Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 50: 321-326, 2004. First published December 18, 2003; 10.1373/clinchem.2003.025098
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2003.025098v1
50/2/321    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bunting, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by van Walraven, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bunting, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by van Walraven, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization
(Clinical Chemistry. 2004;50:321-326.)
© 2004 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

Evidence-based Medicine and Test Utilization

Effect of a Controlled Feedback Intervention on Laboratory Test Ordering by Community Physicians

Peter S. Bunting1,2,a and Carl van Walraven3,4,5

1 Gamma-Dynacare Medical Laboratories, Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
3 Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
4 Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
5 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Division of Biochemistry, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9 Canada. E-mail psbunting{at}ottawahospital.on.ca.

Background: Most studies of interventions to reduce laboratory test utilization have occurred in academic hospital settings, used historical controls, or have had short postintervention follow-up. Interventions with the greatest impact use multiple approaches, are repeated regularly, include comparisons with physician peers, and have a personal approach. We determined whether laboratory test utilization by community physicians could be reduced by a multifaceted program of education and feedback.

Methods: We identified 200 physicians who ordered the largest number of common laboratory tests during 1 year in a nonhospital, commercial community (reference) laboratory. They were assigned to intervention and control groups (100 each). Intervention physicians were visited individually up to three times by laboratory representatives over a 2-year period. At each visit, educational material and the physician’s personal laboratory test utilization data were presented and discussed briefly in general terms, with the latter compared with utilization data for the physician’s peers. Overall test utilization rates 1 year before, during, and 2 years after the intervention were measured using population-based databases. Time-series analysis was used to determine the effect of the intervention on laboratory test utilization.

Results: The two groups began with similar test utilization: control group, 4.06 x 106 tests in 1.48 x 106 visits (2.73 tests/visit); intervention group, 3.90 x 106 tests in 1.41 x 106 visits (2.77 tests/visit). During the 2-year intervention, intention-to-treat analysis showed that utilization decreased significantly in the intervention group compared with the controls [relative reduction of 7.9% (P <0.0001); absolute reduction of 0.22 tests/visit (95% confidence interval, 0.20–0.24)]. This difference persisted until the end of study observation, or more than 2 years after the intervention ended.

Conclusion: A multifaceted education and feedback strategy can significantly and persistently decrease laboratory utilization by practicing community physicians.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 Am J Clin PatholHome page
S. Shahangian and S. R. Snyder
Laboratory Medicine Quality Indicators: A Review of the Literature
Am J Clin Pathol, March 1, 2009; 131(3): 418 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
D. Davis and R. Galbraith
Continuing Medical Education Effect on Practice Performance: Effectiveness of Continuing Medical Education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines
Chest, March 1, 2009; 135(3_suppl): 42S - 48S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
M. J. Poley, K. I. Edelenbos, M. Mosseveld, M. A.M. van Wijk, D. H. de Bakker, J. van der Lei, and M. P.M.H. Rutten-van Molken
Cost Consequences of Implementing an Electronic Decision Support System for Ordering Laboratory Tests in Primary Care: Evidence from a Controlled Prospective Study in The Netherlands
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2007; 53(2): 213 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
J Kwok and B Jones
Unnecessary repeat requesting of tests: an audit in a government hospital immunology laboratory
J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2005; 58(5): 457 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.