|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received on December 17, 2007
Accepted on June 30, 2008
Cancer Diagnostics |
ta
vobait
1,
1 Pharmacokinetic Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, University Montpellier I, Montpellier, France, and Department of Analytical and Toxicological Chemistry, Kaunas University of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania
2 Oncopharmacology Department, Pharmacy Service, Val d'Aurelle Anticancer Centre, Montpellier, France
3 Department of Analytical and Toxicological Chemistry, Kaunas University of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania
4 Pharmacokinetic Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, University Montpellier I, Montpellier, France
5 Pharmacokinetic Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, University Montpellier I, Montpellier, France, and Oncopharmacology Department, Pharmacy Service, Val d'Aurelle Anticancer Centre, Montpellier, France
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Fbressolle{at}aol.com.
BACKGROUND: We developed and compared 2 different methods for quantifying uracil (U) and dihydrouracil (UH2) in BSA and human plasma. Special attention was paid to the selectivity/specificity and the absence of a matrix effect. The UH2/U ratio is intended as a biomarker to identify patients with deficiency in 5-fluorouracil metabolism.
METHODS: We quantified U and UH2 with 2 liquid chromatography methods after solid-phase extraction, one with UV detection (LC-UV) and the other with mass spectrometric detection (LC-MS). We selected 2 internal standards to prevent the risk of interferences. Separation was achieved with a Waters Atlantis dC18 column (LC-MS) or a Waters SymmetryShield RP18 column connected with an Atlantis dC18 (LC-UV). Mass spectrometric data were acquired in single-ion monitoring mode.
RESULTS: Assay imprecision in BSA solution was <15% (LC-UV) and <12% (LC-MS); in plasma, assay imprecision was <9.5% and <9.0%, respectively. Recoveries were 88.2%–110% (LC-UV) and 94.8%–107% (LC-MS). Extraction efficiencies were
89.0%. In BSA, the lower limits of quantification for U and UH2 were 2.5 µg/L and 6.25 µg/L, respectively, for the LC-UV method and 2.5 µg/L and 3.1 µg/L for LC-MS. The corresponding values in plasma were 11.6 µg/L and 21.5 µg/L, and 4.1 µg/L and 12.1 µg/L.
CONCLUSIONS: To estimate endogenous U and UH2 concentrations and their ratio, we recommend the use of a drug-free human plasma pool in which baseline U and UH2 concentrations have previously been measured with the standard-addition method. Our LC-MS method, which has the better test performance and is useful for measuring UH2/U ratios in cancer patients, is preferred when this equipment is available.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |