Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 0: clinchem.2007.096032v1, 2008; 10.1373/clinchem.2007.096032
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2007.096032v1
54/4/729    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leeflang, M. M.G.
Right arrow Articles by Zwinderman, A.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leeflang, M. M.G.
Right arrow Articles by Zwinderman, A.H.

Received on ,
Accepted on ,

Informatics and Statistics

Bias in Sensitivity and Specificity Caused by Data-Driven Selection of Optimal Cutoff Values: Mechanisms, Magnitude, and Solutions

Mariska M.G. Leeflang 1*, K.G.M. Moons 2, J.B. Reitsma 1, A.H. Zwinderman 1

1 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2 Julius Center for Health Sciences and General Practice, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

BACKGROUND: Optimal cutoff values for tests results involving continuous variables are often derived in a data-driven way. This approach, however, may lead to overly optimistic measures of diagnostic accuracy. We evaluated the magnitude of the bias in sensitivity and specificity associated with data-driven selection of cutoff values and examined potential solutions to reduce this bias.

METHODS: Different sample sizes, distributions, and prevalences were used in a simulation study. We compared data-driven estimates of accuracy based on the Youden index with the true values and calculated the median bias. Three alternative approaches (assuming a specific distribution, leave-one-out, smoothed ROC curve) were examined for their ability to reduce this bias.

RESULTS: The magnitude of bias caused by data-driven optimization of cutoff values was inversely related to sample size. If the true values for sensitivity and specificity are both 84%, the estimates in studies with a sample size of 40 will be approximately 90%. If the sample size increases to 200, the estimates will be 86%. The distribution of the test results had little impact on the amount of bias when sample size was held constant. More robust methods of optimizing cutoff values were less prone to bias, but the performance deteriorated if the underlying assumptions were not met.

CONCLUSIONS: Data-driven selection of the optimal cutoff value can lead to overly optimistic estimates of sensitivity and specificity, especially in small studies. Alternative methods can reduce this bias, but finding robust estimates for cutoff values and accuracy requires considerable sample sizes.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
B. Bharti and S. Bharti
Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarker research: trade-off between sensitivity and specificity with change of test cut-offs
J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2009; 62(11): 1051 - 1051.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. K. Aarsand, H. Boman, and S. Sandberg
Familial and Sporadic Porphyria Cutanea Tarda: Characterization and Diagnostic Strategies
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2009; 55(4): 795 - 803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. H. Kernstine and G. L. Grunkemeier
Invited commentary.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2009; 87(3): 891 - 892.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. M.G. Leeflang, J. J. Deeks, C. Gatsonis, P. M.M. Bossuyt, and on behalf of the Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy
Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
Ann Intern Med, December 16, 2008; 149(12): 889 - 897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.