|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received on January 5, 2007
Accepted on July 3, 2007
Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics |
1 Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA
2 Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
3 Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
4 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Emily.Winn-Deen{at}cepheid.com.
Background: Current practice guidelines for managing patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) call for monitoring BCR-ABL transcript concentrations with a quantitative reverse transcription–PCR (qRT-PCR) assay. Because the available laboratory-developed assays lack consensus on the appropriate design, reporting of results, and reference intervals, we developed and evaluated an integrated BCR-ABL assay that yields standardized results for any laboratory and can be performed by technicians with no specialized training.
Methods: We used the Cepheid Xpert® BCR-ABL Monitor assay to measure both BCR-ABL and ABL (endogenous control) transcripts in blood samples from CML patients and healthy individuals. The assay involves 8 manual pipetting steps, fully automated nucleic acid purification, a nested qRT-PCR step, and data analysis.
Results: The BCR-ABL assay requires approximately 2 h 20 min and covers a 5-log concentration range with a lower detection limit for the BCR-ABL/ABL ratio of approximately 0.005%. Assay results were negative for 100% of the 56 known CML-negative samples (12 patients with other hematologic disorders and 44 healthy blood donors). Testing of CML-positive patients undergoing disease monitoring showed 85% agreement with negative results (17 of 20) and 100% agreement with positive results (26 of 26). An imprecision/portability study revealed no differences in performance between sites, days, instruments, and operators.
Conclusions: The Xpert BCR-ABL Monitor assay provides a robust and reproducible alternative to laboratory-developed assays. Its ease of use may allow more laboratories to offer BCR-ABL testing for patients, and the short assay time enables same-day results for treating physicians.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
S. Branford, L. Fletcher, N. C. P. Cross, M. C. Muller, A. Hochhaus, D.-W. Kim, J. P. Radich, G. Saglio, F. Pane, S. Kamel-Reid, et al. Desirable performance characteristics for BCR-ABL measurement on an international reporting scale to allow consistent interpretation of individual patient response and comparison of response rates between clinical trials Blood, October 15, 2008; 112(8): 3330 - 3338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |