|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hemostasis and Thrombosis |
1 Department of Medicine III, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
2 Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.
3 Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Helios Kliniken, Schwerin, Germany.
aAddress correspondence to this author at: Innere Medizin, Abt. III, Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Fax 49-6221-56-5235; e-mail boris.ivandic{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: From healthy control individuals (n = 20) and patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n = 20) or sepsis (n = 20), we obtained blood drawn into 5 tubes containing citrate or a mixture of citrate, theophylline, adenosine, and dipyridamole (CTAD). The tubes were incubated for 30 min at room temperature or 0 °C before a single or double centrifugation (15 min, 2500g) at room temperature or 4 °C, respectively. sCD40L, ß-thromboglobulin (ßTG), and platelet factor 4 (PF4) concentrations were measured using immunoassays.
Results: Concentrations of sCD40L were very low in all CTAD and citrated samples maintained at 0 °C (median
0.076 µg/L). Although increased ßTG and PF4 confirmed disease-related in vivo platelet activation, sCD40L was not higher in patients than in controls. In contrast, if the samples were processed at room temperature, sCD40L was significantly higher in ACS patients than in controls (P <0.02 in CTAD and citrated plasma at room temperature). Moreover, the ßTG:PF4 ratio decreased in patient but not control CTAD samples, suggesting a greater susceptibility of patient platelets to in vitro activation.
Conclusions: Increased sCD40L concentrations resulted from in vitro platelet activation during sample preparation. Disease-related in vivo activation did not contribute to sCD40L concentrations in plasma. Therefore, published studies of sCD40L demand cautious interpretation, because their preanalytical conditions were not standardized.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In spite of the great interest in this biomarker, sCD40L still awaits appropriate clinical validation (8). Although preanalytical conditions may influence sCD40L concentrations significantly, they have not been standardized for the measurement of this marker (9)(10)(11)(12)(13). This lack of standardization prompted us to examine the effects of preanalytical conditions on the measurement of sCD40L in samples collected from healthy control individuals and patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and sepsisboth diseases are associated with in vivo platelet activation. Platelet activation was independently determined by measurement of ß-thromboglobulin (ßTG) and platelet factor 4 (PF4) concentrations. In response to activation, these proteins are rapidly secreted from platelet granules in a constant molar ratio. Decrease of the ßTG:PF4 ratio is a sensitive indicator of in vitro platelet activation (14).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
preanalytical sample processing
Five samples of venous blood were drawn via a butterfly canula (21-gauge) into 2 plastic syringes (S-Monovette, Sarstedt AG) containing 1/10 of the syringe volume of 0.106 mol/L trisodium citrate, and into 3 plastic syringes containing citrate and the inhibitors of platelet activation theophylline (15 mmol/L), adenosine (3.7 mmol/L), and dipyridamole (0.198 mmol/L) (CTAD). One of the CTAD syringes was precooled (ice-water mix) to minimize in vitro platelet activation, degranulation, and formation of microparticles. We used each syringe to examine a different condition of preanalytical processing, i.e., a combination of anticoagulant (citrate or CTAD) and incubation temperature (0 °C or room temperature). After incubation of whole blood at room temperature or 0 °C (ice-water mix) for 30 min, we obtained plasma samples after a single centrifugation (2500g) at 15 °C for 15 min and stored them at 20 °C until analysis. Whole blood, which was drawn into the precooled CTAD tube, was incubated at 0 °C before centrifugation (2500g) at 4 °C for 15 min. The plasma was removed from the central portion of the supernatant, centrifuged again to obtain platelet-poor plasma (PPP), and analyzed immediately.
analytical methods
sCD40L was measured by use of an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay using the ElecSys® 2010 automated analyzer (Roche Diagnostics) (13). Within-run imprecision, reflected by CV, in pools of citrated plasma and serum (n = 21) was 1.8% at 0.1 µg/L and 1.2% at 6.9 µg/L; between-run imprecision, over 6 days, was 4.6% and 6.4%, respectively. Interference of CTAD with sCD40L analysis was negligible: sCD40L was comparable (6.81 and 6.96 µg/L) in a serum sample diluted 10:1 with CTAD and NaCl (0.154 mmol/L), respectively. Commercial ELISAs (Diagnostica Stago/Roche Diagnostics) were used to measure ßTG and PF4 concentrations.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SCD40L, ßTG, and pf4 in the different sample preparations
All samples processed at 0 °C (and particularly CTAD PPP samples) exhibited very low concentrations of sCD40L (median
0.076 µg/L). There was no difference between controls and ACS patients, but values were lower in septic patients (Table 1
). Samples from ACS patients processed at room temperature had increased sCD40L concentrations (Table 1
). In contrast, median concentrations of ßTG were significantly higher in CTAD samples (processed at 0 °C) from ACS and sepsis patients compared with controls (Table 2
; MannWhitney U, P = 0.0157 and P = 0.0388 for ACS and sepsis, respectively). Median concentrations of PF4 were also increased in patients with ACS and sepsis compared with controls (Table 2
). Sample processing at room temperature decreased ßTG:PF4 ratios (Table 2
). Interestingly, CTAD samples obtained from healthy controls maintained a high ßTG:PF4 ratio in spite of these conditions.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, the first immunoassay was developed for the automated analysis of sCD40L. When we used this assay, we measured only very low concentrations of sCD40L in carefully processed samples (CTAD PPP) from ACS and sepsis patients, although increased ßTG and PF4 confirmed in vivo platelet activation in these patients. Apparently, disease-related in vivo platelet activation did not contribute significantly to the increased ranges of sCD40L reported in the literature. Concentrations of sCD40L were influenced by the temperature of preanalytical incubation and centrifugation and the presence of CTAD, which inhibits platelet function by increasing intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate. Interestingly, sCD40L was significantly increased in ACS patients if the samples were processed at room temperature. Previous studies of sCD40L in ACS patients also applied these sample-processing conditions (15).
We also examined the ßTG:PF4 ratio to measure in vitro platelet activation in the different sample preparations. In vivo, this ratio is
5.0, because PF4 has a short half-life (<20 min) compared with ßTG (100 min). In vitro, the ßTG:PF4 ratio decreases, because PF4 is no longer removed from circulation by rapid binding to the endothelial surface (14). The ßTG:PF4 ratio decreased significantly in CTAD samples from ACS and sepsis patients if the preanalytical processing temperature was increased to room temperature. In comparison, the ratio remained high in control CTAD samples, suggesting that platelets from healthy individuals may be more resistant to temperature-related in vitro activation than platelets from patients. Temperature-dependent formation of microparticles or specific enzymatic processes, or both, may explain this finding.
We conclude that previously reported plasma concentrations of sCD40L demand cautious interpretation, because they may result from in vitro platelet activation. For the time being, the role of sCD40L as a marker of atherothrombotic risk should be considered doubtful awaiting further evaluation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Financial disclosures: None declared.
Acknowledgments: We are indebted to Prof. Georg Hess for helpful comments and discussions. We thank Christa Dewald for excellent technical assistance.
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Nonstandard abbreviations: CD40L, CD40 ligand; sCD40L, soluble CD40L; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; ACS, acute coronary syndrome; ßTG, ß-thromboglobulin; PF4, platelet factor 4; CTAD, citrate, theophylline, adenosine, and dipyridamole; PPP, platelet-poor plasma. ![]()
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
C. Antoniades, C. Bakogiannis, D. Tousoulis, A. S. Antonopoulos, and C. Stefanadis The CD40/CD40 ligand system: linking inflammation with atherothrombosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 18, 2009; 54(8): 669 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Plaikner, A. Peer, G. Falkensammer, C. Schmidauer, C. Pechlaner, A. Griesmacher, O. Pachinger, and J. Mair Lack of Association of Soluble CD40 Ligand with the Presence of Acute Myocardial Infarction or Ischemic Stroke in the Emergency Department Clin. Chem., January 1, 2009; 55(1): 175 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Mohler III, C. M. Ballantyne, M. H. Davidson, M. Hanefeld, L. M. Ruilope, J. L. Johnson, A. Zalewski, and for the Darapladib Investigators The Effect of Darapladib on Plasma Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 Activity and Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease or Coronary Heart Disease Risk Equivalent: The Results of a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 29, 2008; 51(17): 1632 - 1641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |