Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 0: clinchem.2008.115543v1, 2009; 10.1373/clinchem.2008.115543
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2008.115543v1
55/6/1100    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seegmiller, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seegmiller, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, R.

Received on August 5, 2008
Accepted on December 23, 2008

Proteomics and Protein Markers

Quantification of Urinary Albumin by Using Protein Cleavage and LC-MS/MS

Jesse C. Seegmiller 1, David R. Barnidge 1, Bradley E. Burns 1, Timothy S. Larson 2, John C. Lieske 3, Rajiv Kumar 4*

1 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
2 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Department of Internal Medicine, and Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
3 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, and Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
4 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rkumar{at}mayo.edu.

BACKGROUND: Urinary albumin excretion is a sensitive diagnostic and prognostic marker for renal disease. Therefore, measurement of urinary albumin must be accurate and precise. We investigated a method to quantify intact urinary albumin with a low detection limit.

METHODS: We constructed an external calibration curve using purified human serum albumin (HSA) added to a charcoal-stripped urine matrix. We then added an internal standard, 15N-labeled recombinant HSA (15NrHSA), to the calibrators, controls, and patient urine samples. The samples were reduced, alkylated, and digested with trypsin. The concentration of albumin in each sample was determined by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and linear regression analysis, in which the relative abundance area ratio of the tryptic peptides 42LVNEVTEFAK51 and 526QTALVELVK534 from albumin and 15NrHSA were referenced to the calibration curve.

RESULTS: The lower limit of quantification was 3.13 mg/L, and the linear dynamic range was 3.13–200 mg/L. Replicate digests from low, medium, and high controls (n = 5) gave intraassay imprecision CVs of 2.8%–11.0% for the peptide 42LVNEVTEFAK51, and 1.9%–12.3% for the 526QTALVELVK534 peptide. Interassay imprecision of the controls for a period of 10 consecutive days (n = 10) yielded CVs of 1.5%–14.8% for the 42LVNEVTEFAK51 peptide, and 6.4%–14.1% for the 526QTALVELVK534 peptide. For the 42LVNEVTEFAK51 peptide, a method comparison between LC-MS/MS and an immunoturbidometric method for 138 patient samples gave an R2 value of 0.97 and a regression line of y = 0.99x + 23.16.

CONCLUSIONS: Urinary albumin can be quantified by a protein cleavage LC-MS/MS method using a 15NrHSA internal standard. This method provides improved analytical performance in the clinically relevant range compared to a commercially available immunoturbidometric assay.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. C. Seegmiller, D. Sviridov, T. S. Larson, T. M. Borland, G. L. Hortin, and J. C. Lieske
Comparison of Urinary Albumin Quantification by Immunoturbidimetry, Competitive Immunoassay, and Protein-Cleavage Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2009; 55(11): 1991 - 1994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.