|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received on March 21, 2005
Accepted on June 1, 2005
Proteomics and Protein Markers |
1 Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
2 Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
Background: Profiling approaches in proteomics, such as surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) mass spectrometry, are used in disease marker discovery. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential influence of selected preanalytical factors on the results obtained.
Methods: Plasma samples anticoagulated with EDTA, citrate, or heparin, and serum samples from healthy volunteers were profiled by SELDI on CM10, immobilized metal affinity capture (IMAC) array with copper surface, and H50 chip surfaces. With linear mixed-effects models, we examined the influence of elapsed time between venipuncture and sample separation (immediate to 24 h) and the type of serum tube used (Greiner Vacuette activator, gel serum separator, or plain tubes). We analyzed purified platelets, as well as platelet-poor and platelet-rich plasma samples treated with calcium and/or thrombin to determine the platelet contribution, directly or via the clotting process, to the profiles generated. We then used cluster analysis to identify samples with similar peak profiles.
Results: Different plasma types and sera could be distinguished on the basis of cluster analyses of their spectral profiles. Elapsed time between venipuncture and separation of plasma and serum from blood samples altered the profiles obtained, particularly for serum samples and particularly on IMAC chips. The type of serum collection tube also affected the profiles because of differences in clotting time. In vitro manipulation of platelets revealed that specific peaks in IMAC profiles of serum appeared to be derived directly from platelets. Several other peaks, including some of those exhibiting time-dependent changes, arose during the clotting process.
Conclusion: Preanalytical variables, such as sample handling, can markedly influence results.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
G. M. Fiedler, A. B. Leichtle, J. Kase, S. Baumann, U. Ceglarek, K. Felix, T. Conrad, H. Witzigmann, A. Weimann, C. Schutte, et al. Serum Peptidome Profiling Revealed Platelet Factor 4 as a Potential Discriminating Peptide Associated with Pancreatic Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2009; 15(11): 3812 - 3819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. ZEIDAN, R. I. CUTRESS, N. MURRAY, G. R. COULTON, C. HASTIE, G. PACKHAM, and P. A. TOWNSEND Proteomic Analysis of Archival Breast Cancer Serum Cancer Genomics Proteomics, May 1, 2009; 6(3): 141 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Tworoger, D. Spentzos, F. T. Grall, T. A. Liebermann, and S. E. Hankinson Reproducibility of Proteomic Profiles Over 3 Years in Postmenopausal Women Not Taking Postmenopausal Hormones Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2008; 17(6): 1480 - 1485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Mannello Serum or Plasma Samples?: The "Cinderella" Role of Blood Collection Procedures Preanalytical Methodological Issues Influence the Release and Activity of Circulating Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Tissue Inhibitors, Hampering Diagnostic Trueness and Leading to Misinterpretation Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 2008; 28(4): 611 - 614. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. McLerran, W. E. Grizzle, Z. Feng, W. L. Bigbee, L. L. Banez, L. H. Cazares, D. W. Chan, J. Diaz, E. Izbicka, J. Kagan, et al. Analytical Validation of Serum Proteomic Profiling for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: Sources of Sample Bias Clin. Chem., January 1, 2008; 54(1): 44 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Diamandis Oncopeptidomics: A Useful Approach for Cancer Diagnosis? Clin. Chem., June 1, 2007; 53(6): 1004 - 1006. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Diamandis Is Early Detection of Cancer with Serum Biomarkers or Proteomic Profiling Feasible? Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book, April 14, 2007; 2007(1): 129 - 132. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Timms, E. Arslan-Low, A. Gentry-Maharaj, Z. Luo, D. T'Jampens, V. N. Podust, J. Ford, E. T. Fung, A. Gammerman, I. Jacobs, et al. Preanalytic Influence of Sample Handling on SELDI-TOF Serum Protein Profiles Clin. Chem., April 1, 2007; 53(4): 645 - 656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C.S. Cho, T. T.C. Yip, R. K.C. Ngan, T.-T. Yip, V. N. Podust, C. Yip, H. H.Y. Yiu, V. Yip, W.-W. Cheng, V. W.S. Ma, et al. ProteinChip Array Profiling for Identification of Disease- and Chemotherapy-Associated Biomarkers of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Clin. Chem., February 1, 2007; 53(2): 241 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. V. Gnatenko, P. L. Perrotta, and W. F. Bahou Proteomic approaches to dissect platelet function: half the story Blood, December 15, 2006; 108(13): 3983 - 3991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Pilny, P. Bouchal, S. Borilova, P. Ceskova, J. Zaloudik, R. Vyzula, B. Vojtesek, and D. Valik Surface-Enhanced Laser Desorption Ionization/Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Reveals Significant Artifacts in Serum Obtained from Clot Activator-Containing Collection Devices. Clin. Chem., November 1, 2006; 52(11): 2115 - 2116. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Hortin The MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometric View of the Plasma Proteome and Peptidome Clin. Chem., July 1, 2006; 52(7): 1223 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Diamandis Serum Proteomic Profiling by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Cancer Diagnosis: Next Steps Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 66(11): 5540 - 5541. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Diamandis Validation of breast cancer biomarkers identified by mass spectrometry. Clin. Chem., April 1, 2006; 52(4): 771 - 772. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. J. Semmes The "omics" Haystack: Defining Sources of Sample Bias in Expression Profiling Clin. Chem., September 1, 2005; 51(9): 1571 - 1572. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |