Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 54: 927-928, 2008; 10.1373/clinchem.2007.099770
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zouwail, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Begley, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zouwail, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Begley, J. P.
(Clinical Chemistry. 2008;54:927-928.)
© 2008 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Influence of Thyroid Hormone Autoantibodies on 7 Thyroid Hormone Assays

Soha A. Zouwail1,a, Angela M. O’Toole2, Penelope M. S. Clark2 and Joe P. Begley1,3

1 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Poole and Royal Bournemouth Hospitals, Dorset, UK
2 Regional Endocrine Laboratory, University Hospital Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
3 Centre of Postgraduate Medical Research and Education, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Poole Hospital, Longfleet Road, Poole, Dorset, UK, BH15 2JB, Fax +44-1202-448454, e-mail soha.zouwail{at}poole.nhs.uk


To the Editor:

Spurious results of thyroid function tests (TFT) can be recognized when they do not reflect the clinical status of the patient or are not internally consistent [e.g., increased FT4 with nonsuppressed thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)]. Potential causes of spurious TFT results include nonspecific binding of endogenous circulating factors, such as heterophilic antibodies, with assay reagents(1), the presence of albumin variants found in familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinaemia(2), and thyroid hormone autoantibodies (THAA)(3). We describe a patient who had discordant TFTs due to circulating THAA and report differences in TFT results obtained on a variety of automated immunoassay platforms.

A 19-year-old man presented with tiredness spanning a 12-month period following a prolonged viral illness. A family history of hypothyroidism prompted a request for TFTs. These showed increased FT4 of 60 pmol/L (reference interval 10–25 pmol/L) and FT3 of 8.1 pmol/L (reference interval 2.5–6.5 pmol/L), but an nonsuppressed TSH of 0.9 mU/L (reference interval 0.3–5.5 mU/L). The tests were performed on an Immulite 2500 (Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics). The patient was clinically euthyroid. Use of residual samples was in accordance with the Human Tissue Act of 2004 and the guidelines of the Royal College of Pathologists. The terms of the Declaration of Helsinki were also fully observed. Test results for heterophilic antibodies using heterophile blocking tubes (Scantibodies) were found to be negative. A screening test for familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinaemia(4) was also negative. Incubation of the patient’s serum with radiolabeled T4 tracer in the presence of 8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulfonic acid, followed by precipitation with polyethylene glycol(5), indicated the presence of T4 autoantibodies as the cause of the erroneously high FT4 result. A similar screen for T3 autoantibodies(5), using a similar method but with radiolabeled T3, was negative for this patient.

Serum FT4 measured by equilibrium dialysis (EDFT4) was within the reference interval (Table 1 ). Although the general effects of THAA on assay methods have been previously reviewed(3), the specific effects on currently used assays methods are not precisely known. We compared our TFT results for this patient with results obtained with different analytical platforms: Advia Centaur (Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics), Elecsys E170 (Roche Diagnostics), TOSOH AIA 1800 (Tosoh Bioscience), Architect c800 (Abbott Limited Diagnostics), UniCel DxI 800 (Beckman Coulter UK), and Wallac Delfia (PerkinElmer UK).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. TFT Measurements by 7 Different Immunoassays and Equilibrium Dialysis.1

Measurements of TSH obtained with the different systems did not show marked assay-dependent variation (Table 1Up ). The Immulite 2500 was the only assay that gave an increased FT3 result of 9.1 pmol/L (reference interval 2.5–6.5 pmol/L). Although no T3 autoantibodies were detected, endogenous antibodies to T4 may possibly cross-react with the T3 label used in the Immulite assay. FT4 results varied from within the reference range with Wallac Delfia to >200% of the upper reference limit with the Advia Centaur, suggesting that observed differences in FT4 results are likely due to differences in assay design. One-step procedures showed the greatest positive interference; high results were observed with both the Advia Centaur and Immulite 2500. The TOSOH AIA 1800, another 1-step assay, appeared less affected, a finding that may be attributable to a different tracer used for signal detection. Both the Advia Centaur and Immulite 2500 use chemiluminescent substrates, whereas the TOSOH uses a fluorogenic tracer. The different molecular sizes of the labels may influence whether they are recognized by the THAA.

Two-step methods appear not to be susceptible to THAA interference, because the procedure ensures that there is no contact between serum components and analog tracer(3). This characteristic was evident in the Wallac Delfia, which gave results comparable to the EDFT4. Conversely, the other 2-step assays, Abbott Architect and Beckman DXI 800, gave borderline low results, which may have been related to the nature of the tracer used in these assays. Both the Abbott and Beckman assays use T3 acridinium–labeled tracer in the second step of the reaction, when the tracer binds to unbound sites of the capture antibody. Any THAA left after the washing step will bind only the analyte and not the tracer, and hence increase the signal and decrease the FT4 concentration detected. The Elecsys E170 is a competitive 1-step assay that differs in that it involves 2 incubations steps, but without a washing step in between. First the serum and a ruthenium-labeled capture antibody are mixed, then the biotin-labeled T4 analog that binds the remaining free sites on the capture antibody is added. This assay design may account for the borderline positive interference observed (Table 1Up ).

Our data demonstrate that the presence of THAA can lead to both positive and negative interference in FT4 assays, and an increased FT3 in only 1 assay. Serum TSH provides the most reliable assessment of thyroid function for patients found to have such antibodies.


Acknowledgments

Grant/Funding Support: None declared.

Financial Disclosures: None declared.

Acknowledgments: We are grateful to many colleagues in the participating laboratories who performed assays on our behalf. We also thank the patient for allowing us to distribute his sample for analysis.


References

  1. Boscato LM, Stuart MC. Heterophilic antibodies: a problem for all immunoassays. Clin Chem 1988;34:27-33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Flechner I, Aranoff G, Reifen R, et al. Detection of albumin binding abnormalities in sera of patients with familial dysalbuminaemic hyperthyroxinemia using isoelectric focusing. Endocr Res 1992;18:229-240.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Despres N, Grant MA. Antibody interference in thyroid assays: a potential for clinical misinformation. Clin Chem 1998;44:440-454.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Stewart MF, Ratcliffe WA, Roberts I. Thyroid function tests in patients with familial dysalbuminaemic hyperthyroxinaemia (FDH). Ann Clin Biochem 1986;23:59-64.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Sakata S, Nakamura S, Miura K. Autoantibodies against thyroid hormones or iodothyronine. Ann Intern Med 1985;103:579-589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zouwail, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Begley, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zouwail, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Begley, J. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS