Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 0: clinchem.2004.037424v1, 2004; 10.1373/clinchem.2004.037424
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2004.037424v1
50/12/2263    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Worsfold, M.
Right arrow Articles by Davie, M. W.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Worsfold, M.
Right arrow Articles by Davie, M. W.J.

Received on May 19, 2004
Accepted on September 10, 2004

Evidence-Based Medicine and Test Utilization

Assessment of Urinary Bone Markers for Monitoring Treatment of Osteoporosis

Michael Worsfold 1*, Diane E. Powell 1, Teresa J.W. Jones 1, Michael W.J. Davie 1

1 Charles Salt Centre, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY10 7AG, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mike.worsfold{at}rjah.nhs.uk.

Background: The usefulness of urinary markers of bone turnover in monitoring therapy depends on their within-person variability compared with their responses to therapy. The aim of this study was to ????.

Methods: We measured variation during a whole year of cross-linked N-terminal telopeptide of collagen I (NTx) and urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD) as ratios to creatinine concentration and after log-transformation of the ratios, in untreated women stratified into three bone density classes, of which the lowest was osteoporotic. We also measured changes in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (LSBMD) and hip (FNBMD) in untreated women with normal bones and in those with moderate osteopenia and calculated the reference change value (RCV; or least significant change) at P <0.05 for all of these measures. We made the same measurements on women treated with bisphosphonates, estrogen replacement (HRT), or calcium and examined their individual responses to treatment compared with RCV.

Results: After 12 months on bisphosphonates, LSBMD changed more than RCV (2.55%) in 47% of women compared with 44% of those on HRT and 13% of those on calcium. Response of FNBMD was less. Log NTx (RCV= -28%) responded to bisphosphonates in 78%, regardless of BMD, but less often to HRT (67%). Log DPD (RCV= -30%) responded to bisphosphonates less frequently (53% at 12 months).

Conclusions: NTx has advantages over DPD in monitoring therapy for osteoporosis when mailed urine samples are used.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. Skulan, T. Bullen, A. D. Anbar, J. E. Puzas, L. Shackelford, A. LeBlanc, and S. M. Smith
Natural Calcium Isotopic Composition of Urine as a Marker of Bone Mineral Balance
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2007; 53(6): 1155 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. G.W. Norden, P. Rodriguez-Cutillas, and R. J. Unwin
Clinical Urinary Peptidomics: Learning to Walk Before We Can Run
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2007; 53(3): 375 - 376.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
C. S. Miller, C. P. King Jr., M. C. Langub, R. J. Kryscio, and M. V. Thomas
Salivary biomarkers of existing periodontal disease: A cross-sectional study
J Am Dent Assoc, March 1, 2006; 137(3): 322 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. Di Stefano, F. Formoso, C. Tamone, G. Aimo, G. Mengozzi, S. Bergui, and G. C. Isaia
Short-Term Urine Deoxypyridinoline Biological Variability in the First 5 Years after Menopause
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2005; 51(11): 2189 - 2192.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.