|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received on March 5, 2008
Accepted on August 26, 2008
Hematology |
1 Research associate, Centre de Génétique Humaine, CHU, University of Liège, Belgium
2 Service de Biologie Clinique, CHR Citadelle, Liège, Belgium
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: F.Boemer{at}chu.ulg.ac.be.
BACKGROUND: Neonatal screening programs for sickle cell disease are now widespread in North American and European countries. Most programs apply isoelectric focusing or HPLC to detect hemoglobin variants. Because tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is being used for screening of inherited metabolic disorders and allows protein identification, it was worth testing for hemoglobinopathy screening.
METHODS: We minimized sample preparation and analysis times by avoiding prior purification, derivatization, or separation. We developed a tryptic digestion methodology to screen for the main clinically important variants (HbS, HbC, and HbE) and
-thalassemia. To ensure proper discrimination between homozygote and heterozygote variants, we selected 4 transitions with good signal intensities for each specific peptide and calculated variant/HbA ratios for each. Method validation included intra- and interseries variability, carryover, and limit of detection. We also performed a comparative study with isoelectric focusing results on 2082 specimens.
RESULTS: Intraassay imprecision values (CVs) varied between 2.5% and 30.7%. Interassay CVs were between 6.3% and 23.6%. Carryover was <0.03%, and the limit of detection was fixed at 1% of HbS. According to the MS/MS settings (detection of HbS, HbC, HbE, and
-globin production defects), the comparative study did not yield any discrepant results between the 2 techniques.
CONCLUSIONS: MS/MS is a reliable method for hemoglobinopathy neonatal screening.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
C. Turner, Y. Daniel, and R. N. Dalton Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease through Use of Tandem Mass Spectrometry Clin. Chem., June 1, 2009; 55(6): 1243 - 1244. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Boemer, O. Ketelslegers, J.-M. Minon, V. Bours, and R. Schoos In Reply Clin. Chem., June 1, 2009; 55(6): 1244 - 1245. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |