Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 0: clinchem.2006.070805v1, 2006; 10.1373/clinchem.2006.070805
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2006.070805v1
52/11/2060    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brain, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shine, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brain, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shine, B.

Received on April 1, 2006
Accepted on August 29, 2006

Endocrinology and Metabolism

Measurement of Urinary Metanephrines to Screen for Pheochromocytoma in an Unselected Hospital Referral Population

Keith L. Brain 1*, Jonathan Kay 2, Brian Shine 2

1 Department of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
2 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: keith.brain{at}pharm.ox.ac.uk.

Background: Despite the rarity of pheochromocytoma, diagnosis is important because of the dangers of uncontrolled severe hypertension and the availability of very effective surgical treatment. Urinary or plasma catecholamines or catecholamine derivatives are commonly used to screen for pheochromocytomas before imaging, but data from 24-h urinary metanephrine results, patient age, and sex may better predict tumors in populations with a low pretest probability.

Methods: We retrospectively studied outcomes of an unselected population (1819 patients) referred to a tertiary hospital laboratory for urinary metanephrine testing and investigated the usefulness of some simple derivative measures for detecting pheochromocytoma. We normalized values for urinary 24-h excretion of metanephrine, normetanephrine, and 3-methoxytyramine by dividing by an age- and sex-specific reference range. We then compared pheochromocytoma prediction by the use of products of these normalized measures with the gold standard of biopsy-confirmed tumor.

Results:The product of the excretion of normalized metanephrine (nMAD) and normalized normetanephrine (nNMT) (nMAD·nNMT) was a highly sensitive (100%) and specific (99.1%) measure, yielding a positive predictive value of 82%. ROC curves were not improved by including the normalized 3-methoxytyramine concentrations in the product. The test for nMAD·nNMT gave higher sensitivity and specificity than the tests for either substance alone.

Conclusion: The test for nMAD·nNMT is a useful measure for identifying pheochromocytoma in a population with a low pretest probability.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
T J Cawood, P J Hunt, D O'Shea, D Cole, and S Soule
Recommended evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas is costly, has high false-positive rates and confers a risk of fatal cancer that is similar to the risk of the adrenal lesion becoming malignant; time for a rethink?
Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2009; 161(4): 513 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Clin BiochemHome page
R. T Peaston and S. Ball
Biochemical detection of phaeochromocytoma: why are we continuing to ignore the evidence?
Ann Clin Biochem, January 1, 2008; 45(1): 6 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
M. d'Herbomez, G. Forzy, C. Bauters, C. Tierny, P. Pigny, B. Carnaille, F. Pattou, J.-L. Wemeau, and N. Rouaix
An analysis of the biochemical diagnosis of 66 pheochromocytomas
Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2007; 156(5): 569 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.