Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 53: 790-793, 2007. First published January 26, 2007; 10.1373/clinchem.2006.080762
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2006.080762v1
53/4/790    most recent
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Brøndum-Nielsen, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Brøndum-Nielsen, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
(Clinical Chemistry. 2007;53:790-793.)
© 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

A Homogeneous Assay for Analysis of FMR1 Promoter Methylation in Patients with Fragile X Syndrome

Christina Dahl1, Karen Grønskov2, Lars A. Larsen3, Per Guldberg1 and Karen Brøndum-Nielsen2,a

1 Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2 The Kennedy Institute-National Eye Clinic, Glostrup, Denmark; and 3 Wilhelm Johannsen Centre for Functional Genome Research, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Genetics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark;

aaddress correspondence to this author at: The Kennedy Institute-National Eye Clinic, Gl. Landevej 7, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark; fax 45-43-43-11-30, e-mail kbn{at}kisoe.org


Abstract

Background: Fragile X syndrome is caused by the expansion of a CGG trinucleotide repeat at the 5' untranslated region of the fragile X mental retardation 1 gene (FMR1). When expanded to >200 repeats (full mutation), the repeat region and the adjacent promoter CpG island become hypermethylated, rendering FMR1 transcriptionally inactive. Conventional molecular diagnosis of fragile X syndrome involves determination of the CGG repeat number by Southern blot analysis.

Methods: A homogeneous methylation-specific melting curve analysis (MS-MCA) assay for methylation status of the FMR1 promoter region was developed on the LightCycler platform. Genomic DNA was treated with sodium bisulfite, and a region containing 8 CpG sites was amplified in the presence of SYBR Green I, using primers that do not differentiate between methylated and unmethylated FMR1 molecules. After amplification, the samples were melted at 0.05 °C/s, and fluorescence melting curves were recorded. We studied samples, previously characterized by Southern blot analyses, from 10 female and 10 male donors with normal numbers of CGG trinucleotide repeats, 9 male donors who were premutation carriers, 4 male donors who carried both a premutation and a full mutation, and 25 patients with fragile X syndrome.

Results: Samples from all 20 male patients with fragile X syndrome showed a high melting peak corresponding to fully methylated FMR1, whereas samples from healthy males showed a single low melting peak corresponding to unmethylated FMR1. Of 24 samples from affected males, 9 (38%) showed 2 melting peaks, suggesting that cellular methylation mosaicism is common in fragile X syndrome.

Conclusions: MS-MCA allows rapid and reliable identification of fragile X syndrome in male patients.

Fragile X syndrome is the most common inherited cause of mental retardation, with a frequency of 1 in 4000 males and 1 in 6000 females (1). The mental impairment in affected individuals ranges from learning disabilities to autism and severe mental retardation and may be accompanied by a variety of physical and behavioral characteristics, making the clinical diagnosis difficult.

At the genomic level, fragile X syndrome is associated with the expansion of a naturally occurring CGG trinucleotide tandem repeat in the promoter region and 5' untranslated region of the fragile X mental retardation 1 gene (FMR1) at Xq27.3 (1). The number of CGG repeats is highly variable, and 4 allelic forms of FMR1 have been defined: normal alleles have <50 CGG repeats and are stable upon transmission from generation to generation; intermediate (or "gray-zone") alleles have 50–58 CGG repeats and may show some instability; premutations have between 59 and ~200 repeats and are liable to further expand upon transmission; and the alleles in individuals with fragile X syndrome have >200 repeats. The FMR1 allele with a CGG repeat number of >200 is known as a full mutation and is associated with hypermethylation of the repeat region and the adjacent promoter CpG island. It is generally recognized that promoter hypermethylation causes transcriptional silencing of FMR1 and that the pathophysiological background for disease manifestations is the absence or deficit of the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) (1). The theory of methylation-coupled silencing is supported by rare reports of healthy individuals with FMRP expression from full-mutation FMR1 alleles without promoter hypermethylation (2).

Because the lack of definitive clinical diagnostic criteria, molecular tests are important for detection of individuals with fragile X syndrome. The gold standard is Southern blot analysis, which requires large amounts of DNA and is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Numerous PCR-based tests have been developed for screening procedures, which estimate the number of CGG repeats (3)(4). The major disadvantage of these methods is that their specificity for detecting full-mutation and large premutation alleles is only moderate, owing to the common failure of conventional PCR to amplify long repetitive regions with a very high G+C content. The Clinical Molecular Genetics Society (CMGS) best practice guidelines recommend prescreening by PCR amplification of the CGG repeat and subsequent Southern blot analysis of samples that fail to amplify (males) or show a single allele (females). A disadvantage of this strategy is the inability to reliably distinguish between healthy males and males who are mosaic for normal and full-mutation alleles. Alternative PCR-based tests to determine FMR1 methylation status and/or repeat length have been developed (5)(6)(7)(8); these rely on treatment of DNA template with bisulfite to convert unmethylated cytosine, but not methylated cytosine, into uracil before PCR amplification (9). However, these methods all require a 2-step procedure, comprising initial PCR amplification followed by product analysis, which implies the risk of carry-over contamination.

We have developed a homogeneous assay for fragile X syndrome on the LightCycler platform, based on detection of hypermethylated FMR1 alleles by methylation-specific melting curve analysis (MS-MCA). This method resolves differentially methylated DNA sequences on the basis of differences in melting temperature after treatment of DNA with bisulfite (10). The basic steps, which can be integrated by means of a thermal cycler coupled with a fluorometer, involve nondiscriminatory amplification of methylated and unmethylated alleles in the presence of SYBR Green I, followed by step-wise increase of the temperature under continuous fluorescence monitoring to examine the melting properties of the PCR products. The derived melting peaks provide a graphic profile of the entire pool of DNA molecules in the sample and can be used to differentiate among 4 different methylation states: (a) unmethylated alleles generate a single low melting peak, (b) fully methylated alleles generate a single high melting peak, (c) a mixture of unmethylated and fully methylated alleles generate both the low and high melting peaks, and (d) heterogeneously methylated alleles generate a broadened melting top located between the low and high melting peaks. The latter state indicates molecular mosaicism, in which the content and distribution of methylated cytosine residues differ among different alleles in the same sample.

Genomic DNA was treated with sodium bisulfite, as previously described (10). To establish an MS-MCA assay for detection of FMR1 hypermethylation, we designed a primer set that spans 8 CpG sites within the FMR1 promoter and tested it on bisulfite-treated DNA from 2 healthy persons, a male and a female, and in vitro-methylated DNA (CpGenome Universal Methylated DNA, Chemicon). The primers were 5'-GTG AAG TGG TTT TAG TGT TTA TAT T-3' (2541) and 5'-CTC AAA AAC TAC CCT CCA CC-3' (2645R), which amplify a 105-bp region of the FMR1 promoter 5'-CpG island (GenBank Accession No. X61378). The underlined nucleotides indicate mismatches within the primer sequences representing CpG sites in the FMR1 promoter sequence. PCR was carried out using the LightCycler 1.0 instrument (Roche) in 10-µL reaction mixtures containing 5 pmol of each primer, 3 mmol/L MgCl2, 1x FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I (Roche), and bisulfite-modified DNA. Reactions were started by initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 34 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s, 65 °C for 10 s, and 72 °C for 15 s. Melting curve analysis was performed immediately after amplification by measuring the fluorescence of SYBR Green I during a temperature transition from 60 °C to 95 °C at 0.05 °C/s. Fluorescence data were converted into melting peaks using the LightCycler Software 4.05. DNA from the healthy male showed a single melting peak with an apparent melting temperature (Tm) of ~77 °C (Fig. 1A ), in vitro-methylated DNA showed a single melting peak with a Tm ~4 °C higher (Fig. 1A ), and DNA from the healthy female showed both melting peaks because 1 allele was methylated with X-chromosome inactivation (Fig. 1B ).


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. MS-MCA analysis of the FMR1 promoter region.

Bisulfite-treated DNA was amplified in the presence of SYBR Green I using primers that do not differentiate between methylated and unmethylated FMR1 alleles. The melting characteristics of the PCR products were determined directly in the PCR tube by continuous fluorescence monitoring during a temperature transition at 0.05 °C/s. (A), the melting peaks for in vitro-methylated DNA (M) and DNA from a healthy male (U) have Tms of ~81 °C and ~77 °C, respectively. Also shown are melting peaks for DNA from (B) a healthy female donor; (C) 2 male patients with fragile X syndrome, including 1 whose DNA shows a mosaic pattern (thick line); and (D) a female patient with fragile X syndrome (thick line) and a male donor whose DNA shows a promutation carrier pattern.

We blindly tested DNA from 58 sample donors, including 10 females and 10 males with normal numbers of CGG trinucleotide repeats, 9 male premutation carriers, 4 mosaic males carrying both a premutation and a full mutation, and 20 male and 5 female patients with fragile X syndrome. These samples had previously been examined by Southern blot analysis. The samples were donated for investigation with informed consent from the patients/parents. All samples from healthy females showed both low and high melting peaks, corresponding to the unmethylated and fully methylated FMR1 alleles, respectively. Samples from healthy male donors showed a single low melting peak, whereas samples from all 24 male patients with fragile X syndrome showed a high melting peak corresponding to fully methylated FMR1 (Fig. 1CUp ). The 4 samples from male donors who carried both full-mutation and premutation alleles showed both low and high melting peaks (Fig. 1CUp ). In addition, of the 20 samples from fragile X male patients who carried a full mutation, 5 samples showed 2 melting peaks but were not identified as mosaics by Southern blot analysis. The size of the low melting peak in the mosaic samples from male donors showed some interrun variation, probably due to stochastic amplification. In total, 9 of the 24 samples from affected males (38%) contained both unmethylated and fully methylated FMR1 alleles, suggesting that cellular FMR1 methylation mosaicism is common in fragile X syndrome. In previous studies, mosaicism in affected males has been detected with highly variable frequencies, ranging from 12% (11) to 41% (12), which probably reflects differences in assay resolution and/or the tissues analyzed (13).

In our study, all 5 samples from female patients with fragile X syndrome showed both low and high melting peaks and thus could not be distinguished from samples from healthy female donors (Fig. 1DUp ). This is in agreement with other studies showing that blood lymphocytes from female patients with fragile X syndrome hold both methylated and unmethylated FMR1 alleles (14)(15). We found that samples from male premutation carriers had a single low melting peak similar to that seen in samples from those of healthy males in previous studies (Fig. 1DUp ), consistent with previous studies showing that premutation FMR1 alleles are unmethylated (16)(17). None of the 58 samples showed melting peaks with intermediate Tms, suggesting that molecular mosaicism at the FMR1 locus is rare and, accordingly, the distribution of FMR1 promoter methylation is bimodal (18).

As with other methods relying on treatment of DNA with bisulfite, incomplete conversion of cytosine to uracil may be a problem and may cause false-positive results (19). However, MS-MCA of the FMR1 promoter in DNA from healthy males consistently showed a single low-melting peak, suggesting that the protocol used in this study led to complete bisulfite conversion. Another potential problem associated with MCA is that resolution of Tm differences using the LightCycler may be reduced when more samples are melted at the same time (20). Nevertheless, the Tm difference between methylated and unmethylated FMR1 sequences was so large (~4 °C) that interpretation of the melting peaks was unproblematic even when a full rotor was analyzed.

In summary, closed-tube resolution of methylated and unmethylated FMR1 alleles on the basis of differences in Tm after bisulfite conversion was 100% effective in identifying fragile X syndrome in male patients. Because the assay reads both methylated and unmethylated alleles simultaneously, mosaicism was also readily identified in DNA from male donors. On the other hand, the assay did not enable us to detect fragile X syndrome in DNA from female donors or permutation carrier status in the male donors because the methylation patterns were similar to those of healthy individuals. In addition, for some male patients who had fragile X with mosaicism, DNA patterns were indistinguishable from those of healthy females. Nevertheless, considering that the main indication to test for FMR1 abnormalities is mental retardation in male patients, the MS-MCA assay could find widespread use as an initial screening procedure due to its low cost, simplicity, and closed-tube format.


Acknowledgments

We thank Vibeke Ahrenkiel for expert technical assistance. This study was supported by the Danish Medical Research Council and the Neye Foundation.


References

  1. Warren ST, Sherman SL. The fragile X syndrome. Scriver CR Beaudet AL Sly WS Valle D eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease 2001:1257-1289 McGraw-Hill New York. .
  2. Smeets HJ, Smits AP, Verheij CE, Theelen JP, Willemsen R, van de Burgt I, et al. Normal phenotype in two brothers with a full FMR1 mutation. Hum Mol Genet 1995;4:2103-2108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Larsen LA, Grønskov K, Nørgaard-Pedersen B, Brøndum-Nielsen K, Hasholt L, Vuust J. High-throughput analysis of fragile X (CGG)n alleles in the normal and premutation range by PCR amplification and automated capillary electrophoresis. Hum Genet 1997;100:564-568.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. O’Connell CD, Atha DH, Jakupciak JP, Amos JA, Richie K. Standardization of PCR amplification for fragile X trinucleotide repeat measurements. Clin Genet 2002;61:13-20.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Panagopoulos I, Lassen C, Kristoffersson U, Aman P. A methylation PCR approach for detection of fragile X syndrome. Hum Mutat 1999;14:71-79.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Zhou Y, Law HY, Boehm CD, Yoon CS, Cutting GR, Ng IS, et al. Robust fragile X (CGG)n genotype classification using a methylation specific triple PCR assay. J Med Genet 2004;41:e45.[Free Full Text]
  7. Zhou Y, Lum JM, Yeo GH, Kiing J, Tay SK, Chong SS. Simplified molecular diagnosis of fragile X syndrome by fluorescent methylation-specific PCR and GeneScan analysis. Clin Chem 2006;52:1492-1500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Boyd VL, Moody KI, Karger AE, Livak KJ, Zon G, Burns JW. Methylation-dependent fragment separation: direct detection of DNA methylation by capillary electrophoresis of PCR products from bisulfite-converted genomic DNA. Anal Biochem 2006;354:266-273.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Clark SJ, Harrison J, Paul CL, Frommer M. High sensitivity mapping of methylated cytosines. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22:2990-2997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Worm J, Aggerholm A, Guldberg P. In-tube DNA methylation profiling by fluorescence melting curve analysis. Clin Chem 2001;47:1183-1189.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Rousseau F, Heitz D, Biancalana V, Blumenfeld S, Kretz C, Boue J, et al. Direct diagnosis by DNA analysis of the fragile X syndrome of mental retardation. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1673-1681.[Abstract]
  12. Nolin SL, Glicksman A, Houck GE, Jr, Brown WT, Dobkin CS. Mosaicism in fragile X affected males. Am J Med Genet 1994;51:509-512.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. MacKenzie JJ, Sumargo I, Taylor SA. A cryptic full mutation in a male with a classical fragile X phenotype. Clin Genet 2006;70:39-42.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Heine-Suner D, Torres-Juan L, Morla M, Busquets X, Barcelo F, Pico G, et al. Fragile-X syndrome and skewed X-chromosome inactivation within a family: a female member with complete inactivation of the functional X chromosome. Am J Med Genet A 2003;122:108-114.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Martinez R, Bonilla-Henao V, Jimenez A, Lucas M, Vega C, Ramos I, et al. Skewed X inactivation of the normal allele in fully mutated female carriers determines the levels of FMRP in blood and the fragile X phenotype. Mol Diagn 2005;9:157-162.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Genc B, Muller-Hartmann H, Zeschnigk M, Deissler H, Schmitz B, Majewski F, et al. Methylation mosaicism of 5'-(CGG)(n)-3' repeats in fragile X, premutation, and normal individuals. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:2141-2152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Hornstra IK, Nelson DL, Warren ST, Yang TP. High resolution methylation analysis of the FMR1 gene trinucleotide repeat region in fragile X syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 1993;2:1659-1665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Stöger R, Kajimura TM, Brown WT, Laird CD. Epigenetic variation illustrated by DNA methylation patterns of the fragile-X gene FMR1. Hum Mol Genet 1997;6:1791-1801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Dahl C, Guldberg P. DNA methylation analysis techniques. Biogerontology 2003;4:233-250.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Gundry CN, Vandersteen JG, Reed GH, Pryor RJ, Chen J, Wittwer CT. Amplicon melting analysis with labeled primers: a closed-tube method for differentiating homozygotes and heterozygotes. Clin Chem 2003;49:396-406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
C. Dahl and P. Guldberg
A ligation assay for multiplex analysis of CpG methylation using bisulfite-treated DNA
Nucleic Acids Res., December 18, 2007; 35(21): e144 - e144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. Dahl and P. Guldberg
High-Resolution Melting for Accurate Assessment of DNA Methylation
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2007; 53(11): 1877 - 1878.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2006.080762v1
53/4/790    most recent
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Brøndum-Nielsen, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Brøndum-Nielsen, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS