|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors |
1 Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
2 GSF, Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Epidemiology, Neuherberg, Germany.
3 Department of Internal Medicine IICardiology, University of Ulm Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Internal Medicine IICardiology, University of Ulm Medical Center, Robert-Koch Strasse 8, D-89081 Ulm, Germany. Fax 49-731-500-45021; e-mail wolfgang.koenig{at}uniklinik-ulm.de.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Participants for this nested case-control study came from the population-based Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease/Kooperative Gesundheitsforschung in der Region Augsburg study. ADMA was measured by liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry in 88 men with incident coronary events (fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death) and 254 age-matched controls, with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 6.2 (3.37.9) years.
Results: After adjustment for potential confounders, the relative risk for a future coronary event was 2.00 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.273.16; P = 0.003] for smokers compared with nonsmokers and 1.35 (95% CI 0.782.33; P = 0.282) for the top vs the bottom tertile of the ADMA distribution. In cases and controls, lower ADMA plasma concentrations were observed in smokers. Analysis of ADMA-associated risk in smokers and nonsmokers separately revealed substantial differences: the adjusted relative risk for future coronary events (top vs bottom tertile of the ADMA distribution) was 0.48 (95% CI 0.161.46; P = 0.198) in smokers and 2.40 (95% CI 1.145.08; P = 0.021) in nonsmokers. Exposure of human endothelium-derived EAhy 926 cells to tobacco smoke enhanced expression of the ADMA metabolizing enzyme dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 2 and reduced ADMA concentration.
Conclusions: In apparently healthy men, increased ADMA predicts the risk for coronary events in nonsmokers, but not in smokers. This may be explained in part by an alteration of ADMA metabolism by tobacco smoke.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Altogether, 9796 men and women ages 25 to 74 years participated in the 2 independent cross-sectional surveys (S2, 4940 participants; S3, 4856 participants). In the framework of the Kooperative Gesundheitsforschung in der Region Augsburg (KORA), vital statistics were assessed for all sampled persons in the 2 survey populations. Patients with incident acute coronary events before the 75th year of age were identified through the population-based MONICA/KORA coronary event registry (15). The median (interquartile range) follow-up time of the study population was 6.2 (3.37.9) years. Eighty-nine men without prevalent CHD or diabetes mellitus at baseline developed an incident acute coronary event (S2, 78 cases; S3, 11 cases). For each case, we randomly selected 3 age- and survey-matched control individuals without an incident acute coronary event during follow-up from the 2 survey populations, resulting in a study sample of 356 participants (89 cases, 267 controls). We decided not to include women because of their very low event rate. We excluded from the analysis 14 men (1 case, 13 controls) with missing data for ADMA or any of the other considered variables. Therefore, the study population of the present report is based on 88 cases and 254 event-free controls ages 35 to 74 years.
The outcome variable was a combination of incident fatal or nonfatal acute myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death. According to the MONICA manual (14), the diagnosis of a major nonfatal myocardial infarction was based on acute symptoms, cardiac enzymes, and typical electrocardiogram changes. Deaths from cardiovascular causes were validated by autopsy reports, death certificates, chart review, and information from the last treating physician.
survey methods
All participants completed a standardized questionnaire, including medical history, lifestyle, and drug intake. Blood pressure, body height (m), body weight (kg), body mass index (BMI; kg/m2), smoking habits, and alcohol consumption (g/day) were determined as described (16). We assessed leisure-time physical activity on a 4-level graded scale for winter and summer (none, <1, 12, and >2 h/week) and calculated the number of years of education from the highest level of formal education completed (17). Actual hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure
140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure
90 mm Hg, being aware of having hypertension, or taking antihypertensive medication.
cell culture experiments
We maintained human endothelial cells (EAhy 926 cells, a hybrid human cell line derived from fusion of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and A549 carcinoma cells, a kind gift of Dr. Edgell (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC) (18) in DMEM at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 50 mL CO2/L. The cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) used in the cell culture experiments was prepared from the University of Kentucky reference cigarette 2R4F. We collected the particulate phase of smoke on a Cambridge filter pad by use of a smoking machine under standard conditions prescribed by ISO4387:2000. The smoke particulate matter was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide at 10 g/L and stored frozen at 80 °C in separate vials. On the day of the experiment, each vial of CSC solution was opened and diluted in serum-free cell culture medium to desired concentration. Nicotine concentrations observed at CSC concentrations of 1 and 10 mg/L matched the concentration interval found in plasma of smokers. We assessed ADMA liberation, RNA expression, and cytotoxicity in 6-well plates after treatment of cells for 48 h with CSC. Control cells were treated with medium containing an equivalent amount of dimethyl sulfoxide.
taqman real-time quantitative reverse transcription-pcr analysis
Total RNA was extracted from EAhy 296 cells by RNAzol (Wak-Chemie) and reverse-transcribed (Superscript II, Invitrogen) by use of random hexamers. We quantified mRNA expression of dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 1 (DDAH1) and DDAH2 by use of the Applied Biosystems ABI Prism 7900 HT system (TaqMan). We carried out TaqMan reactions in 384-well plates according to the manufacturers instructions (Applied Biosystems) using premade probes for DDAH1 (Probe Hs00201707_m1 generating an amplicon of 77 bp from the NM_012137.2 transcript) and DDHA2 (probe Hs00203889_m1 generating an amplicon of 85 bp from the NM_013974.1 transcript) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as an endogenous control (probe Hs99999905_m1 generating an amplicon of 122 bp from the M33197.1 transcript). We performed relative quantification of gene expression using the 
CT method as described in the user guide for the ABI Prism 7900 HT system.
laboratory procedures
We collected a nonfasting venous blood sample from all participants in a supine resting position. We measured total serum cholesterol (TC) and HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) by routine enzymatic methods. Samples for measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP) and ADMA were stored at 70 °C until analysis. We measured serum CRP concentrations with a high-sensitivity immunoradiometric assay (range, 0.05 to 10 mg/L) as described (19). In cell culture supernatants, we measured ADMA and L-arginine by ultrasensitive liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry as previously validated and described in detail (20). We measured plasma concentrations of ADMA by use of a commercial ELISA reagent set (DLD) (21). The lower limit of detection for the ADMA ELISA was <0.05 µmol/L; intra- and interassay CVs were 4.5% and 8.3%, respectively. Cross-reactivities with SDMA and L-arginine were 1.2% and <0.02%, respectively. The correlation coefficient of the plasma ADMA values obtained by ELISA and liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry (n = 29) was 0.984.
We measured oxidized LDL by use of a competitive ELISA (Mercodia). We measured lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) by use of a commercial reagent set (cytotoxicity detection reagent set; Roche Diagnostics) and protein concentration by use of the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad). We estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) according to the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula (22).
All analyses were run in a blinded fashion.
statistical analysis
We computed means or proportions for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics for men with and without an incident coronary event. The distribution of CRP concentration was markedly skewed, and we therefore calculated the geometric mean (geometric SD) from the log-transformed data. We tested differences in mean values of continuous variables for statistical significance by t-test and differences in proportions by
2 test. We assessed associations among continuous variables by Pearson correlation coefficient r.
We used Cox proportional hazards analysis to assess the independent risk for the occurrence of a 1st coronary event. Study participants were grouped into tertiles of plasma ADMA concentrations, and the risk was calculated relative to the bottom tertile. Results are presented as hazard ratios (HRs) together with their 95% confidence interval (CI). First, crude HRs were calculated (model 1). Results were then adjusted for age (continuous) and survey (S2 or S3; model 2) and for age (continuous), survey (S2, S3), education years (<12,
12 years), smoking status (yes, no), alcohol consumption (0 g/d, 139.9 g/d,
40 g/d), obesity (BMI <30.0 kg/m2,
BMI
30.0 kg/m2), physical activity (inactive, active), actual hypertension (no, yes), TC/HDL-C ratio (continuous), and GFR (continuous; model 3). To further evaluate the interaction of ADMA and smoking status with regard to incident coronary events, we calculated adjusted HRs according to smoking status and tertile of ADMA, with never-smoking and low ADMA tertile as reference. For a test of trend, we coded ADMA tertiles with their median values and repeated the Cox regression described above. Moreover, to test for possible modifications of the ADMA effect on a coronary event by risk factors, we included interaction terms of ADMA tertiles and the parameter under concern in the multivariate Cox regression models. Cell culture data were compared by ANOVA followed by Dunnett multiple comparison test.
All significance tests were 2-tailed, and probability values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed with the Statistical Analysis System (version 8.2, SAS Institute) and Prism4 (GraphPad Software).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
associations and correlations between adma and cardiovascular risk factors
Correlations between ADMA and cardiovascular risk factors are shown in Table 2
. ADMA and age were positively correlated (r = 0.28, P <0.001 in controls and r = 0.41, P <0.001 in cases), whereas there was an inverse correlation of ADMA and GFR (r = 0.25, P <0.001 in controls and r = 0.326, P = 0.002 in cases). We observed no statistically significant correlations of ADMA with BMI or with systolic or diastolic blood pressure, TC, HDL-C, oxidized LDL, or CRP. In both groups (cases and controls), differences in ADMA concentrations between smokers and nonsmokers were observed: mean (SD) ADMA concentrations among cases were 0.69 (0.17) and 0.87 (0.23), respectively (P <0.001), and among controls, 0.74 (0.20) and 0.80 (0.22), respectively (P = 0.067).
|
relative risks for coronary events associated with increase of adma in relation to smoking status
To assess the risk of an incident coronary event according to baseline concentrations of ADMA, we calculated Cox proportional hazard models (Table 3
). For this purpose, ADMA concentrations were categorized into tertiles (0.360.70, 0.710.85, and 0.862.30 µmol/L). Median ADMA plasma concentrations in the low, intermediate, and high ADMA tertiles were 0.61, 0.77, and 0.97 µmol/L, respectively.
|
When all 342 men were included, irrespective of smoking status, the trend toward a higher HR for an incident coronary event in the intermediate and the top tertile vs the bottom tertile of the ADMA distribution did not reach statistical significance in any of the Cox regression models (Table 3
). In the fully adjusted model (3) the HR for the top ADMA tertile was 1.35 (95% CI 0.782.33; P = 0.282). In the same model, the relative risk of a future coronary event was 2.00 (95% CI 1.273.16; P = 0.003) for smokers compared with nonsmokers. By contrast, analysis of ADMA-associated risk for smokers and nonsmokers separately revealed striking differences (Table 3
). The adjusted relative risk comparing the top tertile to the bottom tertile of the ADMA distribution was 0.48 (95% CI 0.161.46; P = 0.198) for smokers, but it was 2.40 (95% CI 1.145.08; P = 0.021) for nonsmokers. Smoking was the only risk factor with a significant interaction with ADMA values (P = 0.031). In further analysis, adjusting for CRP (n = 316), the HRs were similar, with HRs (95% CIs) of 0.48 (0.141.66) for smokers and 2.35 (1.105.03) for nonsmokers.
To explore the interaction of ADMA and smoking in more detail, we assessed HRs after grouping the participants according to smoking status and tertile of ADMA (Fig. 1
). Using as reference nonsmoking men with plasma ADMA in the lowest tertile (n = 77), the complex interaction of smoking and ADMA with respect to coronary risk became even more evident. In accordance with the initial analysis in nonsmoking men, the risk of suffering a coronary event increased with tertiles of ADMA [HR 1.63 (0.773.46) and 2.37 (1.144.95), respectively, for men in the 2nd (n = 88) and 3rd (n = 91) ADMA tertiles]. By contrast, the coronary risk in the middle and top ADMA tertiles did not further increase in current smokers [HR 2.25 (0.877.79) in the 2nd ADMA tertile (n = 24) and HR 2.36 (0.816.86) in the 3rd ADMA tertile (n = 17)]. Smoking status was associated with the highest risk in patients with low ADMA concentrations (n = 45) [HR 4.49 (2.089.68)].
|
effects of tobacco smoke on adma liberation and ddah expression in EAHY 926 cells
Incubation of EAhy 926 cells for 48 h with 1.0 and 10.0 mg/L CSC resulted in declines of the ADMA concentration in the cell culture medium (normalized to cellular protein) by 28.2% and 24.8%, respectively (Fig. 2A
), whereas very low concentrations of CSC had no effect. The ADMA/L-arginine ratio declined with increasing concentrations (1.0 and 10.0 mg/L) of CSC, by 18.2% and 22.0%, respectively (both P <0.05).
|
Expression of DDAH2 mRNA was augmented by 87.6% after 48 h of incubation with 10.0 mg/L tobacco smoke concentrate, whereas changes in expression did not reach statistical significance at lower concentrations (Fig. 2B
). Expression of DDAH1 was not significantly altered (all P >0.05). None of the concentrations of CSC was associated with significant increases in LDH activity (as indicator of cytotoxicity; Fig. 2C
).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
smoking and adma
So far, the effect of smoking on ADMA has been discussed quite controversially (23). In a previous study in elderly men with a high cardiovascular risk profile, significantly lower plasma ADMA concentrations were no longer statistically significant after correction for baseline variables and morbidity (24). Another recent study by Schnabel et al. (9) found higher ADMA concentrations in smoking compared with nonsmoking men and women in a population of patients with preexisting CHD. The most plausible explanation for apparent discrepancies regarding the effects of smoking on ADMA reported by different investigators is that ADMA plasma concentrations are regulated by multiple factors and that in health and disease the relative contributions of these mechanisms to ADMA concentrations may be quite different (1)(25)(25A).
Most data available today suggest that degradation of ADMA by DDAH, rather than asymmetrical methylation of L-arginine residues and proteolysis, plays the key role in the regulation of ADMA concentrations (1)(25)(25A). Both isoforms of DDAH have been shown to be sensitive to oxidative stress (26), and ADMA concentrations tend to rise under conditions of oxidative stress (27). Hence, differences in systemic oxidative stress in patients with and without underlying cardiovascular disease may explain some of the apparent discrepancies.
A previous analysis of the MONICA Augsburg 1994/1995 cohort found a strong association between smoking and various markers of systemic inflammation in men (28). Unlike oxidative stress, inflammation is associated with lower ADMA concentrations (29). Although in our study there was no formal statistical interaction between ADMA and CRP, smoking-induced inflammation may have contributed to lower ADMA concentrations.
This study was the first to investigate a complete (lipid and water soluble) extract of cigarette smoke; previous studies reporting divergent results on ADMA and DDAH expression used only the water-soluble fraction of cigarette smoke (30) or nicotine at cytotoxic levels (31) or investigated ADMA concentrations in regenerated endothelial cells from carotid arteries obtained 6 weeks after endothelial removal in rabbits chronically exposed to nicotine (32).
A further explanation for divergent observations may be that CSCs from different cigarette brands were found to differ in their effect on the expression of a subset of >1000 genes (33).
smoking, adma, and coronary risk
This is the first prospective study investigating the association of ADMA and cardiovascular risk in a nested case-control design in a large cohort of primarily healthy participants. All previous studies on ADMA involved patients with preexisting CHD (6)(9) or organ failure (11)(12)(34) or mixed cohorts (7). In the whole cohort on which the present study was based (n = 3022), the incidences of fatal and nonfatal coronary events per 100 000 persons for current smokers, former smokers, and men who never smoked were 723, 578, and 399, respectively. With this in mind, it is striking that in the present study we observed little or no additive effect of smoking on risks in the middle and top ADMA tertiles (Fig. 1
). Even more surprising is the observation that in men with low ADMA values, smoking was associated with the highest HR. Based on our in vitro data (which suggest that cigarette smoke may enhance metabolism of ADMA) a simple explanation for this apparent paradox may be that with respect to ADMA-associated risk, smoking may present a classical confounding factor. High cigarette consumption may lower ADMA concentrations while contributing itself to a higher incidence of cardiovascular events via multiple other mechanisms.
Upregulation of DDAH expression should not raise too much enthusiasm in smokers, though. Smoking clearly is associated with a higher risk for cancer, and promotion of NO-mediated angiogenesis could have catastrophic effects when occurring in tumors. Indeed, recent studies suggest that DDAH activity and expression are increased in human tumors (35) and may enhance tumor growth (36). Thus, induction of DDAH expression may be an additional mechanism linking smoking and cancer.
adma and other risk factors
Of all risk markers evaluated (including CRP and oxidized LDL), we found a positive correlation of ADMA concentrations only with age and a negative correlation only with GFR. Conflicting results regarding the correlation or association of ADMA and other risk markers have been previously noted (1) and have been attributed at least in part to differences in concomitant diseases and risk factors. In contrast to most previous studies, we investigated a rather healthy, unselected, population-based study cohort. Negative findings in our population certainly do not preclude significant correlations in higher-risk populations with more extreme deviations from the normal range of BMI or blood pressure. In this respect, it is of interest to note that in healthy men an infusion of ADMA (leading to a more than 20-fold increase of plasma ADMA concentration) resulted in an increase of the mean arterial blood pressure by as little as 4.5 mm Hg (37).
strengths and limitations of the study
The major strengths of the present study are its population-based design and the length of follow-up. We took all incident cases from 2 random samples of the general population and age-matched controls from the same source. Also, we analyzed only the hard endpoints fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death. Nonetheless, there are limitations of the present study that need to be considered. Whereas the sample size in this event-based nested case-control design was clearly adequate to detect or exclude clinically meaningful differences in outcome for the primary comparison, sample size for the subgroup analysis of smokers and nonsmokers was small. This resulted in relatively wide CIs, indicating limited power of the subgroup analyses, especially with regard to negative findings and absolute effect sizes.
In conclusion, in an apparently healthy population with a low to moderate cardiovascular risk, we found no significant relationship between plasma ADMA concentration and long-term cardiovascular outcome for the cohort at large. This apparent lack of association could be attributed at least in part to a substantial interaction of smoking status, plasma ADMA concentration, and cardiovascular risk. When accounting for this interaction, our data actually provide first evidence that ADMA is an independent risk marker in healthy nonsmoking men.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
C. Antoniades, C. Shirodaria, P. Leeson, A. Antonopoulos, N. Warrick, T. Van-Assche, C. Cunnington, D. Tousoulis, R. Pillai, C. Ratnatunga, et al. Association of plasma asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA) with elevated vascular superoxide production and endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling: implications for endothelial function in human atherosclerosis Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2009; 30(9): 1142 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Boger, L. M. Sullivan, E. Schwedhelm, T. J. Wang, R. Maas, E. J. Benjamin, F. Schulze, V. Xanthakis, R. A. Benndorf, and R. S. Vasan Plasma Asymmetric Dimethylarginine and Incidence of Cardiovascular Disease and Death in the Community Circulation, March 31, 2009; 119(12): 1592 - 1600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Andersen, U. Simonsen, N. Uldbjerg, C. Aalkjaer, and S. Stender Smoking Cessation Early in Pregnancy and Birth Weight, Length, Head Circumference, and Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Activity in Umbilical and Chorionic Vessels: An Observational Study of Healthy Singleton Pregnancies Circulation, February 17, 2009; 119(6): 857 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zeller, C. Korandji, J.-C. Guilland, P. Sicard, C. Vergely, L. Lorgis, J.-C. Beer, L. Duvillard, A.-C. Lagrost, D. Moreau, et al. Impact of Asymmetric Dimethylarginine on Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2008; 28(5): 954 - 960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Leong, D. Zylberstein, I. Graham, L. Lissner, D. Ward, J. Fogarty, C. Bengtsson, C. Bjorkelund, D. Thelle, and for The Swedish-Irish-Norwegian (SIN) Collaboratio Asymmetric Dimethylarginine Independently Predicts Fatal and Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction and Stroke in Women: 24-Year Follow-Up of the Population Study of Women in Gothenburg Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2008; 28(5): 961 - 967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |