HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: clinchem.2006.072801v1 52/11/2141    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chan, O. T.M. Articles by Herold, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chan, O. T.M. Articles by Herold, D. A. Related Collections Proteomics and Protein Markers

Chip Electrophoresis as a Method for Quantifying Total Microalbuminuria

¹ Department of Pathology, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA.
² Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA.

^aAddress correspondence to this author at: 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, Department of Pathology, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161. Fax 858-552-7452; e-mail ochan{at}ucsd.edu.

Abstract

Background: Microalbuminuria is an important prognostic marker in diabetic nephropathy and cardiovascular disease. Initially, most commercial assays used immunoreactivity to quantify microalbuminuria; however, size-exclusion HPLC demonstrated the existence of nonimmunoreactive forms of albumin that may not be detected by immunoassay. Recent liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry analyses suggested that size-exclusion HPLC gave higher results attributable to other urine proteins coeluting with albumin. We describe an assay that measures total microalbuminuria (immunoreactive and nonimmunoreactive) without any discernable interference from other common urine proteins.

Methods: We used an automated chip electrophoresis system that utilized microfluidic separation technology and fluorescent sample detection. Each albumin specimen was mixed with the manufacturer’s sample buffer in addition to a chicken albumin internal calibrator and then electrophoresed without additional reducing agents.

Results: With variable concentrations of bovine serum albumin normalized to a chicken albumin internal calibrator, the electrophoresis system was best fit with a polynomial (R² = 0.9997; concentration range, 5–300 mg/L). The lower limit of detection was 5 mg/L. Interchip and intrachip variation studies conducted on patient urine demonstrated CVs of 3%–13%. The introduction of potentially interfering agents (i.e., molecular analytes, nonalbumin proteins) did not alter precision. Compared with immunoassay, the chip electrophoresis identified higher microalbuminuria concentrations in all urine samples. The method also clearly resolved the albumin peak from interfering proteins.

Conclusions: Unlike immunoassay, chip electrophoresis can detect both immunoreactive and nonimmunoreactive forms of albumin. This system is a simple, robust method to quantify microalbuminuria with good sensitivity, precision, and accuracy.

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				C. Granier, K. Makni, L. Molina, B. Jardin-Watelet, H. Ayadi, and F. Jarraya Gene and protein markers of diabetic nephropathy Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 792 - 799. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Sviridov, S. K. Drake, and G. L. Hortin Reactivity of Urinary Albumin (Microalbumin) Assays with Fragmented or Modified Albumin Clin. Chem., January 1, 2008; 54(1): 61 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]