Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 0: clinchem.2003.029223v1, 2004; 10.1373/clinchem.2003.029223
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2003.029223v1
50/8/1396    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patriarca, M.
Right arrow Articles by Menditto, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patriarca, M.
Right arrow Articles by Menditto, A.

Received on December 4, 2003
Accepted on May 17, 2004

Laboratory Management

Estimate of Uncertainty of Measurement from a Single-Laboratory Validation Study: Application to the Determination of Lead in Blood

Marina Patriarca 1*, Marco Castelli 1, Federica Corsetti 1, Antonio Menditto 1

1 Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: marina.patriarca{at}iss.it.

Background: Lead is an environmental pollutant, and human exposure is assessed by monitoring lead concentrations in blood. Because the main source of environmental exposure has been the use of leaded gasoline, its phase-out has led to decreased lead concentrations in the general population. Therefore, validated analytical methods for the determination of lower lead concentrations in blood (<150 µg/L) are needed. In addition, new ISO standards require that laboratories determine and specify the uncertainty of their results.

Methods: We validated a method to determine lead in blood at concentrations up to 150 µg/L by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry with Zeeman background correction according to EURACHEM guidelines. Blood samples were diluted (1:1 by volume) with 2 mL/L Triton X-100. NH4H2PO4 (5 g/L) and Mg(NO3)2 (0.5 g/L) were used as modifiers. Matrix-matched standards were used for calibration.

Results: We determined the limits of detection (3.1 µg/L) and quantification (9.4 µg/L). Repeatability and intermediate imprecision within the range 35-150 µg/L were <5.5% and <6.2%, respectively. We assessed trueness by use of certified reference materials, by recovery tests, and by comparison with target values from other reference methods (candidate external quality assessment samples). The expanded uncertainty ranged from 20% to 16% (with a confidence level of 95%) depending on concentration.

Conclusions: This study provides a working example of the estimate of uncertainty from method performance data according to the EURACHEM/CITAC guidelines. The estimated uncertainty is compatible with quality specifications for the analysis for lead in blood adopted in the US and the European Union.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
D. Stockl, K. Van Uytfanghe, D. R. Cabaleiro, L. M. Thienpont, M. Patriarca, M. Castelli, F. Corsetti, and A. Menditto
Calculation of Measurement Uncertainty in Clinical Chemistry * The authors of the article cited above respond:
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2005; 51(1): 276 - 277.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
Correction for Volume 50, Issue , p. 1396
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2005; 51(1): 281 - 281.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.