Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 47: 1858-1860, 2001;
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Ahsen, N.
Right arrow Articles by Oellerich, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by von Ahsen, N.
Right arrow Articles by Oellerich, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hematology
(Clinical Chemistry. 2001;47:1858-1860.)
© 2001 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Cryoglobulins Interfere with Platelet Counts by Optical and Impedance Methods but not with the CD61 Immunoplatelet Count

Nicolas von Ahsen1a, Bettina Ehrlich1, Colin Stephen Scott3, Joachim Riggert2 and Michael Oellerich1

Departments of
1 Clinical Chemistry and
2 Transfusion Medicine, Georg-August-University, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075 Goettingen, Germany
3 Abbott Diagnostika GmbH, 65205 Wiesbaden-Delkenheim, Germany

aauthor for correspondence: fax 49-551-39-12504, e-mail nahsen{at}gwdg.de

Automated complete blood counts (CBCs) use supplementary warnings (flags) to provide alerts for the existence of hematologic abnormalities (1). We observed on several occasions platelet-count interference by cryoglobulins, where the impedance and optical results were in error to a similar extent and did not trigger a delta alert.

Platelets usually are counted by impedance analysis or by optical procedures (refractive and laser light-scattering properties). The CELL-DYN CD4000 system (Abbott Laboratories) simultaneously provides both and offers a further optional approach using immunoplatelet analysis (2)(3). In the latter method, a fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled monoclonal antibody (CD61; Clone RUU-PL 7F12, IgG1 subclass) binds the glycoprotein (Gp)IIIa part of the GpIIb/IIIa receptor subunit (3). This glycoprotein is expressed by all human platelets, both resting and activated, but not by erythrocytes or leukocytes. The immunochemical platelet count is largely unaffected by sample interferences and allows determination of platelet counts to <1 x 109/L (4). The analytical performance is virtually identical to that reported for alternative flow cytometric immunomethods (5).

We recently encountered four patients with cryoglobulinemia in whom erroneously high platelet counts were obtained by both optical and impedance platelet counts.

Patient 1 had lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma. Because the CD4000 analyzer flagged the presence of variant lymphocytes, a peripheral blood smear was examined. This confirmed the presence of lymphoma cells and also revealed thrombocytopenia, whereas the automated impedance and optical analyses suggested platelet counts of ~355 x 109/L (Table 1 ). The result from a chamber (hemacytometry) count (38 x 109/L) also indicated thrombocytopenia, and a CD4000 CD61 immunoplatelet count (42 x 109/L) further substantiated the morphologic conclusions. Therefore, both the impedance and optical platelet counts were overestimated and, because the errors were of similar numeric magnitude, no CD4000 delta alert was given. Consequently, this patient’s thrombocytopenia would have been missed had the manual slide review not been performed for other reasons. We processed these same samples with other hematology analyzers (Sysmex SE8000, Sysmex K4500, Sysmex XE2100, and Bayer Technicon H3) and found platelet count overestimates similar to that of the CD4000.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical features and results from platelet counts (x 109/L) obtained by different methods.

Patient 2 (Table 1Up ) had Waldenström macroglobulinemia, but at the time of CBC analysis he was not thrombocytopenic. Both the CD4000 (impedance and optical) and Technicon H3 (optical) instruments significantly overestimated the platelet count. Two other patients seen during the past 18 months demonstrated similar patterns of interference. Both had cryoglobulinemia, one associated with centroblastic lymphoma (patient 3) and the other with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (patient 4; see Table 1Up ). These patients also had several episodes of thrombocytopenia during their hospital stays for cytoreductive chemotherapy.

Because of these observations, we wished to develop a review procedure for recognizing such situations in the absence of a significant difference between CD4000 impedance and optical platelet counts. Frequency distributions of platelet size may show increased steepness or asymmetry in the lower ends of platelet size histograms because of smaller-sized non-platelet particles such as cryoglobulin. The Technicon H3 analyzer displayed a typical peak indicative of cryoglobulinemia (6) in its optical platelet size plot (Fig. 1A ; patient 2), but this was not seen in the CD4000 impedance histogram (Fig. 1B ). In addition, the CD4000 optical scatter graph (Fig. 1C ) did not appear unduly abnormal, although there was some suggestion of a significant accumulation of events at the lower end of the 7° axis scatter. Thus, atypical CD4000 platelet plots are not always seen in cryoglobulinemia, although other interferences are usually detected with high efficiency. For comparison, whereas the Technicon H3 appeared to provide a more immediate visual indication of sample cryoglobulins, large platelet count overestimates were still obtained in most cases.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Platelet distribution for patient 2.

(A), histogram representing platelet size distribution of patient 2 (Table 1Up ), who had cryoglobulinemia as determined with the Technicon H*3 analyzer. The reported platelet count was 819 x 109/L, although the observed histogram with a high event frequency in the very low size range suggests that it was erroneous. Analysis of the same sample with the CD4000 impedance (B; 578 x 109/L) and optical (C; 619 x 109/L) platelet counting methods does not reveal any obvious abnormal distributions, although there appears to be an unusually sharp cutoff at the lower threshold on the 7° axis of the optical plot. Subsequent analysis with the CD4000 immunoplatelet method revealed a platelet count that was significantly lower (226 x 109/L) than the counts obtained by the other methods. In the immunoplatelet graphic plot (D), a large number of gray events (non-platelet) are seen to overlay the cluster of platelets (black events).

Examination of graphic plots is not used in all laboratories, and its efficiency may be limited when workload is high. Without it, operators depend on the presence of other hematologic abnormalities, instrument flags, or clinical information. Because patients with cryoglobulinemia, both at clinical presentation and during treatment, almost always show abnormal erythrocyte or leukocyte results, morphologic review is likely.

When spurious platelet counts are suggested by graphic or morphologic review, a systematic approach to subsequent investigation can be initiated. Initially, warming samples (>30 min at 37 °C) before instrument analysis generally resolves cryoglobulin interference and enables platelet counting by standard optical or impedance methods. When interference persists after rewarming, other causes should be considered.

When doubt remains regarding the true platelet count, the conventional alternative is manual hemacytometry, but its imprecision is unacceptably high when the platelet count is <20 x 109/L. The CD4000 CD61 immunoplatelet count, however, has high precision in thrombocytopenia (4) and, moreover, is not influenced by the presence of cellular or plasma interferences (Fig. 1DUp ). Despite the cost of the test (approximately US $16 in Germany), immunoplatelet counting should be considered in situations such as platelet transfusions and therapeutic interventions with bleeding risk.

Few reports have described platelet count interference by cryoglobulins, although awareness of the potential analytical problems is high. Because the presence of thrombocytopenia was masked in two of the four cases described here, we believe that cryoglobulin interference is an important concern for the clinical laboratory.


Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Hans Seeger for helpful discussions and Prof. Victor W. Armstrong for valuable editorial support.


References

  1. Bridgen ML, Dalal BI. Cell counter-related abnormalities. Lab Med 1999;30:325-334.[Web of Science]
  2. Kickler KS, Rothe M, Blosser L, Schisano T, van Hove L. Improving platelet transfusion therapy using the ImmunoPLT method on the Cell-Dyn 4000. Lab Hematol 1998;4:80-87.
  3. Gill JE, Davis KA, Cowart WJ, Nepacena FU, Kim YR. A rapid and accurate closed-tube immunoassay for platelets on an automated hematology analyzer. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;114:47-56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kunz D, Kunz WS, Scott CS, Gressner AM. Automated CD61 immunoplatelet analysis of thrombocytopenic samples. Br J Haematol 2001;112:584-592.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Kunz D, Hoffkes H, Kunz WS, Gressner AM. Standardized flow cytometric method for the accurate determination of platelet counts in patients with severe thrombocytopenia. Cytometry 2000;42:284-289.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Howard CA, Macon WR, Smith MC. An atypical spike in a platelet histogram caused by a type I cryoglobulinemia. Lab Med 1994;25:770-771.[Web of Science]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory ScienceHome page
Z. K. Shihabi
Cryoglobulins: An Important but Neglected Clinical Test
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2006; 36(4): 395 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Ahsen, N.
Right arrow Articles by Oellerich, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by von Ahsen, N.
Right arrow Articles by Oellerich, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hematology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS