Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 0: clinchem.2005.058339v1, 2005; 10.1373/clinchem.2005.058339
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2005.058339v1
51/12/2326    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solberg, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lahti, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Solberg, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lahti, A.

Received on July 27, 2005
Accepted on September 21, 2005

General Clinical Chemistry

Detection of Outliers in Reference Distributions: Performance of Horn's Algorithm

Helge Erik Solberg 1* Ari Lahti 2

1 Department of Medical Biochemistry, Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet HF, Oslo, Norway
2 Department of General Psychiatry, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: heesolbe{at}online.no.

Background: Medical laboratory reference data may be contaminated with outliers that should be eliminated before estimation of the reference interval. A statistical test for outliers has been proposed by Paul S. Horn and coworkers (Clin Chem 2001;47:2137-45). The algorithm operates in 2 steps: (a) mathematically transform the original data to approximate a gaussian distribution; and (b) establish detection limits (Tukey fences) based on the central part of the transformed distribution.

Methods: We studied the specificity of Horn's test algorithm (probability of false detection of outliers), using Monte Carlo computer simulations performed on 13 types of probability distributions covering a wide range of positive and negative skewness. Distributions with 3% of the original observations replaced by random outliers were used to also examine the sensitivity of the test (probability of detection of true outliers). Three data transformations were used: the Box and Cox function (used in the original Horn's test), the Manly exponential function, and the John and Draper modulus function.

Results: For many of the probability distributions, the specificity of Horn's algorithm was rather poor compared with the theoretical expectation. The cause for such poor performance was at least partially related to remaining nongaussian kurtosis (peakedness). The sensitivity showed great variation, dependent on both the type of underlying distribution and the location of the outliers (upper and/or lower tail).

Conclusion: Although Horn's algorithm undoubtedly is an improvement compared with older methods for outlier detection, reliable statistical identification of outliers in reference data remains a challenge.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
E. Schwedhelm, V. Xanthakis, R. Maas, L. M. Sullivan, F. Schulze, U. Riederer, R. A. Benndorf, R. H. Boger, and R. S. Vasan
Asymmetric Dimethylarginine Reference Intervals Determined with Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Results from the Framingham Offspring Cohort
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2009; 55(8): 1539 - 1545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.