HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: clinchem.2003.019786v1 50/3/530    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lumbreras-Lacarra, B. Articles by Hernández-Aguado, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lumbreras-Lacarra, B. Articles by Hernández-Aguado, I. Related Collections Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization

Methodology in Diagnostic Laboratory Test Research in Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

¹ Department of Clinic Analysis, General University Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain. ² Department of Internal Medicine, General University Hospital of Elche, Elche, Spain. ³ Department of Public Health, University of Miguel Hernández, San Juan de Alicante, Spain.

^aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Public Health, Facultad de Medicina, University of Miguel Hernández, Carretera de Valencia Km. 8.7, 03550 San Juan de Alicante, Spain. Fax 34-96-5919551; e-mail ihernandez{at}umh.es.

Background: The application of epidemiologic principles to clinical diagnosis has been less developed than in other clinical areas. Knowledge of the main flaws affecting diagnostic laboratory test research is the first step for improving its quality. We assessed the methodologic aspects of articles on laboratory tests.

Methods: We included articles that estimated indexes of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) and were published in Clinical Chemistry or Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine in 1996, 2001, and 2002. Clinical Chemistry has paid special attention to this field of research since 1996 by publishing recommendations, checklists, and reviews. Articles were identified through electronic searches in Medline. The strategy combined the Mesh term "sensitivity and specificity" (exploded) with the text words "specificity", "false negative", and "accuracy". We examined adherence to seven methodologic criteria used in the study by Reid et al. (JAMA1995;274:645–51) of papers published in general medical journals. Three observers evaluated each article independently.

Results: Seventy-nine articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The percentage of studies that satisfied each criterion improved from 1996 to 2002. Substantial improvement was observed in reporting of the statistical uncertainty of indices of diagnostic accuracy, in criteria based on clinical information from the study population (spectrum composition), and in avoidance of workup bias. Analytical reproducibility was reported frequently (68%), whereas information about indeterminate results was rarely provided. The mean number of methodologic criteria satisfied showed a statistically significant increase over the 3 years in Clinical Chemistry but not in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.

Conclusions: The methodologic quality of the articles on diagnostic test research published in Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine is comparable to the quality observed in the best general medical journals. The methodologic aspects that most need improvement are those linked to the clinical information of the populations studied. Editorial actions aimed to increase the quality of reporting of diagnostic studies could have a relevant positive effect, as shown by the improvement observed in Clinical Chemistry.

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				B. Lumbreras, L. A. Parker, M. Porta, M. Pollan, J. P.A. Ioannidis, and I. Hernandez-Aguado Overinterpretation of Clinical Applicability in Molecular Diagnostic Research Clin. Chem., April 1, 2009; 55(4): 786 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. A. DeBari Computation of decision levels from differentiated logistic regression probability curves. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., March 1, 2006; 36(2): 194 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M.M. Bossuyt The Quality of Reporting in Diagnostic Test Research: Getting Better, Still Not Optimal Clin. Chem., March 1, 2004; 50(3): 465 - 466. [Full Text] [PDF]