or logistic regression analysis, and covariable adjustments were done for age, sex, type 2 diabetes, body mass index, smoking, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. We used the Cox proportional hazards model to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. The criterion for statistical significance was P <0.05. The SPSS statistical package (SPSS Inc. Ver. 11.5) was used.

Genotypes fulfilled Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in each cohort. There were no significant differences in the frequencies of genotypes for CAD patients, CAD controls, and blood donor controls (Table 1 ). None of the logistic regression models revealed a significant association between the CYP2J2 polymorphism and CAD, regardless of whether or not we adjusted for conventional cardiovascular risk factors (data not shown). Very similar results were obtained when we compared the CYP2J2 genotypes in patients with previous MI vs CAD patients without MI (Table 1 ). Results were also not significant in any respect when we screened for relationships between CYP2J2 and early manifestations of CAD or MI. Among the 3243 LURIC study participants included in this examination, 496 deaths (15.4%) occurred during a median observation time of 5.45 years. The analysis for cardiovascular mortality included a total of 3229 individuals, of whom 333 (10%) died from cardiovascular causes. No deaths occurred in individuals with the TT genotype. Therefore, Cox models comparing only the GG with the GT genotypes were calculated. Regardless of whether or not we adjusted for age, sex, and conventional risk factors, the CYP2J2 polymorphism showed no association with mortality from all causes or with cardiovascular mortality (data not shown). Because EETs have been reported to inhibit vascular inflammation, we analyzed the relationship between systemic markers of inflammation such as sensitive C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and leukocyte count and the CYP2J2 genotype. The CAD status was included as main effect, and statistical adjustments were made for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors (body mass index, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and smoking). None of these models revealed any statistically significant relationships between the CYP2J2 genotype and inflammatory markers (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Prevalence of CYP2J2 genotypes in CAD patients, CAD controls, and blood donor controls.

In contrast to a recent study (3), we could not confirm the –50G>T polymorphism as a risk factor for CAD or MI in our large cross-sectional LURIC cohort. In addition, we were not able to detect any relationship of this polymorphism with total mortality or cardiovascular mortality in this cohort at intermediate risk of death. Association studies of genetic polymorphisms often lead to discrepant results, especially if small numbers of cases and controls are examined. Therefore, the validity of genetic association studies using single nucleotide polymorphisms has recently been challenged (5). In many instances, positive associations seen in small studies have not been confirmed in subsequent studies of large cohorts.


Acknowledgments

We thank S. von Karger and A. Schwentek (Freiburg) for technical assistance and the LURIC study team and laboratory staff at the Ludwigshafen General Hospital and the universities of Freiburg and Ulm.


References

  1. Wu S, Moomaw CR, Tomer KB, Falck JR, Zeldin DC. Molecular cloning and expression of CYP2J2, a human cytochrome P450 arachidonic acid epoxygenase highly expressed in heart. J Biol Chem 1996;271:3460-3468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. King LM, Ma J, Srettabunjong S, Graves J, Bradbury JA, Li L, et al. Cloning of CYP2J2 gene and identification of functional polymorphisms. Mol Pharmacol 2002;61:840-852.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Spiecker M, Darius H, Hankeln T, Soufi M, Sattler AM, Schaefer JR, et al. Risk of coronary artery disease associated with polymorphism of the cytochrome P450 epoxygenase CYP2J2. Circulation 2004;110:2132-2136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Winkelmann BR, Marz W, Boehm BO, Zotz R, Hager J, Hellstern P, et al. Rationale and design of the LURIC study–a resource for functional genomics, pharmacogenomics and long-term prognosis of cardiovascular disease. Pharmacogenomics 2001;2:S1-S73.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Ioannidis JP, Trikalinos TA, Ntzani EE, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG. Genetic associations in large versus small studies: an empirical assessment. Lancet 2003;361:567-571.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmann, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by März, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmann, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by März, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS