Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 53: 1155-1158, 2007. First published April 26, 2007; 10.1373/clinchem.2006.080143
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow 080143.Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2006.080143v1
53/6/1155    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skulan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skulan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Areas of Clinical Chemistry
(Clinical Chemistry. 2007;53:1155-1158.)
© 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Natural Calcium Isotopic Composition of Urine as a Marker of Bone Mineral Balance

Joseph Skulan1,a, Thomas Bullen2, Ariel D. Anbar3, J. Edward Puzas4, Linda Shackelford5, Adrian LeBlanc6 and Scott M. Smith5

1 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI; 2 Branch of Regional Research, Water Resources Discipline, US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA; 3 School of Earth and Space Exploration and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ;4 Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; 5 Human Adaptation and Countermeasures Division, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX; 6 Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

aaddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1215 W. Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706; fax 608-262-0693, e-mail jlskulan{at}geology.wisc.edu


Abstract

Background: We investigated whether changes in the natural isotopic composition of calcium in human urine track changes in net bone mineral balance, as predicted by a model of calcium isotopic behavior in vertebrates. If so, isotopic analysis of natural urine or blood calcium could be used to monitor short-term changes in bone mineral balance that cannot be detected with other techniques.

Methods: Calcium isotopic compositions are expressed as {delta}44Ca, or the difference in parts per thousand between the 44Ca/40Ca of a sample and the 44Ca/40Ca of a standard reference material. {delta}44Ca was measured in urine samples from 10 persons who participated in a study of the effectiveness of countermeasures to bone loss in spaceflight, in which 17 weeks of bed rest was used to induce bone loss. Study participants were assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: controls received no treatment, one treatment group received alendronate, and another group performed resistive exercise. Measurements were made on urine samples collected before, at 2 or 3 points during, and after bed rest.

Results: Urine {delta}44Ca values during bed rest were lower in controls than in individuals treated with alendronate (P <0.05, ANOVA) or exercise (P <0.05), and lower than the control group baseline (P <0.05, t-test). Results were consistent with the model and with biochemical and bone mineral density data.

Conclusion: Results confirm the predicted relationship between bone mineral balance and calcium isotopes, suggesting that calcium isotopic analysis of urine might be refined into a clinical and research tool.

An empirical model of the behavior of calcium isotopes in vertebrates (1) predicts that the natural calcium isotope composition of human soft tissue and urine is affected by changes in the relative rates of bone formation and resorption. Confirmation of this prediction would indicate that measurements of the calcium isotope composition of urine or blood might be a useful marker of net bone mineral balance. Such a marker, which would not require accelerator mass spectrometry or the administration of isotopic tracers, could provide information that cannot be gained from bone biochemical markers, and provide it more quickly than is possible with observed changes in bone mineral density (BMD).

Although measurements of calcium isotopes have a wide range of applications in research on bone and calcium metabolism, to date these applications have been limited to the use of artificially prepared calcium isotopic tracers such as 41Ca (2). The application described in this paper is fundamentally different from tracer studies in that it is based on measurements of natural, biologically induced variations in the calcium isotopic composition of urine. These variations are too small to be of interest in tracer studies, but they are biologically informative, and can be measured reliably with high-precision mass spectrometry.

Calcium has 6 naturally occurring isotopes (40Ca, 42Ca, 43Ca, 44Ca, 46Ca, and 48Ca). Because natural variations in calcium isotopic compositions are, with very rare exceptions (3), strictly dependent on the relative masses of the isotopes, it is possible to calculate the complete isotopic composition of a calcium sample from the ratio of any 2 isotopes (4)(5). Calcium isotopic compositions are most commonly reported as {delta}44Ca, or the difference in parts per thousand between the 44Ca/40Ca of a sample and the 44Ca/40Ca of a standard reference material (in this case seawater):

Formula

Natural processes can fractionate (that is, alter the relative abundances of) calcium isotopes (1)(4)(6). In nature, {delta}44Ca ranges from approximately –1.6{per thousand} to –0.4{per thousand} in nonbiogenic minerals, and from approximately –4.0{per thousand} to +1.0{per thousand} in biological materials. Within organisms, there typically is ~2{per thousand}–4{per thousand} difference between the highest and lowest {delta}44Ca values measured in different tissues (1). Fractionation mechanisms are not well understood, but calcium isotope fractionation during abiological and biological mineralization is well documented, and probably accounts for much of the observed natural variation in {delta}44Ca (1)(4)(6). Among a phylogenetically diverse group of nonhuman vertebrates, {delta}44Ca of bone is ~1.3{per thousand} lower than that of dietary and dissolved soft tissue calcium from which bone mineral precipitates (1). This difference largely results from fractionation during bone formation. Bone resorption, however, being a bulk dissolution process, does not fractionate calcium isotopes. As a result, when the rates of bone formation and bone resorption are equal and dietary intake of {delta}44Ca is constant, the difference in {delta}44Ca between bone and soft tissue is expected to be constant.

A simple model of calcium isotope behavior predicts that positive bone mineral balance (during which the rate of bone formation exceeds the rate of bone resorption) will cause positive excursions in soft tissue {delta}44Ca, and vice versa:

Formula
where {delta}s, {delta}d, and {delta}b are {delta}44Ca of soft tissue, dietary Ca, and bone, respectively; Vs, Vb, and Vd are the fluxes of calcium resorbed from bone, incorporated into bone, and absorbed from diet, respectively; and {Delta}b is the Ca isotope fractionation during bone formation (1).

To test the hypothesized relationship between soft tissue {delta}44Ca and bone mineral balance in humans, we measured {delta}44Ca of urine from a 10-person subset of participants in a previously published human study of the effectiveness of countermeasures to bone loss in spaceflight (7), in which extended bed rest (17 weeks) was used to induce bone loss and simulate weightlessness. Study participants were assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: no treatment (controls; n = 4), treatment with the antiresorptive drug alendronate (n = 3), or treatment with resistive exercise (n = 3). Study participants were fed identical diets; 2 samples of homogenized diet yielded the same {delta}44Ca (–1.88{per thousand} and –1.90{per thousand}), indicating that dietary {delta}44Ca was approximately constant during the study. Data were collected on BMD and biochemical markers of bone resorption (n-telopeptide, NTX) and bone formation (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, BSAP). {delta}44Ca was measured for food samples and 1-week pooled urine samples (a soft tissue proxy) collected at intervals before, during, and after bed rest.

Analytical procedures for BMD and biochemical markers are given elsewhere (7). {delta}44Ca measurements were conducted at the US Geological Survey in Menlo Park, CA, using well-established and rigorously tested geochemical techniques, including a calcium isotope "double-spike" that corrects for matrix effects and instrumental isotope fractionation (1)(5)(6)(8)(9). Reported {delta}44Ca values are based on a minimum of 60 isotope ratio measurements, with an internal imprecision of 0.15{per thousand} (2{varsigma}, 95% CI) or better. Total procedural replicates of 15 urine samples collected for this study yielded an mean external (intraassay) imprecision of ±0.154{per thousand} (2{varsigma}, 95% CI); external imprecision was ±0.040{per thousand} to ±0.154{per thousand} on full procedural replicates on reference materials having {delta}44Ca values of 0{per thousand} to –2.01{per thousand} (see the Technical Information in the Data Supplement that accompanies the online version of this article at http://www.clinchem.org/content/vol53/issue6).

No funding organization influenced the design or execution of these methods, or the presentation of our results.

Results (Table 1 and Fig. 1 ) were consistent with the hypothesized association between changes in soft tissue (e.g., urine) {delta}44Ca and changes in bone calcium balance, and with published interpretations of the BMD and biochemical marker data (7). Tested against a null hypothesis of no change in calcium isotope composition, mean urinary {delta}44Ca values became positive in the alendronate group (P <0.05, t-test), remained unchanged in the exercise group (P >0.50), and became negative in the control group (P <0.05), the group expected to have lost bone during bed rest (Fig. 1A , Table 1 ). No significant trends were observed in any group between weeks 4 and 17 (P >0.50, ANOVA).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Summary of data.1


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. (A), changes in {delta}44Ca during bed rest, by treatment group, at weeks 4, 10, and 16 or 17, and after bed rest at week 19.

Symbols show mean values, ends of whiskers show extreme values. * P <0.05. {ddagger} P <0.10. (B), mean change during bed rest from initial values of urinary {delta}44Ca and BMD of the femoral neck and lumbar spine, for alendronate (A), exercise (E), and control (C) groups. For {delta}44Ca, dark lines inside boxes show 50th percentiles, ends of boxes show 25th and 75th percentiles, and ends of whiskers show upper and lower extremes. For BMD data, central bars show means and ends of whiskers show extreme values.

{delta}44Ca was lower in the control group than in the alendronate (P <0.05, ANOVA) and exercise groups (P <0.05). There was no significant difference between the alendronate and exercise groups (P = 0.220). Because analytical uncertainty in {delta}44Ca measurements is low, interindividual variability within groups reflects real biological differences between individuals.

It is difficult to calculate bone mineral balance from biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption. These markers are of marginal clinical value (10)(11) and are not calibrated to the mass of bone gained or lost from the skeleton. In many cases bone formation and resorption increase or decrease together. For example, bone fractures cause a large increase in the rate of bone remodeling and in the concentration of formation and resorption markers (12). In this study both NTX and BSAP decreased in individuals treated with alendronate, and both increased in the exercise group (Table 1Up ). In contrast, {delta}44Ca is directly related to net change in skeletal mass and not to the individual rates of bone formation and resorption.

Large changes in {delta}44Ca occur much more rapidly than in BMD (Fig. 1BUp ). In the control group {delta}44Ca had become negative by the 4th week of bed rest (the earliest point in the study from which urine samples were analyzed) and was trending positive in the alendronate group (P <0.05 and 0.058, respectively), whereas 17 weeks were required to produce detectable changes in some BMD measures. In fact, extensive studies of calcium isotopic tracers (13)(14)(15) suggest that {delta}44Ca responds to changes in bone mineral balance in much less than 4 weeks. The residence time of calcium in different nonskeletal pools varies, so a week or more may be required to achieve full equilibration between bone mineral balance and urine {delta}44Ca (16)(17), but changes in bone mineral balance should be detectable in urinary {delta}44Ca within a few days. Long-term changes in bone mineral balance could be monitored by periodic sampling of urine calcium.

The calcium isotope data reported here constitute virtually all of the information we have on the natural behavior of calcium isotopes in humans, and more data are needed to validate the use of natural calcium isotopes as a biomarker. Although analytical variability in calcium isotope measurements is very low, we have no information on the background variation in urinary {delta}44Ca in healthy humans outside of conditions designed to induce bone loss, and thus cannot accurately assess preanalytical variability (18) or establish a reference change value(19) in calcium isotope composition. Processes other than bone formation may fractionate calcium and produce isotopic differences between soft tissue calcium compartments. For example, {delta}44Ca of all urine samples was higher than dietary {delta}44Ca (see the online Data Supplement). Differences in calcium isotopic composition between soft tissue compartments must be investigated and explained.

Future research will focus on gaining a comprehensive understanding of the distribution of calcium isotopes in the human body. This research is warranted by the potential for measurement of {delta}44Ca to be an important addition to the tools currently available for diagnosing, studying, and assessing treatments for metabolic bone disease in humans.


Acknowledgments

Grant/funding support: This research was supported by a grant from the Environmental Health Sciences Center of the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry (to J.E.P. and A.D.A.) and by HIH P30 ES 01247-24 (Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY). We also acknowledge support from the National Research Program of the Water Resources Discipline, US Geological Survey.

Financial disclosures: None declared

Acknowledgements: We thank Richard Slaughter, Dale Schoeller, and Aarthy Raman for help with statistical analyses, and Victoria Abrash, Jane Krauhs, and 2 anonymous reviewers for their invaluable assistance in preparing and revising the manuscript.


References

  1. Skulan J, DePaolo DJ. Calcium isotope fractionation between soft and mineralized tissues as a monitor of calcium use in vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:13709-13713.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Fitzgerald RL, Hillegonds DJ, Burton DW, Griffin TL, Mullaney S, Vogel JS, et al. 41Ca and accelerator mass spectrometry to monitor calcium metabolism in end stage renal disease patients. Clin Chem 2005;51:2095-2102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Marshall BD, DePaolo DJ. Precise age determinations and petrogenic studies using the K-Ca method. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1982;46:2537-2545.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  4. Skulan J, DePaolo DJ, Owens TL. Biological control of calcium isotopic abundances in the global calcium cycle. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1997;61:2205-2210.
  5. Russell WA, Papanastassiou DA, Tombrello TA. Ca isotope fractionation on the earth and other solar system materials. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1978;42:1075-1090.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  6. Zhu P, Macdougall JD. Calcium isotopes in the marine environment and the oceanic calcium cycle. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1998;62:1691-1698.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  7. Shackelford LC, LeBlanc AD, Driscoll TB, Evans HJ, Rianon NJ, Smith SM, et al. Resistance exercise as a countermeasure to disuse induced bone loss. J Appl Physiol 2004;97:119-129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. DePaolo DJ. Calcium isotopic variations produced by biological, kinetic, radiogenic and nucleosynthetic processes. Rev Mineral Geochem 2004;55:255-288.[Free Full Text]
  9. Perakis SS, Maguire DA, Bullen TD, Cromack K, Waring RH, Boyle JR. Coupled nitrogen and calcium cycles in forests of the Oregon Coast Range. Ecosystems 2006;9:63-74.[CrossRef]
  10. Gillett MJ, Vasikaran SD. Urinary NTX results rarely alter the clinical management of patients with osteoporosis in the tertiary hospital. Pathology 2006;38:49-52.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. . NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 2001;285:785-795.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Watts NB. Clinical utility of biochemical markers of bone remodeling. Clin Chem 1999;45:1359-1368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Heaney RP, Recker RR. Estimation of true calcium absorption. Ann Intern Med 1985;103:516-521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Freeman SPHT, Beck B, Bierman JM, Caffee MW, Heaney RP, Holloway L, et al. The study of skeletal calcium metabolism with 41Ca and 45Ca. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 2000;172:930-933.[CrossRef]
  15. Weaver CM. Use of calcium tracers and biomarkers to determine calcium kinetics and bone turnover. Bone 1998;22(Suppl):103S-104S.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Smith SM, Wastney ME, Nyquist LE, Shih CY, Wiesmann H, Nillen JL, et al. Calcium kinetics with microgram stable isotope doses and saliva sampling. J Mass Spectrom 1996;31:1265-1270.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Smith SM, Wastney ME, O’Brien KO, Morukov BV, Larina IM, Abrams SA, et al. Bone markers, calcium metabolism, and calcium kinetics during extended-duration space flight on the Mir space station. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:208-218.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Vesper HW. Analytical and preanalytical issues in measurement of biochemical bone markers. Lab Med 2005;36:424-429.[Free Full Text]
  19. Worsfold M, Powell DE, Jones TJ, Davie MW. Assessment of urinary bone markers for monitoring treatment of osteoporosis. Clin Chem 2004;50:2263-2270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. R. Zwart, G. E. Crawford, P. L. Gillman, G. Kala, A. S. Rodgers, A. Rogers, A. M. Inniss, B. L. Rice, K. Ericson, S. Coburn, et al.
Effects of 21 days of bed rest, with or without artificial gravity, on nutritional status of humans
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2009; 107(1): 54 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow 080143.Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2006.080143v1
53/6/1155    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skulan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skulan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Areas of Clinical Chemistry


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS