Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 0: clinchem.2004.037226v1, 2004; 10.1373/clinchem.2004.037226
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2004.037226v1
50/12/2254    most recent
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halperin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zhulina, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halperin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zhulina, E. B.

Received on May 13, 2004
Accepted on August 24, 2004

Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics

Hybridization Isotherms of DNA Microarrays and the Quantification of Mutation Studies

Avraham Halperin 1*, Arnaud Buhot 1, Ekaterina B. Zhulina 2

1 UMR 5819 [UJF, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), CEA], DRFMC/SI3M, CEA Grenoble, Grenoble, France
2 Institute of Macromolecular Compounds of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Bolshoy, Russia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ahalperin{at}cea.fr.

Method: The theory is formulated in terms of the hybridization isotherms relating the hybridization fraction at the spot to the composition of the sample solutions at thermodynamic equilibrium. It focuses on samples containing an excess of single-stranded DNA and on DNA arrays with a low surface density of probes. The hybridization equilibrium constants can be obtained by the nearest-neighbor method.

Results: Two approaches allowed us to obtain quantitative results from the DNA array data. In one, the signal of the mutation spot was compared with that of the wild-type spot. The implementation requires knowledge of the saturation intensity of the two spots. The second approach required comparison of the intensity of the mutation spot at two different temperatures. In this case, knowledge of the saturation signal was not always necessary.

Conclusions: DNA arrays can be used to obtain quantitative results on the concentration ratio of mutated DNA to wild-type DNA in studies of somatic point mutations.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
A. Halperin, A. Buhot, and E. B. Zhulina
Brush Effects on DNA Chips: Thermodynamics, Kinetics, and Design Guidelines
Biophys. J., August 1, 2005; 89(2): 796 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.