|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received on November 2, 2005
Accepted on March 1, 2006
Endocrinology and Metabolism |
1 Department of Medicine and General Clinical Research Center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY
2 Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY
3 General Clinical Research Center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dstein{at}aecom.yu.edu.
Background: Isotope-dilution assays (IDAs) are well established for quantification of metabolites or small drug molecules in biological fluids. Because of their increased specificity, IDAs are an alternative to immunoassays for measuring C-peptide.
Methods: We evaluated a 2-dimensional liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (2D LC/MS) IDA method. Sample preparation was by off-line solid-phase extraction, and C-peptide separation was performed on an Agilent 1100 2D LC system with a purification method based on high-pressure switching between 2 high-resolution reversed-phase columns. Because of the low fragmentation efficiency of C-peptide, multiple-reaction monitoring analysis was omitted and selective ion monitoring mode was chosen for quantification. Native and isotope-labeled ([M+18] and [M+30]) C-peptides were monitored in the +3 state at m/z 1007.7, 1013.7, and 1017.7.
Results: The assay was linear (r2 = 0.9995), with a detection limit of 300 amole (1 pg) on column. Inter- and intraday CVs for C-peptide were
2%. Comparison with an established polyclonal-based RIA showed high correlation (r = 0.964). Plasma concentrations of total C-peptide measured by RIA were consistently higher than by IDA LC/MS, consistent with the higher specificity of IDAs compared with immunoassays.
Conclusions: The 2D LC/MS IDA approach eliminates matrix effects, enhancing assay performance and reliability, and has a detection limit 100-fold lower than any previously reported LC/MS method. Isotope-labeled C-peptide(s) can be clearly differentiated from endogenous C-peptide by the difference in m/z ratio, so that both peptides can be quantified simultaneously. The method is highly precise, robust, and applicable to pharmacokinetic detection of plasma peptides.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
R. R. Little, C. L. Rohlfing, A. L. Tennill, R. W. Madsen, K. S. Polonsky, G. L. Myers, C. J. Greenbaum, J. P. Palmer, E. Rogatsky, and D. T. Stein Standardization of C-Peptide Measurements Clin. Chem., June 1, 2008; 54(6): 1023 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-M. Wiedmeyer, K. S. Polonsky, G. L. Myers, R. R. Little, C. J. Greenbaum, D. E. Goldstein, and J. P. Palmer International Comparison of C-Peptide Measurements Clin. Chem., April 1, 2007; 53(4): 784 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |