Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 0: clinchem.2004.043950v1, 2005; 10.1373/clinchem.2004.043950
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2004.043950v1
51/3/586    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, N. W.
Right arrow Articles by Tredger, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, N. W.
Right arrow Articles by Tredger, J. M.

Received on October 12, 2004
Accepted on December 21, 2004

Drug Monitoring and Toxicology

Low Hematocrit and Serum Albumin Concentrations Underlie the Overestimation of Tacrolimus Concentrations by Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay versus Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Nigel W. Brown 1*, Christopher E. Gonde 1, Jemimah E. Adams 1, J. Michael Tredger 2

1 Immunosuppressive Drug Monitoring, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK
2 Institute of Liver Studies, Guy's King's and St. Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College London, London, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nigel.brown{at}kingsch.nhs.uk.

Background: Rapid liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods are used increasingly for tacrolimus (TRL) monitoring but show a negative difference with respect to a microparticle immunoassay (MEIA). This report examines possible reasons for this difference between methods.

Methods: We collected 1156 samples from 277 adult and 121 pediatric recipients of liver, renal, and bone marrow grafts or hepatocyte or pancreatic islet cell implants. TRL was measured by MEIA and LC-MS/MS, and hematologic and biochemical data were collected when available.

Results: LC-MS/MS was significantly more precise (P <0.02) than the MEIA with increased sensitivity. The MEIA had a median difference of 16.2% vs LC-MS/MS overall, and this was significantly affected by patient cohort (P <0.001). The difference was greater in adult or pediatric liver graft recipients while they were inpatients rather than outpatients (31.8% and 14.0% vs 7.5% and 6.5%, respectively). The difference was also greater in bone marrow than kidney graft recipients (32.8% vs 15.8%, respectively). Multiple linear regression analysis showed significant inverse relationships of this difference with hematocrit (packed cell volume) and plasma albumin (P <0.001) in the total cohort and a positive relationship with plasma bilirubin in a subgroup of pediatric liver graft recipients.

Conclusions: Patients with a low packed cell volume and plasma albumin are likely to show artificially high concentrations of TRL when measured by MEIA. The increased risk of underimmunosuppression must be considered should doses be reduced to lower these seemingly high TRL concentrations.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
R. Borrows, G. Chusney, M. Loucaidou, A. James, S. Goel, S. Borrows, J. Van Tromp, T. Cairns, M. Griffith, N. Hakim, et al.
Analysis of Factors Influencing Tacrolimus Levels and Immunoassay Bias in Renal Transplantation
J. Clin. Pharmacol., August 1, 2007; 47(8): 1035 - 1042.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.