Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 53: 1553-a-1555-a, 2007; 10.1373/clinchem.2007.090688
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Woerden, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Duran, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Woerden, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Duran, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
(Clinical Chemistry. 2007;53:1553-1555.)
© 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Primary Hyperoxaluria Remains Undiagnosed in Patients with Hyperoxaluria and Recurrent Urolithiasis

Christiaan S. van Woerden1,a, Jaap W. Groothoff1, Frits A. Wijburg1, Hans R. Waterham2, Ronald J.A. Wanders1, Marcel J.W. Janssen3 and Marinus Duran2

Departments of1 Pediatrics, and 2 Clinical Chemistry, Laboratory of Genetic, Metabolic Diseases, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3 Department of Clinical Chemistry, and Hematology, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Pediatrics, Academic Medical Center, G8-205, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Fax 31-20-6917735; e-mail c.s.vanwoerden{at}amc.nl.


To the Editor:

Primary hyperoxaluria (PH) is a metabolic disorder caused by deficiency of either the liver-specific enzyme alanine:glyoxylate aminotransferase (AGT) for PH type 1 (PH1) or glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate dehydrogenase (GR/HPR) for PH type 2 (PH2). PH increases endogenous oxalate production, leading to the development of renal stones and nephrocalcinosis, which may result in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (1). The 1st step in the diagnostic process involves measurement of urinary oxalate, glycolate, and/or L-glycerate, followed by enzymatic analysis of AGT (in liver) or GR/HPR (in lymphocytes), or genetic testing of the AGXT gene for PH1 or the GRHPR gene for PH2. Extensive metabolic screening is rarely performed in adults who present with stone disease because PH disease presentation usually occurs in childhood, not in adulthood. Nevertheless, more than one-third of PH1 is diagnosed in adult patients in ESRD (2). Early diagnosis and treatment is of utmost importance in PH, because conservative therapy can prevent renal insufficiency (2), particularly pyridoxine therapy in PH1(3). If treatment is not initiated in a timely manner, ESRD will ensue in these patients. Therefore, adequate diagnostic measures should be taken after the first clinical signs and symptoms have evolved.

We performed a comprehensive search among all nephrologists in the Netherlands (2) and discovered a relatively high prevalence of PH in the Netherlands. The high number of adult patients who were diagnosed only after the development of ESRD (59% for adults) indicates that our search method may have missed patients with PH and prompted us to design a strategy to identify more patients with PH. During a period of 8 years, in one routine academic hospital laboratory, we traced all patients with hyperoxaluria and performed further metabolic and genetic investigation to diagnose or exclude PH.

Since 1995, urinary oxalate has been measured at the Laboratory for General Clinical Chemistry at the Department of Clinical Chemistry in the Academic Medical Center. Until 2003, results of urinary oxalate screening revealed hyperoxaluria in 32 of 150 patients, according to the reference interval we determined with a 24-h urine collection study performed in this laboratory. In 25 of these 32 patients (those we were able to contact) we performed analyses of urinary oxalate, glycolate, and L-glycerate in fresh 24-h urine by ion chromatography (Dionex) and gas chromatography. Hyperoxaluria was detected in 6 patients (clinical characteristics as listed in Table 1 ). One patient had PH1, confirmed by detection of a Gly170Arg mutation on the so-called minor allele of the AGXT gene. The urinary oxalate excretion rate was only mildly increased because this patient used pyridoxine at the time of urinalysis. The other 5 patients had urine glycolate and L-glycerate excretion rates that were within the reference intervals and therefore in these 5 patients the diagnosis of PH was rejected and no further testing was performed. Four of these 5 patients had developed urinary tract symptoms after the onset of intestinal disease, diagnosed as secondary hyperoxaluria related to malabsorption. The 5th patient did not have evidence of PH or secondary hyperoxaluria and therefore this case was classified as idiopathic hyperoxaluria.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Characteristics of patients with hyperoxaluria.

In this study, we searched for PH in a specific patient group in which we suspected that PH may have been underdiagnosed (2). Apparently, our strategy led to the discovery of a patient with previously undiagnosed PH. In view of the very low prevalence of PH in populations studied so far, the finding of a new PH patient in a cohort of 150 patients is remarkable and confirms that PH remains undiagnosed in some adult patients, and that the prevalence of this disease may be higher than previously estimated (2). The cases we describe in this report show that PH can be diagnosed only with an immediate and complete diagnostic work-up, a procedure that provides the best opportunity to prevent further renal damage. Therefore, episodes of urolithiasis, nephrocalcinosis, recurrent urinary tract infections, or unexplained decline of renal function require assessment of urinary oxalate to exclude PH. We strongly suggest that performing the same screening strategy in other hospital laboratories will detect more PH patients who may benefit from early recognition and treatment.

As previously reported, hyperoxaluria, dehydration, and other comorbidities may lead to renal involvement (4). Citrate administration decreases the risk of stone formation (5), but this treatment was not used in 3 of the cases we investigated, an omission that may have placed them at higher risk for renal involvement. Therefore, all available conservative measures to decrease the risk of stone formation should be taken in patients with any type of hyperoxaluria.


Acknowledgments

Grant/funding support: None declared.

Financial disclosures: None declared.


References

  1. Danpure CJ. Primary hyperoxaluria. Scriver CR Beaudet AL Sly WS Valle D eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease 2001:3323-3367 McGraw-Hill New York. .
  2. van Woerden CS, Groothoff JW, Wanders RJ, Davin JC, Wijburg FA. Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 in The Netherlands: prevalence and outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18:273-279.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. van Woerden CS, Groothoff JW, Wijburg FA, Annink C, Wanders RJ, Waterham HR. Clinical implications of mutation analysis in primary hyperoxaluria type 1. Kidney Int 2004;66:746-752.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Parks JH, Worcester EM, O’Connor RC, Coe FL. Urine stone risk factors in nephrolithiasis patients with and without bowel disease. Kidney Int 2003;63:255-265.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Soygur T, Akbay A, Kupeli S. Effect of potassium citrate therapy on stone recurrence and residual fragments after shockwave lithotripsy in lower caliceal calcium oxalate urolithiasis: a randomized controlled trial. J Endourol 2002;16:149-152.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Woerden, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Duran, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Woerden, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Duran, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS