International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. http://www.icmje.org/ (Accessed 1 March 2006).
Institute of Laboratory Animal Research. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences,1996:140pp.
Scientific style and format. The CBE manual for authors, editors, and publishers, 6thed. Northbrook, IL: Council of Biology Editors, 1994:825pp.
Dodd JS, ed. The ACS style guide: a manual for authors and editors, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1997:460pp. (Address: 1155 16th St., NW, Washington, DC 20036.)
Taylor BN, US ed. The international system of units (SI). NIST Special Publication 330, Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1991:62pp. (Periodically revised; for sale by Supt. of Documents, Code No. NSPUE2, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325.)
Rodbard D. Data processing for radioimmunoassays: an overview. In: Natelson S, Pesce AJ, Dietz AA, eds. Clinical chemistry and immunochemistry; chemical and cellular bases and applications in disease. Washington, DC: AACC, 1978:477-94.
NCCLS Tentative Guideline EP5-T. User evaluation of precision performance of clinical chemistry devices. Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, June 1984.
Carey RN, Garber CC. Evaluation of methods. In: Kaplan LA, Pesce AJ, eds. Clinical chemistry. Theory, practice and correlation, 2nd ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1989:290-310.
Linnet K, Boyd JC. Selection and analytical evaluation of methods – with statistical techniques. In: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE, eds. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics, 4th ed. St Louis: Elsevier Saunders, 2005:353-407.
Linnet K. Necessary sample size for method comparison studies based on regression analysis. Clin Chem 1999;45:882-94. [Abstract/Full Text]
Linnet K. Evaluation of regression procedures for methods comparison studies. Clin Chem 1993;39:424-32. [Full Text]
12. Martin RF. General Deming regression for estimating systematic bias and its confidence interval in method-comparison studies. Data supplement. GDR: Executable program for general Deming regression calculations and graphics.
[Abstract/Full Text/Data Supplement]
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307-10.
Fraser CG, Petersen PH. Analytical performance characteristics should be judged against objective quality specifications. Clin Chem 1999;45:321-3.
[Extract/Full Text]
Solberg HE. Establishment and use of reference values. In: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, eds. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994:454-84.
16. International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Nomenclature Committee. Enzyme nomenclature 1992. San Diego: Academic Press, 1992:862pp.
STARD Group. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD statement. Clin Chem 2003;49:1-6.
[Abstract/Full Text]
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HCW, Lijmer J. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem 2003;49:7-18.
[Abstract/Full Text]
Harper R, Reeves B. Reporting of precision of estimates for diagnostic accuracy: a review. BMJ 1999;318:1322-3. [Full Text]
Harris EK. On P values and confidence intervals (why can't we P with more confidence?) [Editorial]. Clin Chem 1993;39:927-8. [Full Text]
Henderson AR. Chemistry with confidence: should Clinical Chemistry require confidence intervals for analytical and other data? [Opinion]. Clin Chem 1993;39:929-35.
[Abstract/Full Text]
Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine [Review]. Note that in Figs. 4-12 in this paper, the labels for the x-axis at the top and bottom are reversed. The (correct) dual labeling of the x-axis solves the problem of whether to plot specificity or 1 - specificity on the x-axis. Clin Chem 1993;39:561-77.
[Abstract/Full Text]
Krouwer JS. Cumulative distribution analysis graphs-an alternative to ROC curves [Technical Brief]. Clin Chem 1987;33:2305-6.
Albert A. On the use and computation of likelihood ratios in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem 1982;28:1113-9. [Abstract/Full Text]
Matthews JNS, Altman DG, Campbell MJ, Royston P. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. Br Med J 1990;300:230-5.
Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG for the CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. www.consort-statement.org.
