<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org">
<title>Clinical Chemistry recent issues</title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org</link>
<description>Clinical Chemistry RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:eIssn>1530-8561</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Clinical Chemistry</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0009-9147</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/149?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/152?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/154?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/161?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/165?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/172?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/177?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/186?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/194?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/202?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/212?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/223?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/237?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/244?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/248?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/254?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/262?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/272?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/281?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/291?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/306?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/314?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/319?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/321?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/327?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/4?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/7?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/10?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/16?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/19?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/19-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/21?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/34?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/44?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/53?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/62?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/73?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/82?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/90?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/99?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/121?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/127?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/132?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/136?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/139?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/140?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/140-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/143?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/144?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/146?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/148?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.clinchem.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Clinical Chemistry</title>
<url>http://www.clinchem.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/149?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introduction: Advances in Protein Analysis for the Clinical Laboratory [Preamble]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/149?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hortin, G. L., Carr, S. A., Anderson, N. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:57 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.132803</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introduction: Advances in Protein Analysis for the Clinical Laboratory [Preamble]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>151</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>149</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Preamble</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/152?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dementia Diagnostics 2.0--Transfer from Research Studies into Routine Clinical Practice [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/152?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Otto, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:57 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Other Areas of Clinical Chemistry]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.136051</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dementia Diagnostics 2.0--Transfer from Research Studies into Routine Clinical Practice [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>153</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>152</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/154?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adventures in Clinical Chemistry and Proteomics: A Personal Account [Reflection]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/154?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anderson, N. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:57 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.126680</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adventures in Clinical Chemistry and Proteomics: A Personal Account [Reflection]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>160</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>154</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Reflection</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/161?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quantitative Clinical Proteomics by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Assessing the Platform [Perspective]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/161?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoofnagle, A. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:57 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.134049</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quantitative Clinical Proteomics by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Assessing the Platform [Perspective]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>164</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>161</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Perspective</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/165?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protein-Based Multiplex Assays: Mock Presubmissions to the US Food and Drug Administration [Special Reports]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/165?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>As a part of ongoing efforts of the NCI-FDA Interagency Oncology Task Force subcommittee on molecular diagnostics, members of the Clinical Proteomic Technology Assessment for Cancer program of the National Cancer Institute have submitted 2 protein-based multiplex assay descriptions to the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety, US Food and Drug Administration. The objective was to evaluate the analytical measurement criteria and studies needed to validate protein-based multiplex assays. Each submission described a different protein-based platform: a multiplex immunoaffinity mass spectrometry platform for protein quantification, and an immunological array platform quantifying glycoprotein isoforms. Submissions provided a mutually beneficial way for members of the proteomics and regulatory communities to identify the analytical issues that the field should address when developing protein-based multiplex clinical assays. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Regnier, F. E., Skates, S. J., Mesri, M., Rodriguez, H., Tezak, Z., Kondratovich, M. V., Alterman, M. A., Levin, J. D., Roscoe, D., Reilly, E., Callaghan, J., Kelm, K., Brown, D., Philip, R., Carr, S. A., Liebler, D. C., Fisher, S. J., Tempst, P., Hiltke, T., Kessler, L. G., Kinsinger, C. R., Ransohoff, D. F., Mansfield, E., Anderson, N. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:57 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.140087</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protein-Based Multiplex Assays: Mock Presubmissions to the US Food and Drug Administration [Special Reports]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>171</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>165</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/172?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Proteomics Research to Discover Markers: What Can We Learn from Netflix(R)? [Mini-Reviews]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/172?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Research in the field of proteomics to discover markers for detection of cancer has produced disappointing results, with few markers gaining US Food and Drug Administration approval, and few claims borne out when subsequently tested in rigorous studies. What is the role of better mathematical or statistical analysis in improving the situation?</p>
<p>Content: This article examines whether a recent successful Netflix-sponsored competition using mathematical analysis to develop a prediction model for movie ratings of individual subscribers can serve to improve studies of markers in the field of proteomics. Netflix developed a database of movie preferences of individual subscribers using a longitudinal cohort research design. Groups of researchers then competed to develop better ways to analyze the data. Against this background, the strengths and weaknesses of research design are reviewed, contrasting the Netflix design with that of studies of biomarkers to detect cancer. Such biomarker studies generally have less-strong design, lower numbers of outcomes, and greater difficulty in even just measuring predictors and outcomes, so the fundamental data that will be used in mathematical analysis tend to be much weaker than in other kinds of research.</p>
<p>Conclusions: If the fundamental data that will be analyzed are not strong, then better analytic methods have limited use in improving the situation. Recognition of this situation is an important first step toward improving the quality of clinical research about markers to detect cancer. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ransohoff, D. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.126698</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Proteomics Research to Discover Markers: What Can We Learn from Netflix(R)? [Mini-Reviews]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>176</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>172</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Mini-Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/177?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Clinical Plasma Proteome: A Survey of Clinical Assays for Proteins in Plasma and Serum [Mini-Reviews]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/177?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>An analysis of all US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for protein-based assays through 2008 reveals 109 unique protein targets in plasma or serum, as well as 62 additional tests for peptides, protein posttranslational modifications, protein complexes, autoantibodies against endogenous proteins, and blood cell proteins. A further 96 unique protein targets are assayed in plasma by laboratory-developed tests available for clinical use in the US, yielding a total of 205 proteins that include products of approximately 211 genes (excluding immunoglobulins). These tests provide quantitative measurements for approximately 1% of the human protein gene products, defining a practical clinical plasma proteome. The rate of introduction of new protein analytes has remained essentially flat over the past 15 years, averaging 1.5 new proteins per year (median of 1 per year). This rate falls far short of that needed to support projected medical needs and indicates serious deficiencies in the protein biomarker pipeline, from which no proteomics-discovered analytes have yet emerged. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anderson, N. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.126706</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Clinical Plasma Proteome: A Survey of Clinical Assays for Proteins in Plasma and Serum [Mini-Reviews]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>185</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>177</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Mini-Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/186?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Antibody-Based Protein Multiplex Platforms: Technical and Operational Challenges [Mini-Reviews]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/186?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: The measurement of multiple protein biomarkers may refine risk stratification in clinical settings. This concept has stimulated development of multiplexed immunoassay platforms that provide multiple, parallel protein measurements on the same specimen.</p>
<p>Content: We provide an overview of antibody-based multiplexed immunoassay platforms and discuss technical and operational challenges. Multiplexed immunoassays use traditional immunoassay principles in which high-affinity capture ligands are immobilized in parallel arrays in either planar format or on microspheres in suspension. Development of multiplexed immunoassays requires rigorous validation of assay configuration and analytical performance to minimize assay imprecision and inaccuracy. Challenges associated with multiplex configuration include selection and immobilization of capture ligands, calibration, interference between antibodies and proteins and assay diluents, and compatibility of assay limits of quantification. We discuss potential solutions to these challenges. Criteria for assessing analytical multiplex assay performance include the range of linearity, analytical specificity, recovery, and comparison to a quality reference method. Quality control materials are not well developed for multiplexed protein immunoassays, and algorithms for interpreting multiplex quality control data are needed.</p>
<p>Summary: Technical and operational challenges have hindered implementation of multiplexed assays in clinical settings. Formal procedures that guide multiplex assay configuration, analytical validation, and quality control are needed before broad application of multiplexed arrays can occur in the in vitro diagnostic market. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellington, A. A., Kullo, I. J., Bailey, K. R., Klee, G. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.127514</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Antibody-Based Protein Multiplex Platforms: Technical and Operational Challenges [Mini-Reviews]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>193</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>186</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Mini-Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/194?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Integration of Proteomic-Based Tools for Improved Biomarkers of Myocardial Injury [Mini-Reviews]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/194?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Given the mounting evidence in favor of early pharmacologic and catheter-based interventions for patients across the spectrum of acute coronary syndromes, discovering novel diagnostically sensitive and specific biomarkers that provide biochemical proof of early or reversible myocardial injury could have a substantial positive impact on patient care.</p>
<p>Content: To address unmet needs in disease biomarkers, investigators have turned to proteomics approaches. We describe advances in proteomics discovery technologies based on liquid chromatography&ndash;tandem mass spectrometry that facilitate the unbiased analysis of low-abundance blood proteins. We detail the development of emerging techniques to enhance the biomarker verification process, such as accurate inclusion mass screening, stable isotope dilution&ndash;multiple reaction monitoring&ndash;mass spectrometry (SID-MRM-MS), and stable isotope standards with capture by antipeptide antibodies, which combines the advantages of specific immunoaffinity enrichment of a target peptide with the structural specificity and quantitative capabilities of SID-MRM-MS. We highlight new assays incorporating these techniques for troponin I, a representative low-abundance cardiac biomarker, and interleukin-33, an emerging novel marker of myocardial stress for which no existing ELISA exists. We demonstrate that troponin I and interleukin-33 peptides have a linear, dynamic range spanning 4 orders of magnitude and limits of detection of approximately 0.5 &micro;g/L back-calculated to the protein concentration.</p>
<p>Conclusions: There remain important unmet diagnostic and prognostic needs in cardiology. Advances in technology may allow proteomics to play a vital role in the discovery and validation of novel biomarkers to help fill those needs. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerszten, R. E., Carr, S. A., Sabatine, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.127878</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Integration of Proteomic-Based Tools for Improved Biomarkers of Myocardial Injury [Mini-Reviews]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>201</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>194</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Mini-Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/202?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Full-Length Characterization of Proteins in Human Populations [Mini-Reviews]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/202?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Diversity in human proteins often gives rise to pluralities of structurally similar but functionally distinct proteins. Such microheterogeneity generally escapes proteomics discovery technologies, as well as conventional immunometric assays. As an intermediate between these 2 technological approaches, targeted, full-length characterization of proteins using mass spectrometry is a suitable means of defining microheterogeneity evident in human populations.</p>
<p>Content: We describe and explore the implications of microheterogeneity using the exemplar of human vitamin D binding protein (Gc-Globulin) as observed in cohorts of 400 individuals. Our investigations yielded: (<I>a</I>) population frequency data comparable to genotyping; (<I>b</I>) population frequency data for protein variants, with and without genotype linkage; (<I>c</I>) reference values for the different protein variants per cohort and genotype; and (<I>d</I>) associations between variant, frequency, relative abundance, and diseases.</p>
<p>Summary: With the exception of the genotype frequency, such population data are unique and illustrate a need to more fully understand the exact full-length qualitative and quantitative idiosyncrasies of individual proteins in relation to health and disease as part of the standardized biomarker development and clinical proteomic investigation of human proteins. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borges, C. R., Rehder, D. S., Jarvis, J. W., Schaab, M. R., Oran, P. E., Nelson, R. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.134858</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Full-Length Characterization of Proteins in Human Populations [Mini-Reviews]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>211</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>202</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Mini-Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/212?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Bottleneck in the Cancer Biomarker Pipeline and Protein Quantification through Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches: Current Strategies for Candidate Verification [Reviews]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/212?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Although robust discovery-phase platforms have resulted in the generation of large numbers of candidate cancer biomarkers, a comparable system for subsequent quantitative assessment and verification of all candidates is lacking. Established immunoassays and available antibodies permit analysis of small subsets of candidates; however, the lack of commercially available reagents, coupled with high costs and lengthy production and purification times, have rendered the large majority of candidates untestable.</p>
<p>Content: Mass spectrometry (MS), and in particular multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)-MS, has emerged as an alternative technology to immunoassays for quantification of target proteins. Novel biomarkers are expected to be present in serum in the low (&micro;g/L&ndash;ng/L) range, but analysis of complex serum or plasma digests by MS has yielded milligram per liter limits of detection at best. The coupling of prior sample purification strategies such as enrichment of target analytes, depletion of high-abundance proteins, and prefractionation, has enabled reliable penetration into the low microgram per liter range. This review highlights prospects for candidate verification through MS-based methods. We first outline the biomarker discovery pipeline and its existing bottleneck; we then discuss various MRM-based strategies for targeted protein quantification, the applicability of such methods for candidate verification, and points of concern.</p>
<p>Summary: Although it is unlikely that MS-based protein quantification will replace immunoassays in the near future, with the expected improvements in limits of detection and specificity in instrumentation, MRM-based approaches show great promise for alleviating the existing bottleneck to discovery. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Makawita, S., Diamandis, E. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.127019</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Bottleneck in the Cancer Biomarker Pipeline and Protein Quantification through Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches: Current Strategies for Candidate Verification [Reviews]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>222</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>212</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/223?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sweetening the Pot: Adding Glycosylation to the Biomarker Discovery Equation [Reviews]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/223?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Cancer has profound effects on gene expression, including a cell&rsquo;s glycosylation machinery. Thus, tumors produce glycoproteins that carry oligosaccharides with structures that are markedly different from the same protein produced by a normal cell. A single protein can have many glycosylation sites that greatly amplify the signals they generate compared with their protein backbones.</p>
<p>Content: In this article, we survey clinical tests that target carbohydrate modifications for diagnosing and treating cancer. We present the biological relevance of glycosylation to disease progression by highlighting the role these structures play in adhesion, signaling, and metastasis and then address current methodological approaches to biomarker discovery that capitalize on selectively capturing tumor-associated glycoforms to enrich and identify disease-related candidate analytes. Finally, we discuss emerging technologies&mdash;multiple reaction monitoring and lectin-antibody arrays&mdash;as potential tools for biomarker validation studies in pursuit of clinically useful tests.</p>
<p>Summary: The future of carbohydrate-based biomarker studies has arrived. At all stages, from discovery through verification and deployment into clinics, glycosylation should be considered a primary readout or a way of increasing the sensitivity and specificity of protein-based analyses. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drake, P. M., Cho, W., Li, B., Prakobphol, A., Johansen, E., Anderson, N. L., Regnier, F. E., Gibson, B. W., Fisher, S. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cancer Diagnostics (since 2002)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.136333</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sweetening the Pot: Adding Glycosylation to the Biomarker Discovery Equation [Reviews]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>236</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>223</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/237?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analytical Validation of Protein-Based Multiplex Assays: A Workshop Report by the NCI-FDA Interagency Oncology Task Force on Molecular Diagnostics [Reviews]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/237?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Clinical proteomics has the potential to enable the early detection of cancer through the development of multiplex assays that can inform clinical decisions. However, there has been some uncertainty among translational researchers and developers as to the specific analytical measurement criteria needed to validate protein-based multiplex assays. To begin to address the causes of this uncertainty, a day-long workshop titled "Interagency Oncology Task Force Molecular Diagnostics Workshop" was held in which members of the proteomics and regulatory communities discussed many of the analytical evaluation issues that the field should address in development of protein-based multiplex assays for clinical use. This meeting report explores the issues raised at the workshop and details the recommendations that came out of the day&rsquo;s discussions, such as a workshop summary discussing the analytical evaluation issues that specific proteomic technologies should address when seeking US Food and Drug Administration approval.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodriguez, H., Tezak, Z., Mesri, M., Carr, S. A., Liebler, D. C., Fisher, S. J., Tempst, P., Hiltke, T., Kessler, L. G., Kinsinger, C. R., Philip, R., Ransohoff, D. F., Skates, S. J., Regnier, F. E., Anderson, N. L., Mansfield, E., on behalf of the Workshop Participants]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.136416</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analytical Validation of Protein-Based Multiplex Assays: A Workshop Report by the NCI-FDA Interagency Oncology Task Force on Molecular Diagnostics [Reviews]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>243</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/244?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cancer Biomarker Discovery via Low Molecular Weight Serum Profiling--Are We Following Circular Paths? [Opinion]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/244?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davis, M. T., Auger, P. L., Patterson, S. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.127951</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cancer Biomarker Discovery via Low Molecular Weight Serum Profiling--Are We Following Circular Paths? [Opinion]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>247</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>244</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Opinion</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/248?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Amyloid-{beta}(1-42), Total Tau, and Phosphorylated Tau as Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease [Proteomics and Protein Markers]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/248?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: To improve ante mortem diagnostic accuracy of Alzheimer disease (AD), measurement of the biomarkers amyloid-&beta;(1&ndash;42) (A&beta;42), total tau (Tau), and tau phosphorylated at threonine<SUB>181</SUB> (pTau) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been proposed. We have used these markers and evaluated their performance.</p>
<p>Methods: From January 2001 to January 2007, we assessed A&beta;42, Tau, and pTau by commercial ELISAs in CSF from 248 consecutive AD patients and 131 patients with subjective memory complaints attending our outpatient memory clinic. Diagnoses were made blind to the results of the biomarker assays. We assessed sensitivity and specificity and analyzed trends over time.</p>
<p>Results: Interassay CVs from analysis of pools of surplus CSF specimens were mean 11.3% (SD 4.9%) for A&beta;42; 9.3% (1.5%) for Tau, and 9.4% (2.5%) for pTau, respectively (n = 7&ndash;18). To achieve 85% sensitivity, cutoff values were 550 (95% CI 531&ndash;570) ng/L for A&beta;42; 375 (325&ndash;405) ng/L for Tau, and 52 (48&ndash;56) ng/L for pTau. Corresponding specificities were 83% (95% CI 76%&ndash;89%) for A&beta;42, 78% (70%&ndash;85%) for Tau, and 68% (60%&ndash;77%) for pTau. Logistic regression to investigate the simultaneous impact of the 3 CSF biomarkers on the diagnosis yielded a sensitivity of 93.5% and specificity of 82.7%, at a discrimination line of A&beta;42 = 373 + 0.82 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> Tau. The area under the ROC curves of Tau and pTau showed significant fluctuation over time.</p>
<p>Conclusions: CSF biomarkers A&beta;42 and Tau can be used as a diagnostic aid in AD. pTau did not have additional value over these 2 markers. Cutoff values, sensitivities, specificities, and discrimination lines depend on the patient groups studied and laboratory experience. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mulder, C., Verwey, N. A., van der Flier, W. M., Bouwman, F. H., Kok, A., van Elk, E. J., Scheltens, P., Blankenstein, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.130518</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Amyloid-{beta}(1-42), Total Tau, and Phosphorylated Tau as Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease [Proteomics and Protein Markers]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>253</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>248</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Proteomics and Protein Markers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/254?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analytical Validation of a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Assay [Proteomics and Protein Markers]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/254?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: We report the development of a novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) assay, a modification of the Roche fourth-generation cTnT assay, and validation of the analytical performance of this assay.</p>
<p>Methods: Validation included testing of analytical sensitivity, specificity, interferences, and precision. We established the 99th percentile cutoff from healthy reference populations (n = 616). In addition, we studied differences in time to a positive result when using serial measurements of hs-cTnT vs cTnT in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI).</p>
<p>Results: The hs-cTnT assay had an analytical range from 3 to 10 000 ng/L. At the 99th percentile value of 13.5 ng/L, the CV was 9% using the Elecsys&reg; 2010 analyzer. The assay was specific for cTnT without interferences from human cTnI or cTnC, skeletal muscle TnT, or hemoglobin concentrations up to 1000 mg/L, above which falsely lower values would be expected. When the assay was evaluated clinically, a hs-cTnT higher than the 99th percentile concentration identified a significantly higher number of patients with non-STEMI on presentation (45 vs 20 patients, <I>P</I> = 0.0004) compared with cTnT, and a final diagnosis of non-STEMI was made in 9 additional patients (55 vs 46 patients, <I>P</I> = 0.23) after serial sampling. Time to diagnosis was significantly shorter using hs-cTnT compared with cTnT [mean 71.5 (SD 108.7) min vs 246.9 (82.0) min, respectively; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.01].</p>
<p>Conclusions: The analytical performance of hs-cTnT complies with the ESC-ACCF-AHA-WHF Global Task Force recommendations for use in the diagnosis of MI. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giannitsis, E., Kurz, K., Hallermayer, K., Jarausch, J., Jaffe, A. S., Katus, H. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.132654</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analytical Validation of a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Assay [Proteomics and Protein Markers]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>261</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>254</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Proteomics and Protein Markers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/262?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Peptides Generated Ex Vivo from Serum Proteins by Tumor-Specific Exopeptidases Are Not Useful Biomarkers in Ovarian Cancer [Proteomics and Protein Markers]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/262?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: The serum peptidome may be a valuable source of diagnostic cancer biomarkers. Previous mass spectrometry (MS) studies have suggested that groups of related peptides discriminatory for different cancer types are generated ex vivo from abundant serum proteins by tumor-specific exopeptidases. We tested 2 complementary serum profiling strategies to see if similar peptides could be found that discriminate ovarian cancer from benign cases and healthy controls.</p>
<p>Methods: We subjected identically collected and processed serum samples from healthy volunteers and patients to automated polypeptide extraction on octadecylsilane-coated magnetic beads and separately on ZipTips before MALDI-TOF MS profiling at 2 centers. The 2 platforms were compared and case control profiling data analyzed to find altered MS peak intensities. We tested models built from training datasets for both methods for their ability to classify a blinded test set.</p>
<p>Results: Both profiling platforms had CVs of approximately 15% and could be applied for high-throughput analysis of clinical samples. The 2 methods generated overlapping peptide profiles, with some differences in peak intensity in different mass regions. In cross-validation, models from training data gave diagnostic accuracies up to 87% for discriminating malignant ovarian cancer from healthy controls and up to 81% for discriminating malignant from benign samples. Diagnostic accuracies up to 71% (malignant vs healthy) and up to 65% (malignant vs benign) were obtained when the models were validated on the blinded test set.</p>
<p>Conclusions: For ovarian cancer, altered MALDI-TOF MS peptide profiles alone cannot be used for accurate diagnoses. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timms, J. F., Cramer, R., Camuzeaux, S., Tiss, A., Smith, C., Burford, B., Nouretdinov, I., Devetyarov, D., Gentry-Maharaj, A., Ford, J., Luo, Z., Gammerman, A., Menon, U., Jacobs, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.133363</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Peptides Generated Ex Vivo from Serum Proteins by Tumor-Specific Exopeptidases Are Not Useful Biomarkers in Ovarian Cancer [Proteomics and Protein Markers]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>271</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>262</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Proteomics and Protein Markers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/272?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Endoprotease Profiling with Double-Tagged Peptide Substrates: A New Diagnostic Approach in Oncology [Proteomics and Protein Markers]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/272?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: The measurement of disease-related proteolytic activity in complex biological matrices like serum is of emerging interest to improve the diagnosis of malignant diseases. We developed a mass spectrometry (MS)-based functional proteomic profiling approach that tracks degradation of artificial endoprotease substrates in serum specimens.</p>
<p>Methods: The synthetic reporter peptides that are cleaved by tumor-associated endopeptidases were systematically optimized with regard to flanking affinity tags, linkers, and stabilizing elements. Serum specimens were incubated with reporter peptides under standardized conditions and the peptides subsequently extracted with affinity chromatography before MS. In a pilot study an optimized reporter peptide with the cleavage motif WKPYDAADL was added to serum specimens from colorectal tumor patients (n = 50) and healthy controls (n = 50). This reporter peptide comprised a known cleavage site for the cysteine-endopeptidase "cancer procoagulant."</p>
<p>Results: Serial affinity chromatography using biotin- and 6xHis tags was superior to the single affinity enrichment using only 6xHis tags. Furthermore, protease-resistant stop elements ensured signal accumulation after prolonged incubation. In contrast, signals from reporter peptides without stop elements vanished completely after prolonged incubation owing to their total degradation. Reporter-peptide spiking showed good reproducibility, and the difference in proteolytic activity between serum specimens from cancer patients and controls was highly significant (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001).</p>
<p>Conclusions: The introduction of a few structural key elements (affinity tags, linkers, d-amino acids) into synthetic reporter peptides increases the diagnostic sensitivity for MS-based protease profiling of serum specimens. This new approach might lead to functional MS-based protease profiling for improved disease classification. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peccerella, T., Lukan, N., Hofheinz, R., Schadendorf, D., Kostrezewa, M., Neumaier, M., Findeisen, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.133462</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Endoprotease Profiling with Double-Tagged Peptide Substrates: A New Diagnostic Approach in Oncology [Proteomics and Protein Markers]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>280</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>272</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Proteomics and Protein Markers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/281?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Selected Reaction Monitoring-Mass Spectrometric Immunoassay Responsive to Parathyroid Hormone and Related Variants [Proteomics and Protein Markers]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/281?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Parathyroid hormone (PTH) assays able to distinguish between full-length PTH (PTH1&ndash;84) and N-terminally truncated PTH (PTH7&ndash;84) are of increasing significance in the accurate diagnosis of endocrine and osteological diseases. We describe the discovery of new N-terminal and C-terminal PTH variants and the development of selected reaction monitoring (SRM)-based immunoassays specifically designed for the detection of full-length PTH [amino acid (aa)1&ndash;84] and 2 N-terminal variants, aa7&ndash;84 and aa34&ndash;84.</p>
<p>Methods: Preparation of mass spectrometric immunoassay pipettor tips and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis were carried out as previously described. We used novel software to develop SRM assays on a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer. Heavy isotope-labeled versions of target peptides were used as internal standards.</p>
<p>Results: Top-down analysis of samples from healthy individuals and renal failure patients revealed numerous PTH variants, including previously unidentified aa28&ndash;84, aa48&ndash;84, aa34&ndash;77, aa37&ndash;77, and aa38&ndash;77. Quantitative SRM assays were developed for PTH1&ndash;84, PTH7&ndash;84, and variant aa34&ndash;84. Peptides exhibited linear responses (<I>R</I><sup>2</sup> = 0.90&ndash;0.99) relative to recombinant human PTH concentration limits of detection for intact PTH of 8 ng/L and limits of quantification of 16&ndash;31 ng/L depending on the peptide. Standard error of analysis for all triplicate measurements was 3%&ndash;12% for all peptides, with &lt;5% chromatographic drift between replicates. The CVs of integrated areas under the curve for 54 separate measurements of heavy peptides were 5%&ndash;9%.</p>
<p>Conclusions: Mass spectrometric immunoassays identified new clinical variants of PTH and provided a quantitative assay for these and previously identified forms of PTH. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lopez, M. F., Rezai, T., Sarracino, D. A., Prakash, A., Krastins, B., Athanas, M., Singh, R. J., Barnidge, D. R., Oran, P., Borges, C., Nelson, R. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.137323</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Selected Reaction Monitoring-Mass Spectrometric Immunoassay Responsive to Parathyroid Hormone and Related Variants [Proteomics and Protein Markers]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>290</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>281</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Proteomics and Protein Markers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/291?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Automated Detection of Inaccurate and Imprecise Transitions in Peptide Quantification by Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry [Proteomics and Protein Markers]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/291?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS) of peptides with stable isotope&ndash;labeled internal standards (SISs) is increasingly being used to develop quantitative assays for proteins in complex biological matrices. These assays can be highly precise and quantitative, but the frequent occurrence of interferences requires that MRM-MS data be manually reviewed, a time-intensive process subject to human error. We developed an algorithm that identifies inaccurate transition data based on the presence of interfering signal or inconsistent recovery among replicate samples.</p>
<p>Methods: The algorithm objectively evaluates MRM-MS data with 2 orthogonal approaches. First, it compares the relative product ion intensities of the analyte peptide to those of the SIS peptide and uses a <I>t</I>-test to determine if they are significantly different. A CV is then calculated from the ratio of the analyte peak area to the SIS peak area from the sample replicates.</p>
<p>Results: The algorithm identified problematic transitions and achieved accuracies of 94%&ndash;100%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 83%&ndash;100% for correct identification of errant transitions. The algorithm was robust when challenged with multiple types of interferences and problematic transitions.</p>
<p>Conclusions: This algorithm for automated detection of inaccurate and imprecise transitions (AuDIT) in MRM-MS data reduces the time required for manual and subjective inspection of data, improves the overall accuracy of data analysis, and is easily implemented into the standard data-analysis work flow. AuDIT currently works with results exported from MRM-MS data-processing software packages and may be implemented as an analysis tool within such software. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abbatiello, S. E., Mani, D. R., Keshishian, H., Carr, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.138420</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Automated Detection of Inaccurate and Imprecise Transitions in Peptide Quantification by Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry [Proteomics and Protein Markers]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>305</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>291</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Proteomics and Protein Markers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/306?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quantification of Serum 1-84 Parathyroid Hormone in Patients with Hyperparathyroidism by Immunocapture In Situ Digestion Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry [Endocrinology and Metabolism]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/306?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Immunoassays specific for 1&ndash;84 parathyroid hormone (PTH) reportedly reflect the bioactivity of PTH; however, PTH immunoassays can be susceptible to interference by cross-reacting PTH fragments. In addition, these assays currently lack standardization. A methodology using immunocapture purification with liquid chromatography&ndash;tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) detection, along with a stable isotope&ndash;labeled internal standard, may help address these issues.</p>
<p>Methods: We isolated 1&ndash;84 PTH from 1 mL serum by immunocapture on a 6.5-mm polystyrene bead. The immobilized PTH was digested in situ and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. For quantification, we used the selected reaction monitoring response from the N-terminal tryptic peptide 1&ndash;13 PTH (<sup>1</sup>SVSEIQLMHNLGK<sup>13</sup>).</p>
<p>Results: The linear range of the assay was 39.1&ndash;4560 ng/L, and the limit of detection and limit of quantification were 14.5 ng/L and 39.1 ng/L, respectively. The intraassay CVs ranged from 6% to 11%, and the interassay CVs ranged from 7% to 17%. Interference by PTH fragments 1&ndash;44 PTH, 7&ndash;84 PTH, 43&ndash;68 PTH, 52&ndash;84 PTH, 64&ndash;84 PTH, and PTH-related protein (PTHrP) was &le;1% to &le;0.001%. Method comparison of LC-MS/MS vs the Roche Cobas&reg; immunoassay yielded Deming fit of LC-MS/MS = 1.01<I>x</I> immunoassay &ndash; 13.21. The mean bias by Bland&ndash;Altman plot was &ndash;9.4%.</p>
<p>Conclusions: In patients with hyperparathyroidism, the immunocapture in situ digestion LC-MS/MS method can provide accurate and precise PTH results compared with immunoassay. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kumar, V., Barnidge, D. R., Chen, L.-S., Twentyman, J. M., Cradic, K. W., Grebe, S. K., Singh, R. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Endocrinology and Metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.134643</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quantification of Serum 1-84 Parathyroid Hormone in Patients with Hyperparathyroidism by Immunocapture In Situ Digestion Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry [Endocrinology and Metabolism]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>313</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>306</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Endocrinology and Metabolism</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/314?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of Multiplex Immunoassay Platforms [Brief Communication]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/314?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Candidate biomarkers discovered with high-throughput proteomic techniques (along with many biomarkers reported in the literature) must be rigorously validated. The simultaneous quantitative assessment of multiple potential biomarkers across large cohorts presents a major challenge to the field. Multiplex immunoassays represent a promising solution, with the potential to provide quantitative data via parallel analyses. These assays also require substantially less sample and reagents than the traditional ELISA (which is further limited by its ability to measure only a single antigen). We have measured the reproducibility, reliability, robustness, accuracy, and throughput of commercially available multiplex immunoassays to ascertain their suitability for serum biomarker analysis and validation.</p>
<p>Methods: Assay platforms MULTI-ARRAY (Meso Scale Discovery), Bio-Plex (Bio-Rad Laboratories), A<sup>2</sup> (Beckman Coulter), FAST Quant (Whatman Schleicher &amp; Schuell BioScience), and FlowCytomix (Bender MedSystems) were selected as representative examples of technologies currently used for high-throughput immunoanalysis. All assays were performed according to protocols specified by the manufacturers and with the reagents (diluents, calibrators, blocking reagents, and detecting-antibody mixtures) included with their kits.</p>
<p>Results: The quantifiable interval determined for each assay and antigen was based on precision (CV &lt; 25%) and percentage recovery (measured concentration within 20% of the actual concentration). The MULTI-ARRAY and Bio-Plex assays had the best performance with the lowest limits of detection, and the MULTI-ARRAY system had the most linear signal output over the widest concentration range (10<sup>5</sup> to 10<sup>6</sup>). Cytokine concentrations in unspiked and cytokine-spiked serum samples from healthy individuals were further investigated with the MULTI-ARRAY and Bio-Plex assays.</p>
<p>Conclusions: The MULTI-ARRAY and Bio-Plex multiplex immunoassay systems are the most suitable for biomarker analysis or quantification. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fu, Q., Zhu, J., Van Eyk, J. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Automation and Analytical Techniques]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.135087</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of Multiplex Immunoassay Platforms [Brief Communication]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>318</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>314</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Brief Communication</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/319?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The ELISA, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay [Citation Classic]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/319?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Engvall, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:58 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.127803</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The ELISA, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay [Citation Classic]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>320</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>319</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Citation Classic</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/321?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Conversation with Dennis Hochstrasser [Interview]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/321?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Landau, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:59 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.127829</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Conversation with Dennis Hochstrasser [Interview]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>326</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>321</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Interview</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/327?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Recipe for Proteomics Diagnostic Test Development: The OVA1 Test, from Biomarker Discovery to FDA Clearance [Clinical Chemist]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/2/327?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fung, E. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:01:59 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cancer Diagnostics (since 2002)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.140855</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Recipe for Proteomics Diagnostic Test Development: The OVA1 Test, from Biomarker Discovery to FDA Clearance [Clinical Chemist]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>329</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>327</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Chemist</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adiponectin and Prostate Cancer Mortality: To Be or Not to Be Skinny? [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freedland, S. J., Williams, C. D., Masko, E. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:52 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Endocrinology and Metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.137406</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adiponectin and Prostate Cancer Mortality: To Be or Not to Be Skinny? [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/4?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Few Point-of-Care Hemoglobin A1c Assay Methods Meet Clinical Needs [Editorials]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/4?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruns, D. E., Boyd, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Point-of-Care Testing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.139865</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Few Point-of-Care Hemoglobin A1c Assay Methods Meet Clinical Needs [Editorials]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>6</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/7?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for Diagnosis of Incipient Alzheimer Disease in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment [Perspective]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/7?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dean, R. A., Shaw, L. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Other Areas of Clinical Chemistry]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.134692</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for Diagnosis of Incipient Alzheimer Disease in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment [Perspective]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>9</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Perspective</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/10?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Detection of Biological Agents Used for Terrorism: Are We Ready? [Q[amp   ]A]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/10?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellogg, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Infectious Disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.139493</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Detection of Biological Agents Used for Terrorism: Are We Ready? [Q[amp   ]A]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>15</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Q[amp   ]A</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/16?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sharply Increased Serum Free Light-Chain Concentrations after Treatment for Multiple Myeloma [Clinical Case Study]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/16?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murata, K., Clark, R. J., Lockington, K. S., Tostrud, L. J., Greipp, P. R., Katzmann, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hematology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.133041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sharply Increased Serum Free Light-Chain Concentrations after Treatment for Multiple Myeloma [Clinical Case Study]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>18</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Case Study</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/19?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Commentary [Clinical Case Study]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/19?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faix, J. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hematology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.136788</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Commentary [Clinical Case Study]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>19</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Case Study</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/19-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Commentary [Clinical Case Study]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/19-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blinder, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Hematology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.137091</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Commentary [Clinical Case Study]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>20</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Case Study</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/21?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stroke Biomarkers: Progress and Challenges for Diagnosis, Prognosis, Differentiation, and Treatment [Review]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/21?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Stroke is a devastating condition encompassing a wide range of pathophysiological entities that include thrombosis, hemorrhage, and embolism. Current diagnosis of stroke relies on physician clinical examination and is further supplemented with various neuroimaging techniques. A single set or multiple sets of blood biomarkers that could be used in an acute setting to diagnosis stroke, differentiate between stroke types, or even predict an initial/reoccurring stroke would be extremely valuable.</p>
<p>Content: We discuss the current classification, diagnosis, and treatment of stroke, focusing on use of novel biomarkers (either solitary markers or multiple markers within a panel) that have been studied in a variety of clinical settings.</p>
<p>Summary: The current diagnosis of stroke remains hampered and delayed due to lack of a suitable mechanism for rapid (ideally point-of-care), accurate, and analytically sensitive biomarker-based testing. There is a clear need for further development and translational research in this area. Potential biomarkers identified need to be transitioned quickly into clinical validation testing for further evaluation in an acute stroke setting; to do so would impact and improve patient outcomes and quality of life. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saenger, A. K., Christenson, R. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.133801</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stroke Biomarkers: Progress and Challenges for Diagnosis, Prognosis, Differentiation, and Treatment [Review]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>33</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/34?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A 25-Year Prospective Study of Plasma Adiponectin and Leptin Concentrations and Prostate Cancer Risk and Survival [Endocrinology and Metabolism]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/34?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Adipocytokines may mediate the association between adiposity and lethal prostate cancer outcomes.</p>
<p>Methods: In the Physicians&rsquo; Health Study, we prospectively examined the association of prediagnostic plasma concentrations of adiponectin and leptin with risk of developing incident prostate cancer (654 cases diagnosed 1982&ndash;2000 and 644 age-matched controls) and, among cases, risk of dying from prostate cancer by 2007.</p>
<p>Results: Adiponectin concentrations were not associated with risk of overall prostate cancer. However, men with higher adiponectin concentrations had lower risk of developing high-grade or lethal cancer (metastatic or fatal disease). The relative risk (95% CI) comparing the highest quintile to the lowest (Q5 vs Q1) was 0.25 (95% CI 0.07&ndash;0.87; <I>P</I><SUB><I>trend</I></SUB> = 0.02) for lethal cancer. Among all the cases, higher adiponectin concentrations predicted lower prostate cancer&ndash;specific mortality [hazard ratio (HR)<SUB>Q5 vs Q1</SUB>= 0.39; 95% CI 0.17&ndash;0.85; <I>P</I><SUB><I>trend</I></SUB> = 0.02], independent of body mass index (BMI), plasma C-peptide (a marker of insulin secretion), leptin, clinical stage, and tumor grade. This inverse association was apparent mainly among men with a BMI &ge;25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (HR<SUB>Q5 vs Q1</SUB>= 0.10; 95% CI 0.01&ndash;0.78; <I>P</I><SUB><I>trend</I></SUB> = 0.02), but not among men of normal weight (<I>P</I><SUB><I>trend</I></SUB> = 0.51). Although the correlation of leptin concentrations with BMI (<I>r</I> = 0.58, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001) was stronger than that of adiponectin (<I>r</I> = &ndash;0.17, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001), leptin was unrelated to prostate cancer risk or mortality.</p>
<p>Conclusions: Higher prediagnostic adiponectin (but not leptin) concentrations predispose men to a lower risk of developing high-grade prostate cancer and a lower risk of subsequently dying from the cancer, suggesting a mechanistic link between obesity and poor prostate cancer outcome. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, H., Stampfer, M. J., Mucci, L., Rifai, N., Qiu, W., Kurth, T., Ma, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Endocrinology and Metabolism]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.133272</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A 25-Year Prospective Study of Plasma Adiponectin and Leptin Concentrations and Prostate Cancer Risk and Survival [Endocrinology and Metabolism]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>43</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>34</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Endocrinology and Metabolism</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/44?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Six of Eight Hemoglobin A1c Point-of-Care Instruments Do Not Meet the General Accepted Analytical Performance Criteria [Point-of-Care Testing]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/44?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Hemoglobin A<SUB>1c</SUB> (Hb A<SUB>1c</SUB>) point-of-care (POC) instruments are widely used to provide rapid-turnaround results in diabetic care centers. We investigated the conformance of various Hb A<SUB>1c</SUB> POC instruments (In2it from Bio-Rad, DCA Vantage from Siemens, Afinion and Nycocard from Axis-Shield, Clover from Infopia, InnovaStar from DiaSys, A1CNow from Bayer, and Quo-Test from Quotient Diagnostics) with generally accepted performance criteria for Hb A<SUB>1c</SUB>.</p>
<p>Methods: The CLSI protocols EP-10, EP-5, and EP-9 were applied to investigate imprecision, accuracy, and bias. We assessed bias using 3 certified secondary reference measurement procedures and the mean of the 3 reference methods. Assay conformance with the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) certification criteria, as calculated from analyses with 2 different reagent lot numbers for each Hb A<SUB>1c</SUB> method, was also evaluated.</p>
<p>Results: Because of disappointing EP-10 results, 2 of the 8 manufacturers decided not to continue the evaluation. The total CVs from EP-5 evaluations for the different instruments with a low and high Hb A<SUB>1c</SUB> value were: In2it 4.9% and 3.3%, DCA Vantage 1.8% and 3.7%, Clover 4.0% and 3.5%, InnovaStar 3.2% and 3.9%, Nycocard 4.8% and 5.2%, and Afinion 2.4% and 1.8%. Only the Afinion and the DCA Vantage passed the NGSP criteria with 2 different reagent lot numbers.</p>
<p>Conclusions: Only the Afinion and the DCA Vantage met the acceptance criteria of having a total CV &lt;3% in the clinically relevant range. The EP-9 results and the calculations of the NGSP certification showed significant differences in analytical performance between different reagent lot numbers for all Hb A<SUB>1c</SUB> POC instruments. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lenters-Westra, E., Slingerland, R. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Point-of-Care Testing]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.130641</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Six of Eight Hemoglobin A1c Point-of-Care Instruments Do Not Meet the General Accepted Analytical Performance Criteria [Point-of-Care Testing]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>52</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>44</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Point-of-Care Testing</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/53?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Alternative Splicing and Molecular Characterization of Splice Site Variants: BRCA1 c.591C>T as a Case Study [Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/53?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Deleterious mutations in <I>BRCA1</I> (breast cancer 1, early onset; MIM 113705) increase breast and ovarian cancer [B(O)C] risk; however, many variants cannot be readily classified as deleterious or neutral. Unclassified variants (UVs) pose serious problems in genetic counseling. RNA-splicing analysis is essential for the assessment of many UVs.</p>
<p>Methods: Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis was used to genotype the <I>BRCA1</I> c.591C&gt;T variant in 685 index cases of B(O)C families, 326 sporadic breast cancer cases, and 450 healthy controls from Spain. In silico tools were used to predict the effect of the c.591C&gt;T variant on splicing. In vitro splicing analysis was performed in 7 c.591C&gt;T carriers and 10 noncarriers. cDNAs were PCR-amplified with primers designed to detect <I>BRCA1</I> alternative splicing isoforms. The products were analyzed by capillary electrophoresis. Peak areas were used to quantify the relative abundance of each isoform. Sequencing through exonic single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) enabled us to discriminate wild-type and variant transcripts.</p>
<p>Results: c.591C&gt;T was detected in B(O)C families (1.5%), breast cancer cases (0.3%), and controls (0.9%). c.591C&gt;T induced <I>BRCA1</I> exon 9 skipping and modified the relative expression of (9,10), (9,10,11B), 11B, and full-length isoforms. The mean ratio of (9,10) to the full-length isoform increased from 0.25 in noncarriers to 1.5 in carriers. The mean (9,10,11B)/11B ratio increased from 0.2 to 4. Overall expression levels of c.591C&gt;T and wild-type alleles were similar.</p>
<p>Conclusions: Our data support a nonpathogenic role for the <I>BRCA1</I> c.591C&gt;T variant. Naturally occurring alternative splicing isoforms need to be considered when assessing the role of <I>BRCA1</I> UVs on splicing. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dosil, V., Tosar, A., Canadas, C., Perez-Segura, P., Diaz-Rubio, E., Caldes, T., de la Hoya, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.132274</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Alternative Splicing and Molecular Characterization of Splice Site Variants: BRCA1 c.591C>T as a Case Study [Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>61</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>53</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/62?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[DNA Sequence Capture and Enrichment by Microarray Followed by Next-Generation Sequencing for Targeted Resequencing: Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Gene as a Model [Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/62?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: The introduction and use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques have taken genomic research into a new era; however, implementing such powerful techniques in diagnostics laboratories for applications such as resequencing of targeted disease genes requires attention to technical issues, including sequencing template enrichment, management of massive data, and high interference by homologous sequences.</p>
<p>Methods: In this study, we investigated a process for enriching DNA samples that uses a customized high-density oligonucleotide microarray to enrich a targeted 280-kb region of the <I>NF1</I> (neurofibromin 1) gene. The captured DNA was sequenced with the Roche/454 GS FLX system. Two <I>NF1</I> samples (CN1 and CN2) with known genotypes were tested with this protocol.</p>
<p>Results: Targeted microarray capture may also capture sequences from nontargeted regions in the genome. The capture specificity estimated for the targeted <I>NF1</I> region was approximately 60%. The de novo Alu insertion was partially detected in sample CN1 by additional de novo assembly with 50% base-match stringency; the single-base deletion in sample CN2 was successfully detected by reference mapping. Interferences by pseudogene sequences were removed by means of dual-mode reference-mapping analysis, which reduced the risk of generating false-positive data. The risk of generating false-negative data was minimized with higher sequence coverage (&gt;30<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>).</p>
<p>Conclusions: We used a clinically relevant complex genomic target to evaluate a microarray-based sample-enrichment process and an NGS instrument for clinical resequencing purposes. The results allowed us to develop a systematic data-analysis strategy and algorithm to fit potential clinical applications. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chou, L.-S., Liu, C.-S. J., Boese, B., Zhang, X., Mao, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.132639</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[DNA Sequence Capture and Enrichment by Microarray Followed by Next-Generation Sequencing for Targeted Resequencing: Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Gene as a Model [Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>72</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>62</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/73?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Synergy of Total PLAC4 RNA Concentration and Measurement of the RNA Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Allelic Ratio for the Noninvasive Prenatal Detection of Trisomy 21 [Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/73?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Maternal plasma mRNA encoded by the <I>PLAC4</I> gene (placenta-specific 4), which is transcribed from chromosome 21 in placental cells, is a potential marker for the noninvasive assessment of chromosome 21 dosage in the fetus. We evaluated the diagnostic sensitivities and specificities of 2 trisomy 21&ndash;screening approaches that use maternal plasma <I>PLAC4</I> mRNA.</p>
<p>Methods: We studied maternal plasma samples from 153 pregnant women carrying euploid and trisomy 21 fetuses. For the samples in which the fetuses were heterozygous for the studied <I>PLAC4</I> single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), we measured the ratio between 2 alleles of the SNP in maternal plasma <I>PLAC4</I> mRNA (RNA-SNP) by mass spectrometric (MS) and digital PCR methods. For pregnancies involving fetuses homozygous for the SNP, we quantified the total <I>PLAC4</I> mRNA concentration in maternal plasma by real-time PCR and digital PCR.</p>
<p>Results: For the RNA-SNP approach, we achieved a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 40.2%&ndash;100%) and 89.7% (95% CI, 78.8%&ndash;96.1%), respectively, for both the MS and the digital PCR methods. For the mRNA-quantification approach, the areas under the ROC curves were 0.859 (95% CI, 0.741&ndash;0.903) and 0.833 (95% CI, 0.770&ndash;0.923) for plasma <I>PLAC4</I> mRNA concentrations measured by the real-time PCR and the digital PCR methods, respectively.</p>
<p>Conclusions: For prenatal screening of trisomy 21, the quantification of the total <I>PLAC4</I> mRNA concentration can be used in a synergistic manner with the RNA-SNP allelic ratio approach to increase the population coverage of cases in which diagnostic information can be obtained. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tsui, N. B.Y., Akolekar, R., Chiu, R. W.K., Chow, K. C.K., Leung, T. Y., Lau, T. K., Nicolaides, K. H., Lo, Y.M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.132662</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Synergy of Total PLAC4 RNA Concentration and Measurement of the RNA Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Allelic Ratio for the Noninvasive Prenatal Detection of Trisomy 21 [Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>81</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>73</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/82?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Aberrant Concentrations of Liver-Derived Plasma Albumin mRNA in Liver Pathologies [Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/82?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: We hypothesized that liver-derived mRNA, such as <I>ALB</I> (albumin) mRNA, would be released into human plasma with liver cell death.</p>
<p>Methods: We genotyped <I>ALB</I> mRNA molecules in samples of plasma and whole blood from liver and bone marrow transplant recipients by RNA single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Plasma and whole blood <I>ALB</I> mRNA genotypes were compared with the DNA genotypes of the recipients and donors. A reverse-transcription quantitative real-time PCR assay was used to measure plasma <I>ALB</I> mRNA concentrations in 107 patients [hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cirrhosis, or chronic hepatitis B (CHB)] and 207 healthy controls.</p>
<p>Results: The RNA genotype data revealed <I>ALB</I> mRNA in plasma to be liver derived, whereas tissue compartments other than the liver also contributed to the <I>ALB</I> mRNA detected in whole blood. Statistically significant increases in plasma <I>ALB</I> mRNA concentrations were observed for HCC, cirrhosis, and active CHB, compared with controls. A cutoff of 835 copies/mL of plasma <I>ALB</I> mRNA identified by ROC curve analysis showed 85.5% diagnostic sensitivity and 92.8% diagnostic specificity for the detection of liver pathologies. Only 21.5% of patients with liver pathologies had increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activities, whereas 73.8% had increased plasma <I>ALB</I> mRNA concentrations. Only 48.6% of the HCC patients had increased serum -fetoprotein concentrations, whereas 91.4% had increased plasma <I>ALB</I> mRNA concentrations.</p>
<p>Conclusions: <I>ALB</I> mRNA is liver specific in plasma, but not in whole blood. Plasma <I>ALB</I> mRNA is increased in some liver pathologies and may be more diagnostically sensitive than -fetoprotein and ALT. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chan, R. W.Y., Wong, J., Chan, H. L.Y., Mok, T. S.K., Lo, W. Y.W., Lee, V., To, K. F., Lai, P. B.S., Rainer, T. H., Lo, Y.M. D., Chiu, R. W.K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.133355</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Aberrant Concentrations of Liver-Derived Plasma Albumin mRNA in Liver Pathologies [Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>89</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>82</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/90?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Noninvasive Prenatal Detection of Trisomy 21 by an Epigenetic-Genetic Chromosome-Dosage Approach [Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/90?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: The use of fetal DNA in maternal plasma for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 (T21) is an actively researched area. We propose a novel method of T21 detection that combines fetal-specific epigenetic and genetic markers.</p>
<p>Methods: We used combined bisulfite restriction analysis to search for fetal DNA markers on chromosome 21 that were differentially methylated in the placenta and maternal blood cells and confirmed any target locus with bisulfite sequencing. We then used methylation-sensitive restriction endonuclease digestion followed by microfluidics digital PCR analysis to investigate the identified marker. Chromosome-dosage analysis was performed by comparing the dosage of this epigenetic marker with that of the <I>ZFY</I> (zinc finger protein, Y-linked) gene on chromosome Y.</p>
<p>Results: The putative promoter of the <I>HLCS</I> (holocarboxylase synthetase) gene was hypermethylated in the placenta and hypomethylated in maternal blood cells. A chromosome-dosage comparison of the hypermethylated <I>HLCS</I> and <I>ZFY</I> loci could distinguish samples of T21 and euploid placental DNA. Twenty-four maternal plasma samples from euploid pregnancies and 5 maternal plasma samples from T21 pregnancies were analyzed. All but 1 of the euploid samples were correctly classified.</p>
<p>Conclusions: The epigenetic&ndash;genetic chromosome-dosage approach is a new method for noninvasive prenatal detection of T21. The epigenetic part of the analysis can be applied to all pregnancies. Because the genetic part of the analysis uses paternally inherited, fetal-specific genetic markers that are abundant in the genome, broad population coverage should be readily achievable. This approach has the potential to become a generally usable technique for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tong, Y. K., Jin, S., Chiu, R. W.K., Ding, C., Chan, K.C. A., Leung, T. Y., Yu, L., Lau, T. K., Lo, Y.M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.134114</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Noninvasive Prenatal Detection of Trisomy 21 by an Epigenetic-Genetic Chromosome-Dosage Approach [Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>98</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>90</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/99?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bright-Field Microscopy Visualization of Proteins and Protein Complexes by In Situ Proximity Ligation with Peroxidase Detection [Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/99?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: The in situ proximity ligation assay (PLA) allows a protein or protein complex to be represented as an amplifiable DNA molecule. Recognition is mediated by proximity probes consisting of antibodies coupled with oligonucleotides. Upon dual binding of the proximity probes, the oligonucleotides direct the formation of a circular DNA molecule, which is then amplified by rolling-circle replication. The localized concatemeric product is then detected with fluorescent probes. The in situ PLA enables localized detection of individual native proteins or interacting protein pairs in fixed cells or tissue sections, thus providing an important tool for basic and clinical research.</p>
<p>Methods: We used horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated oligonucleotides to couple in situ PLA with enzymatic visualization of the localized detection event.</p>
<p>Results: We demonstrate the detection of protein complexes, both in cells and in tissue sections, and show that we can quantify the complexes with image-analysis software specially developed for recognizing HRP signals in bright-field microscopy images. We show that fluorescence and HRP signals produce equivalent results, both in cultured cells and in tissue samples.</p>
<p>Conclusions: The combination of in situ PLA with bright-field detection and automated image analysis allows the signals present to be counted in an automated fashion and thus provides a sensitive and specific method for quantification of proteins and protein complexes with bright-field microscopy. With this approach, in situ PLA can be used without the requirement for expensive fluorescence microscopes, thereby avoiding problems with nonspecific fluorescence while maintaining compatibility with conventional histologic staining. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zieba, A., Wahlby, C., Hjelm, F., Jordan, L., Berg, J., Landegren, U., Pardali, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.134452</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bright-Field Microscopy Visualization of Proteins and Protein Complexes by In Situ Proximity Ligation with Peroxidase Detection [Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>110</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Distribution of Asymmetric Dimethylarginine among 980 Healthy, Older Adults of Different Ethnicities [Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/111?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Endothelium-derived nitric oxide plays a crucial role in the regulation of vascular tone and the development of cardiovascular disease. The endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) has emerged as a novel cardiovascular risk factor. ADMA appears to be an independent predictor for cardiovascular and overall mortality. However, the majority of studies investigating the clinical role of ADMA were performed in European study populations with few individuals of other ethnicities.</p>
<p>Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of 980 healthy, older (age 60&ndash;72 years) individuals of different ethnicities living in the San Francisco Bay area and analyzed ADMA plasma concentrations and their relationship to other cardiovascular risk factors. Plasma ADMA concentrations were measured using a recently developed, highly sensitive ELISA.</p>
<p>Results: In our entire sample, we were able to define a reference interval for ADMA plasma concentrations of 0.47 (90% CI 0.46&ndash;0.48) &micro;mol/L to 0.85 (0.84&ndash;0.89) &micro;mol/L. The mean ADMA concentration was 0.63 (SD 0.11) &micro;mol/L (median 0.61 &micro;mol/L). Mean ADMA concentrations were significantly lower in African Americans (0.60 &micro;mol/L; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.01) and mixed non-Hispanics (0.60 &micro;mol/L; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) compared with whites (0.63 &micro;mol/L). ADMA was positively correlated with cystatin-C in both men ( = 0.29) and women ( = 0.37), and median plasma ADMA concentrations increased across cystatin-C quintiles.</p>
<p>Conclusions: ADMA varies nearly 2-fold across a healthy sample of older men and women, correlates with age, body mass index, and renal function, and is different across ethnic groups. Additional studies in a wider age range and including larger ethnic subgroups would be useful. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sydow, K., Fortmann, S. P., Fair, J. M., Varady, A., Hlatky, M. A., Go, A. S., Iribarren, C., Tsao, P. S., for the ADVANCE Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.136200</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Distribution of Asymmetric Dimethylarginine among 980 Healthy, Older Adults of Different Ethnicities [Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>120</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/121?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic Value of Emerging Neurohormones in Chronic Heart Failure during Optimization of Heart Failure-Specific Therapy [Proteomics and Protein Markers]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/121?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Serial measurements of neurohormones have been shown to improve prognostication in the setting of acute heart failure (HF) or chronic HF without therapeutic intervention. We investigated the prognostic role of serial measurements of emerging neurohormones and BNP in a cohort of chronic HF patients undergoing increases in HF-specific therapy.</p>
<p>Methods: In this prospective study we included 181 patients with chronic systolic HF after an episode of hospitalization for worsening HF. Subsequently, HF therapy was gradually increased in the outpatient setting until optimized. We measured copeptin, midregional proadrenomedullin, C-terminal endothelin-1 precursor fragment, midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide, and B-type natriuretic peptide before and after optimization of HF therapy. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 24 months.</p>
<p>Results: Angiotensin-converting enzyme/angiotensin receptor blocker and &beta;-blockers were increased significantly during the 3-month titration period (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001 for both). In a stepwise Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, glomerular filtration rate, diabetes mellitus, and ischemic HF, baseline and follow-up neurohormone concentrations were predictors of the primary endpoint as follows (baseline hazard ratios): copeptin 1.92, 95% CI 1.233&ndash;3.007, <I>P</I> = 0.004; midregional proadrenomedullin 2.79, 95% CI 1.297&ndash;5.995, <I>P</I> = 0.009; midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide 2.05, 95% CI 1.136&ndash;3.686, <I>P</I> = 0.017; C-terminal endothelin-1 precursor fragment 2.24, 95% CI 1.133&ndash;4.425, <I>P</I> = 0.025; B-type natriuretic peptide 1.46, 95% CI 1.039&ndash;2.050, <I>P</I> = 0.029.</p>
<p>Conclusions: In pharmacologically unstable chronic HF patients, baseline values and follow-up measures of copeptin, midregional proadrenomedullin, C-terminal endothelin-1 precursor fragment, midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide, and B-type natriuretic peptide were equally predictive of all-cause mortality. Relative change of neurohormone values was noncontributory. </p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neuhold, S., Huelsmann, M., Strunk, G., Struck, J., Adlbrecht, C., Gouya, G., Elhenicky, M., Pacher, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.125856</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic Value of Emerging Neurohormones in Chronic Heart Failure during Optimization of Heart Failure-Specific Therapy [Proteomics and Protein Markers]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>126</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>121</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Proteomics and Protein Markers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/127?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Increased Complement Factor H with Decreased Factor B Determined by Proteomic Differential Displays as a Biomarker of Tai Chi Chuan Exercise [Brief Communications]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/127?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: Exhaustive exercise can be associated with short-term immune suppression, but moderate exercise such as tai chi chuan (TCC) has been shown to have beneficial effects on immunity. The mechanisms for the health benefits of exercise remain to be determined, and no potential biomarkers for these beneficial health effects have been identified. This study investigated serum proteomic markers in individuals participating in TCC exercise.</p>
<p>Methods: Two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis was used to compare proteomic markers in 3 individuals before and after 12 weeks of TCC exercise. The different protein spots were identified by mass spectrometry and validated in an additional 20 individuals by western blot analysis.</p>
<p>Results: We identified 39 protein spots for 18 proteins with a noticeable increase or decrease after TCC exercise. Validation of the differentially displayed proteins with 20 paired pre- and postexercise samples revealed a significant increase in complement factor H (<I>P</I> = 0.0034) associated with decreases in C1 esterase inhibitor (<I>P</I> = 0.0038) and complement factor B (<I>P</I> = 0.0029).</p>
<p>Conclusions: In this first study of proteomic biomarkers of TCC exercise, we found an increase in complement factor H associated with a decrease in complement factor B. Complement factor H is involved in protection from microangiopathy and macular degeneration and may represent a useful marker of the health effects of exercise.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, K. D., Chang, W.-C., Chuang, H., Wang, P.-W., Liu, R.-T., Yeh, S.-H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Proteomics and Protein Markers]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.126615</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Increased Complement Factor H with Decreased Factor B Determined by Proteomic Differential Displays as a Biomarker of Tai Chi Chuan Exercise [Brief Communications]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>131</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>127</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Brief Communications</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/132?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of Very Highly Elevated C-Reactive Protein Concentration with Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality [Brief Communications]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/132?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Background: The clinical relevance of very highly increased high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentrations (&gt;10 mg/L) is incompletely understood. We examined the association between very highly increased hsCRP and risk of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and all-cause mortality.</p>
<p>Methods: We recruited 5248 participants free from overt CVD and acute infection [mean age 53.5 (SD 12.4) years, 55.5% women] from the Scottish Health Survey, a representative sample of community-dwelling adults. hsCRP and other conventional risk factors were measured at baseline.</p>
<p>Results: Over an average of 7 years&rsquo; follow-up, there were a total of 259 incident CVD events (including myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass, percutaneous coronary angioplasty, stroke, heart failure) and 357 all-cause deaths. Very highly increased hsCRP was associated with CVD events after adjustment for Framingham risk score (FRS), body mass index (BMI), central obesity, and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (hazard ratio 2.40, 95% CI 1.51&ndash;3.81) and also with all-cause death (hazard ratio 3.64, 95% CI 2.57&ndash;5.15). With the addition of CRP scores to the conventional Framingham model, 7.4% of participants were reclassified into a high-risk (&gt;20% FRS) CVD category. Very highly increased hsCRP was also associated with several modifiable risk factors, including smoking, HDL cholesterol, and central obesity.</p>
<p>Conclusions: hsCRP &gt;10 mg/L was a stronger predictor of clinical events than a conventional cut point of 3 mg/L. Very highly increased hsCRP may provide clinically meaningful prognostic information.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamer, M., Chida, Y., Stamatakis, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.130740</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of Very Highly Elevated C-Reactive Protein Concentration with Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality [Brief Communications]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>135</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>132</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Brief Communications</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/136?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Detection of Increased Amounts of Cell-Free Fetal DNA with Short PCR Amplicons [Brief Communications]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/136?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Aim: A digital PCR approach has recently been suggested to detect greater amounts of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma than conventional real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). Because the digital qPCR approach uses shorter PCR amplicons than the real-time qPCR assay, we investigated whether a real-time qPCR assay appropriately modified for such short amplicons would improve the detection of cell-free fetal DNA.</p>
<p>Method: We developed a novel universal-template (UT) real-time qPCR assay that was specific for the <I>DYS14</I> sequence on Y chromosome and had a short amplicon size of 50 bp. We examined this "short" assay with 50 maternal plasma samples and compared the results with those for a conventional real-time qPCR assay of the same locus but with a longer amplicon (84 bp).</p>
<p>Results: Qualitatively, both assays detected male cell-free fetal DNA with the same specificity and detection capability. Quantitatively, however, the new UT real-time qPCR assay for shorter amplicons detected, on average, almost 1.6-fold more cell-free fetal DNA than the conventional real-time qPCR assay with longer amplicons.</p>
<p>Conclusions: The use of short PCR amplicons improves the detection of cell-free fetal DNA. This feature may prove useful in attempts to detect cell-free fetal DNA under conditions in which the amount of template is low, such as in samples obtained early in pregnancy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sikora, A., Zimmermann, B. G., Rusterholz, C., Birri, D., Kolla, V., Lapaire, O., Hoesli, I., Kiefer, V., Jackson, L., Hahn, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.132951</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Detection of Increased Amounts of Cell-Free Fetal DNA with Short PCR Amplicons [Brief Communications]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>138</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>136</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Brief Communications</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/139?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analytical Considerations in the Investigation of Mixed Cryoglobulinemia [Letters to the Editor]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/139?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, E. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:53 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Other Areas of Clinical Chemistry]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.134502</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analytical Considerations in the Investigation of Mixed Cryoglobulinemia [Letters to the Editor]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>140</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>139</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/140?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In Reply [Letters to the Editor]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/140?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schnabl, K. L., Chan, P. C., Adeli, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:54 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Other Areas of Clinical Chemistry]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.137109</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In Reply [Letters to the Editor]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>140</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>140</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/140-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What Criteria Should Be Used to Assess Troponin Assays? [Letters to the Editor]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/140-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schneider, H. G., Tate, J. R., Hickman, P. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:52:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.137422</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What Criteria Should Be Used to Assess Troponin Assays? [Letters to the Editor]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>142</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>140</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/143?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Call for Nominations [Clinical Chemist]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/143?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:54 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Call for Nominations [Clinical Chemist]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>143</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>143</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Chemist</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/144?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lily Robinson and Up in Arms: Recollections [Clinical Chemist]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/144?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:54 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Other Areas of Clinical Chemistry]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.139840</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lily Robinson and Up in Arms: Recollections [Clinical Chemist]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>145</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>144</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Chemist</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/146?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What Is Your Guess? Unexpected Ethanol in Urine: Increasing Proof [Clinical Chemist]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/146?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haverstick, D. M., Bruns, D. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:54 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Drug Monitoring and Toxicology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.138354</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What Is Your Guess? Unexpected Ethanol in Urine: Increasing Proof [Clinical Chemist]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>147</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>146</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Chemist</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/148?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unveiling the Right Side: Day Lily [Clinical Chemist]]]></title>
<link>http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/short/56/1/148?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolak-Dinsmore, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:01:54 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1373/clinchem.2009.139667</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unveiling the Right Side: Day Lily [Clinical Chemist]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Clinical Chemistry</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>148</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>148</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Chemist</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>