Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 0: clinchem.2008.115469v1, 2009; 10.1373/clinchem.2008.115469
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2008.115469v1
55/5/938    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pettersson, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sinisalo, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pettersson, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sinisalo, J.

Received on July 31, 2008
Accepted on January 21, 2009

Proteomics and Protein Markers

Antiantibodies to Cardiac Troponin Associate with Higher Initial Concentrations and Longer Release of Troponin I in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients

Kim Pettersson 1*, Susann Eriksson 2, Saara Wittfooth 1, Emilia Engström 1, Markku Nieminen 3, Juha Sinisalo 3

1 Department of Biotechnology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
2 Innotrac Diagnostics Oy, Turku, Finland
3 Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Laboratory, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kim.pettersson{at}utu.fi.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponin (cTn) is an established marker of myocardial infarction. Pronounced heterogeneity and the minute amounts released into the circulation constitute significant challenges for cTn detection. Recently, autoantibody formation to cTn was shown to be common and to interfere with immunoassay performance. In this study, we investigated cTn autoantibodies and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients over a 1-year period after the index event.

METHODS: We used a second-generation cTnI assay designed to reduce the interference of cTn autoantibodies. The assay for cTn autoantibodies used 2 anti-cTnI antibodies to capture the ternary cTnI-complex, enabling unrestricted binding of the autoantibodies, which were detected with a labeled antihuman IgG antibody. We analyzed serum samples from 81 non–ST-elevation ACS patients taken at admission and after 1 week and 3 and 12 months.

RESULTS: We found 14 cTn autoantibody–positive patients (21%) among the 67 cTnI-positive and none among the 14 cTnI-negative patients. Nine were autoantibody-positive at admission, and 5 became positive at 1 week. Autoantibody signals significantly increased in the 1-week and 3-month samples. At all time points, cTnI was significantly increased in the autoantibody-positive group relative to the negative group. Persistent cTnI elevations at 3 and 12 months were seen in the patients already autoantibody positive at admission.

CONCLUSIONS: During ACS, patients with cTn autoantibodies have higher cTnI release and therefore larger myocardial damage than patients without autoantibodies. Their cTnI release also lasts longer, at least months. The possible prognostic impact of these observations must be evaluated in larger clinical cohorts.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.