Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 0: clinchem.2007.092627v1, 2007; 10.1373/clinchem.2007.092627
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2007.092627v1
54/1/86    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Söderlund-Strand, A.
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Söderlund-Strand, A.
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, J.

Received on May 28, 2007
Accepted on October 10, 2007

Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics

High-Throughput Genotyping of Oncogenic Human Papilloma Viruses with MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

Anna Söderlund-Strand 1, Joakim Dillner 1, Joyce Carlson 2*

1 WHO HPV LabNet Global Reference Laboratory Malmö, Sweden; Department of Medical Microbiology, Lund University, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
2 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Lund University, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: joyce.carlson{at}med.lu.se.

BACKGROUND: Human papilloma virus (HPV) is the major cause of cervical cancer. Use of HPV genotyping in cervical screening programs and for monitoring the effectiveness of HPV vaccination programs requires access to economical, high-throughput technology.

METHODS: We used the Sequenom MassARRAY platform to develop a high-throughput mass spectrometric (MS) method for detecting 14 specific oncogenic HPV genotypes in multiplex PCR products. We compared results from 532 cervical cell samples to the comparison method, reverse dot blot hybridization (RDBH).

RESULTS: The MS method detected all samples found positive by RDBH. In addition, the MS method identified 5 cases of cervical disease (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade I or higher) that RDBH analysis had missed. Discrepancies in specific genotypes were noted in 20 samples, all positive by MS, with an overall concordance of {kappa} = 0.945.

CONCLUSIONS: The MS high-throughput method, with a processing capacity of 10 x 384 samples within 2 working days and at a consumables cost of about US$2 per sample, performed as well as or better than the comparison method.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
A. Soderlund-Strand, J. Carlson, and J. Dillner
Modified General Primer PCR System for Sensitive Detection of Multiple Types of Oncogenic Human Papillomavirus
J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2009; 47(3): 541 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.