Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Correction for Middleton and Vaks, Clin Chem 53 (4) 735-741.
Clinical Chemistry 53: 1170, 2007; 10.1373/clinchem.2007.090571
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
(Clinical Chemistry. 2007;53:1170.)
© 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

Correction

Correction


The article by John Middleton and Jeffrey E. Vaks entitled "Evaluation of Assigned Value Uncertainty for Complex Calibrator Value Assignment Processes: A Prealbumin Example" (Clin Chem 2007;53:735–41), contains several errors. In the first section of Results, page 739, the text should be changed from "The IWC value assignment results are shown in Table 1" to "The IWC level 8 results are given in Table 1". Also, in Table 2, for IWC5 to IWC8, the decimal point in the uncertainty SD’s should be shifted one digit to the left. Additionally, in Table 3, footnote b, the reference interval should be changed from "... based on width of 20 mg/L of the... 18–38 mg/L" to "... based on width of 200 mg/L of the ... 180–380 mg/L." Also, in Table 3, the superscript "a" should be removed from the 180 and 380 mg/L table entries. Finally, in the 4th paragraph in Results (page 739), the text should be changed from "... we made 48 measurements (4 instruments, 12 replicates per sample) ... to "... we made 96 measurements (4 instruments, 24 replicates per sample) ... ." The authors regret the errors.





This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS