|
|
|||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received on June 4, 2004
Accepted on July 30, 2004
Proteomics and Protein Markers |
1 Finsen Laboratory, Copenhagen, Denmark, and Current address: Schering Oy, Turku, Finland
2 Finsen Laboratory, Copenhagen, Denmark
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gunilla{at}finsenlab.dk.
Background:The cell surface receptor (uPAR) for urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), is a strong prognostic marker in several types of cancer. uPA cleaves the three-domain protein uPAR(I-III) into two fragments: uPAR(I), which contains domain I; and uPAR(II-III), which contains domains II and III. Established immunoassays measure a combination of uPAR forms. Our aim was to design immunoassays for specific quantification of the individual forms of uPAR.
Methods: Using appropriate combinations of epitope-mapped monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) for capture and europium-labeled detection Mabs we designed two-site sandwich time-resolved fluorescence immunoassays (TR-FIAs): TR-FIA 1 to measure uPAR(I-III) alone; TR-FIA 2 to measure both uPAR(I-III) and uPAR(II-III); and TR-FIA 3 to measure uPAR(I). To avoid detection of uPAR(I-III) in TR-FIA 3, we used a combination of the peptide uPAR antagonist AE120 and a domain I antibody, R3. AE120 blocks the binding of R3 to uPAR(I-III). In contrast, AE120 does not interact with liberated domain I and therefore does not interfere with the binding of R3 to uPAR(I).
Results: The limits of quantification (CV <20%) determined by adding the proteins to uPAR-depleted plasma were <3 pmol/L in all three assays. The interassay CVs were <11%, and recoveries were between 93% and 105%. Cross-reactivities of purified proteins in the three TR-FIAs were no more than 4%. Studies on chymotrypsin cleavage of uPAR and size-exclusion chromatography of plasma with and without added protein further supported the specificity of the assays.
Conclusions: The three novel TR-FIAs accurately quantify uPAR(I-III) alone, uPAR(I-III) together with uPAR(II-III), and uPAR(I), respectively, in biological samples, including blood plasma, and thus are well suited for studies of the diagnostic and prognostic value of individual uPAR forms in cancer patients.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
Z.-B. Li, G. Niu, H. Wang, L. He, L. Yang, M. Ploug, and X. Chen Imaging of Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor Expression Using a 64Cu-Labeled Linear Peptide Antagonist by microPET Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2008; 14(15): 4758 - 4766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lilja, A. Vickers, and P. Scardino Measurements of Proteases or Protease System Components in Blood to Enhance Prediction of Disease Risk or Outcome in Possible Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 25(4): 347 - 348. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Steuber, A. J. Vickers, A. M. Serio, V. Vaisanen, A. Haese, K. Pettersson, J. A. Eastham, P. T. Scardino, H. Huland, and H. Lilja Comparison of Free and Total Forms of Serum Human Kallikrein 2 and Prostate-Specific Antigen for Prediction of Locally Advanced and Recurrent Prostate Cancer Clin. Chem., February 1, 2007; 53(2): 233 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Piironen, A. Haese, H. Huland, T. Steuber, I. J. Christensen, N. Brunner, K. Dano, G. Hoyer-Hansen, and H. Lilja Enhanced Discrimination of Benign from Malignant Prostatic Disease by Selective Measurements of Cleaved Forms of Urokinase Receptor in Serum Clin. Chem., May 1, 2006; 52(5): 838 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |