|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received on April 17, 2008
Accepted on August 14, 2008
Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics |
1 Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, Cancer Research Institute of Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
2 National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
3 Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
4 Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, Cancer Research Institute of Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia, and Division of Medical Genetics UKBB, Research Group Human Genetics, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
5 Division of Medical Genetics UKBB, Research Group Human Genetics, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
6 Institute of Molecular Cancer Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: zdena.bartosova{at}savba.sk.
BACKGROUND: In the workup of patients with suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), detection of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) could help pinpoint the DNA in the mismatch-repair (MMR) gene carrying the germline mutation, but analysis of microsatellite markers has proved unreliable for this purpose. We developed a simple, low-cost method based on single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping and capillary electrophoresis for the assessment of LOH at 2 MMR loci simultaneously.
METHODS: We used the Applied Biosystems SNaPshot® Multiplex Kit with meticulously selected primers to assess 14 common SNPs in MLH1 [mutL homolog 1, colon cancer, nonpolyposis type 2 (E. coli)] and MSH2 [mutS homolog 2, colon cancer, nonpolyposis type 1 (E. coli)] and optimized the protocol for DNA isolated from peripheral blood and fresh/frozen or archival microsatellite-unstable tumors from patients with confirmed (n = 42) or suspected (n = 25) HNPCC. The 42 tumors from patients with confirmed MLH1 or MSH2 germline mutations were used to validate the method's diagnostic accuracy against results obtained with DNA sequencing or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
RESULTS: The SNaPshot assay provided better detection of certain SNPs than DNA sequencing. The MLH1 and MSH2 SNP marker sets were informative in 82% and 76% of the 67 cases analyzed, respectively. The new assay displayed 100% specificity for detecting LOH and predicted the location of the germline mutation in 40% of the cases (54% of those involving MLH1, 22% in MSH2).
CONCLUSIONS: Our SNP-based method for detecting LOH in MLH1 and MSH2 is simple to perform with instruments available in most clinical genetics laboratories. It can be a valuable addition to protocols now used to guide mutational screening of patients with suspected HNPCC.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |