Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 0: clinchem.2008.112052v1, 2009; 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112052
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2008.112052v1
55/5/923    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frankenstein, L.
Right arrow Articles by Zugck, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frankenstein, L.
Right arrow Articles by Zugck, C.

Received on June 5, 2008
Accepted on February 11, 2009

Proteomics and Protein Markers

Variability of N-Terminal Probrain Natriuretic Peptide in Stable Chronic Heart Failure and its Relation to Changes in Clinical Variables

Lutz Frankenstein 1*, Andrew Remppis 1, Joerdis Frankenstein 2, Georg Hess 3, Dietmar Zdunek 4, Karen Slottje 1, Hugo A. Katus 1, Christian Zugck 1

1 Department of Cardiology, Angiology Pulmonology, University of Heidelberg, Germany
2 Lehrstuhl für Pharmazeutische Biologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
3 Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany
4 Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Lutz.Frankenstein{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the variability of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and its relation to known confounding variables in patients with stable chronic heart failure who were on a stable optimized medication regimen.

METHODS: At 4 sampling intervals (14-day, 1-month, 2-month, and 3-month) the results for NT-proBNP measurements and several clinical variables were measured in samples from 41 patients with chronic systolic dysfunction who met 21 prespecified criteria for stability.

RESULTS: Mean within-person NT-proBNP variabilities expressed as percentage CV were 17.6%, 18.9%, 15.5%, and 16.2% at 14-day, 1-month, 2-month, and 3-month follow-up, respectively, and the corresponding reference change values were 34.6%, 52.5%, 43.1%, and 45.0%, respectively. Within-person variability of NT-proBNP was not found to be associated with renal function, weight, or waist circumference. Likewise, age, sex, baseline NT-proBNP, New York Heart Association functional class, and ejection fraction did not influence variability of NT-proBNP. The index of individuality ranged from 0.07–0.15 depending on the time interval between test results.

CONCLUSIONS: Although other reported studies have revealed variations in the range of 80%, in this prespecified stable heart-failure population variation of NT-proBNP at 14-day, 1-month, 2-month, and 3-month follow-up was lower and was not related to renal function or weight. In view of the low index of individuality we observed, within-person variation is quite low compared to between-person variation. Consideration of these facts is important for the interpretation of clinical trials and the use of NT-proBNP in monitoring patients with heart failure.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.